Duplicate Content and Titles in SEOMoz reports
-
I've had to rename some of the pages on my site and also move them to different locations. I placed a rel="canonical" on the old page pointing to the new one. The reports on my PRO Dashboard are telling me that I have Duplicate Content and Page Title errors.
Do the SEOMoz automated reports take the rel="canonical" link into consideration or do I need to remove these pages and do a 301 redirect from the old to the new page?
-
Yes, I did misinterpret when to properly use rel canonical. Google seemed to respond the way I was expecting though. All of my new pages went into the index while the old pages were ignored.
Once a 301 is in place, is it safe to remove the old page from the server?
-
From that video i would use a 301 as Matt stated, I could not see any circustance he mentioned to use canonical unless you dont have access to do a 301, there are other reaons also, if you use a canonical, you need to update both pages as the user is not redirected the new page with a canonical.
I think you have misunderstood when to use a rel canonical, a rel canonical is good for un aviodable duplicate content, where you have to have 2 pages the same, you can tell google what is the canonical, but this is not the case for you, you canuse a 301 redirect, that is What Matt suggested as tghe best solution.
You must also remebeer whan Matt Cutts is giveing advice he is giving advice from a google point of view, what it is good for google for you to know. If you notived he said near the end that there is not a lot of difference between the amount of pagerank passed between a canonical and a 301, that means there is a difference. He also states that they only leak a littlle bit of page rank, from all tests and writings on the subject that little bit is between 5% to 15%. i would not call that little myself. From tthe original algorithm google released years ago, i believe that it is 15%, So one has to wonder how much difference there is between a canonical and a 301 in link juice passed.
-
Thanks for your response. I've been reading a lot about the rel=canonical for duplicate content so I figured that I had a situation in which I should utilize it. I also found this Matt Cuts video where he describes when to use rel=canonical and when to 301.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=zW5UL3lzBOA
-
not sure what rogerbot does here, but i would definatly 301 rather then use rel canonical, if they have no incomming links i would let them 404
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Duplicate title on Crawl
Ok, this should hopefully be a simple one. Not sure if this is a Moz crawl issue of redirect issue. Moz is reporting duplicate title for www.site.co.uk , site.co.uk and www.site.co.uk/home.aspx is this a canonical change or a moz setting I need to get this number lower.
Moz Pro | | smartcow0 -
Links being reported in Webmaster Tools
Hi Are the Total Links To Your Site, as reported in GWT, purely external inbound links ? Since these links are usually, as far as i can tell, much higher in number than any other link reporting tool and hence, i presume, more accurate, why don't services such as Moz etc include this in reporting ? I know its just a total number and link quality is whats important not quantity, but i would have thought interesting to show in reporting in conjunction with link quality info such as is already reported. Since most backlink reporting tools do show a total but always much much lower than that reported in gwt (i think) All Best Dan
Moz Pro | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
Why am I getting all these duplicate pages?
This is going for basically all my pages, but my website has 3 'duplicates' as the rest just have 2 (no index) Why are these 3 variations counting as duplicate pages? http://www.homepage.com http://homepage.com http://www.hompage.com/index.php
Moz Pro | | W2GITeam0 -
Forward slash on URL on Duplicate Content Report
Hi I'm new to this whole Moz thing, so needing help from some kind people! I've just looked at my Duplicate Page Content report and there are loads of URLs in there which are the same but are just differentiated by adding / at the end of the URL, e.g. http://youngepilepsy.org.uk/news-and-events/events http://youngepilepsy.org.uk/news-and-events/events/ Is this be a canonical issue? I can't understand why though as these aren't at the root. However when we add inline text links within the page HTML, there are some URLs with / and some without, could that be the reason? Thanks for your help! Jackie
Moz Pro | | YoungEpilepsy1 -
Seomoz puts hyphen and company name after page title in the report, why?'
Hi Community, Can you figure out why this is happening? The title in the url itself does not contain - CodeBaby. Thank you! W6yg1cJ.png
Moz Pro | | CodeBaby0 -
Duplicate content error?
I am getting a duplicate content error for the following pages: http://www.bluelinkerp.com/products/accounting/index.asp http://www.bluelinkerp.com/products/accounting/ But, of course, the 2nd link is just an automatic redirect to the index file, is it not? Why is it thinking it is a different URL? See image. NJfxA.png
Moz Pro | | BlueLinkERP0 -
Discrepancies in PA and LRDs reported in different SEOmoz tools
I've noticed a difference in the reported PA and LRD numbers for URLs depending on whether you use Open Site Explorer, or look at the same metrics from within the rankings history (in your campaign set up). I've checked this for a few URLs and what I'm seeing is the reported scores for PA and LRDs is different 9 times out of ten. The PA is sometiomes higher on one report, lower on another, or vice versa. Same for LRDs. I thought it might be because one report was lagging behind and using old data, but that would only make sense if I was seeing an increase in reported LRDs, but it just as often shows a decrease ! Is this just a bug in the campaign>rankings history report or is there a reason for the discrepancies?
Moz Pro | | Websensejim0 -
Solving duplicate content errors for what is effectively the same page.
Hello,
Moz Pro | | jcarter
I am trying out your SEOMOZ and I quite like it. I've managed to remove most of the errors on my site however I'm not sure how to get round this last one. If you look at my errors you will see most of them revolve around things like this: http://www.containerpadlocks.co.uk/categories/32/dead-locks
http://www.containerpadlocks.co.uk/categories/32/dead-locks?PageSize=9999 These are essentially the same pages because the category for Dead Locks does not contain enough products to view over more than one resulting in the fact that when I say 'View all products' on my webpage, the results are the same. This functionality works with categories with more than the 20 per page limit. My question is, should I be either: Removing the link to 'show all products' (which adds the PageSize query string value) if no more products will be shown. Or putting a no-index meta tag on the page? Or some other action entirely? Looking forward to your reply and you showing how effective Pro is. Many Thanks,
James Carter0