Local SEO Practice: Creating a Fictitious Business?
-
Has anyone tried fabricating a fake, brick-and-mortar store as an SEO experiment? Sort of along the lines of what Starwood is doing (check out this Wikipedia experiment with the Test Galaxy Sheraton), but with a legitimate physical address and all?
Was it useful? And are there any potential legal troubles that could arise from borrowing a vacant address?
I'm thinking this could be helpful for my Intern to gain practical experience in local SEO, without the politics of working for a client But I wouldn't want to blight that address for future occupants if the experiment went horribly awry.
We could instead offer pro bono services to a small business with a limited web presence – that would be useful to her, and constructive. But I'd like to have a better understanding of what signals Google looks for when deciding whether to index a website in local search, and see whether possible to dupe those algos.
What are your thoughts, Mozzers?
.
-
Duplicate post, sorry!
-
Thanks for your input, Keri! I think we're going to go the pro bono route.
Starwood's a curious case, and I also wonder to what extent those pages exist for SEO reasons. Some of their test properties look innocuous, like sandboxes for translation plug-ins or new templates, but the Wikipedia citation on the 'List of New York Hotels' is really interesting to me. When I was working in-house for a New York hotel chain, I also picked up on weird affinities between that page and rankings in local search. Back in May I noticed that the Magic 7 for "NYC Hotels" exclusively listed hotels with Wikipedia pages, and decided to create one for one of the properties. Bingo! Within a few weeks, we were usually among the top local results for "nyc luxury hotels", "nyc 4-star hotels", and "nyc 5-star hotels" (yeesh, Google, it's either one or the other...)
At the same time, hotels with Wikipedia pages started receiving snippets and thumbnails from their articles on the far right of the screen, adjacent to the map. This seemed to be exclusive to the hospitality vertical, and I didn't notice the same SERP formatting in other cities. You would also see thumbnails of related hotels (which as a rule, also had Wikipedia pages), and a list of features that it seemed to be cross-referencing from multiple sources, like:
Hotel Class: 4 Stars
Architect: Steven Jacobs
Style: Modernist
My hunch is that Starwood was testing two hypotheses with the Test Galaxy Sheraton:
- Does inclusion on Wikipedia's list of hotels in New York City influence rankings, either local or web?
- Does Google source a hotel's 'features' from lists and structured mark-ups on a hotel's own website?
In any case, Google did away with the Wikipedia-heavy SERPs a few months ago but I suspect it continues to inform local search. It makes sense from a business perspective that Google would want to use use open-source data whenever possible. They could crunch its geocoordinates and with their algorithms without paying license fees, I would think, no?
-
I'd totally avoid doing anything like this as well, and think that offering pro bono services would be much better all the way around.
My guess is that Starwood didn't realize that those URLs were live and indexable on the web. I must say that http://www.starwoodhotels.com/preferredguest/property/features/attraction_detail.html?propertyID=588&attractionId=1000027215 provided my ROFL of the morning though!
-
Think I needed this, Daniel. Thank you!
My conscience says that you're right. I've gone back and forth on this today, and whatever educational value there might be seems outweighed by the potential to confuse people and affect livelihoods.
There are things that I'd like to test that go beyond the standard on-page/off-page process of citations, schemata, and KML—things like EXIF data, geocaching, and Wikipedia mentions—but it doesn't seem fair to test any of them without having some skin in the game.
Ah, if only there were a sandbox for real company stuff...
-
Yikes!
No, no, no.
A thousand times no.
And once again: no.
Fakery is always and everywhere wrong. It's not complicated.
If that means nothing to you, consider the consequences of exposure.
As a former TV news director I can assure you this is a helluva story:
"Company in the sleazy SEO business is caught red-handed in the cynically calculated use of deceit to intentionally mislead the public by creating a fake business; calls it an "intern experiment" and says it did nothing wrong. Consumer advocates disagree and call for regulation and licensing of SEO industry. Part two tomorrow, as our series on the death of privacy and birth of web big brotherism continues. Are your children safe?"
Sheesh.
Few issues are black and white.
But this is one.
-
Thanks,
Let me know what you think of my post, I am trying to start establishing myself in the blogosphere, though that particular post is really is a high-level recap of Search Love, though I had a lot of points made in David Mihms Presentation, which was amazing.
In response to the local algos, they seem to be, in my opinion, even more neurotic than the organic ones. I mean they are ALL over the place, it is also VERY hard to track local rankings.
-
I agree with Zach and I would suggest going with the other option you already have in your head.
"We could instead offer pro bono services to a small business with a limited web presence – that would be useful to her, and constructive. But I'd like to have a better understanding of what signals Google looks for when deciding whether to index a website in local search, and see whether possible to dupe those algos."
In my opinion, that's the best way to go. @Zach, thanks for posting those links. I will check out your post.
-
You'd be treading in some murky water there. I had a conversation last week at SearchLove Boston with David Mihm, one of the most reputable local SEOs, and we had a conversation about creating fictitious addresses for businesses, the problem is that you cannot use a PO box, which leaves you to use things like UPS store mailboxes. Google can obviously tell that if your at a UPS Store and will take it down; David Mihm explained it as a Wack-A-Mole game.
Also, if you use fictitious addresses, what stops competitors from reporting you? Again, you could try it, but it's real tricky to do, and successfully get away with. I'm much more of a fan of #RCS.
Some good resources to learn from
http://protechig.com/seo/search-love-boston-2012-takeaways/ (not to toot my own horn, but I have a good amount of local tips in this post)
Hope this helps!
Zach
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Analytics for SEO
Can someone recommend a good (advance) online or offline (Europe) training course for Google Analytics?
SEO Learn Center | | Tormar0 -
Can you have same product name and description on a local and national site at the same time without getting dinged by google?
My question is regarding a few sites we own which are all related. The local site (http://location.company.com) is a extension of the national main site (http://company.com.) We are in the process of launching these new sites as replacements to older sites we created years ago. My first question regarding SEO is it important to the search engines to have unique product content on both sites even though they promote the same products (with same pictures) and brands or can we keep the same product names and descriptions as I hope? I ask this because essentially they are the same site but with with the exception of the local extension..... We thought by re writing all the content on the main pages of both sites along with different; title tags, page title and meta descriptions that that would make the sites different enough to get away with this. Is that the case? Thank you in advance for your assistance, Jake
SEO Learn Center | | Closetstogo0 -
Creating a webinar
Hi Mozzers, Wanted to pick your brains on something...we are going to give all our clients an update on the industry and want to invite them all to a webinar. Although I've done a few before, I've never set one up and wondered if anyone had any advice on what platform to use etc? Any recommendations would be brilliant! Thanks in advance, Karl
SEO Learn Center | | KarlBantleman0 -
Off Page SEO Topic
Hi, I want to know a list of off page SEO topics (panda and penguin friendly) what will drive traffic. Can you help me? Al
SEO Learn Center | | bayezid0 -
Listing multiple locations on Facebook for local business and top platforms for local SEO
What is the easiest way to register multiple locations for a business to Facebook local? I'm sure we've all had the challenge of multiple local business listings for a client. The set up is just busy work, but the verification can be an issue with some busier or less organized locations. I'm interested to see if anyone has a more eloquent solution to achieve this. I also have a second question as far as local listings go - how would you rank the most influential local listing platforms? Thanks, Bill
SEO Learn Center | | wpsoule0 -
Difficult Boss: Does anyone know of a SEO quick reference?
I am dealing with a boss who does not understand all the aspects of SEO and its value. He thinks if I just plaster keywords on a page, we'll rank. He thinks I'm wasting my time blogging, link-building, ect. I'm wondering if anyone knows of an article or blog post that has been published that BRIEFLY explains the value of these things. What I am looking for is NOT an article about the basics of SEO. I don't need something that is written for a beginner SEO just starting out who wants to learn how to do it. I need something that is written for a business owner who isn't technically-minded, so he can understand why and how each aspects helps rankings. Does any such reference exist?
SEO Learn Center | | UnderRugSwept0 -
Suggestions for Best SEO tools and extensions for chrome?
The only browser I am very comfortable working with is chrome. There are plenty of extensions and tools for it but adding them all makes it slow. could use some suggestions from experienced chromers which are most effective extensions for SEOs in Chrome?
SEO Learn Center | | GulitUpadhyay0 -
Universal Local Results & Venice Update - What's what?
There is some buzz in the community regarding the Venice Update of the Google Algorithm. Google has said the following about this: "Improvements to ranking for local search results. [launch codename “Venice”] This improvement improves the triggering of Local Universal results by relying more on the ranking of our main search results as a signal."
SEO Learn Center | | DeptAgency
source:http://insidesearch.blogspot.com/2012/02/search-quality-highlights-40-changes.html A lot of Blog posts refer to this update and discuss the effect of the location of the googler on the ranking of "standard/traditional results". My question is: Does the term 'Local Universal Results' include "standard/traditional" results or is it used by Google to refer to 'Google Places' Results in the standard SERP? So, are the results that are impacted by Venice recognizable as 'Local Results' (by the teardrop and google Maps and so on), or does it influence 'standard/traditiona results' as well, other than simply pushing them down by inserting Google Places results in the SERP? Thanks a lot! 1WWBV.jpg0