Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
XML SiteMap - Right Away or Delay?
-
So, I have a new client whose web designer declined to create an XML site map. They said that they would rather wait a year and let Google create one.
I am wondering what the opinion of other SEOMoz members is about this--do you create an XML right away or think there is an advantage in delaying?
Personally, I always prefer to have one right away--What is the best practice in your experience and why?
-
I hate when I reply and it doesn't post!
Thanks Ryan,
Appreciate your sharing your experience in submission before posts are made. I would not have thought about doing one for subdomains--great insight and suggestion.
The site in question has been up a while and is pretty comprehensive so I thought it would be a good practice. Another site I am working on did not have one either and it will be interesting to see how the XML sitemap added today will impact it.
Thanks again to all of you for chiming in. Very helpful, I just had not heard of someone declining to create one as a general practice before.
-
Todd, I appreciate your suggestion about the video site map. That is a great idea that I did not think of!
So, I must confess that I've been remiss about using Webmaster Tools but as my sophistication has increased, I am expanding my use of other tools for a more comprehensive approach.
-
Thanks Martijn,
I've mainly been an SEO writer until this last year or so and almost exclusively work on small business websites.
I take an initial look at the indexing of the pages on Yahoo, Google and Bing and then monitor it over time. Since I do a lot of work for web designers, my preference for XML sitemaps is just one of practice.
It seems that many small business sites do not include them and I like to work to get them an edge in many different ways. Many have horrible sites that need all the help they can get!
-
Martijn and Todd share some good points. I'll add a different viewpoint. If your site offers solid navigation and no island pages, sitemaps are completely unnecessary.
When you register your site, Google will begin attempting to crawl the main page of the site. If you offer standard, crawlable navigation, then Google will find every page on your site naturally. Sitemaps offer Google and Bing a list of links to your site's pages. If a link is noticed in your sitemap which has not been otherwise crawled, then your sitemap offers an opportunity for search engines to crawl the page.
As for timing, just be sure there is actual content on your site prior to submitting a sitemap. I had once installed forum software on a site and then submitted a sitemap to Google prior to any posts being made. I received a penalty notice and had to submit a reconsideration request to have the site later indexed.
There are only a few cases where I can see the benefit of submitting a sitemap. A couple examples:
-
if you add a new sub-domain which is otherwise not linked to by your main site
-
if you add an island page to your site which you wish to be indexed
-
-
Hola!
google has this to say about submitting sitemaps "Submit a Sitemap to tell Google about pages on your site we might not otherwise discover." ala Webmaster tools. I stand firmly behind your inkling to create a good standard issue sitemap and submit. Last week we had a client (attorney) who did not have a sitemap at all for the three years her site was up, google had about 22 pages in its index, after sitemap, 432 pages in its index. Be sure to submit to BIng webmaster tools as well, cover all bases!
so I say create right away, its not going to hurt anything, and can quite honestly help a lot! as a footnote to this answer, if you are using videos, etc... on the site be sure to build a video sitemap as well we have been seeing a lot successful indexing of our clients media.
Hope this helps!
-
For our company/websites we used different methods of submitting our sitemaps, but until now I prefer submitting the XML sitemaps after a couple of weeks/months (it varies with the kind of website). For us this had a couple of reasons, these were the main ones:
- Insights in your ("natural") crawl stats: By waiting a couple of weeks/months with submitting your sitemaps to Google we were able to see the "natural" crawl stats of our websites.
- Analyse the differences: This also applies to the reason I mentioned above. If you wait you are able to see the difference in your crawl stats after submitting your sitemap to Google. You are not definitely sure if this is directly correlated to you submitting your sitemap of course. But at least you could have a look.
But there are sure also reasons for directly submitting a sitemap: you are directly able to segment your urls, so you can see which segments of your website need to be optimized. And the number of pages crawled vs indexed.
I would like to know your own answer to the question. Why do you prefer submitting a XML sitemap right away?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Questions about putting 2-3 keywords in title tag.
Hi there, what is the best way to decide the keywords to be used in title tag?
Web Design | | lucybish0 -
Reducing cumulative layout shift for responsive images - core web vitals
In preparation for Core Web Vitals becoming a ranking factor in May 2021, we are making efforts to reduce our Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) on pages where the shift is being caused by images loading. The general recommendation is to specify both height and width attributes in the html, in addition to the CSS formatting which is applied when the images load. However, this is problematic in situations where responsive images are being used with different aspect ratios for mobile vs desktop. And where a CMS is being used to manage the pages with images, where width and height may change each time new images are used, as well as aspect ratios for the mobile and desktop versions of those. So, I'm posting this inquiry here to see what kinds of approaches others are taking to reduce CLS in these situations (where responsive images are used, with differing aspect ratios for desktop and mobile, and where a CMS allows the business users to utilize any dimension of images they desire).
Web Design | | seoelevated3 -
Does changing content and design of the website gonna affect my all the backlinks i have made till now
i have been working on my link profile for a month now, after learning about 5 step moz methodology i have decided that i would like to change all of the content of my site and taylor it to what my customers need, am i gonna loose all the domain authority if make changes? if it gonna affect, hows that gonna come out
Web Design | | calvinkj0 -
Have Your Thoughts Changed Regarding Canonical Tag Best Practice for Pagination? - Google Ignoring rel= Next/Prev Tagging
Hi there, We have a good-sized eCommerce client that is gearing up for a relaunch. At this point, the staging site follows the previous best practice for pagination (self-referencing canonical tags on each page; rel=next & prev tags referencing the last and next page within the category). Knowing that Google does not support rel=next/prev tags, does that change your thoughts for how to set up canonical tags within a paginated product category? We have some categories that have 500-600 products so creating and canonicalizing to a 'view all' page is not ideal for us. That leaves us with the following options (feel it is worth noting that we are leaving rel=next / prev tags in place): Leave canonical tags as-is, page 2 of the product category will have a canonical tag referencing ?page=2 URL Reference Page 1 of product category on all pages within the category series, page 2 of product category would have canonical tag referencing page 1 (/category/) - this is admittedly what I am leaning toward. Any and all thoughts are appreciated! If this were in relation to an existing website that is not experiencing indexing issues, I wouldn't worry about these. Given we are launching a new site, now is the time to make such a change. Thank you! Joe
Web Design | | Joe_Stoffel1 -
Why is my financial services site being flagged as gambling
Watchguard and Websense/Forecepoint are flagging my financial services site gambling...how can I prevent that from happening. https://fwag.com/
Web Design | | AdsposureDev0 -
What’s the best tool to visualize internal link structure and relationships between pages on a single site?
I‘d like to review the internal linking structure on my site. Is there a tool that can visualize the relationships between all of the pages within my site?
Web Design | | QBSEO0 -
Best way to indicate multiple Lang/Locales for a site in the sitemap
So here is a question that may be obvious but wondering if there is some nuance here that I may be missing. Question: Consider an ecommerce site that has multiple sites around the world but are all variations of the same thing just in different languages. Now lets say some of these exist on just a normal .com page while others exist on different ccTLD's. When you build out the XML Sitemap for these sites, especially the ones on the other ccTLD's, we want to ensure that using <loc>http://www.example.co.uk/en_GB/"</loc> <xhtml:link<br>rel="alternate"
Web Design | | DRSearchEngOpt
hreflang="en-AU"
href="http://www.example.com.AU/en_AU/"
/>
<xhtml:link<br>rel="alternate"
hreflang="en-NZ"
href="http://www.example.co.NZ/en_NZ/"
/> Would be the correct way of doing this. I know I have to change this for each different ccTLD but it just looks weird when you start putting about 10-15 different language locale variations as alternate links. I guess I am just looking for a bit of re-affirmation I am doing this right.</xhtml:link<br></xhtml:link<br> Thanks!0 -
3 Brands, 3 Services, 3 Different Websites Right?
My client was told that having 1 website for 3 different brands/services is better than having 3 websites. I need your help to prove my value to a new client. This client has worked with Reach Local on PPC for some time and when they first got started the Reach Local Markering Consultant told this cleint that they needed to have one site for better SEO purposes. The client was told that Google ranks websites higher if they have more paid traffic going to them. I've been doing this for long enough to realize this does not help ranking, at least not enough to make a difference. Keep in mind this is for 3 different companies. One company does plumbing, another electrical and the last one does air conditioning. They also have 4 locations but only two locations have mutliple services opperating out of them. I understand these 2 location will not have there own Google+ Local / Places listing. Using the same address for 2 different business and expecting a first page ranking is just not possible. Right now when you visit the clients website you see a logo that rotates with a banner section that follows the logo rotation. First you see the AC Company and then the Plumbing etc. I see this as confusing to the end user and it is more work to get it ranked for SEO. I recommended that we build 3 speerate websites for each service and just list out all the addresses that the company services on the contact page. I would also design inside the footer links to the other services for branding purposes. Please share your thoughts on how you would handle this if you were doing the SEO for your own 3 different business services. I really appreicate any input/insight to this. Thank you so much in advance!!!!
Web Design | | 1SMG0