URL paths and keywords
-
I'm recommending some on-page optimization for a home builder building in several new home communities. The site has been through some changes in the past few months and we're almost starting over.
The current URL structure is
http://homebuilder.com/oakwood/features
where
homebuilder = builder name
Oakwood Estates= name of community
features = one of several sub-paths including site plan, elevations, floor plans, etc.
The most attainable keyword phrases include the word 'home' and 'townname'
I want to change the URL path to:
http://homebuilder.com/oakwood-estates-townname-homes/features
Is there any problem with doing this? It just seems to make a lot of sense. Any input would be appreciated.
-
I had a feeling that there was something inherently wrong with my approach which is why I asked the question. Good to know that there's folks willing to help out - thanks for the clarification(s). And the separate town pages is a good solution. Thanks.
-
Perhaps this video would be more helpful: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRzMhlFZz9I
The URL is a ranking factor, but it should not be focused to this level of detail. It is one of over 200 ranking factors, most of the weight goes to the domain name and the keywords deeper in the URL have very very very little effect on ranking. Where it matters more is for users to be able to read the URL prior to clicking through. If you make your URL too long, then it will get cut off and the most important terms at the end wont be viewed.
If you feel "Oakwood estates" is not helpful and you also feel the town name is very important, then you could make your URLs homebuilder.com/town/floor-plans.
The effect of keywords in your URLs comes more into play when sites link to you using the URL. If sites do not link to you, it's not really going to matter. If sites do link to you but use anchor text, it wont matter either. Even if sites link to you using a keyword stuffed URL, there will be so many terms in it the weight given to each term will be so low it wont make any meaningful difference.
-
I would start with the major cities, surrounding the area, and create zip coded directories.
I found the more directories, I create and submit, and coinciding names & keeping then relative to what the search reports are.
This is after the a close look at your GA Reports.I hope it helps.
-
This is a really good answer by Ryan, covers both Usability and SEO.
I'd suggest going with this recommendation, sticking with the shorter style URL structure to benefit user experience and to focus on the main primary keywords for SEO.
It would also make it easy to clearly target other towns/cities at a high level, e.g. http://homebuilder.com/townname/
-
Thanks. That makes sense.
Consider this though. I should have been clearer.
The keyword phrase that I would be targeting in almost every case would be 'townname homes for sale' and/or 'townname homes'.
'Oakwood Estates' and the other community names don't really generate much traffic, and while I need them for the small amount of traffic they produce, I'm more interested in penetrating the broader area names.
Your take?
-
There is not any problem with taking that approach in and of itself. I would suggest there is not any need nor a substantial benefit to sticking those extra keywords in the URL. If it was my site, I would think "oakwood" is probably enough instead of "oakwood-estates", and the town name should not be needed in the URL at all. I would think Oakwood is associated with only one town.
The URL would then be http://homebuilder.com/oakwood/floor-plans for example.
As a general rule for most of SEO, the more terms you add the more you dilute your other keywords. People have a tendency to want to stuff in extra terms to gain relevancy. The process is not user friendly nor does it help with SEO.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
I'm struggling to understand (and fix) why I'm getting a 404 error. The URL includes this "%5Bnull%20id=43484%5D" but I cannot find that anywhere in the referring URL. Does anyone know why please? Thanks
Can you help with how to fix this 404 error please? It appears that I have a redirect from one page to the other, although the referring page URL works, but it appears to be linking to another URL with this code at the end of the the URL - %5Bnull%20id=43484%5D that I'm struggling to find and fix. Thanks
Technical SEO | | Nichole.wynter20200 -
Usage of keywords in URL
Hi everyone, I'm trying to optimize our website and I'm not sure what's ideal for our URL structure. We have two products: one of them is focused on B2C & the other one on B2B.
Technical SEO | | Klouwers
Our homepage is focused on the B2C product. For our B2B product, I'm not sure what's ideal. The URL for our 'homepage' of the B2B product is ourdomain.com/software. We have different target groups for our B2B software, and therefore different pages on our website. Which URL would be best to use for the keyword personal trainer software?
1. ourdomain.com/software/personal-trainer-software
2. ourdomain.com/software/personal-trainer0 -
Which URL would you choose?
1 – www.company.com/subfolder/subfolder/keyword-keyword-product (I’m able to keyword match with this url) or 2. www.company.com/subfolder/subfolder/product (no url keyword match) What would you choose? A url which is "short" but still relevant, or, a url which is more descriptive allowing “keyword” match? Be great to get your feedback guys. Many thanks Gary
Technical SEO | | GaryVictory0 -
Should I change the URL now?
Hi all, I have a client website that got hit in the latest algorithm update. It since appears that it had over 100 suspect links to it. I performed the Disavow procedure a few weeks ago via my Google Webmaster account, but have not received a message yet to say its been actioned. The majority of these suspect links go to one page. I am considering changing the base category (in Wordpress) to a different keyphrase and then submitting a new sitemap for indexing. This way there will be no actual link from a suspect website to a page on my website. Do you see what I mean? Will this help do you think? Thanks in advance.
Technical SEO | | BrandC0 -
Determine the best URL structure
Hi guys, I'm working my way through a URL restructure at the moment and I've several ideas about the best way to do it. However, it would be good to get some views on this. At the moment I'm working on a property website - http://bit.ly/N7eew7 As you can quickly see, the URL structure of the site needs a lot of work. Similar websites - http://bit.ly/WXH5WG http://bit.ly/Q3UiLC One of the sites has http://www.domain.ie/property-to-let/location/ And the other has http://www.domain.ie/rentals/location/property-to-let/ I could do with some guidance about the best steps to take with this. I've a few ideas myself but this is a massive project. Cheers, Mark
Technical SEO | | MarkScully0 -
Urls with or without .html ending
Hello, Can anyone show me some authority info on wheher links are better with or without a .html ending? Thanks is advance
Technical SEO | | sesertin0 -
Keywords
Hi All, If I had a site about a cartoon character (for example). When I add keywords to the 'keywords' meta tag, would I be best to put specific phrases such as Cartoon Character, Cartoon Character on TV, Cartoon Character on Television or would the following have the same effect: Cartoon Character, Tv, Movie, Television I was wondering if having the above instance might be less effective as the search engines might read TV, Movie, Television as less relevant to Cartoon Character. Hope that makes sense! 🙂
Technical SEO | | wedmonds0 -
Duplicate canonical URLs in WordPress
Hi everyone, I'm driving myself insane trying to figure this one out and am hoping someone has more technical chops than I do. Here's the situation... I'm getting duplicate canonical tags on my pages and posts, one is inside of the WordPress SEO (plugin) commented section, and the other is elsewhere in the header. I am running the latest version of WordPress 3.1.3 and the Genesis framework. After doing some testing and adding the following filters to my functions.php: <code>remove_action('wp_head', 'genesis_canonical'); remove_action('wp_head', 'rel_canonical');</code> ... what I get is this: With the plugin active + NO "remove action" - duplicate canonical tags
Technical SEO | | robertdempsey
With the plugin disabled + NO "remove action" - a single canonical tag
With the plugin disabled + A "remove action" - no canonical tag I have tried using only one of these remove_actions at a time, and then combining them both. Regardless, as long as I have the plugin active I get duplicate canonical tags. Is this a bug in the plugin, perhaps somehow enabling the canonical functionality of WordPress? Thanks for your help everyone. Robert Dempsey0