Proving Bad Intent
-
Okay, so based on common sense re: author name and generic comment...
...I'm pretty sure this blog comment awaiting approval is aimed at getting users to a phony site in hopes they will make a donation to a fraudster impersonating Johns Hopkins.
But if you check out the URL, you'll see they are not idiots. It's an .edu address with a high DA.
Two questions:
- Are my suspicions well founded?
- How would I go about proving this, in a less clear cut case?
Author : how to grow weed (IP: 173.208.91.231 , 173-208-91-231.ipvnow.com)
E-mail : Diekema@gmail.com
URL : http://apps.pathology.jhu.edu/blogs/pancreas/?p=121
Whois : http://whois.arin.net/rest/ip/173.208.91.231
Comment:
After study a few of the blog posts on your website now, and I truly like your way of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark website list and will be checking back soon. Pls check out my web site as well and let me know what you think -
One thought is that it would add legitimacy to the comment, and get it approved. On some systems, the first comment needs to be manually approved, and after that the person can freely comment.
-
We all agree that the comment to my client's site is spam.
The issue is whether http://apps.pathology.jhu.edu/blogs/pancreas/?p=121 is also a spam site. I initially thought it might be sophisticated fraud: someone replicated actual content form an authentic Johns Hopkins site with the aim of raking in donations. But that doesn't explain the URL and seemingly legit links.
So I'm left wondering why the bad guy sent spam to my client's site, with an authentic site's URL. What was he hoping to achieve?
-
I don't believe that is the site being spammed. I believe the OP received a spam post on a different site, and the person posting the spam claimed that their URL was the JHU site.
-
That's wild. If it's spam, I'm not sure what's going on.
If you go the website that's being linked to, the site actually looks semi-legit.
I chased down a few of the links and the only external one I can find is to a guy who rides his bike to raise awareness of John Hopkins...and the "official" site has links from legit, personal blogs that are surely real.
And...the only outbound links appear on the ste appear to be completely legit to real places.
Maybe I'm missing something, but why would someone be spamming this site? (Assuming they weren't trying to build the authority before they built their links...which really wouldn't be smart anyways.)
Just so I know I'm not losing my mind...we're talking about: http://apps.pathology.jhu.edu/blogs/pancreas/?p=121 right?
-
If you do a search on part of the comment, you'll see it duplicated all across the web https://blekko.com/ws/+%22study+a+few+of+the+blog+posts+on+your+website+now,+and+I+truly+like+your+way+of+blogging%22
so it is certainly a spam comment. The URL looks decently legit, but the email is a gmail address, certainly a spam author name, and comment is spam. Not sure that they're trying to defraud anyone regarding JHU, but it is certainly spam and I'd just delete it and go on.
-
Yes it is a spam site.
Google the email address and it pops up on several spam trackers.
https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=Diekema%40gmail.com
|
Date |
IP Address |
Username |
Email |
|
|
| 9-Mar-12 07:33 | 173.234.161.143 | Hai Tanzi | Diekema@gmail.com ||
|
| 14-Jan-12 03:32 | 200.222.13.135 | top 10 dubstep songs | Diekema@gmail.com ||
|
| 10-Jan-12 06:06 | 108.62.46.70 | decorator | Diekema@Gmail.com ||
|
| 30-Nov-11 04:28 | 173.234.248.159 | how to attract men | Diekema@gmail.com ||
|
<fieldset><legend>Legend</legend></fieldset>
|
| Toxic IP address or "bad" email domain |
| Highlighted | Hot IP or disposable email address |I just delete all comments that even smells of spam.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
User intent and ranking
Hello, I was doing search to see who ranks on the keyword "bike tours" i noticed a lot of website rank without content "text". Is it because they fulfil the user intent with a search box where you can search by date and destination, trip type and price that google ranks those webpages ? It is the same for the keyword Paris bike tours https://www.fattiretours.com/paris How do they rank with so little content (once again is it because the fulfil the user intent ) Thank you,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoanalytics0 -
If I nofollow outbound external links to minimize link juice loss > is it a good/bad thing?
OK, imagine you have a blog, and you want to make each blog post authoritative so you link out to authority relevant websites for reference. In this case it is two external links per blog post, one to an authority website for reference and one to flickr for photo credit. And one internal link to another part of the website like the buy-now page or a related internal blog post. Now tell me if this is a good or bad idea. What if you nofollow the external links and leave the internal link untouched so all internal links are dofollow. The thinking is this minimizes loss of link juice from external links and keeps it flowing through internal links to pages within the website. Would it be a good idea to lay off the nofollow tag and leave all as do follow? or would this be a good way to link out to authority sites but keep the link juice internal? Your thoughts are welcome. Thanks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Rich_Coffman0 -
AddThis good or bad for SEO - Urgent
I have heard rumours that AddThis isn't good for SEO is that correct? Just thinking about adding it to my site.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoman100 -
Bad Backlink?
Hi I found this site whilst looking through WMT backlinks to our site: http://www.buildingarena.co.uk/companies/key-industrial-equipment Is this type of iFrame of our site a bad signal to Google? It's not something we've done, so I'd like to know before getting it removed. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeckyKey0 -
Quick Question: Is it Bad for SEO to paste from Word to your CMS?
Hey just a quick question I'm having trouble finding a definitive answer to: Is the markup that is transferred from Word docs bad for SEO? We are managing to paste it and it looks fine, but the developers are worried that the extra code will be bad for SEO. Does anyone have solution besides pasting into Text Editor and formatting in the CMS? Is this necessary or can we just leave the extra code? Thank you!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | keL.A.xT.o0 -
Updating existing content - good or bad?
Hi All, There are many situations where I encounter the need (or the wish) to update existing content. Here are few reasons: Some update turned up on the subject that does not justify a new posy / article but rather just adding two lines. The article was simply poorly written yet the page has PR as it is a good subject and is online for quite some time (alternatively I can create a new and improved article and 301 the old one to the new). Improving titles and sub titles of old existing articles. I would love to hear your thoughts on each of the reasons... Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeytzNet1 -
New links appeared, how do I test to see if they are good or bad?
I've just noticed 5 links appear via Majestic. Opensiteexplorer hasnt picked these up yet. I want to check if I should get these removed or leave them be. How can I check to see if the link is good or bad?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JohnPeters0 -
Are dropdown menus bad for SEO
I have an ecommerce shop here: http://m00.biz/UHuGGC I've added a submenu for each major category and subcategory of items for sale. There are over 60 categories on that submenu. I've heard that loading this (and the number of links) before the content is very bad for SEO. Some will place the menu below the content and use absolute positioning to put the menu where it currently is now. It's a bit ridiculous in doing things backwards and wondering if search engines really don't understand. So the question is twofold: (1) Are the links better in a bottom loading sidemenu where they are now? (2) Given the number of links (about 80 in total with all categories and subcategories), is it bad to have the sidemenu show the subcategories which, in this instance, are somewhat important? Should I just go for the drilldown, e.g. show only categories and then show subcategories after? Truth is that users probably would prefer the dropdown with all the categories and second level subcategories, despite the link number and placement.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | attorney1