Too many on page links
-
I'm having trouble interpreting this data. It says several of my blog pages have too many on page links, some as high as 140 and there is no example of a blog post that they are referring to. What am I missing? I never post more than a handful (5-7) in our 600-1000wd blogs. When I drill down, it doesn't give me very much information except "Found over 41 years ago" off to the right. When I click on the "too many on page links" URL, it provides a long list of website pages that are renamed with the blog name. huh?
A lot of this stuff isn't very intuitive, SEOMoz.
-
Tried to set up my campaign to look at the root domain, but it said that my website is set up as a subdomain automatically converted this step of the process to "subdomain".
I believe this would be due to either the root domain being redirected to the subdomain, or there not being any content on the root domain address. If another mozzer does not offer a definitive answer, try contacting the SEOmoz help desk for more information.
When you say "choose" one version of my site, do you mean as far as what SEOMoz crawls? Or are you suggesting I make a change to the site itself?
The site itself. You have one website and it's content should only be available via 1 address. Think of it this way. You can create a website at the address "mysite.com". Next, you create another site at the URL "www.mysite.com" which is an exact duplicate of the "mysite.com" site. This is exactly what you have done. You can even repeat the process further and create subdomains such as "www1.mysite.com". Each subdomain is a duplicate of the main domain and causes confusion for users and search engines alike. Resolve this confusion. Choose ONE way to present your site and remain consistent.
The blog is, I believe, set up as a subdomain (with www.blogs.aerohive.com) and it is hosted by a third-party.
The URL "blogs.aerohive.com" is indeed hosted elsewhere, but the URL "www.blogs.aerohive.com" is hosted at the same location as your main site. It is a mirror of your main site. Remove this subdomain.
I am trying to understand what was set up correctly or incorrectly within SEOMoz and what can fix and what I can fix with my website
Presently there are two major issues which need to be resolved. Both issues are with your website itself, not the SEOmoz tools. If you have managed hosting, the easiest step is to call or open a ticket with your hosting provider and make two requests:
1. Add a 301 to redirect all non-www traffic to it's www equivalent
2. Delete the www.blogs.aerohive.com subdomain
You should be able to copy and paste the above two requests and paste it into a ticket. Your hosting provider should completely understand what actions are necessary.
-
Thanks Sha,
There seems to be a consensus on what issue is, although I asked some extra questions in my reply above to Ryan. Kind of confusing. The blog should be setup as a subdomain, right?
Amanda
-
Thanks Brian - there seems to be a consensus on what issue is, although I asked some extra questions in my reply above to Ryan. Kind of confusing.
Amanda
-
This was very helpful (as were the other two replies) so I am hoping you can help clarify how I can get this addressed. (going with list format to simplify):
1- I tried to set up my campaign to look at the root domain, but it said that my website is set up as a subdomain automatically converted this step of the process to "subdomain".
2- SEOMoz Pro did tell me at some point in the setup process about what you mentioned above, which is that there are two versions of my site. This may have been at the setup point where it converted root domain to subdomain, though I can't recall.
3- When you say "choose" one version of my site, do you mean as far as what SEOMoz crawls? Or are you suggesting I make a change to the site itself?
4- The blog is, I believe, set up as a subdomain (with www.blogs.aerohive.com) and it is hosted by a third-party. I set up the dedicated blog campaign as a subdomain, but had some difficulty with it as well. Not sure if that was correctly set up or not.
Basically I am trying to understand what was set up correctly or incorrectly within SEOMoz and what can fix and what I can fix with my website so that I can better analyze it here (and obviously get search engine approval as the ultimate goal).
Thanks,
Amanda
-
Hi Amanda,
I don't think the problem is with the tool. The tool is simply reporting what the crawler sees.
Since you have said "an actual blog page, which I am attempting to analyze as a dedicated campaign for my blog" I am thinking that you have set up a separate campaign for what you think of as the "actual blog" and designated the campaign as a subdomain?
If this is the case, then presumably, you also have a campaign set up for what you think of as the main site. So, as Ryan and Brian mentioned, you have two copies of all content in your blog, but it exists in two different locations on your server, so is being seen by two different campaigns with different URL's.
The 100 links per page is a recommended rule of thumb to protect usability and avoid degrading the value of individual links on the page. So, as both Ryan and Brian advised, it is much more important right now to deal with the duplication issues on your site.
Hope that helps,
Sha
-
Ouch, yea I see. I would definitely get those canonical (www / non-www / www.blog) issues resolved first, then worry about the links
Brian
-
It seems a subdomain was created for your site and errors were made in the process.
If your main URL is www.areohive.com and you decide to offer a blog as a subdomain, the recommended name would be blog.aerohive.com. Your main site is located on the "www" subdomain and the blog would be offered on the "blog" subdomain. It is unnecessary and a bit confusing to keep the www prefix with another subdomain as happened with http://www.blogs.aerohive.com/.
Your subdomain is currently set up as a mirror of content for your main site. Both URLs you shared are valid URLs with identical pages displayed and a header code of 200 is returned. This duplication should be resolved immediately.
Upon further checking, I just realized your site is set up with a blogs.aerohive.com subdomain, and it does show unique content. Therefore the necessary step is to remove the www.blogs.aerohive.com subdomain.
Another major SEO issue involving duplication is your site is also available in both the www and non-www form of the URL. http://aerohive.com and http://www.aerohive.com are both valid URLs which display content and 200 header response codes. This issue should also be fixed immediately. Your site has backlinks to both versions of the URL.
Choose one version of your URL, the www or non-www version, then be consistent. 301 redirect the unused version of the URL to the main URL. This step will consolidate your backlinks and improve your ranking. Next, review your entire site to ensure all links consistently use the chosen URL format. Also check your social sites and signatures to ensure they are updated as well.
Once the above major issues are resolved, we can then loop back to the linking issue. Relatively speaking, it is a much less important issue.
-
Hi Brian,
I think you are right, but I think there is something wrong with the way this tool is analyzing my pages. I explained what I think is going on in Ryan's thread above. Like maybe this is an analysis of the website page (which I have analyzed in a separate campaign) vs. an actual blog page, which I am attempting to analyze as a dedicated campaign for my blog.
amanda
-
I think what's happening, and I don't understand this part especially (although I eluded to it originally), but I am analyzing my blog, the "too many links" is under my blog campaign, but when it names a "page" it is actually a website page renamed with the blog title. I will post an example but it will come up as a bad link for you I think.
1- I think that perhaps I have this campaign set up wrong? So it isn't analyzing the pages correctly, or the right pages
-
The issue here is likely that your blog template and plugins combined are creating a situation where there are lots of links on the page to begin with (navas, footer, archives etc. etc.). As Ryan said, all of those other links on the page that are not in your post (page) count too, so when you add a few more inline in your post (or page) you are pushed over the top.
Depending on what type of CMS you use, getting the number links on the page down is probably going to involve some kind of change (template/plugins) to remove some site wide links you don't really need. Once you do that, you should see that 140 number go away (or at least way down).
Side note, it was reported elsewhere that the "Found over 41 years ago" thing is a bug, you should open a help ticket and let the staff here know you were affected by it.
Brian
-
If you can offer a link to the page, we can be a lot more helpful.
Based on what you shared all I can offer is the software looks at the <a>tags on the page to locate links, and apparently 140 were located. Links include all the links on the page include the site's navigation links, footer links, sidebar links, image links, social sharing links, etc.</a>
<a>You may also use the "Highlight Links or Text" icon located on the MOZbar to locate various links on a given page.</a>
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Landing page separate from product page
Hello there, I have a wordpress website with a woocommerce plugin. I have 4 landing pages that describe my products and at the end of the pages, I have a CTA to my product page. is it bad for SEO? my website: https://relationadviser.ir
On-Page Optimization | | Aaron.be1 -
Should you do on-page optimization for a page with rel=canonical tag?
If you ad a rel=canonical tag to a page, should you still optimize that page? I'm talking meta description, page title, etc.
On-Page Optimization | | marynau0 -
Need Professional Help with Site Structure, Page Authority, and Internal Linking
We are a 10 year + small (1000 pages) niche ecommerce site (Magento) that has recently lost rankings to a competitor. We out perform them in every metric so I do not understand them leap frogging us to the top spot. This has forced me to look at my site structure, page authority (rank), and internal linking. After reviewing a moz crawl issues report, here are some of my observations: Root domain has a PA of 40 Top 3 $ Category pages have a PA of 22, 18, 18 Multiple meaningless blog posts and other category/product pages have PA’s of 30+ Here is a screenshot of the crawl report with internal links, links, etc showing. I need some help - thoughts, suggestions, next steps in analysis?
On-Page Optimization | | SammyT0 -
Which is better? One dynamically optimised page, or lots of optimised pages?
For the purpose of simplicity, we have 5 main categories in the site - let's call them A, B, C, D, E. Each of these categories have sub-category pages e.g. A1, A2, A3. The main area of the site consists of these category and sub-category pages. But as each product comes in different woods, it's useful for customers to see all the product that come in a particular wood, e.g. walnut. So many years ago we created 'woods' pages. These pages replicate the categories & sub-categories but only show what is available in that particular wood. And of course - they're optimised much better for that wood. All well and good, until recently, these specialist page seem to have dropped through the floor in Google. Could be temporary, I don't know, and it's only a fortnight - but I'm worried. Now, because the site is dynamic, we could do things differently. We could still have landing pages for each wood, but of spinning off to their own optimised specific wood sub-category page, they could instead link to the primary sub-category page with a ?search filter in the URL. This way, the customer is still getting to see what they want. Which is better? One page per sub-category? Dynamically filtered by search. Or lots of specific sub-category pages? I guess at the heart of this question is? Does having lots of specific sub-category pages lead to a large overlap of duplicate content, and is it better keeping that authority juice on a single page? Even if the URL changes (with a query in the URL) to enable whatever filtering we need to do.
On-Page Optimization | | pulcinella2uk0 -
Page grader says we are keyword stuffing but we arn't. Page source shows different story.
Hi community! We have just run a page grader for the keyword 'LED Bulbs' on whichledlight.com and it comes up that we are keyword stuffing! However, a brief look at the source for the homepage and there's only 6 times that LED Bulbs pops up. We do have the non plural version of the word 'LED Bulb' on the page 27 times.. do we think that would contribute to the keyword stuffing? Thanks!!
On-Page Optimization | | TrueluxGroup0 -
Do Navigation links count the main link on the page?
After reading this article http://www.seomoz.org/learn-seo/anchor-text it talks about how only one link per page counts if they are going to the same page. This is what i had learned in the past; however, my understanding was if it was a in the main navigation as a child or grandchild or in the side navigation and then in the main body text, the link in the main body would count/ be held higher than the other options.
On-Page Optimization | | DoRM0 -
Is the on-page link count a distinct count or a gross count?
My Crawl Diagnostic report is showing too many on-page links (~120-141). Is this a count of distinct links (i.e. example.com and example.com/?q count as 2)?
On-Page Optimization | | SpartzAlison0 -
Why home page ranks higher than keyword-optimized page
We have a page that is optimized for the keyword "job scheduling". A search on the keyword "job scheduling" results in this page not ranking at all, while our home page (uc4.com) ranks third. Could you provide some ideas/suggestions as to why this would be the case and how to make our job scheduling page rank higher? Thanks, claudia
On-Page Optimization | | claudmar0