Google disavow DMOZ/ODP spam sites?
-
Hello
Looking into links to my one of my sites (over 10 years old) I've found that along with some bad spammy links, around 80% of my inbound links are from directories that are exact copies of ODP. Should I be concerned about / asking for removal / disavowing these links? Normally I would be trying to get rid of low quality links like this, but since they are ODP clones I'm not sure it's worth the effort. The sites openly state that their data is from ODP (Open Directory Project), but does this mean Google ignores them? I could spend my whole life swatting these links.
Thoughts?
Edit: I'm hoping for suggestions that specifically reference the ODP clone site situation. I did not create these links, I guess I should have made that more clear.
-
Contact the site owner and request removal.
More specifically, make every possible attempt to locate the site owner. Use the following:
WHOIS e-mail address, e-mail address from website, contact form on website, social media pages, and phone number, physical mailing address. Make a sincere effort to reach each site owner.
-
What is best way to get rid of bad inbound links in your opinion?
-
Hi Nelson,
I am glad your question was addressed.
I apologize if my perspective has become hardened over time. I actually work with many aspects of SEO but manipulative link issues have consumed the majority of my time this year. When my phone rings it is often a client who has an issue related to manipulative links.
To be clear, I am not passing any judgment here or taking sides. I do understand Google did not enforce their guidelines in the past with respect to manipulative links. Many topics arise during this conversation about what Google should do, can't do, perceived abuses, etc. In order to best service clients I focus on a single question - - - what steps need to be taken to restore site rankings so they are not artificially suppressed.
Once we clear the air and reach that point, we can move forward productively. I want to help you and other site owners impacted by this issue which is why I share my time here. I hope you are able to receive complete and accurate information, then put it to use.
Best of luck.
-
"In your case, it is different based on your manipulative activities. "
You seem to really want the scenario to be one in which I'm manipulating links either directly or indirectly. I read some of your other posts and I see that's your niche, fixing manipulative links, so it's understandable but it's not necessarily useful for this bias to colour every answer. You may or may not remember that 10 years ago it was considered desirable and normal to get listed on ODP. Google was barely more than a search provider to Yahoo then.
For the record, the site I'm referring to is not commercial, nobody has ever worked on it for me so nobody was building links on my behalf. I have not received communication from Google about a penalty (never on any site as a matter of fact), and this particular site's traffic has never been high enough to notice a drop in traffic in April. I was just wondering if it was possible the scraped sites and their links to me were diluting my site's rankings and if I should but a bunch of effort into having them removed and/or disavow.
Anyway, thank you very much Ryan, I managed to filter out an answer to my question
-
For you, yes. For most site owners, no.
Based on your interpretation, I am going to assume your site is manually penalized by Google or you have your rankings are being suppressed by Penguin. If that is the case, either you or an agent (employee, "SEO", developer, etc) acting on your behalf has built manipulative links to your website. If that is the case, you intentionally tried to cheat the system.
To be clear, no laws were broken. It does not mean you are a bad person or anything on that level. Rather it means there is a process which everyone who desires to rank well in search engines should follow, and that process was intentionally broken for your site. So yes, there are negative consequences to cheating and getting caught.
The overwhelming majority of site owners are not negatively impacted by the links you mentioned. Google simply devalues those links and that is it. In your case, it is different based on your manipulative activities.
I know that may be hard to hear so I will try another analogy. In California, if anyone drives with a blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.08% or above they are violating the law and can be arrested. Most of the public does not have a DUI on their record so they can drive with a 0.07% BAC and not worry about a DUI; however, if you are convicted of a DUI then you are likely on probation for several years. During that probationary period, you may not drive with even a 0.01% BAC you can be arrested. The point being the rules are not the same for those who have been caught breaking the rules and those who have complied with them.
The links from 99% of general directories are indeed manipulative. Whether those links were built by the site owner or, in the case of a DMOZ clone site, a directory owner, the links were built with the purpose of manipulating search engines. Sometimes a new directory is attempting to fill up with some data to give visitors the illusion it has numerous in the hopes they will pay for service. Others attempt to earn money with AdWords. Either way, they are manipulative links.
-
So, what I'm getting from this is even though I didn't create these links (and therefore I was not participating in manipulative link schemes, unless getting myself listed in ODP/DMOZ in the first place was "manipulative"), I should try by any means necessary to get the clone links removed because they look manipulative to Google.
-
**Is your site under a manual penalty or impacted by Penguin? Have you participated in manipulative link building? **
If the answer to these questions is no, then Google has clearly stated you should not be using the Disavow tool at all.
**Have you contacted these sites via multiple methods (WHOIS email, email address on site, contact form from site, phone, mail, social media, etc) requesting the links to be removed? **
If not, you may be wasting your time. Google has clearly stated they expect site owners to use the Disavow tool as a last resort when all other methods fail.
I've found that along with some bad spammy links, around 80% of my inbound links are from directories that are exact copies of ODP.
If your rankings are being suppressed by Google due to manipulative links, then any manipulative directory links should be removed. Google likely devalues all those links, but they must be addressed in order to remove a penalty.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
If I disavow bad links on "disavow link webmaster" will they still show up on my moz reports?
We recently found out we have a lot of bad links linking back to our website from spam sites, I disavowed them through the google disavow link webmaster. On my moz report it still shows the links, is that normal?
Link Building | | Ryan.Cruz0 -
Quick way to review Disavow?
We've recently taken on a new client that has a very large Disavow file. I'm wondering if any good backlinks are being disavowed in the list and want to do an audit but wondered if there was a tool I could use that could give me some high level stats on each of the domains in the Disavow? Ideally, I'd love to be able to drop a list of domains into a tool that can tell me PR, DA, Spam Score, Citation Flow, Trust Flow in an exportable table. Does such a tool exist?
Link Building | | Marketing_Today1 -
Are these links to my site bad?
I am the owner of two diffrent ecommerce sites. Lets call them A and B. Site A is a larg site with ower 5000 pages. In the footer off site A there is a link to site B. Is it bad for site B to get 5000 links (to homepage) from site A? Should i remove these types off links? Thanks for your help!
Link Building | | Spletnafuzija0 -
To disavow or Not to disavow is the question?
OK, I have done some analysis of my site and it seems quite clear that I have been hit by Penguin and this is largely down to my link building strategy. My question now is; 1. Do I try to undo the damage by disavowing toxic links I have identified, or 2. Do I just accept what is and ensure that from here on in I follow natural backlink acquisition? Thanks
Link Building | | UnderMe0 -
Links from other sites in our network
I work for a large publisher with many websites, and it's common for our biggest sites to link to smaller sites within the network. These links are follow, site-wide, anchor text-optimised footer links. I think it's obvious that these links are harmful to the smaller sites that are being linked to, but it's hard to convince others of that, particularly because the toolbar PR benefit is very obvious. Do you think it would be better to: a) Remove the links completely b) Keep the links, but make them nofollow c) Keep the links (as it's not harmful) Thanks
Link Building | | OMGPyrmont0 -
Iframed data on external sites
Hi all, I am looking to create som widgets for external sites with some of my data, off course with links to my site. But if i make a php file with some content, and another site iframes that php file, would I get link juice from this? If not, any suggestions to how i could get my data on to another site AND get the juice? -Rasmus
Link Building | | rasmusbang0 -
What is white hat seo for google penguin and google panda?
Hi, This is my 1st question to some experts. I need advice on link building. Are following good and white hat seo? 1: Bookmarkings on top sites 2: Top directory submission, or directories that seomoz recommended? 3: Top article directories, yahoo voices, ezine etc.. 4: Top web 2.0, wordpress, blogger, tumblr 5: Guest posts on quality blogs. I was use to with black hat methods (by mistake) , that i was not aware, Some are pure blackhat, that i never did. some time it hard to judge which are black hat. In past google like some links, now most are devalue or got penalty. Now i want to do quality seo work and slow process. any advice will be great regarding quality seo. Thanks.
Link Building | | chsajid110 -
Strengthening my personal coaching site
Hello, My domain for my personal coaching site is my name bobweikel(dot)com and I think this is weak for all of my keywords, but I'm sticking with it. What's some of the easiest way I could gain strength with national keywords so that people will pursue phone coaching with me, terms like nlp coach wealth and success coach wealth coach personal coach life coach I know that these are varying greatly in competitiveness. Thanks!
Link Building | | BobGW0