How not to lose link juice when linking to thousands of PDF guides?
-
Hi All,
I run an e-commerce website with thousands of products.
In each product page I have a link to a PDF guide of that product.Currently we link to it with a "nofollow" <a href="">tag.</a>
<a href="">Should we change it to window.open in order not to lose link juice?
Thanks</a>
-
Dear Egol,
I'm assuming by your answer that PDF's take link juice and JPG's don't (please correct me if I'm wrong).
Is that the case even if I have <a href="">to enlarge the image? (I use href with JQuery and not regular target=_blank)</a>
<a href="">Also, what to do about the certificates that are on other sites? (too many and rapidly changing for me to get it to my site)</a>
-
Thanks,
I was assuming that these had product dimensions, how to use, etc information. I would want all of that content on my site.
If these are certificates then I would link to them as .jpg images and that eliminates concerns about link juice.
-
Dear Egol,
Thank for the reply. I'm guessing my example for product guides was not exact.
These are not guides but rather certificates of authentication which the customers expect to see. Some I have in PDF's, some in JPG's and some I refer to a cetificate page in another site. The question is what to do...I currently use "nofollow" links on all types of certificates (jpg, pdf and links to other site). What do you suggest to do?
I was considering either window.open (which I fear would look spammy) or leaving it as is...
Thanks
-
Just saying what I would do if this was my website.
My employees would be told that getting that pdf data onto the product sales page is a top priority job... and I would call the car dealer and order my new Jaguar.
-
I don't think having them indexed would do me any good.
The important page is the product page itself - the way I see it, there is no good reason to lose link juice for these guides...
I'm trying to improve my sites overall performance.
Important note...
Also, I have some cases where the manuals are pages on the manufacturer's site. Should I change these links from follow to JS links in order not to lose the juice from my site to other sites?
-
Are you just trying to streamline your product pages, or are you experiencing a specific issue with your product pages that you're hoping this will solve?
Linking to the PDF's via a javascript function should help preserve link juice and crawl budget.
You should only add those PDF's that have been indexed to the robots.txt if you absolutely do not want them in the index, otherwise it won't really do anything to help.
-
Due to your answer I checked and I see that some of the PDF's are indexed.
I didn't know that Google does that.
It is probably from the time that the links were not "nofollow".Should I exclude them using robots.txt?
-
Are the PDF's currently being crawled and indexed?
If you want to hide the PDF's from search engines, and preserve link juice, then a javascript method like you've mentioned ought to keep things wrapped up.
You could also consider some data capture, such as requiring an e-mail address to be entered before you see the download link.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Links disappeared
Hi, I am a wedding photographer based in Liverpool. I have been trying to do my own SEO for the last 6 months. I have been hovering around the top of page two for the main search terms for the past few years. I used an SEO company before christmas who got a lot of spammy links which resulted in my site dropping to page 4 of the SERPS. With the help of this forum I managed to locate them and disavow those links, and have tried to do it myself. I have managed to gain a few "featured weddings" on national wedding blogs and wrote a few articles for another wedding blog and also some forum comments. I have also got a few links for example from a wedding band in exchange for some photographs. I have got onto page 1 about 4 times, the best result was at position 6 on page 1 but every time I have slowly dropped out again. I have methodically (once a month) checked for any of the spammy links and updated the disavow list. My competitors have at best old forum comments and the like and on checking their websites with open site explorer are not actively link building at all. I have just checked my Webmaster tools and google is only recognising 51 links. (none of my good wedding blog links are there) I have an external links csv from the 28th June with 602 links on it. I changed my website around May of this year but it is still on the same domain name www.dwliverpoolphotography.co.uk. Can anybody help? Best wishes. David.
Technical SEO | | WallerD0 -
Reciprocal links and nofollow tag
What happens if I link to a site using the nofollow tag and they are linking back to me with a dofollow link? Will it give me as much power and link juice as if it was a one way link (to me) or will Google discount the link because it's reciprocal?
Technical SEO | | Livet0 -
Do I need a link to my sitemap?
I have a very large sitemap. I submit it to both Google and Bing, but do I need a link to it? If someone went there it would probably lock their browser. Is there any danger of not having a link if I submit it to Google and Bing?
Technical SEO | | EcommerceSite0 -
Internal Link Analysis Tool
I want to get a better handle on what internal link text (and co-occurance if possible) my site currently has. We have a lot of old blog articles that provide link juice back to the main site, but with thousands of pages, we never kept track of when we internally link to a page. Are there any tools that will provide an analysis of this? OpenSiteExplorer seems like a very tedious way to do it and it didn't appear to be 100% accurate. Also, are there any tools that will provide analysis and recommendations based on keywords targeted?
Technical SEO | | TheDude0 -
Absolute and relative paths for internal links
I have been looking into absolute and relative paths for internal links, what is better for SEO? Thanks
Technical SEO | | adaptiveconsultancy0 -
2 home page domains causing split in link juice
We have 2 home page domains that are resulting in a split in links. We have mysite.com and mysite.com/index.php. The site is on Joomla and when we try and re-direct the /index.php to just mysite.com is causing an infinite loop. I have done this on other platforms with no problems - is this an issue because of Joomla? How can we complete a 301 re-direct to consolidate our link juice to one domain url?
Technical SEO | | devonkrusich0 -
Nofollow link passing link juice
Can a link which is nofollwed pass link juice ? Please see the discussion at - http://www.seomoz.org/q/if-multiple-links-on-a-page-point-to-the-same-url-and-one-of-them-is-no-followed-does-that-impact-the-one-that-isn-t
Technical SEO | | seoug_20050 -
Best practise for updating software guide
Heya! I write a guide for a specific piece of Internet-based software which is about to undergo a major patch release. No-one's going to be using the old version, so my old-version articles are essentially going to be useless, as are keywords related to the old version number. Given that, I'm intending to update all my guides to be current with the new version. However, obviously I want to keep the Google juice for the old guides, as they rank pretty well. The three options I'm considering: Simply retitle the old guides to the latest version number - "How to use Blue Widget 2.0" becomes "How to use Blue Widget 3.0". Disadvantage - my URLs still include the old version number, 2.0. Write updated guides as seperate articles and 301 redirect the old articles to them. I've done this before with some success. So, I'd 301 the URL for "How to use Blue Widget 2.0" to the url for "How to use Blue Widget 3.0", my new article. Disadvantages - possible loss of link juice? Also, I believe redirects can be kinda tricksy. Just leave both the old and new versions up there, with a link from the old version saying "outdated, check the new version". My belief is that this would be the worst idea. Should I do one of them, or something else? And why?
Technical SEO | | Cairmen0