Best way to address duplicate news sections within site
-
A client has a news section at www.clientsite.com/news and also at subdomain.clientsite.com/news. The stories within each section are identical:
www.clientsite.com/news/story-11-5-2011
subdomain.clientsite.com/news/story-11-5-2011
What's the best way to avoid a duplicate content issue within the site? A 301 redirect doesn't seem appropriate from the user experience point of view.
Is applying a rel=canonical <www.clientsite.com news="" story-a-b-c="">to each story within the subdomain news section the best option? They have 100's of stories, wondering if there might be an easier way?</www.clientsite.com>
Also, the news pages list the story headline and the first 3 lines of copy. Do these summaries present duplicate content issues with the full story page?
Thank you!
-
Alan, I appreciate your effort here. These are the sources I already shared
A complete summary of everything shared in those articles you quote:
1. It doesn't make a difference to google which method is used. When I examine all the information and analysis, it seems to indicate Google will index the content either way. How well that content will rank in Google is a different topic. There are reasons to keep content separate, such as when discussing topics unrelated to the main site, in which case a subdomain would be best.
2. Matt uses the directory approach, and he recommends for others to do the same.
AT BEST you can get that it is close to even with a slighter preference towards subfolders based on that information.
The Rand offers outstanding analysis as to why subfolders are the superior choice. Rand's analysis is in 2009, 2 years after the original articles quoted from Matt. http://www.seomoz.org/blog/understanding-root-domains-subdomains-vs-subfolders-microsites
The bottom line, it's up to you how much you care about your site and it's performance. Personally, I am a fighter. I also micro-manage website architecture because in many aspects, it is a one-time set it and forget it type of thing. Whether to use subdirectories vs subfolders, whether to use underscores in URLs vs dashes, etc. are things you do one time and then it is automated forever.
A detailed list of reasons supporting the subfolder approach has been offered. The DA, time, costs, etc. all support subfolders. If you wish to ignore all those strong, positive benefits and go with a subdomain then that is your choice.
Good luck.
-
The originals
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008_01_01_archive.htmlhttp://www.mattcutts.com/blog/subdomains-and-subdirectories/
here is a better example from Matt
Deb December 11, 2007 at 1:01 am
<dd class="comment odd alt thread-odd thread-alt depth-1">
Matt thanks for your reply, just a query (if you don’t mind) if I add content in mattcutts.com/blog – it effect in seo because I add directly content in the domain mattcutts.com but if I add content in blog.mattcutts.com is the effect is same? I don’t think so – because this is a subdomain not directly related with the domain?
If I disturb you please don’t mindThanks
Deb</dd>
<dd class="comment odd alt thread-odd thread-alt depth-1">Matt Cutts December 10, 2007 at 10:55 am</dd>
<dd class="comment byuser comment-author-matt-cutts bypostauthor odd alt thread-odd thread-alt depth-1">
Deb, it really is a pretty personal choice. For something small like a blog, it probably won’t matter terribly much. I used a subdirectory because it’s easier to manage everything in one file storage space for me. However, if you think that someday you might want to use a hosted blog service to power your blog, then you might want to go with blog.example.com just because you could set up a CNAME or DNS alias so that blog.example.com pointed to your hosted blog service.
</dd>
I was trying to find video matt made where he makes a simular claim. but i have to get back to work
-
Alan,
We will have to agree to disagree on this one.
There is a ton of what can only be referred to as "SEO bullshit" published. When I quote a source it will usually be Matt Cutts directly, or Google, or a highly respected SEO who shares an opinion on a topic AND who offers very solid research to back up that opinion. In short, credibility is everything when quoting a source to support a given position.
You are quoting a site I have never heard of, alexander.holbreich.org. Is it just me? Do others know and recognize this site as a reputable source of SEO information?
The author's About page is a total of 4 lines of text. Line 1 = his name, Line 3 & 4 is where he lives. Line 2 = he has a degree in "Business Information" but doesn't even state where or when he received this degree. This web page is a solid example of a page that has absolutely zero trust on SEO.
I think it is great that you read various sources of SEO for ideas, but that is a big difference from depending on those sources as credible information.
If you want to quote, try the main source article. Doing such would add higher credibility to your position. I can agree there is a lot of confusion on this topic, but it is propagated mostly by pages like the one you linked which should probably never be read.
Using the source you quoted and some common ground I would share the following:
-
Matt Cutts stated he uses folders "My personal preference on subdomains vs. subdirectories is that I usually prefer the convenience of subdirectories for most of my content. A subdomain can be useful to separate out content that is completely different."
-
Matt Cutts recommended for others to use folders "If you’re a newer webmaster or SEO, I’d recommend using subdirectories until you start to feel pretty confident with the architecture of your site."
-
Matt shared a specific example of when a subdirectory would be appropriate, and it is an example I had shared as well in response to the original question "A subdomain can be useful to separate out content that is completely different. Google uses subdomains for distinct products such news.google.com or maps.google.com, for example."
The above aside, one site is easier to maintain then two. There are lower costs all around (software, trust badges, SSL, etc). There is less time involved as well. All that time and money can be put into other aspects of SEO such as link building and creating great content.
Further, by combining your content into one site, all your content benefits from the higher DA of your site.
I hope you take the information I am sharing the right way Alan. My professional experience leads me to almost always use a folder unless there is a clear and specific reason to use a subdomain such as trying to separate out content which is not related to the main site. The difference is strong enough to where I would recommend for most clients who have a subdomain to delete it and move to the subfolder structure.
If you find a differing opinion, I would love to hear it. All I ask is for it to be from a highly credible SEO source who preferably shares detailed examples or logic to support the position.
Best Regards,
-
-
"With respect to the general subfolder vs domain discussion, as far as I have seen most of the "debate" ended with subfolders being the winner."
For what reasons is it the winner? I use subdomains a lot, thats why I have looked for evidence, and Matt Cutts has stated it makes no difference.
Rand states, it is his personal belief, but google and Matt Cutts have stated many times it makes no difference to rankings
http://alexander.holbreich.org/2008/01/subdomains-vs-subdirectories/" otherwise irrelevant change during this discussion only serves to confuse an otherwise muddy topic"
I dont think its confusion, it is information clearly stated (not to do with rankings) for one to consider. it is an indication of googles thinking. It is stated correcly and all informmation should be considered. One could say that stating rands personal belief is confusing.
-
I take a different view on this topic then Alan.
As Alan mentioned, the recent Google change sole effect is how links to sub-domains from the root domain visually appear in Google WMT. They have absolutely no ranking weight difference. Bringing up that otherwise irrelevant change during this discussion only serves to confuse an otherwise muddy topic.
With respect to the general subfolder vs domain discussion, as far as I have seen most of the "debate" ended with subfolders being the winner.
There are a couple situations where a subdomain would be preferable to a folder. One example is when a different, unrelated topic or product is being offered. Keith, you brought up the example of Google Maps. A few comments I would share:
-
Google Maps is a different product then Google search. Really the main thing they have is they are being offered by the same company. The idea of providing satellite images and driving directions is really quite different then providing the best search results. These two products happen to be offered by the same company but if you think about it, they are really very distinct products. It would be the same idea if Ford created their own version of Sirius radio. Yes, the radios would be offered in Ford cars but the product is truly distinct of the cars and can stand completely alone.
-
Google's site was set up years ago before this topic was analyzed to this depth. Many changes have been made over the years.
A couple great discussions on this topic:
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/understanding-root-domains-subdomains-vs-subfolders-microsites
A quote Rand shared in a different article "99.9% of the time, if a subfolder will work, it's the best choice for all parties." I agree for the overwhelming majority of cases, a subfolder is preferred. There are some corner cases but normally speaking the subfolder is the preferred approach.
-
-
Subdomains or folder is an old debaiting point, but matt cutts has said it makes no difference.
I have also noticed that google includes subdomain links in its site links, as well as google WMT now shows subdomain links as internal(I know this is seperate to ranking, but it makes but with the other evidence it gives weight to what matt cutts stated). -
Good catch on the subdomains! That is a separate issue, and I am recommending they move everything to a clientsite.com/folder setup. The sub-domains do have unique content (except for the news) and they set it up that way because they've seen other sites, like Google, set up sub-domains for maps and their other products.
What's a good explanation to the client for why other large sites like Google set up different content sections as subdomains vs. the folder approach I am recommending?
-
the news pages list the story headline and the first 3 lines of copy. Do these summaries present duplicate content issues with the full story page?
No
With respect to the subdomain, what is the purpose of having the subdomain? It seems likely the best course of action would be to merge any unique content from the subdomain into the main site, then remove the subdomain. Your articles would benefit from the (presumably) stronger DA on the main site. Also your efforts would be reduced by allowing you to fully focus on one site rather then maintain two sites.
How does this subdomain benefit anyone?
If you insisted on keeping the subdomain, then yes the canonical meta tag would work.
-
canonical would be best here. but you would want to do it with code, or use rewrite outbound rules on the server
I would not worry about the sumery problem
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Sub domain? Micro site? What's the best solution?
My client currently has two websites to promote their art galleries in different parts of the country. They have bought a new domain (let's call it buyart.com) which they would eventually like to use as an e-commerce platform. They are wondering whether they keep their existing two gallery websites (non e-commerce) separate as they always have been, or somehow combine these into the new domain and have one overarching brand (buyart.com). I've read a bit on subdomains and microsites but am unsure at this stage what the best option would be, and what the pros and cons are. My feeling is to bring it all together under buyart.com so everything is in one place and creates a better user journey for anyone who would like to visit. Thoughts?
Technical SEO | | WhitewallGlasgow0 -
Best way to change URL for already ranking pages
Hello. I have a lot of pages that I'm optimising. The ones I'm focusing on right now is already ranking, but the URLs could be better (they don't include the keywords right now). However I'm worried that if I change the URLs they will drop in rankings or have to start over. I would of course set up 301 redirect, but is there more I need to do? What is the best way to change URL for already ranking pages?
Technical SEO | | GoMentor0 -
Will unused/dead pages within my site that is non-linked hurt my seo?
For example my website has mysite.com/randomunusedpage.html No links go into that page from the website but it is published (came with the WP theme). Will that hurt my SEO and should I delete the page or is it harmless? Thanks
Technical SEO | | Marvellous0 -
Site Blacklisted
Good morning. Just done my WMT ritual morning check and one of my sites has been blacklisted for malware. It's a wordpress site - I've run various scans, e.g. http://sitecheck.sucuri.net/scanner/ and also installed wordfence and scanned with that and wordfence produced some offending files which I have now deleted. I've also installed website defender in the hope that it wont happen again. I'm pretty good with staying on top of updates and rarely let a few days pass without upgrading new version of wordpress or plugins etc. I've also checked my users to make sure no new admins or anything and also changes passwords. I've asked for a review from Google and just wondered how long these reviews take? Also, has anybody got any advice, is there anything else I should be doing? Thanks
Technical SEO | | littlesthobo0 -
Duplicate content
I'm getting an error showing that two separate pages have duplicate content. The pages are: | Help System: Domain Registration Agreement - Registrar Register4Less, Inc. http://register4less.com/faq/cache/11.html 1 27 1 Help System: Domain Registration Agreement - Register4Less Reseller (Tucows) http://register4less.com/faq/cache/7.html | These are both registration agreements, one for us (Register4Less, Inc.) as the registrar, and one for Tucows as the registrar. The pages are largely the same, but are in fact different. Is there a way to flag these pages as not being duplicate content? Thanks, Doug.
Technical SEO | | R4L0 -
A week ago I asked how to remove duplicate files and duplicate titles
Three weeks ago we had a very large number of site errors revealed by crawl diagostics. These errors related purely to the presence of both http://domain name and http://www.domain name. We used the rel canonical tag in the head of our index page to direct all to the www. preference, and we have no improvement. Matters got worse two weeks ago and I checked with Google Webmaster and found that Google had somehow lost our preference choice. A week ago I asked how to overcome this problem and received good advice about how to re-enter our preference for the www.tag with Google. This we did and it was accepted. We aso submitted a new sitemap.xml which was also acceptable to Google. Today, a week later we find that we have even more duplicate content (over 10,000 duplicate errors) showing up in the latest diagnostic crawl. Does anyone have any ideas? (Getting a bit desperate.)
Technical SEO | | FFTCOUK0 -
Is there an easier way from the server to prevent duplicate page content?
I know that using either 301 or 302 will fix the problem of duplicate page content. My question would be; is there an easier way of preventing duplicate page content when it's an issue with the URL. For example: URL: http://example.com URL: http://www.example.com My guess would be like it says here, that it's a setting issue with the server. If anyone has some pointers on how to prevent this from occurring, it would be greatly appreciated.
Technical SEO | | brianhughes2 -
What is the best way to deal with pages whose content changes?
My site features businesses that offers activities for kids. Each business has its own page on my site. Business pages contains a listing of different activities that organization is putting on (such as events, summer camps, drop-in activities). Some businesses only offer seasonal activities (for example, during Christmas break and summer camps). The rest of the year, the business has no activities -- the page is empty. This is creating 2 problems. It's poor user experience (which I can fix no problem) but it also is thin content and sometimes treated as duplicate content. What's the best way to deal with pages whose content can be quite extensive at certain points of the year and shallow or empty at other parts? Should I include a meta ROBOTS tag to not index when there is no content, and change the tag to index when there is content? Should I just ignore this problem? Should I remove the page completely and do a redirect? Would love to know people's thoughts.
Technical SEO | | ChatterBlock0