I assume you mean that your code is outputting empty review when there are no reviews? Are you using a plugin, or is it custom code?

If it's a plugin, I would suggest speaking with the plugin developer or raising it via their feature request process.

If it's custom code, then I'm afraid it is down to you! If there is no review for that product, don't output the microdata!

Google will often make up its own mind what to put in your description, especially if it thinks that your provided description doesn't match what it thinks the page is about.

I'm afraid your developer hasn't fixed the issue. I was looking in the wrong place (your screenshot identified the issue), the malware isn't replacing the meta description, but actually inserting text at the top of the page, but only when it detects that it is the Mobile Googlebot visiting.

Using Google Chrome Developer Tools you can set your user agent and see the issue yourself (See my screenshot)

If I were you, I'd disable all the plugins and then reload the page in Chrome with your user agent set and see if that helps, if not, I would look at your theme's JS/source files.

oBUJqpm

I can't see anything obvious. I did wonder whether it might be a script that only replaced the description when it was crawled by Google but I can't see any evidence of this.

If your developer is suggesting that they have removed the issue, I assume they did find a problem and have corrected it. When was it corrected? It may well just be a case of Google taking some time to update the index. You could check this in Search Console, use the URL Inspection and do a Live Test and then View Tested Page, check the source to see if the description is as expected.

If it is, I think it is likely just a case of waiting, given that you have already requested reindexing.

I might not have understood your question, so apologies in advance if that's the case.

Your redirects won't be temporary, they'll be permanent (301). As far as the search engines (and anyone else) are concerned, the location has moved permanently.

You can't really set a redirect (temporary or permanent) as nofollow. The redirect is a response code from the server, it's not a link. To be fair, you wouldn't want to set it to nofollow even if you could, you want the search engines to follow the redirection to the new place and index that.

If I understand you correctly, you are trying to use the review structure data?

Google's Structured Data Testing Tool is showing an error in your structured data:
https://search.google.com/structured-data/testing-tool/u/0/#url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mashhoor.ir%2Fblog%2F%25D9%2585%25D8%25B1%25D8%25A7%25D8%25AD%25D9%2584-%25D8%25AB%25D8%25A8%25D8%25AA-%25D8%25A8%25D8%25B1%25D9%2586%25D8%25AF-%25D9%2588-%25D8%25AB%25D8%25A8%25D8%25AA-%25D8%25B9%25D9%2584%25D8%25A7%25D9%2585%25D8%25AA-%25D8%25AA%25D8%25AC%25D8%25A7%25D8%25B1%25DB%258C%2F

There seem to be two problems. One, you're not actually returning a reviewRating. And two, Google doesn't like your value for rating count, I think it's because you're outputting numbers in Punjabi, e.g. ۲۵۸ (Apologies if that's not the right term) I think they need to use latin characters, but I may be wrong, you may be able to "tell" Google that you are using a different system.

I'd suggest referencing https://developers.google.com/search/docs/data-types/review-snippet

Do you mean pages you initiate the search from, or the search results page? (I know these can be the same thing in some cases)

I would allow a page that you search from to be indexed, depending upon what it is used to search. Someone who has put a query into Google might find your search page useful in resolving their query.

I wouldn't allow search results pages to be indexed, for obvious reasons, even for specific searches links from other locations. You'd be better off creating category index pages or similar.

The issue is now being reported as fixed, with a response from Google’s John Mueller saying it was a technical issue their end. https://searchengineland.com/google-de-indexing-issue-now-fixed-result-of-technical-issues-315058

Hi Davit,

This is a widely reported problem. Fortunately it is now being reported as fixed. https://searchengineland.com/google-de-indexing-issue-now-fixed-result-of-technical-issues-315058

Hope your site soon reappears!

1. Ideally, you want to set those "Review" links to nofollow, rather than the pages they link to noindex.

2. From a quick look, the problem seems to be that lots of your links are pointing to http, rather than https, which means the link gets followed and then your site redirects the client to the https version.
For example, in your breadcrumbs, you link to the homepage but at http. I would suggest using relative links to avoid this i.e "/"
Also, I assume your product descriptions were written before you moved to https, so any links in those are http too. (https://www.twowayradiosfor.com/Motorola-RMU2080D-p/rmu2080d.htm has a link at the bottom about a discontinued product that links to a http page). I would suggest using a find and replace tool to find any reference to http://www.twowayradiosfor.com/ and replace it with https://www.twowayradiosfor.com

Also, unlikely to be causing any issues, but the AddThis tool links are HTTP too, they don't get followed when you actually click them, but that would suggest to me that your site settings are still configured to HTTP rather than https. Perhaps Site Address (URL) is wrongly configured? (That would also explain the Home breadcrumb being wrong)

As an aside, I'd seriously consider dropping the www. given the already long url. It will make your SERPs a little better in my opinion.

From what I've read, it seems to be an issue at Google's end, not something the site owners have done and therefore not something you can fix your end.

That said, interestingly, yours is the first case with reports of the exact same issue occurring multiple times over a timescale of months, most are reporting hours.

Not that that helps I'm afraid.

It looks like you're not the only one: https://www.seroundtable.com/google-dropping-pages-out-of-the-search-index-27369.html

No response from Google yet.

1. I don't think it will, Google has got very good at ignoring these spammy sites. Creating large disavow lists isn't technically that hard, but I don't think I would spend the time doing it seeing as you haven't seen any impact.

2. I don't think either of the response codes you're returning are appropriate.
403 for the indicates that the client doesn't have permissions and therefore it could be inferred that the file does actually exist and therefore the link is valid, which is definitely not something you would want Google to think.
While you have disavowed the links you are 302'ing, I still don't think 302 is the right response. For a start, 302 has been superceded now anyway, but 302 indicated moved temporarily. That is certainly not the case. The page doesn't exist and never has. The only reason to 302 is if you are expecting traffic from these links, but I think that also sends a bad message to Google.
I would definitely suggest 404 for both cases.

Not traffic on its own. CTR and low bounce have been demonstrated to have an impact, but that's traffic and behaviour from organic results, not PPC.

Moz won't take it into account as, when you use the disavow tool, you send the file directly to Google, so Moz will have no visibility.

Your DA has no direct impact on your ranking, so if you've disavowed the links, I would simply make a note of it and carry on about your business.

In all fairness, Google is pretty good at ignoring that kind of thing now, so unless you've had a manual action (or it was very recent and you're anticipating one) it may not be worth the effort of creating and uploading a disavow file.

Answering your question title directly, ignoring your PPC extension. The traffic a page gets organically can affect rankings. People have carried out research in the past that demonstrates that CTR and bounce rate can affect future rankings. That said, Google may have adjusted that out now that people are aware as it could potentially be manipulated...

An interesting question...

Directly, no, Google state that PPC spend won't affect rankings. However, it's an interesting concept, if Google knows that a term you are using as a PPC keyword is driving traffic with a low bounce rate, that would indicate the page is relevant... therefore should it not rank more highly organically... who knows... Even if it has an impact, I wouldn't expect it to high up the list, so I wouldn't include those pages/terms purely for that reason.

That said, Google Ads can give you some useful insight into Google's opinion of your pages for specific keywords. If your Ad Rank is low for a page/keyword combination, then it is unlikely to rank well organically. You can look at "Landing Page Experience" and to a lesser extent "Expected CTR" to get an idea of which areas to target, improving those metrics on Ads could, based on the actions you would have likely had to have taken, improve your chances organically too.

Depending upon how you've set up your previous redirects, it could be a problem, but I suspect you'll be fine.

In my experience, a small redirect chain won't cause a massive issue and unless you already have some multi-step redirects going on, your new plan won't put you at risk of more than two steps anyway. Obviously, a loop would cause serious issues, but I don't think you are at risk of this.

Your redirects should be relative to absolute, i.e. /oldpage to https://siteImanage.com/newpage. In this case, you would just need to update your absolute paths to the new url. If you ensure these are matched first, then you would only have one redirect regardless of whether the client hits the www or non-www domain. If the full domain redirect is matched first, you'll end up for two steps for those people hitting only pages on the old domain

If your redirects are matching based on relative links and redirecting to relative urls (as some plugins do), i.e. /oldpage redirects to /newpage, then you'll end up with a two-step process if someone follows an old link; First, the site will redirect from non-www to www, and then it will redirect to the correct page.

If you have redirects such as "https://siteImanage.com/oldpage" redirecting to "https://siteImanage.com/newpage" then you would create a two-step process again, first to the new page and then to the new domain. Of course, your redirects wouldn't work on the new domain as they wouldn't match, which may or may not be a problem for you.

The measurement is different, and based on the datasets that ahrefs and Moz maintain; there is no value in comparing the metrics directly between the two tools.

I would suggest when using either of these metrics that you only compare within a single tool, and between sites/domains in similar (if not the same) niche.

I'm not sure I entirely understand what you're trying to achieve. Could you post a few examples of what you would like to redirect (and to what) and what you wouldn't want to redirect? Also, which web server are you using (nginx, Apache, IIS...)

I'm not sure, I suspect they get a large number of reports and I don't know whether the process is automated.  I've used it a few times but never heard anything back, so I'm not sure if you'll get any feedback either way.

In that case, you need to report it as webspam. https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/spamreportform?hl=en

Hi,

It depends what you want to report. One of the most common violations (in my opinion) is link buying, and you can report that by following the links here: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/93713?hl=en

Many other types of violation are automatically picked up (and I suspect generally link buying is picked up eventually). What specifically do you need/want to report?

Alex