Yahoo Site Explorer died. Does DA and PA Seomoz parameters have all it takes to replace YSE?
-
We're trying to simplify our link analysis job when acquiring a new external link. We're wondering to know if Domain Authority Seomoz parameter is all what we need to take a decision.
Does DA Seomoz parameter takes into consideration 'domain age', 'alexa ranking', 'dmoz links', indexed pages on google', and 'inbound links vs outbound links'?
-
A few thoughts regarding your guidelines:
It can take 60 days for the PA of a new page to be updated in OSE. If the page you are attempting to acquire a link from is new I would not be concerned about the page's PA at all.
The Domain Age is not a factor I would consider at all when acquiring a link.
Toolbar PR is only updated every 3-4 months so you wont know the true PA of a page, especially if it is a new page.
I would recommend the following primary considerations when acquiring links: site DA, popularity of the page which offers the link (if it is a new page, what is the expected PA/PR of the page in 90 days), relevance of site and page and the location of the link (in content, footer, etc).
-
Hi! I've read Matt's blog post Introducing SEOmoz's Updated Page Authority and Domain Authority and now we better understand how PA and DA works. You guys do a really good job!
We check the metrics of hundreds of pages and domains when acquiring new links and that's why is very important for us to make this fast.
Now that Y!SE died and we better understand how PA and DA works we conclude that we'll be checking the following factors before acquiring new links:
- PA: should be 25+
- DA: should be 25+
- IP: links should not be from the same C class.
- Domain Age: at least 1 year old
- Indexed Pages: at least more than 30.
- IP Neighborhood: domain should not have more than 2 spammy sites on its neighborhood.
- Context and Relevance: according to target keyword.
- PR: page rank should be 1+.
- Google Cache: no more than 2 weeks latency.
We thinks that the metrics above are all what we need BUT honestly still too much to check. Seems that nobody has the magic wand!
Are we missing something? Checking more than should I check?
-
Just figured I'd toss in my $0.02.
As others have noted, Y!SE offered no metrics as to the importance/influence of a site or page in its index, so there's really nothing to compare it with. Google offers PageRank, which Linkscape also has (mozRank). But PA and DA are designed to be predictive algorithms with tons of inputs that try to best reflect how Google.com (US) values links and link metrics.
Matt Peters, our data scientist, has a blog post going up in the next few days with details about how we do this and what PA/DA are from a technical standpoint, but you can basically think of them as the best correlated query/content-agnostic metrics for Google rankings (at least, we've never measured something that could better predict rank position).
-
Will be really useful for the SEO community to see a detail of what specific metrics DA takes into consideration.
The link I shared above shows all the details.
Maybe the DA parameter became the new standard
Many SEOs have used DA as a standard for some time. When there was a problem with the Linkscape crawler a lot of SEOs were quite vocally upset as they even shared DA with clients in reporting, and this reporting was impacted by the issues experienced at the time.
Do you think there's place to improve it? We want only 1parameter for everything.
DA is the most solid form of an all-encompassing parameter. It is far from perfect, and will not be even close in 2012 and likely much longer. There are numerous major considerations which need to be considered such as: impact of social sharing, penalties, link valuation by location (footer vs in content), relevance and more.
The bottom line is Google's algorithm is hidden and likely will always be kept private. It also includes hundreds of factors. It's a struggle in futility and the impossible to mimic Google's ranking. With that said, DA is a solid attempt at a critical metric which is part of that process.
-
Thanks Ryan for your input!
Cyprus, as you said, you can't add into the DA parameter the Link Relevance and Context, but what about other metrics? Do you think there's place to improve it? We want only 1parameter for everything.
Will be really useful for the SEO community to see a detail of what specific metrics DA takes into consideration. Maybe the DA parameter became the new standard
-
I really like Ryan's answer, and I'm going to endorse it.
If you are only looking for ONE metric to judge links, then DA or PA wouldn't be a bad choice. Certainly better than the old PageRank. But I wouldn't advise using just one metric.
DA takes all of SEOmoz link metrics into consideration, including MozTrust and MozRank. Of all the metrics out there, it is best indicator of a given domain's (or page's) ability to rank for a particular phrase. We know of no other publicly available measurement that does as good of job.
That said, it shouldn't be the only thing you should look at when evaluating link prospect. Relevance, Context, number of links on the page, position and other considerations should all be brought into play.
Best of luck in your link building!
-
Everything you wanted to know about Domain Authority can be found here: http://www.seomoz.org/learn-seo/domain-authority
A few other notes:
Alexa Ranking is not a relevant metric for most aspects of SEO. Overall the ranking has been shown to be highly inaccurate for most sites and it is very easy to manipulate. I like to look at Alexa ranking to gain a rough initial idea of a site's popularity, and that's it.
Domain age isn't a relevant metric for most aspects of SEO either. There are brand new domains with high PR and 10 yr old domains with low PR. Any correlation between a site's age and it's PR seems to be simply from the idea that older sites have had more time to earn links.
Open Site Explorer does capture a site's links whether they are from dmoz or any other site. OSE also can differentiate between internal and external links.
I can see the value in adding "indexed pages on Google" to OSE. That request will quickly expand to indexed pages of the various Google sites for each country, and then to Bing as well.
I am all for adding additional metrics to support SEO. I only ask the metrics be relevant information which can be used to understand or improve SEO performance.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why my site so poorly ranks on Google
Hi 🙂 I hope you can help me for my site http://www.majordroid.com/ I really do not understand why my site so poorly ranks on Google. What can I do about that? Are there any errors or something? What can be done about that? Also when I go to the Moz Tools - Open Site Explorer to check how many backlinks I have... It says: 12 Total Links but according to the Google Webmaster tools I have in total 334 links and 138 links to the homepage. see attachment Why Open Site Explorer does not see all the links to my site, which is a possible reason? And last question, what I need to do to remove pages from Google search like this: <cite class="_Rm">/page/2</cite>. <cite class="_Rm">/page/3 and so on...</cite> Thank you 🙂 aK0x345.jpg
Moz Pro | | ivek19870 -
Backlink profile from Open Site Explorer does not seem to update
I have been monitoring our backlink profile on Open Site for over a year now and despite getting a number of new domains linking to us they are not reflected in the tool. Our URL is: www.BlueLinkERP.com Any thoughts on why this might be the case? The number of linking domains also seems very low compared with other tools we use (i.e. HubSpot)
Moz Pro | | BlueLinkERP0 -
What value am I getting from SEOmoz?
Okay, I've been using the trial version of SEOmoz for almost a week, but, I'm just not sure what to do with it to be honest. I'm not an SEO expert, so, a lot of the terminology and reports are confusing. So far the only thing I've found useful are the domain and page duplication errors, but, I can get the same info from Google Webmaster Tools. Am I missing something? We have a very simple site for a small business, not sure I can justify $99 per month for a service I don't really understand. Is this service more for SEO professionals than business owners? -Tom
Moz Pro | | TomHu0 -
How long does it typically take MOZBOT to crawl a site?
Our site has had "crawl in progress" for over 24 hours now without an update, we're dying for the results since our last changes :).
Moz Pro | | absoauto0 -
How is a site really ranking when taking into account Google places?
When I do a rankings search for one of my sites on Google and it appears high in Google places, SEO Moz tracks this as its ranking - but is this its organic ranking? My clients are wondering if things have changed and so am I? Does ranking in the Google places/map appearing on front page of google count as your ranking for that keyword? Client keeps ignoring the Google places ranking and goes looking for a placement farther down... Please explain this probably simple question to me... and if you have official Google references for this, please include them. I appreciate it a lot... be blessed ben
Moz Pro | | creativeguy0 -
Link Diagnosis and Open Site Explorer
I work at a web design firm that's starting to offer SEO to its clients. They want to keep costs down until the SEO side becomes more established, so I've been using mostly free tools to do the SEO. I've been using a website called LinkDiagnosis.com to check backlinks for clients. It says the data is provided by SEOmoz, so I thought it must be pretty reliable. However, I just signed up for the PRO trial to test out all of SEOmoz's tools (& hopefully convince my company to sign us up), and I find that the link information between the 2 tools can be vastly different! Sometimes the number of unique linking domains is very close, but other times it can be off by hundreds, even thousands, with Open Site Explorer typically providing the higher numbers. Is the Link Diagnosis tool really powered with data from SEOmoz, or does it just receive a portion of the data, since it's a free tool? I'm just trying to figure out what will be the most reliable solution for me to keep using, and the discrepancies between the two tools has caused me to question the reliability of both. Thanks, Hector
Moz Pro | | hmunoz0 -
Open Site Explorer Missing URL's
I see a link to my site on a couple different url's, but they are not listed in OSE. The links have been active for a long time too. Does OSE not track all inbound links from all sites? Thanks, Stephen
Moz Pro | | stats440 -
Certain Domains no longer recognised by open site explorer
Afternoon everyone (well, it is for me), We've been tracking the linking root domains to our domain for around 6 months now, alongside tracking these domains we have also been engaging in linking building activities. Our initial activities worked quite well with linking domains rising from around 620 to 720 in 3 months. However, recently we have seen those numbers begin to fall away, in many cases it is because certain domains have stopped linking to us, have become no=follow sites or have been archived. But, in some cases we can see the link is still there, and is being registered by other tools such as yahoo or webmaster tools. My question is really, does anyone have a way of working out why a link, that was in the past being registered by open site explorer, is no longer registering and presumably no longer passing over juice to help with domain authority. What kind of signals should i be looking for to tackle a 'decaying' link? Looking forward to hear your thoughts!
Moz Pro | | NigelJ0