Can someone clarify the importance of Scribe SEO?
-
Hi guys,
I was reading The Beginner's Guide to SEO and was confused about the importance of keyword density.
As I see it, the main purpose of tools like Scribe SEO revolve around analyzing keyword density, however, Chapter 9 of "The Beginner's Guide to SEO" seems to downplay its importance and says
"Despite being proven untrue time and again, this myth has legs. Many SEO tools still feed on the concept that keyword density is an important metric. It's not."
If this is true, what is the real value of tools like Scribe SEO? Currently, I follow keyword analysis tools very closely, and try to get the recommended density in my articles to help build back links. Should I be focusing heavily on the density and prominence of keywords like I am in the picture below, or is there another way you suggest I go about using these tools?
-
As the co-creator of Scribe I am more than happy to address your question.
First, Scribe is not a keyword density checking tool. It is designed to help writers in creating and structuring their content so search engines can better "understand" and index the content.
Second, Scribe contains a number of other features including keyword research/analysis, internal link organization and intelligent ways to connect your content with other sites through online relationship building tools. For a complete overview please go to http://scribecontent.com/demo/ for a video overview.
As to your specific point.
While density does not matter, frequency does. In information retrieval, term frequency is a very important part of most publish search algorithms used at conferences like TReC, etc. To see its importance, there are several excellent mathematical examples at http://www.miislita.com/ . Please note that Dr Garcia, who publishes at this site and was a consultant to us on Scribe v4, is the one that penned the epic "Keyword Density of Non sense" post that disputed the role of density as a ranking factor.
A key component of "understanding" content is both in the analysis of term frequency and term placement. While density calculations, when done properly, do provide some insight as to relative usage; the reality is that most all search systems review term frequency and weight it with other factors in order to determine the probability that a specific document is related to the query.
I think that Moosa H makes a good point in that you do want to write for humans first. Scribe helps you improve your writing to make it easier for search engines to understand what you are writing about.
Samer, thank you for your question and I hope my response provides some clarification to your question.
-
Have a watch of this video by Matt Cutts, where he explains that the one thing people should NOT focus on is keyword density.
Andy
-
Keyword density is a real shit and i guess i have talked about this a million times and i have some strong logic behind this...
1. Write for Humans not Machines
Besides search engine, there are humans who must be more important than any other machine on earth (even more important than Google) because they pay you the real money. If you are going to care too much about keywords and not caring about how that will impact user experience you might win the rankings but might not win customers and all you will gain out of it will be the increase in bounce rate (may be some un-loyal customers).
2. Google is changing
Google is changing like anything... so getting top rankings for your desired key phrases just by keeping a good percentage of keyword density in it, might not work...
Why not play natural?
It’s good to be natural. It’s good to write for humans and not machines...so don’t really care about the density of keyword in the document but care more about how people will react to it.
Scribe SEO?
This software seems promising to me in a one go as it allows you to extract what’s hot from difference resources and get you the topics that will be most attracted to your audience in the current times.
Calculating keyword density can be a part of it but i don’t think they are based on this... so go creative and use this tool to get suggestions but relying on any tool (even SEOmoz) will be dangerous as this industry love quick changes...
-
The pricing is insane too. It's not worth putting the money and effort into using the software. It's just the hype copyblogger team is doing.
-
About 5 years ago, I would rank pages for just about any moderately competitive phrase under the sun, pretty much by boosting as close to 5.5% keyword density as possible on a domain with a good bit of trust. That mentality that you see in Scribe SEO could still gain some ground, but it's a little antiquated.
The issue that over time, Google's gotten smarter (and continues to do so). Including keywords still matters, and not over-doing it does as well. What's changed, is that Google has gotten better at understanding language. Sure, you could stuff "cheap london flights" 15 times into a copy and probably still make it make sense if you really try, but should you?
Everything that you see Microsoft Word doing, analyzing grammar and reading levels, you can bet Google is capable of doing too. And it's pretty well-established now that things like root word stemming (+s, +ed, +ing) and synonyms play too. That sort of thing is more enjoyable for a reader too, so it stands to reason that Google would prefer it. And, from what I've seen in recent years, it seems to look more and more like they do.
So, I'd include keywords/phrases. I'd include them especially in first 1/3 of a sentence, paragraph, and page; lead in noun-first. But I wouldn't let it dictate your writing too much from there.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Longterm wordpress blog not providing seo benefit to main site - help needed please
Hi I have a bigcommerce ecommerce store, with a Wordpress blog on a subdomain. The store and blog have been active for four years, the blog is regularly updated with original content, has many links to the store, is promoted regularly via my brand's social media channels and mailing list, and has the simplest SEO basics covered via a Yoast SEO plugin. But the store sees very little, if any, SEO benefit from the blog. My question is: based on this information, and the details below, is there an issue with the connection between the blog and main site in SEO terms? And if there is, how can I start fixing it? Further info: 1 In my Moz dashboard for the store site, the blog does not show at all as providing any inbound links or linking domains 2 Google Analytics also shows zero referral traffic to the store site from the blog since April 2015 3 Moz crawl issues is flagging ‘duplicate page content issues’ for pretty much every page of the blog, and the analysis provided suggests this may be related to tags but I have only basic SEO knowledge and am fast getting out of my depth here. 4 I have today altered the settings within the Yoast plugin on the blog to ‘noindex’ for Tags, Meta Robots, based on advice I have found in this section but am already well over my head and unsure even this is correct. An agency have been running SEO for the store since 2012 but since uncovering how little they have done in this time for the money paid, I am now taking matters back into my own hands. However I am on a very steep learning curve and this one is beyond me right now - please does anyone have any suggestions where I can start looking to uncover the root issue? Any guidance or advice would be greatly appreciated Thanks very much and hope to hear from someone!
Reporting & Analytics | | Warren_331 -
Google Analytics SEO Queries Not Showing
Hi All, This might be a silly question, but for all the properties I monitor in Google Analytics, I'm now showing no data for SEO Queries under Acquisition for the past 6 days. Normally I would expect a few day delay in queries, but nothing for 6 days is somewhat peculiar especially as it was functioning fine prior to November 12th. Does anyone have insight into what might be going on? Thanks! URaNMa3
Reporting & Analytics | | amichaels0 -
How can you have more pageviews on a website than sessions?
I have a website I work with and for the past month we have a reported 36,834 sessions and 25,490 pageviews? How is this possible? If a users comes to the site isn't that a session and a pageview? Or How can you have a session with out a page view?
Reporting & Analytics | | Firestarter-SEO0 -
How can we stop Google analytics pulling in data from another site?
We have a few accounts under one Google login. They all have separate Google analytics codes but one of the sites is somehow pulling in some data from another site but the other site has not got the same analytics code on it. Not sure how this is happening and what we can do about this, is it a bug in the Google Analytics system? Any help would be appreciated.
Reporting & Analytics | | dentaldesign0 -
How can I track my rankings on Google Images?
I noticed a small amount of traffic coming from a particular very generic keyword. Being pleasantly surprised that we are ranking for this, and after some digging, I found that we are actually ranking in Google images, rather than in the web results. How can I track whether other keywords are ranking in Google images? I use Rank Checker to track keywords in the main web results, but this doesn't have a function for Google Images. Help please - thanks.
Reporting & Analytics | | TheJewelleryEd0 -
GA E-Commerce can't tell the real order source?
I put the e-commerce tracking code on the transaction platform (Regnow) finishing page, but all the orders displayed in GA can't tell the real order source. Instead, most of orders are from direct(none), and referrals from my site. So this is obviously wrong. I need the accurate order source such as google organic or google ppc, then I can find which keyword brings me orders. After some searches, I guess the reason is cookie domain. My GA is set as single domain tracking. And I didn't put any cookie domain code on the Regnow's transaction finishing page. The codes I put on the page are: So, suppose my site is "www.example.com". How to make sure I can track the real order source on the Regnow's transaction finishing page? Should I set my GA to track multi top-level domains, and put _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', '']); code on the tracking page? How to set the domain name, "none" or "example.com"?? Thanks in advance.
Reporting & Analytics | | JonnyGreenwood0 -
Looking for an Automated SEO report Software Solution
Buon Giorno from 4 degrees C mostly cloudy Wetherby UK 🙂 I love Google Analytics but I'm bogged down with analytics report writting. I'm looking for a web analytics softeare package that: 1. White Label ie we can brand the reports up
Reporting & Analytics | | Nightwing
2. Bespoke ie i can pick and choose what I report on
3. Automated ie I can set a time & date when the client receives the report. Any recommendations appreciated 🙂 Grazie tanto, David0 -
Can you re sit the Google analytics IQ test?
Damn I just failed the Google analytics IQ test with a score of 65% 😞 You need 80% to pass... My natural instinct is to resit but after 30 mins of googling around Ive got no answer to the following question: "Can you resit the Google Analytics IQ test for free or do you have to pay again". Any insights welcome...
Reporting & Analytics | | Nightwing0