Mobile Site & SEO
-
If i create a mobile site for a client will google crawl that site for mobile results or will it effect my rankings.
My guess is no, just want to make sure.
Obviously code will be different.
-
I just saw a huge jump for rank on a keyword and went to the SERPs to verify it and found it to be a mobile version of the page (it does not look pretty).
From what I read, I should put rel=canonical tags on the mobile site's pages that indicate the main website's pages to be the canonical version. Yes?
-
Hi Cyrus, I hit the same road block and I was wondering if you still stick to your comment above for 2013.
-
Google will crawl a mobile site as long as it has a good site architecture and contains content that is relevant to what mobile users are searching for. It is important that when creating a mobile site to include a mobile sitemap as this will tell Google that you are targeting mobile users and index the websites according to the various handsets.
The key points to a mobile site are:
Relevant Pages Titles and Descriptions
Appropriate keywords in content Clean HTML coding -
Thanks Bryson - appreciate your insight - and am always happy to get your input on mobile SEO.
-
Popular tactic, but usually makes a site less visible to mobile searchers, not more. Wrote in Search Engine Land last year about how disallowing their mobile site made Home Depot nearly impossible to find in search here: http://searchengineland.com/why-mobile-friendly-is-not-mobile-seo-66192
Better to properly redirect user agents, including Googlebot mobile and smartphone Googlebot as Google explains here: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/12/introducing-smartphone-googlebot-mobile.html
-
I really wouldn't recommend this as you're potentially making your site invisible to smartphone searchers. Googlebot mobile is Google's featurephone crawler and smartphone searchers usually get a variation of the desktop index. There's no need to use robots.txt at all if you properly redirect Googlebot mobile and smartphone Googlebot, as the right pages will be presented to the right searchers.
-
Cyrus, thanks for the mention. Appreciate it.
Glad to see more people talking about mobile SEO. I agree responsive web design can work well for duplicate pages, but I think there's often a case to be made for dedicated mobile content. I also think SEOs in general are too concerned with splitting link equity between desktop and mobile sites when mobile sites can rank without link equity with Google's Skip Redirect/Old Possum update in December. I have a mobile search column in Search Engine Land where I discussed responsive design and SEO if you're interested in learning more: http://searchengineland.com/for-mobile-seo-ask-what-do-mobile-searchers-need-116072
The best way to build a mobile site for better visibility in search is really to build a hybrid of responsive pages and dedicated mobile content. I've detailed the process here: http://searchengineland.com/how-to-best-optimize-your-mobile-site-for-seo-112940
-
This actually isn't true. Google has indexed mobile sites for years and showed them when relevant. But now with Google's Old Possum/Skip Redirect update in December you start to see a lot more mobile URLs ranking in smartphone search where desktop URLs were previously. Screenshots of Old Possum in the wild here: http://www.brysonmeunier.com/skip-redirectold-possum-in-google-smartphone-search-results/
-
There is the solution. I will add it to my robots.txt and use a no index attribute..........That i think is the easiest.
It would be nice to continue this discussion to see what everyone else has to say : ]
-
Hi Waqid,
Yes, if you create a mobile site that is accessible, search engines may discover and crawl it. There is a lot of debate surrounding this, but if they discover duplicate content, you might be dinged in the rankings.
This is a problem with 10,000 solutions.The best practice today, and one that search engines are leaning towards, is a SINGLE URL approach, in which you use CSS style sheets and HTML5 to get your content to display correctly across all browsers, both desktop and mobile.
In reality, this is often more difficult than is practical, so workarounds are required. At a minimum, if you do build separate pages for mobile, make sure they contain the rel=canonical tag pointing to the original URL of your main site. That way, if a search engine discovers these pages, they won't penalize you for duplicate content and will be able to give proper attribution.
Bryson Meunier has a blog on the subject of mobile SEO that's pretty insightful. You can find it here.
Hope this helps! Best of luck with your SEO.
-
If Google does crawl mobile sites would it not make sense that searches from mobile devices would be influenced? when you search Google from a mobile phone the URLs within the SERPs don't show m.yourdomain they show www.yourdomain.
I can see Google crawling these sites to get help assess a company. Did the user have a good experience? etc..
-
Google does crawl the Mobile sites. I have seen that happen several times. The best way to handle this is via robots.txt Lets say your site is yourdomain.com and mobile site is at m.yourdomain.com yourdomain.com/robots.txt User-agent: googlebot-mobile Disallow: / m.yourdomain.com/robots.txt User-agent: googlebot-mobile Disallow: User-agent: Googlebot Disallow: / I hope that helps.
-
please explain more, not enough info here, it's a mobile site you are launching for a client? it will get indexed if you allow it to get indexed. will it effect your rankings or your clients main site rankings? need more info for an answer
-
I dont think Google indexes it. When you go to any site via Google it never shows phone results. Once you click on a SERP result it first goes to the site and then a code in the site loads the mobile version. You set the mobile site in .htaccess. Hope this helps.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Robots.txt & meta noindex--site still shows up on Google Search
I have set up my robots.txt like this: User-agent: *
Technical SEO | | RoxBrock
Disallow: / and I have this meta tag in my on a Wordpress site, set up with SEO Yoast name="robots" content="noindex,follow"/> I did "Fetch as Google" on my Google Search Console My website is still showing up in the search results and it says this: "A description for this result is not available because of this site's robots.txt" This site has not shown up for years and now it is ranking above my site that I want to rank for this keyword. How do I get Google to ignore this site? This seems really weird and I'm confused how a site with little content, that has not been updated for years can rank higher than a site that is constantly updated and improved.1 -
Mobile & desktop pages
I have a mobile site (m.example.com) and a desktop site (example.com). I want search engines to know that for every desktop page there is a mobile equivalent. To do this I insert a rel=alternate on the desktop pages to the mobile equivalent. On the mobile pages I insert a rel=canonical to it's equivalent desktop page. So far so good BUT: Almost every desktop page has 4 or 5 copies (duplicate content). I get rid of this issue by using the rel=canonical to the source page. Still no problem here. But what happens if I insert a rel=alternate to the mobile equivalent on every copy of the source page? I know it sounds stupid but the system doesn't allow me to insert a rel=alternate on just one page. It's all or nothing! My question: Does Google ignore the rel=alternate on the duplicate pages but keeps understanding the link between the desktop source page & mobile page ? Or should I avoid this scenario? Many Thanks Pieter
Technical SEO | | Humix0 -
Bing is not Indexing my site.
Hi, My website is four months old and has more than 8000 pages. Bing has indexed only 8 pages till date and Google also keeps playing hide and seek with it. There was a time when google indexed almost all the pages of my site but now there are only 5000 pages indexed. Moreover when I check my site on google (by typing site:socktail.com), it shows only 26 pages. Please let me know what should I do. If somebody wants to take a look, my website is http://socktail.com Thanks
Technical SEO | | saurabh19050 -
If you are organizing the site structure for an ecommerce site, how would you do it?
Should you use not use slashes and use all dashes or use just a few slashes and the rest with dashes? For example, domain.com/category/brand/product-color-etc OR domain.com/anythinghere-color-dimensions-etc Which structure would you rather go for and why?
Technical SEO | | Zookeeper0 -
Any Insights On HTML5 Parallax Sites & SEO?
Looking for any insights regarding experience with optimization and HTML5 websites that use parallax scrolling making the website only one page (single unique URL). If done right, I've seen a number of these sites with great UX, clean design and nice layouts, but it comes down to only being able to optimize a single page. Does Google view single page sites as less authoritative? I'll open the floor to any comments at all about this. Thanks in advance Mozzers.
Technical SEO | | PHDL0 -
Pintrest SEO
Has any testing been done to determine if Pintrest helps a website ranking?
Technical SEO | | StreetwiseReports0 -
Young site trying hard, but banging head against the wall -- Site Review
Hi All New to PRO but we're seriously committed to getting this working. And firstly thank you to anyone who offers any useful thoughts and insights. We've launched a new site, unfortunately late to the market for the season and are really struggling to get search engine recognition. Site: http://www.ignitehats.co.uk/ We're continuously adding new content, slowly gathering more links and working hard to promote socially. But even on our clearest search terms like "Ignite hats" we're down on page 4. Both GWT and the Seomoz tools highlight no big problems (a few titles that are too long) but otherwise nothing. Maybe wrongly we requested that the Google spam team review our site incase it was being penalised, but got a template response saying the site was not in their spam system (phew, there wasn't a reason it should be we believe). We're wondering if this is just that our site is just too young? It's been live for 6 weeks. But worry maybe this is not the case. We've had success with another site we run much sooner than this. Any help or pointers would be really appreciated. Similar stories and what others have done, at least to give us some confidence to carry on would be great. Thanks for reading.
Technical SEO | | JHill0 -
Proxy servers and SEO
I read somewhere that reverse proxys can cause issue for search engines. Our server is using SQUID. What potential issues there might be?
Technical SEO | | Jani1