How to work with directories for SEO?
-
Hi,
How many directory links do you tend to build in 1 month? And what do you look for in a directories before you submit?
I could build 2 links a day from directories but the thought of 60 links being built a month from directories shouts bad news to me.
I've had a look and come across a few directories with high DA/PA but at the end of the day they are just link directories, no content, lots of thin pages with lots of links pointing out.
A couple of examples of good directories would help.
Cheers
-
Paying to be included in a directory is not the same a a paid link. You are paying for membership, & if your website meet the requirements then the directory will accept you & link to your site as it does with all it's members.
I have used directories for a long time, they have worked great, & they will continue to work great.
Think the key to making it it work is diversify your links, you need all kinds of back links to be successful.Also when it comes to directories, I try to create unique description for each listing. If you copy & past the same description for every link you build then some them may get ignored.
-
Hi Activitysuper,
I can speak to this matter in some degree. All directories are not bad, paid or otherwise.
Quick history, before panda, penguin updates a link was a link was a link, the ones that passed the most juice were high page rank, with the least amount of other outgoing links. If for any reason a site was bad, the links it was linking to were simply ignored or passing no juice.This wasn't that long ago mind you.
What happened is what always happens when money is involved, people starting manipulating the hell out of this. Directory owners started artificially pumping up their page ranks by creating elaborate link rings and exchange programs, once they reached pagerank 4+ they could then sell you a paid listing for big bucks. And it was actually worth it (if you don't mind the grey area) because you would get the link juice and a bump in your page rank as well. On top of this any place that allowed for users to post links were getting spammed.
Google swept in with their swift hand of justice and deemed many of these directories as spam, and further punished sites that were spamming their links all over the place.
So today you look at directories and you do have to wonder should I list there. The answer is very easy. Look at the directory, does this look like a place you would visit for information about your industry? If the answer is no, you don't need to be there.
Some examples of good directories from my industry.
<cite>www.efunda.com/</cite>
www.globalspec.com/
www.saeglobalsuppliermarketplace.com
www.eng-tips.com/
www.thomasnet.com/
www.yahoo.com
www.dmoz.orgWhat is all comes down to is:
Does the directory offer something of value to the industry?
Does it look like a place where I would search for something in my industry?
Are my competitors there?
If you said yes, to any 2 of those then you probably should be there.
-
Thanks,
I agree the easy links you could pick up 1000's a month, all the form fields are exactly the same so pretty much copy/paste job but at the same time complete waste of time.
And when you look at the better directories, they charge - so now your looking at paid links. I would rather pay for a copywriter to produce a guest post then by a link.
I just picked out a directory from the SEOMOZ directory list.
This directory wants you to pay for the link, and I thought paid links was a no go.
-
Hi there,
You can check this http://www.seomoz.org/directories to begin with,
Like you said, it's quite easy to submit a website to directories, and I quote the SEOmoz Beguinner's Guide :
"Be careful: links that are easy to get often carry risks when pursued aggressively and in volume.A diverse, well rounded link profile is always best."
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
A dumb SEO question
Is it possible for a blog to rank only with fantastic content without any purchasing of backlinks... And how long does it take (on average) to get for example 500 active readers daily?
Link Building | | ImeuOkou0 -
Do you know worthy web directories
Does somebody know editorial web directories where it is still worth posting your link (like Dmoz)?
Link Building | | MichaelJanik0 -
Is there an extra SEO benefit for linking to pages that link to you?
Currently working on a link-building strategy and have gotten a few mentions. Just curious if there is any SEO benefits of linking back to the pages my site was mentioned and linked on? Would love to hear your thoughts, thanks!
Link Building | | Derrald0 -
Does profile links work related to offpage SEO?
Hi All, Does profile links work related to offpage SEO? My website was linked to many profiles on sites and wanted to know if i need to cleanup or leave it as they are so they benefit? Thanks
Link Building | | jomin740 -
Are sites that "smell of SEO" being demoted?
I'm working with a site owner who recently hired an SEO to work on just one particular type of keyword. It seems like the more work the SEO did, the lower the keyword gradually dropped. Granted, the "work" is pretty low quality - anchor texted bookmarks, comments and low quality articles. We're doing an experiment where we are going to disavow those links and see if the previous rankings return. Another site that I am consulting with has a lot of good natural links and then some anchor texted links, but from decent sources - some guest posts (on good sites - not a spammy site that exists only for guest posts) and some places where decent websites have agreed to link to the site. The anchor texted links do not make up very much of the overall anchor text. There is good diversity and lots of brand and url anchored links. It seems like the more the SEO does for this site, the more the rankings drop. And it's not all about anchor text. The SEO placed a link in a relevant directory, using the url as anchor...rankings dropped a little. They obtained an expired domain with relevant and very natural links and 301'd it to the new domain...rankings dropped several places. And so on. Occasionally the rankings will pop up a little, but overall it's a downward spiral. Check out this post by Gary Taylor. He did an experiment where he took an established site that was ranking well and threw some spammy links at it. To quote the article, 'every day goes by my ranking for the term “domains” is getting harder to maintain.' He recently tweeted that he has been removing and disavowing links and the rankings are returning. I was looking at searches for real estate related terms in different cities. In some cities, the top sites are ones that have ZERO obvious SEO done to them. There are sites ranking on page 3 that have been SEO'd, and not all of them have poor SEO. Many are what I would consider really well done. Some of the sites ranking on page 1 have under 10 links. There was one with 2 followed links and they were not from super authoritative sites! To complicate matters though, if you look at searches like "Toronto Real Estate Agents" some of the top sites have lots of keyword anchor texted links. Perhaps this should be a blog post rather than a Q&A, but I would love to hear some of your thoughts. My personal thought is that Google's main goal with Penguin and the unnatural links warnings is to make it so that not only is it not profitable to try to manipulate the SERPS, but that every time you try to do so, you potentially do your rankings harm. I used to say that Penguin could only affect a site on the date of a Penguin refresh, but I am thinking now that Google has managed to roll Penguin into the algorithm to some extent so that it can demote the majority of any work that smells of SEO. Thoughts?
Link Building | | MarieHaynes0 -
Paid Directory - Whitehat or Blackhat?
Dear community, Just a quick question: Would you consider a directory as this one whitehat or blackhat SEO? http://mixyellowpages.com/cncat_add.php You can add link to 50 web directories. - No reciprocal link. - 100% approved within 48 hours. - Do follow link. - Get one way link from quality sites. - Pay only $ 15 No monthly fee. Our SEO-agency is using these kinds of directories, so I just wanted to make sure, that this is a) Whitehat-SEO and b) will not harm our rankings. Thanks,
Link Building | | rmvw
David0 -
Directories and duplicate content.
Part of our link building strategy for a dentist is to submit their site to several relevant directories. If I enter the same description in each directory, is it possible that Google will consider this duplicate content and prevent link juice from being passed back to the dentist's site? Thanks folks, Jason
Link Building | | OptioPublishing0 -
What are the benefits of SEO?
If a client asks "why should I spend time and money on SEO?", how would you answer? Is "to be found in search engines" the answer? If so, wouldn't it be more cost effective to use PPC instead of SEO? Is link building a waste of time and money? Is it better to just concentrate on quality content?
Link Building | | SharpKiwi0