Indexing non-indexed content and Google crawlers
-
On a news website we have a system where articles are given a publish date which is often in the future. The articles were showing up in Google before the publish date despite us not being able to find them linked from anywhere on the website.
I've added a 'noindex' meta tag to articles that shouldn't be live until a future date.
When the date comes for them to appear on the website, the noindex disappears. Is anyone aware of any issues doing this - say Google crawls a page that is noindex, then 2 hours later it finds out it should now be indexed? Should it still appear in Google search, News etc. as normal, as a new page?
Thanks.
-
Wow! Nice detective work! I could see how that one would slip under the radar.
Congrats on finding a needle in a haystack!
You should buy yourself the adult beverage of your choice and have a little toast!
Cheers!
-
-
I think Screaming Frog has a trial version, I forget if it limits total number of pages etc. as we bought it a while ago. At least you can try out and see. May be others who have more tools as well.
-
Thanks. I agree I need to get rid of that noindex. The site is new and doesn't have much in the way of tag clouds etc. yet, so it's not like we have a lot of pages to check.
I've used the link: attribute to try and find the offending links each time, but nothing showed up. I use Xenu Link Sleuth rather than Screaming Frog, and I can't find a way to find backlinks with Xenu. Do you know if you can with the free version of Screaming Frog? I've seen the free version described as "almost fully functional" - the number of crawlable links seems to be the main restriction.
-
I like the automated sitemap answer for the cause (as this has bitten me before), but you mentioned you do not have that. I would still bet that somewhere on your web site you are linking to the page that you do not want indexed. It could be a tag cloud page or some other index page. We had a site that it would accidentally publish out articles on our home page ahead of schedule. Point here is that when you have a dynamic site with a CMS, you really have to be on your toes with stuff like this as the automation can get you into situations like this.
I would not use the noindex tag and remove it later. My concern would be that you are sending conflicting signals to Google. noindex tells good to remove this page from the index.
"When we see the noindex meta tag on a page, Google will completely drop the page from our search results, even if other pages link to it." from GWT
When I read that - it sounds like this is not what you want for this page.
You could also setup your system to show a 404 on the URL until the content is live and then let it 200, but you run into the same issue of Google getting 2 opposite signals on the same page. Either way, if you first give the signal to Google that you do not want something indexed, you are at the mercy of the next crawl to see if Google looks at it again.
Regardless, you need to get to the crux of the issue, how is Google finding this URL?
I would use a 3rd party spider tool. We have used Screaming Frog SEO Spider. There are others out there. You would be amazed what they find. The key to this tool is that when it finds something, it also tells you on what page it found it. We have big sites with thousands of pages and we have used it to find broken links to images and links to pages on our site that now 404. Really handy to clean things up. I bet it would find where there is a link on your site that contains the page (or pages) that link to the content. You can then update that page and not have to worry about using noindex etc. Also not that the spiders are much better than humans at finding this stuff. Even if you have looked, the spider looks at things differently.
It also may be as simple as searching for the URL on the web with the link: attribute. Google may show you where it is finding the link.
Good luck and please post back what you find. This is kind of like one of those "who dun it?" mystery shows!
-
There is no automated sitemap. We checked every page we could, including feeds.
-
Do you have an automated sitemap? On at least one occasion, I've found that to be a culprit.
Noindex means it won't be kept in the index. It doesn't mean it won't be crawled. I'm not sure how it would affect crawl timing , tho. I would assume that Google would assume that you would want things not indexed crawled less frequently. Something to potentially try is to use the GWT Fetch as Googlebot tool to force a new crawl of the page and see if that gets it in the index any faster.
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/08/submit-urls-to-google-with-fetch-as.html
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
I'm updating content that is out of date. What is the best way to handle if I want to keep old content as well?
So here is the situation. I'm working on a site that offers "Best Of" Top 10 list type content. They have a list that ranks very well but is out of date. They'd like to create a new list for 2014, but have the old list exist. Ideally the new list would replace the old list in search results. Here's what I'm thinking, but let me know if you think theres a better way to handle this: Put a "View New List" banner on the old page Make sure all internal links point to the new page Rel=canonical tag on the old list pointing to the new list Does this seem like a reasonable way to handle this?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jim_shook0 -
Blocking Certain Site Parameters from Google's Index - Please Help
Hello, So we recently used Google Webmaster Tools in an attempt to block certain parameters on our site from showing up in Google's index. One of our site parameters is essentially for user location and accounts for over 500,000 URLs. This parameter does not change page content in any way, and there is no need for Google to index it. We edited the parameter in GWT to tell Google that it does not change site content and to not index it. However, after two weeks, all of these URLs are still definitely getting indexed. Why? Maybe there's something we're missing here. Perhaps there is another way to do this more effectively. Has anyone else ran into this problem? The path we used to implement this action:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Jbake
Google Webmaster Tools > Crawl > URL Parameters Thank you in advance for your help!0 -
Big discrepancies between pages in Google's index and pages in sitemap
Hi, I'm noticing a huge difference in the number of pages in Googles index (using 'site:' search) versus the number of pages indexed by Google in Webmaster tools. (ie 20,600 in 'site:' search vs 5,100 submitted via the dynamic sitemap.) Anyone know possible causes for this and how i can fix? It's an ecommerce site but i can't see any issues with duplicate content - they employ a very good canonical tag strategy. Could it be that Google has decided to ignore the canonical tag? Any help appreciated, Karen
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Digirank0 -
Not ranking in Google - why???
This will be a bit long, so please bare with me. I have a client in the auto parts industry who wants to rank their homepage for 13 different keywords. We are ranked first page for all keywords in Yahoo! Mexico and Bing Mexico, but not ranking first page at all in Google Mexico. My client's competitor, however, is clearly outranking my client in Google. When comparing both pages, my client's, while not 100% optimized, looks better optimized than their competitor's. Looking at all metrics using Moz, SEMRush, ahrefs, etc... my client's site looks MUCH better on all fronts. I know ranking a single homepage for more than 10 keywords is a difficult task. Our competitor is however, ranking for them, so it's not impossible. The keywords are not even that competitive according to Moz's analysis. I decided to create an optimized page for each keyword to try to rank these pages, but still my client wants the homepage to rank (again, if the competitor is ranking, then it's possible to do this) and I am afraid these pages I created could result in keyword cannibalization ultimately affecting the homepage's possibility to rank. My client had a previous SEO agency working for them and basically all they did was create fake blogs and have lots of keyword rich links directed to the site's homepage. I got the complete link profile from several tools and submitted a disavow requests for as many fishy links I could find, but that hasn't shown any results so far. Note: when looking at the competitor link profile, they have basically just a few links and no external links of real value whatsoever. My client is obviously very frustrated, and so am I. In my SEO experience, it shouldn't be such a difficult task to accomplish, however nothing seems to work even though everything seems to point that my client should rank higher. So now I'm running out of ideas regarding what to do with this site. Any insight you could provide would be SO helpful to me and my client. If needed I can provide my client's homepage URL and also their competitors homepage for you to review. i can also give you any extra information you need. Thanks a lot!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | EduardoRuiz0 -
What may cause a page not to be indexed (be de-indexed)?
Hi All, I have a main category page, a landing page, that does not appear in the SERPS at all (even if I serach for a whole sentence from it). This page once ranked high. What may cause such a punishment for a specific page? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeytzNet0 -
Freshness Index?
Hi, I've been a member for a few months but this is my first entry. I typically build small portal websites to help attract more customers for small business approx. 5-7 pages and very tightly optimized around one primary keyword and 2 secondaries. These are typically very low competition. I do no link building to speak of. I don't keyword stuff or use poorly written content. I know that may be subjective but I believe the content I am using is genuinely useful to the reader. What I have noticed recently is the sites get ranked quite well to begin with e.g. anywhere from the bottom half of the first page to page 2-3 and they stick for maybe 2-3 weeks, and the client is very happy, they then just vanish. It's not just the Google dance either these sites don't typically come back at all or when they do they are 100+ I was advised this was due to the freshness index but honestly these sites are hardly newsworthy...just wondering if anyone had any ideas? Many thanks in advance.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nichemarkettools0 -
Ajax Content Indexed
I used the following guide to implement the endless scroll https://developers.google.com/webmasters/ajax-crawling/docs/getting-started crawlers and correctly reads all URLs the command "site:" show me all indexed Url with #!key=value I want it to be indexed only the first URL, for the other Urls I would be scanned but not indexed like if there were the robots meta tag "noindex, follow" how I can do?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | wwmind1 -
Why is Google indexing either the singular or plural version of a keyword?
Hello Forum, We have just finished completely redoing a website and it seems that for several keywords either the plural or singular version is no longer being displayed in Google search results. For example, we sell yoga products, one of which is a bolster. In the SEO section of Google Analytics, the keyword "bolsters" has held a steady rank while "bolster" lost lots of rank and now no longer shows. Both keywords pointed to the same page and hold nearly equal rank, which has both keywords for "bolster" and "yoga bolster" Any idea what may be going on?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | pano0