My text does not show up in Google
-
Hi there. I've got an urgent question I hope someone can help me with.
I've made a website (www.tonyharrismakingcents.com.au) with a few content pages. I don't get a lot of traffic. All my pages are scrawled and I don't see any errors.
However, when I copy an entire paragraph and Google it, it does not show up in the search results. This makes me believe that the pages are not scrawled correctly. Only when I search for the exact paragraph by putting it between "", the website shows up on the results page.
What can be the reason for this?
Thanks for your help..It's much appreciated.
-
Hi Ryan
Thanks for your honest feedback. It's a good reality check and I completely agree with what you are saying. I guess I know the basic theory but fail to implement it. The SEOMoz beginners guide will be a good start...
-
After examining your web page, there are too many issues to list in a Q&A. A few examples:
1. Your page has an H1 tag "First home buyers" which is great, but the H1 tag is not visible on the page. This is a serious issue as you are presenting different content to users then search engines, which is often the cause of a penalty.
2. Your page title is "First home buyers" but the text is not used a single time in content. It is used in the URL and bread crumbs, but not once in content.
3. Your header image shows words. Search engines cannot "read" images. Yes, OCR is a valid technology but it is not used to index web content. Text should almost always be presented as html text. Doing such provides a better user experience, easier site maintenance and is better for search crawlers as well. The only time I would ever choose to present text in an image is if a very specific font was required.
There are numerous other issues as well. You have a very basic WordPress site. WP is a great platform to build a site upon, but the site is not professionally developed and you will have issues attempting to compete in search rankings against better designed sites.
Also, please forgive the harshness here but, your content is exceptionally poor. I can see the content is unique which means you likely wrote it, but ask yourself this question: If someone searches for "first home buyers" on Google.com.au and finds your article, will that user think "wow! This is exactly what I wanted!" or are they more likely to think "this is crap" and hit the back button on their browser and look for another site.
You offer a total of 161 words which are not even focused in any manner of what is supposed to be the primary topic of the page. This page is a perfect example of what search engines wish to filter out of search results. Other then an exact text match in quotes, this page should simply not rank.
-
Hi Ryan
Here it is..
You should never give up purchasing property. You have every right to start living your own Australian dream. Just like the older generation has done before you. But you’ll need to know how to do it the right way. The more knowledge you have about the mortgage process, the better.
And this is the page URL: http://tonyharrismakingcents.com.au/first-home-buyers/
-
I searched for the following sentence in Google.com.au: Tony Harris loves to share his finance and property knowledge and therefore he has given birth to the Tony Harris MakingCents website building on his belief that people need a trusted source of information.
Your site ranks #2. It is outranked by your Facebook page which has the same text. The rankings make sense.
Please provide the text phrase you used previously along with the target page URL.
-
Thanks Mat. I will do that. And you are right, I don't have any links yet. I need to work on that!!
-
Thanks Ryan for taking the time to respond.
It's just that the paragraph text I'm testing this with is very long and specific. So when it doesn't show up than it makes me worried that the website gets penalized or that there is something wrong.
I guess I just have to be patient (the website is quite new) and focus more on getting the optimization rights. Any feedback on how to improve the SEO for this website is much appreciated!
Thanks again!
-
I think that your problem is that you have no links pointing to your site. Literally - None.
Links are one of the main means that search engines like Google use to determine the importance of a website. The logic goes that a site that has authority sites linking to it must in itself be useful.
Your site is in a competitive niche and needs to demonstrate that it is worthy of appearing above the other sites in that niche. Having other sites link to you is a vital part of that.
Read this chapter of the seomoz beginners guide http://www.seomoz.org/beginners-guide-to-seo/growing-popularity-and-links - this explains what you need to do fairly well. I'd also suggest reading the rest of that guide whilst you are there as it will really help you out.
Good luck.
-
If you search for a page on your site by using a phrase enclosed in quotes, and Google returns the page as a result, then your page has clearly been crawled and indexed.
Your issue is you expect to rank higher for the paragraph / phrase. To do such involves optimization. The question Google asks is, based on 200+ factors which indexed page is most likely to satisfy a user who uses the keyword phrase as a search query.
Your page having the exact matching text offers a strong relevancy boost, but there are other factors.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google ranking content for phrases that don't exist on-page
I am experiencing an issue with negative keywords, but the “negative” keyword in question isn’t truly negative and is required within the content – the problem is that Google is ranking pages for inaccurate phrases that don’t exist on the page. To explain, this product page (as one of many examples) - https://www.scamblermusic.com/albums/royalty-free-rock-music/ - is optimised for “Royalty free rock music” and it gets a Moz grade of 100. “Royalty free” is the most accurate description of the music (I optimised for “royalty free” instead of “royalty-free” (including a hyphen) because of improved search volume), and there is just one reference to the term “copyrighted” towards the foot of the page – this term is relevant because I need to make the point that the music is licensed, not sold, and the licensee pays for the right to use the music but does not own it (as it remains copyrighted). It turns out however that I appear to need to treat “copyrighted” almost as a negative term because Google isn’t accurately ranking the content. Despite excellent optimisation for “Royalty free rock music” and only one single reference of “copyrighted” within the copy, I am seeing this page (and other album genres) wrongly rank for the following search terms: “free rock music”
On-Page Optimization | | JCN-SBWD
“Copyright free rock music"
“Uncopyrighted rock music”
“Non copyrighted rock music” I understand that pages might rank for “free rock music” because it is part of the “Royalty free rock music” optimisation, what I can’t get my head around is why the page (and similar product pages) are ranking for “Copyright free”, “Uncopyrighted music” and “Non copyrighted music”. “Uncopyrighted” and “Non copyrighted” don’t exist anywhere within the copy or source code – why would Google consider it helpful to rank a page for a search term that doesn’t exist as a complete phrase within the content? By the same logic the page should also wrongly rank for “Skylark rock music” or “Pretzel rock music” as the words “Skylark” and “Pretzel” also feature just once within the content and therefore should generate completely inaccurate results too. To me this demonstrates just how poor Google is when it comes to understanding relevant content and optimization - it's taking part of an optimized term and combining it with just one other single-use word and then inappropriately ranking the page for that completely made up phrase. It’s one thing to misinterpret one reference of the term “copyrighted” and something else entirely to rank a page for completely made up terms such as “Uncopyrighted” and “Non copyrighted”. It almost makes me think that I’ve got a better chance of accurately ranking content if I buy a goat, shove a cigar up its backside, and sacrifice it in the name of the great god Google! Any advice (about wrongly attributed negative keywords, not goat sacrifice ) would be most welcome.0 -
Does Google Understand H2 As Subtitle?
I use some HTML 5 tags on my custom template. I implement <header class="entry-header-outer"> Flavour & Chidinma – 40 Yrs 40 Yrs by Flavour & Chidinma </header> html code. h1 tag serves as the title, while h2 tag servers as the subtitle of the post. Take a look at it here: https://xclusiveloaded.com/flavour-chidinma-40-yrs/ I want to know if it's ok or should I remove the h2 tag. Guys, what is your thoughts?
On-Page Optimization | | Kingsmart4 -
If Product Pages Perform Well In Google then Is It Possible That Category Page Can perform Well In Google?
Hi All, For my ecommerce site I have optimized my product pages very nicely like good images, detailed information about products, good reviews, implemented schema for my product and reviews and very perfect onpage. Now my query is if my products pages performing well in google then there are chances that my category page rank well in google too? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | wright3350 -
Getting different search queries in Google Webmaster
Hi All, I have a website Afrofood.com. In it's Google webmaster search queries i have more than 90 Queries, but not a single query is related with this site. All queries are from different site or subject, they have no any relation with my site. Can any one please tell me how to correct this... Site is Afrofood.com related with African foods, recipes, spices and all that. But showing search queries are: [canada goose](https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/top-search-queries?hl=en&siteUrl=http://afrofood.com/&authuser=1#canada goose) [canada goose outlet deutschland](https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/top-search-queries?hl=en&siteUrl=http://afrofood.com/&authuser=1#canada goose outlet deutschland) [polizei shop düsseldorf](https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/top-search-queries?hl=en&siteUrl=http://afrofood.com/&authuser=1#polizei shop düsseldorf) [canada goose deutschland](https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/top-search-queries?hl=en&siteUrl=http://afrofood.com/&authuser=1#canada goose deutschland) [canada goose weste](https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/top-search-queries?hl=en&siteUrl=http://afrofood.com/&authuser=1#canada goose weste) [canada goose kaufen](https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/top-search-queries?hl=en&siteUrl=http://afrofood.com/&authuser=1#canada goose kaufen) [canada goose hamburg](https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/top-search-queries?hl=en&siteUrl=http://afrofood.com/&authuser=1#canada goose hamburg) [canada goose größentabelle](https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/top-search-queries?hl=en&siteUrl=http://afrofood.com/&authuser=1#canada goose größentabelle)
On-Page Optimization | | 1akal0 -
How the hell do you get microformat to show up on google serp?
Preface: I implemented Microformat aggregate review (http://data-vocabulary.org/Review-aggregate) for our e-commerce website and included only on the homepage. The vote and count are actually coming from real reviews we are getting from our customers, and in the homepage some reviews are shown prominently and a link points to the full list of all the reviews. Microformat markup is correct, validated in GWT. Have been online for a while (probably a couple of years). Our website: http://www.gomme-auto.it The star rating never showed up. When checking competitors I could see their microformats where not showing up either. But now things changed, if I check one competitor (the market leader www.gommadiretto.it) searching for it with their brand name “gommadiretto” no star rating is showing, but if I search for tires of a specific manufactured like “pneumatici barum” I can see their result in serp is showing the star rating for that specific internal page (the brand page) where they simply put the website overall aggregate review microformat mark up, they actually put it on every page. And that make me scratch my head and start asking myself some questions: is google showing their microformats because they manually awarded them somehow? no other competitor seems to have got the star rating in serp is google showing their microformats because they have so much more reviews than I have? I have around 1700, they have around 11000. is google showing their microformats because their reviews are certified by TrustPilot? is google showing their microformats because they put it in the product page? well of course since I am not putting it there (in the brand page) it's a factor, but isn't it recommended to put the website aggregate reviews microformat only on one page? and shouldn't we show the brand reviews on the brand page? isn't it best practice/recommended to put the website aggregate review microformat only on one page? is google showing their microformats because of some other reasons I can't see? What the hell is google criteria for showing the star rating? Does anyone know?
On-Page Optimization | | max.favilli0 -
Why Moz is showing Duplicate Page Content Issues?
We have a Career Section on our website. For each job post, there is a separate link of "Apply Job". Now Moz's Crawl Diagnostic is showing Duplicate page content for such URLs. Here are two such URLs: http://tiny.cc/em9nyw http://tiny.cc/bq9nyw Can any one please suggest on this? Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | chandman0 -
How to design a site map page for users (not for Google)
I would like to design a site map for my visitors so they can have a quick view on the whole content of the website. 2 questions : 1 - is this kind of site map can help in terms of SEO ? 2 - if so, what are the best practices to design it ? Thanks in advance.
On-Page Optimization | | betadvisor0 -
Google Penalty?
What are the characteristics of a Google penalty - i.e. how do you know by looking at the rankings for your keywords? Do all keywords that you had previously ranked for fall from say top 5 to nowhere? Do you disappear from SERP for a branded keyword? Or something else?? Basically how do you know if you have been penalized? Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | inhouseninja0