Google Penalisation - Any help would be appreciated!
-
Hi,
We’ve recently received a Google notification of unnatural linking along with a confirmation that we're being penalised. There were a few other sites that we owned that perhaps had too many links pointing to our main domain so we trimmed them down and submitted a reconsideration request and got the following back:"Dear site owner or webmaster of http://www.refreshcartridges.co.uk/,
We received a request from a site owner to reconsider http://www.refreshcartridges.co.uk/ for compliance with Google's Webmaster Guidelines.
We've reviewed your site and we still see links to your site that violate our quality guidelines.
Specifically, look for possibly artificial or unnatural links pointing to your site that could be intended to manipulate PageRank. Examples of unnatural linking could include buying links to pass PageRank or participating in link schemes.
We encourage you to make changes to comply with our quality guidelines. Once you've made these changes, please submit your site for reconsideration in Google's search results.
If you find unnatural links to your site that you are unable to control or remove, please provide the details in your reconsideration request.
If you have additional questions about how to resolve this issue, please see our Webmaster Help Forum for support.
Sincerely,
Google Search Quality Team"I want to stress that we have never in the past and do not currently buy any backlinks. The problem that we face now is that our site has been online for best part of a decade, there are thousands of people linking to us and I have absolutely no idea where to start.
We don’t use an SEO Company but in the past few months have been using SEOmoz to improve our on-page optimisation. I know it’s a massive ask but if could a member of the SEOmoz community or a staff member quickly take a gander and let us know if anything in particular sticks out like a sore thumb it would mean a great deal to me.
Of course, if needed we’ll employ the services of an SEO company but I’m hoping one of you guys will see something immediately obvious that could really help us out!
Thanks in advance.
Kind regards
Chris
-
All in all this has been a pretty bad news day
Right then, time to get cracking. Thanks for all your help today Ryan, it is really appreciated.
-
Unfortunately no.
The way you described is for when you are algorithmically penalized, but not for a manual penalty. For a manual penalty you need to address all the bad links.
Violating Google Guidelines is not a crime, but a legal mindset would probably best convey the situation. If you are caught stealing money, would a judge be satisfied with you returning most of it? No. The judge would require you return all of the stolen money. When you build manipulative links, Google wants them all addressed.
-
Actually, sorry, one more question. I appreciate all the help you're giving me and don't mean to bombard you with what if's!
I'm assuming that you're allowed a certain percentage of 'bad' links when compared with the number of 'good' links. For example, if the webmaster of a massive website such as Amazon log in to their Google Webmaster Tools panel I'm assuming they don't have any penalty notices caused by a few crummy links that will invariably be on a FFA site somewhere when weighed against their 425,000,000 good links.
As such, will our task be to just remove as many bad links as we can and then whatever remains will hopefully be offset by the good?
-
**I really don't want to have to get a new domain name so I guess we'll have to just get cracking. **
Obtaining a new domain name is the most drastic step possible and not recommended in most cases. It would be done primarily due to a site owner's inability to resolve the penalty themselves and not being able to afford hiring someone else to do it.
Purely out of interest though, surely a competitor could just keep adding our site to FFA directories and unrelated blogs and make it impossible for us to get the penalty removed?
What you are asking about is simply not a concern if you take the proper SEO steps on your domain. Having a penalty is like having your house on fire. Your question is something like "Should I put out the fire? What is someone else comes and lights a match at my house?" It is more theoretical then a realistic issue.
-
Oh dear, that's not what I wanted to hear!
I really don't want to have to get a new domain name so I guess we'll have to just get cracking. Purely out of interest though, surely a competitor could just keep adding our site to FFA directories and unrelated blogs and make it impossible for us to get the penalty removed?
-
Chris H, the above answer was a direct response to Christopher Wood's question. Please disregard.
-
Hi Chris,
In brief, your efforts are good but they will not lead to a penalty removal. Once you have a manual penalty, you need to obtain a comprehensive list of every known link to your site. Even if you use all the links from Google and OSE, it is not enough. You need all the links from multiple toolsets. Next, you need to go through every link and determine which links violate Google's Guidelines. Lastly, you need to contact every site owner who is providing a manipulative link and convince them to remove it. If the link is not removed, you need to very thoroughly document all aspects of the process.
Most people who attempt the above fail to satisfy Google's requirements. There is an incredible amount of work involved.
-
Would it be less time to get a new domain name and start over?
I'd like to think that it's not quite at that stage. Regardless, it would be nice to know what exactly had been done so we could ensure that it just wouldn't happen again.
I lose sleep at night worrying because I posted in the World Rock Paper Scissors Associations Website's forum a comment about a bankruptcy lawyer.
Waaaaaaa? I'm really worried now. Ryan, when you say there is actually such an association are you talking between such a site and Refresh Cartridges?
-
Would it be less time to get a new domain name and start over?
That's always an option. Many site owners do not wish to take this approach due to having a domain name which matches their company name. Other site owners have owned their domain for many years and do not wish to lose the links they earned.
If you have a keyword domain name or other low value domain that has not earned many links, then changing domains may be the best approach.
I lose sleep at night worrying because I posted in the World Rock Paper Scissors Associations Website's forum a comment about a bankruptcy lawyer.
I assumed you were joking but then realized there actually is such an association. Clearly one link will not cause a penalty. I have viewed dozens of penalized sites and they all had an overwhelmingly spammy profile with 90%+ of the links being questionable.
-
Hi Ryan,
Thank-you so much for such a helpful post. I've removed the links from refreshcreations.co.uk, computerarticles.co.uk and vatloophole.co.uk with immediate effect. These are all sites which I own so removing links to my 'baby' felt a little bit gutting but as the links were all sitewide it is entirely possible that Google saw them as being manipulative. I'm assuming that once they confirm that they are no longer penalising us that I could reinstate the links with a nofollow attribute?With regard to the link for http://www.tei-c.org.uk/Digital_Technology_for_Graphic_Design I have e-mailed them asking to be removed but I don't hold up much hope for them doing so - God knows where this link came from! Rather naively I'm hoping that Google isn't worried about an odd link here or there on a PR0 site which I have no control over so will now request reconsideration and see what happens.
Just to confirm, am I correct in saying that article writing is still alive but that the articles should be relevant and of a good quality but only include a link to the site in the 'about the author' section? I only ask as this was going to be our next project; writing high quality articles for various technology sites with a link back to Refresh Cartridges.
Am going to have a thorough look through your http://www.seomoz.org/blog/identifying-link-penalties-in-2012 post now and the comments and ensure there's nothing else we can do.
Thanks again for your help.
-
Would it be less time to get a new domain name and start over?
I lose sleep at night worrying because I posted in the World Rock Paper Scissors Associations Website's forum a comment about a bankruptcy lawyer.
-
Hi Chris,
Based on your post, it seems you received a notice in your Google Webmaster Tools informing you your site was penalized for manipulative links. You then submitted a Reconsideration Request to which Google basically repeated the original message....your site is manually penalized for manipulative links.
The bad news is this type of penalty is the most difficult penalty that can be received. It takes a great deal of time and effort following specific steps to remove. To gain a bit of details regarding the penalty, please review this article: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/identifying-link-penalties-in-2012
Using OSE, I noticed the top link to your site seems manipulative:
http://www.tei-c.org.uk/Digital_Technology_for_Graphic_Design
You also have many other low quality links showing which appear manipulative in nature:
http://www.refreshcreations.co.uk/ (sitewide footer link)
http://www.computerarticles.co.uk/ (it appears the link was removed but it also seems this site is operated by your company)
**I want to stress that we have never in the past and do not currently buy any backlinks. **
You may not pay for them, but it seems many links were created by yourself or an agent (employee, developer, seo, link builder, etc) working on your behalf. These links are manipulative according to search engine guidelines and need to be removed.
A link should be an "independent vote" meaning another site owner chose to offer the link for a valid reason, such as your exceptional product or service. If you are able to create the link because you own or operate the site, or because you paid a fee, that link would be deemed manipulative. Even if you submit content to a free directory, article directory, etc. most of those links (think 99%) would be considered manipulative.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Capital - Antitrust Conspiracy
I think we all have heard about Thumbtack breaking the rules w/ badges. Getting deindexed, then getting a 100M injection from Google capital and having the penalties removed: https://techcrunch.com/2014/08/20/service-marketplace-thumbtack-raises-100m-round-led-by-google-capital/ Our primary competitor is a different marketplace backed by Google Capital. Does anyone know of any low frequency products (reliant on SEO) backed Google Capital that has not won out within search? (i.e. is there any hope of competing against a low frequency marketplace after they have Google Capital backing?)
Search Behavior | | MarketGrowth0 -
Anyone facing issues with Google Analytics today?
For some reason all pages on our site seem to be taking ages to load as they seem to be getting stuck at the "waiting for google-analytics.com"! Anyone else facing similar issues today?
Search Behavior | | prsntsnh0 -
Help with robots.txt on Magento
Hi everybody, I need your help in order to fix some problems with HTML errors and Crawling errors generated by Magento on my client's website www.casabiancheria.it I have some problems with duplicate meta informations due to the fact that there are a lot of links such as /stampe-romagnole/tovaglie-con-tovaglioli**/colore/**beige,marrone,giallo,lilla/show/all.html /stampe-romagnole/tovaglie-con-tovaglioli**/colore/**beige,marrone,lilla/show/all.html that are generated by the filter /colore/ and so they have duplicate content and meta information on them. I activated the canonicals on Magento but this hasn't fixed the problem yet. On the sitemap there are only 1 link for each product, so it seems that the canonicals are working, but bot Google Webmaster Tools and SEO Moz are giving me errors on duplicate content and meta informations. I would like to solve these problems by excluding from robots.txt all the urls that contain the filter parameters, such as /colore/, /price/, /dimensions/, etc. (take a look to the attachment). I tried different solutions in order to exclude these links from robots, but I wasn't able to succeed. Below you can find my current robots.txt... can someone help me in order to write the correct form of this file and finally exclude all these urls generated by filters on Magento? Finally, is it worth it to exclude also the images from Magento? (take a look to the final lines of the robots below). Thank you very much for your help! Alberto User-agent: *
Search Behavior | | OptimizedGroup
Disallow: /CVS
Disallow: /.svn$
Disallow: /.idea$
Disallow: /.sql$
Disallow: /.tgz$
Disallow: /w1nL1f3L0g1c/
Disallow: /app/
Disallow: /downloader/
Disallow: /errors/
Disallow: /includes/
Disallow: /lib/
Disallow: /pkginfo/
Disallow: /shell/
Disallow: /var/
Disallow: /404/
Disallow: /cgi-bin/
Disallow: /magento/
Disallow: /report/
Disallow: /scripts/
Disallow: /shell/
Disallow: /skin/
Disallow: /stats/
Disallow: /api.php
Disallow: /cron.php
Disallow: /cron.sh
Disallow: /error_log
Disallow: /get.php
Disallow: /install.php
Disallow: /LICENSE.html
Disallow: /LICENSE.txt
Disallow: /LICENSE_AFL.txt
Disallow: /README.txt
Disallow: /RELEASE_NOTES.txt
Disallow: /?dir
Disallow: /?dir=desc
Disallow: /?dir=asc
Disallow: /?limit=all
Disallow: /?mode*
Disallow: /index.php/
Disallow: /?SID=
Disallow: /checkout/
Disallow: /onestepcheckout/
Disallow: /customer/
Disallow: /customer/account/
Disallow: /customer/account/login/
Disallow: /catalogsearch/
Disallow: /catalog/product_compare/
Disallow: /catalog/category/view/
Disallow: /catalog/product/view/
Disallow: /cgi-bin/
Disallow: /cleanup.php
Disallow: /apc.php
Disallow: /memcache.php
Disallow: /phpinfo.php
Disallow: /control/
Disallow: /customize/
Disallow: /newsletter/
Disallow: /poll/
Disallow: /review/
Disallow: /sendfriend/
Disallow: /tag/
Disallow: /wishlist/
Disallow: /catalog/product/gallery/
Disallow: /?*
Disallow: //colore/
Disallow: //price/
Disallow: //misura/
Disallow: //marca/
Disallow: //sort-by/
Disallow: //combinazione/
Disallow: /*/seleziona-colore/
Disallow: /colore/
Disallow: /price/
Disallow: /misura/
Disallow: /marca/
Disallow: /sort-by/
Disallow: /combinazione/
Disallow: /seleziona-colore/
Disallow: /*colore/
Disallow: /*price/
Disallow: /*misura/
Disallow: /*marca/
Disallow: /*sort-by/
Disallow: /*combinazione/
Disallow: /*seleziona-colore/ UmuEX4z0 -
Privacy Policy requirements for Demos and Interests in Google Analytics
I have a client who is activating the Demographics and Interests in Google Analytics, and I need to provide an appropriate privacy policy, per Google's TOS. Can anybody suggest what to state in the privacy policy? Google says: "If you’ve implemented Google Analytics Demographics and Interest Reporting, you must also disclose in your privacy policy: How you use data from Google's Interest-based advertising or 3rd-party audience data (such as age, gender, and interests) with Google Analytics." So, I guess it's advisable to state that the site gathers "3rd-party audience data." Is it enough to say that the info is being used to better understand and communicate with the website visitor?
Search Behavior | | jrae0 -
I need Help with Google!!!!
I am trying to have my picture on the first page just like SEOmoz when someone search just the name, I know have something to do with google plus, but I am so new doing that no luck or probably I am doing wrong, I have been looking in the internet but I haven't found anything. Is there anyone who can write a tutorial and post here. Maybe is already done and I don't know where. Please see the picture attached so you understand better what I want to do Again I want appear just like this but with my company http://www.sombras.co.uk/images/pic.jpg pic.jpg
Search Behavior | | teksyte0 -
Google Webmaster Tools notice of detected unnatural links to our website
Hi, We have been using SEOmoz for a good few months now and have found it incredibly useful. Unfortunately however I think we may have slipped up a little bit as we have just received the following message in our Google Webmaster Tools: Google Webmaster Tools notice of detected unnatural links to http://www.refreshcartridges.co.uk/ I have a funny feeling I might know what the problem is but I'd like a confirmation before I potentially go off on a wild goose chase. We also own the domain name www.computerarticles.co.uk and recently started introducing the author at the bottom of the post along with both a link to the website homepage and a link to a deep, popular page on our website. For example, check out http://www.computerarticles.co.uk/twitter-time-saving-tools/ We genuinely didn't realise this was a bad thing and thought it would just provide Google with a way of deep linking straight in to popular areas of our site. I would really appreciate advice as to whether you think it might be these links that are causing the problem or whether there is something else that could be causing the problem. In the event it is these links that are causing the issue would you recommend removing the entire 'about the author' page (as we have published around 500 pages on that site) and simply put a link in the blog roll or simplify it to just link to the homepage. I appreciate in advance any help you could give. Regards Chris
Search Behavior | | ChrisHolgate0 -
Pro/Cons of JUST using Google Analytics
I find myself in a situation where I am having to defend why purely relying on just Google Analytics for site data i.e. exit pages, keywords, bounce rate etc... is not good practise. So I thought/wondered if other people have come up against this. What are the Pro and Cons for ONLY using Google Analytics for your site data....
Search Behavior | | JohnW-UK0 -
Have Google changed something in Analytics
Hi Mozzers, I have a client that gets loads of traffic and since the 15th February there has been a decrease in New Visitors and an Increse in Returning. Traffic levels are the same. The returning is up and new are down by a long long shot. Have Google changed the way these visits are calculated? I can't see anything on the blog - anyone experiencing similar issues Bush
Search Behavior | | Bush_JSM0