Is This Keyword Stuffing/Spamming?
-
We are a custom patch company--we make patches for many different types of clients. I have a gallery of patches for almost every kind of client, and they all have their own pages. If I put navigation on the home page such as what I show below, will Google consider that to be too much?
Boy Scout Patches | Motorcycle Patches | Fire Patches | Police Patches | Military Patches | Sports Patches | Business and Organization Patches | Paintball Patches | Scooter Patches | In Memory Patches
They would all be links to different pages, and there would be literally 50-60 more!
Would it be better to remove the word patches from all of the links?
And then another question comes up: too many on-page links?
-
Great!
I see that you made the design wider. I think that is an improvement.
Thanks for the report.
-
Hi Marisa. That's good news. Keep in mind that it is not uncommon that you get an initial bounce with optimization. Keep an eye on the ranking as it may fluctuate and eventually settle after a few crawls to consistent rank.
-
So guess what? I added a links with images on the home page just for the most relevant keywords, like you said, and my ranking improved!
-
Yeah, you would think! No one seems to care! I think getting more Facebook and Twitter followers is the hardest and most frustrating part of my job!
-
We have a Pintrest account. Why I haven't put a link to it on the homepage, I don't know. Thanks for the reminder!
-
You've got some social channels working now...but Pinterest is a missing element and is taking off like lightning.
-
I think that patches could be powerful powerful in social media. Patches - both directly and indirectly - are a social connection badge. So if you can get people to start sharing it could lead to a lot of traffic and sales.
-
Thanks for the advice. Having a quote form directly on the home page has increased conversion by MASSIVE amounts, so I don't see that going anywhere any time soon.
And thanks I'm trying not to panic too much!
-
Thank you for taking the time. I think everything you said is excellent advice.
Since I've already done the KW research and know the most popular types of patches, I'm one step ahead. I can see how making users more engaged can actually help ranking, since I've been hearing a lot lately about how Google takes into account things like bounce rate and time on site to gauge relevancy. I think I am going to do exactly what you said about including an image and a link for the most popular types of patches.
As far as the animation goes, I hate it too and think it's distracting. I also want to get rid of it because Flash seems to be on the outs. The owner is in love with it, and I don't see it going anywhere anytime soon.
-
Do plenty of research (in Keywords, Analytics and SEOmoz) before you start making changes to your homepage, so you'll be making informed decisions. Your get a quote section is taking up a lot of valuable homepage real estate. You might consider creating a banner link to a quote page and use that space for beneficial content. You can create links to your quote page from just about anywhere, so it shouldn't be hard for people to find.
Good luck. Resist the temptation to panic and start grabbing at straws. Be methodical about your changes.
-
I just went to the site and reread your question.... visited some competitors too.
You are looking to add navigation to the homepage of the site that links straight to deeper category pages.
If I had a site in this niche I would do KW research to learn about the most often searched types of patches. Then my homepage would be a gallery of fantastic images - one for each of the most often searched categories. When a person clicks the image they would go to a fantastic presentation of patches of that type.
Google knows everything that everybody everywhere is searching for. My belief is that if your homepage has links to internal pages for everything that everybody everywhere is searching for then that is kickass optimization because it clearly says that you are relevant relevant relevant.
This type of gallery would immediately get people drilling deeper into my site and finding that we have done patches for the organizations and themes that they are looking for - so it should be good for conversions too.
======================
<unsolicited comment=""> I see the animation on the homepage... I don't know what your site looked like before that. But I am wondering if the percentage of people going to deeper pages and placing orders dropped after that animation went up. If this was my site I would be looking into that and be ready to retire it if the data looked that way. </unsolicited>
My bet is that if you have a "gallery of work" on the homepage as described above that the site will rank a little better and sell a lot better. Just sayin my gut because I find it almost impossible to focus on other information while that animation is running... and although that animation is a really good one and amusing, I would find out if it is makin' any money.
-
Thanks for the advice. You reminded me that I'm designing for the user, not the bots. I was just getting a little desperate because, no, our site, is not new--it's a PR4 site that's been online since 1998--but it's continuously dropping in Google. It's now one space from the bottom of the first page for the keyword "embroidered patches." We used to rule Google, so I'm just trying anything I can, while still being legit.
All the sites above us are pr1-3 sites, so I'm starting to wonder if something's wrong with the site itself, so I've been making tweaks.
It's www.stadriemblems.com in case anyone's curious.
-
ha ha...
I am just sayin' what I would do. Not sayin' that it is the best.
I am waiting to get a lot of thumbs down for that post.
-
I will always defer to Egol. Proceed with carpet bombing for 6-8 months, then conduct In-Page Analytics and re-consider aforementioned approach.
-
I would use it.
.... because it is bombing anchor text at all of those pages.
-
You don't need the word "patches" on all those links. Users will know those are patch categories and don't need to read it. Having "patches" in those links is not what is going to bolster your homepage optimization for keywords such as "custom patches" or "custom embroidery patches" etc. A good homepage title and homepage content will do that for you.
I'm guessing your site is relatively new and may not have much domain authority (I may be wrong). If that is the case, pare down the volume (10-15) of links on the homepage to the categories that generate the most business for you: ie "sports patches" "business patches" etc. You'll get better juice distribution to those important pages if there are fewer homepage links.
Once you pare it down, create a left nav link to the rest of your patches - basically a landing page with the rest of the links to the other pages.
-
Hi Marisa,
For 50 - 60 links per page, all containing the word "patches", I'd consider cutting back. You can carry out on-page optimisation of these pages including the word "patches", but for site-wide links, or from the home page, this is going to be quite excessive. If you look at a successful site like Interflora (http://www.interflora.co.uk/), they've been careful not to over-do the internal links for terms along the lines of "[keyword] flowers." There's some relatively aggressive SEO on that page, but nowhere near 50 - 60 links.
A long time ago, Matt Cutts specified that you'd want no more than 100 links per page, but it's generally agreed that a good site can get away with more than that nowadays. The blog post about this is here: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/questions-answers-with-googles-spam-guru
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Ecommerce SEO: Is it bad to link to product/category pages directly from content pages?
Hi ! In Moz' Whiteboard friday video Headline Writing and Title Tag SEO in a Clickbait World, Rand is talking about (among other things) best practices related to linking between search, clickbait and conversion pages. For a client of ours, a cosmetics and make-up retailer, we are planning to build content pages around related keywords, for example video, pictures and text about make-up and fashion in order to best target and capture search traffic related to make-up that is prevalent earlier in the costumer journey. Among other things, we plan to use these content pages to link directly to some of the products. For example a content piece about how to achieve full lashes will to link to particular mascaras and/or the mascara category) Things is, in the Whiteboard video Rand Says:
Algorithm Updates | | Inevo
_"..So your click-bait piece, a lot of times with click-bait pieces they're going to perform worse if you go over and try and link directly to your conversion page, because it looks like you're trying to sell people something. That's not what plays on Facebook, on Twitter, on social media in general. What plays is, "Hey, this is just entertainment, and I can just visit this piece and it's fun and funny and interesting." _ Does this mean linking directly to products pages (or category pages) from content pages is bad? Will Google think that, since we are also trying to sell something with the same piece of content, we do not deserve to rank that well on the content, and won't be considered that relevant for a search query where people are looking for make-up tips and make-up guides? Also.. is there any difference between linking from content to categories vs. products? ..I mean, a category page is not a conversion page the same way a products page is. Looking forward to your answers 🙂0 -
Does my website need the SSL Cert / HTTPS Update?
So, I own a car shipping company called Car Shipping Carriers ( www.carshippingcarriers.com ) and I am trying to find out if I need the SSL Cert / HTTPS for the site. I attached a picture that shows I dropped a HUGE amount of rank back in the beginning of August 2014 and that the SSL/HTTPS update happened at nearly the exact same time. I do have a quote box on my website asking for: Name, Phone, Email, Origin, Destination, Move Date, Year/Make/Model of Vehicle, and Carrier Type. I was unsure if I needed the HTTPS because I am not asking for sensitive data, but it seems that I might need to bite the bullet and update the site to HTTPS. What do you all think? Any expert opinion and/or advice? JWV4N1o
Algorithm Updates | | Dutko23850 -
Studies showing that social sharing does/doesn't affect rankings?
I'm currently researching this area in order to show to a client that social shares aren't as valuable for SEO as they might think. Can anyone point me in the direction of the best studies done on this topic? Thanks in advance!
Algorithm Updates | | QubaSEO0 -
All keywords increasing rank except URL Keyword, whats going on?
Hello, Our website is a private equity firm database, privateequityfirms.com. We rank well for a number of private equity definitions and terms and have been increasing rank in those terms but unfortunately we have been losing ranking in our main keyword and url "private equity firms" .We have ranked as high as 3rd under wikipedia. The only real changes we have made are too the sitemap that is auto generated every time some thing is changed in the database. Does anyone have any ideas what is going on? I have included a Image to help show the problem. Thank you! MozAnalyticsPDF115_zpsddec64fa.png
Algorithm Updates | | Nicktaylor10 -
Sub-domains and keyword rich domains
Hello All I'm hoping for some opinions as i am confused as to the best action for me to take. The problem:
Algorithm Updates | | jonny512379
Although i say the below, we have never been penalised by Google, not taken part in any bad link building and don't do too bad with SERP. but i worry Google may not like what i do these days. We have one main site that is broken down into areas/cities (i,e London, Manchester, etc) so the domain looks like www.domain.co.uk/London But in addition to this we also use Sub-domains to target popular areas (i,e. http://London.domain.co.uk).
These sub-domains take the content from the main site but of course only display results relevant to London and are optimised for "London + Keyword"
Any page that gets duplicated (i.e London.domain.co.uk/profile123 and www.domain.co.uk/profile123 are ALMOST the same content) we add a rel="canonical" link that points to the main domain+page on www.
All these sites have a large amount of links back to www.domain.co.uk/?Page so the user can also search in other areas other then London, etc. This method has worked well for us and is popular with both users and Google search results. All sites/sub-domains are added to GWT under the same account and all sites have unique sitemaps. I do however worry that Google may class this as link manipulation owing to the amount of links pointing back to the main domain and its pages (this is not the reason we use the sub-domains though) In addition to the above sub-domains we have a few domain names (5/6) that are keyword rich that we also place the same content on (i,e www.manchester-keyword.co.uk would show only content relevant to Manchester), and again these sites have links back to the main domain, so users can navigate other areas of the UK. I worry that these additional domains may also not be liked by Google What do people think? I have started to reduce/replace some of the additional keyword rich domains with sub-domains from the main site and then 301 the keyword rich domain (i.e. www.manchester-Keyword.co.uk now goes to http://Manchester.domain.co.uk) as i feel sub-domains may not be penalised as much as unique domains are.
There are domains that i dont really want to 301 as they bring in good amounts of traffic and users have bookmarked them, etc. Any opinions or what you think i should do would be great, as i really worry that if Google stops giving us good results, i'm in real trouble. Although im not sure if what we do is wrong with Google or not.0 -
Linking to authority / competitor website!? Yes or No?
Here is the dilema .... People say, don't be afraid to link to authority website! What if an authority website in particular niche is actually competing with you in the Search, but you do have a review profile there? Is it ok to link to that profile ? Should I include a no follow tag ? Another case : some other authority high ranked website competing in search with mine directly has a profile page for my company, but this authority website has blocked Google bot to crawl the profile page all the reviews there !? Can I still link to that page and will this be appreciated by Google ? Am I passing PR and link juice from my website to those direct comeptitors / authority websites ?
Algorithm Updates | | montauto0 -
Panda / Penguin Behavior ? Recovery?
Our site took a major fall on March 23rd, ie Panda 3.4 and then another smaller one on April 24th, ie Penguin. I have posted a few times in here trying get help on what items to focus on. Been doing this for 13 years, white hat, never chased algos but of course learned as I went. As soon as the fall hit one expert said it was links, which I kinda doubted because we never went after them but we have some but only a handful in comparison to really good authorative links. I concentrated on cleaning up duplicate content due to tags in a blog that only had 7 posts (an add on section to the site) then focuses efforts on just going through and making content better. Had other overlapping content that I would guess would pass inspection but I cleaned it up. After 6 weeks no movement back up, another expert here said yes, he saw some bad links so I should check it out. So back to focusing on links, I actually run a report and discover questionable links, and successfully get about 25 removed. Low numbers but we have only about 50 that were questionable. No contact info on the other directories so I guess we are stuck. Here is where I just go in circles... When our site fell on March 23rd we had 13 of our main pages still ranking at number 1 and 2 on each keyword phrase. Penguin hit and they fell about 10 spots. EXCEPT, one... This one keyword phrase and page stayed on top and ranked at #1 throught he storm. (finally fell to #4 but still remains up there). The whole site is down 90%, we only have 3 fair keyword phrases really ranking out of 250. The mystery is that the keyword phrase that was ranking was the one that supposedly had way over the % of anchor text, 7% of our links go to that page. The other pages that fell on Penguin had no pages linking back. I have been adding blog posts to our site, I post one an in a few days it gets indexed, have one of those ranking at #2 for the keyword, moved up from #4 a week after posting it in the blog. (google searches shows 80K) Just seems like the site should bounce back if new content is able to rank, why not the old? Did other people hit by Panda and Penguin see a sitewide fall or are they still ranking for some terms? I would love to see some discusson on success stories of bouncing back after Panda and Penguin. I see the WP success story but that was pretty sudden after it was brought to Google's attention. Looking for that small business that fixed something and saw improvement. Give me hope here please.
Algorithm Updates | | Force70 -
Keyword density and meta tags
Hi, I've just checked the number of keywords appearing on my website's pages. On some of them the keyword density was way too high (7-10%) if you included the meta tags, but all under 3.5% if I didn't include the keywords and description meta tags. So my question is - when looking at number of keywords used per page, do I have to worry about what's in those meta tags? Do the keywords in there count towards keyword density / number of keywords per page? Thanks, Luke
Algorithm Updates | | McTaggart0