SEO Risks for redirecting sites
-
Hey Everyone,
I've tried searching for this question, but am not exactly sure what keywords to search for so I'm probably missing the resources if they already exist...
My client has had duplicated sites for years, and after multiple penalizations of those sites I was finally able to convince him to consolidate them into a "mega-site". Currently, he has a main domain, a geo-subdomain for each office location under the main domain, and a geo-domain for each office location.
We plan on redirecting each geo-domain to the corresponding geo-subdomain. So, the final result will be one main domain, and a sub-domain for each office location.
I'm looking for any information regarding tracking SEO data after the redirects are in place, how to guard against potential drops in SERPs, what's the smartest strategy to implement, etc... My client is very sensitive to his sites' SEO data, so if anyone has any SEO-related advice regarding redirecting sites it would be greatly appreciated!
Thank you!
-
Her general example was based on her, Matt Cutts and another Google employee having Fitness websites that she then buys and how she would go about the use of canonicals and 301s to show users and search engines that she is the most relevant authority. One of the pluses with the canonicals involved branded searches that would still pull the Matt Cutts site instead of the Maile Ohye site but link equity would be directed to her site and users would be less likely to bounce since the canonical would serve the Matt page whereas a 301 may be jarring at first because if you're looking for Matt and get Maile you may be more likely to bounce even though its the content you are looking for.
(God, I swear I can explain this better in my own head than I can once I attempt to write it out... which is bad considering I actually make a living writing)
-
I have found that folders perform better than subdomains.
I have done 301 redirects of subdomains into folders and the rankings went up strongly. I attribute this to combining the link popularity.
-
Hey Mike,
That sounds like an interesting discussion and sorry I couldn't hear it in person. I'm not sure if this would be relevant to my specific project though - our ultimate goal is to merge two existing sites into one. They have relatively the same content and subjects, meaning the userbase is also probably very similar. The speech that you're referring to sounds like it would be more suitable for a site that is going through a redesign and moving to a new domain name. Your thoughts?
-
I was leaning towards doing all the redirects at once, but didn't have the experience to back that theory up. Thanks for the advice!
-
Hi EGOL,
The sites that we are merging were penalized about 2 years ago. Their value has since begun to increase again, but they still haven't reached the level they were at before the penalization. After all the research we did to answer "why" they were penalized, we could only assume that it was because of our client's massive network of sites.
This was all implemented before I came onto the project. A mistake was made somewhere along the way that set off a "red flag" to Google that these sites were in cahoots (for lack of a better phrase) and penalized them.
We're hoping that the penalization occurred long enough ago that it will not harm the sites we are consolidating the penalized sites into.
My understanding of subdomains vs. folders is that for instances where the topics could virtually be separated (as is the case with multiple geographical locations), then subdomains are the optimal way to go. My client is also interested in ranking well in Google Local, and wants to have separate listings for each business location - which will also be beneficial if we take the subdomain route. I'll admit though, I'm a bit rusty on this topic and would welcome any advice or further resources! I'll do some more research, but if you have any further thoughts on the matter please do send them my way!
Thanks again!
-
Thanks, TommyTan, that's very reassuring!
-
I generally advocate for consolidating a group of sites.... but... are some of these sites penalized? Might be a good idea to understand why and the impact of merging them with unpenalized sites.
Also, if you are going to consolidate, combing the site into folders instead of subdomains can merge the domain authority. Do some research on this before move forward.
-
This reminded me of something Maile Ohye from Google was talking about at SMX NY.
In her talk about 301 vs Rel=Canonical she brought up the idea of putting notices on a site first that Site A is now a part of the Site B Family and will be consolidated in the future and giving people (and the spiders) a link to the new site to start building relevancy. Then later on implementing canonicals across Site A pointing to the relevant places on Site B. Gradually moving towards 301 redirects once Site B becomes the place people now recognize as the main site and the original is no longer needed.
[This of course is all paraphrased and from memory as I don't have my voice recordings of the session handy nor did anyone from Google provide PDFs of their slideshows]
-
Hi Daniel,
From what I know, I don't believe their is any risk at doing all the domains at once. Furthermore, you are not doing to the same page but from geodomains to different geo-subdomains. I've read about people redirecting 50,000 pages in comments and I don't recall anyone mentioning their is any risk.
The only risk I can think of is it might take longer for search engines to recrawl all the pages. Maybe someone can show some light in this.
You can tell your client that suffer a few drop in ranks in the short run for success in the long run.
-
As TommyTan says:
For large redirect projects, you should redirect all that you want to keep the value from. Don't mass redirect to a single page, as most won’t end up passing value, so keep all redirects pointed to pages which are relevant to the original.
You will have to wait a little while for search engines to recrawl and update their indexes. For a clean switchover that pushes all existing link juice to the new pages I'd do them at once.
-
Hi TommyTan,
Thanks for this info and the article, it's a great resource! We plan on mapping out both sites entirely and matching the topics A to A and B to B as you mentioned and this reminded me of a question I should have included in my last post:
Are there any potential risks to doing these redirects all at once? We have at least 3 domains that we want to redirect to the corresponding subdomains, and we don't want to make such a major change to the site that we risk major SERP drops. I'm wondering if we should redirect one domain at a time over a few months, or just do it all in one major sweep...
We're expecting the delay in seeing the affects, and while I know it's unavoidable, convincing my client of this is the big challenge! Like I said, he's very sensitive to his site's SEO data, and any drop in stats after we make a major change instantly makes him second guess the move.
Thanks again!
-
Hi Daniel,
Using 301 redirect is definitely the best bet. 301 redirect usually transfer 99% of the SEO to your new page so I don't believe there is any risk other than making a mistake while setting it up.
When you are redirecting make sure that eacy specific page is redirecting to another specific that is similar. You don't want a visitor wanting to learn something specific and you redirect them to the home page. You are losing opportunities there. So redirect home page to home page, topic A to topic A, topic B to topic B.
After setting up all the redirects, it might take a while for Search Engines to recrawl so don't fret when you still don't see any effect after a week or so.
SEOmoz wrote a SEO Redirection Best Practices Article, hopefully it will help!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does the Year according to the URL have an SEO impact
I ask to Godaddy if there is an SEO impact between buying a url for 1 year or 10 years. They said me that there is no impact, however, I read the historical URL has one. So, the question is : buying with 1 year and autorenew might be the right choice. Warm regards,
Industry News | | johncurlee0 -
Anyone know of any forums for agencies or those individuals engaged in Internet Marketing, SEO, Integrated Marketing, etc.?
Moz.com is the best forum I have been a part of. There is a local forum I really like but spend less time on (we have staff who live on it.) I am interested in a forum where everyone is agency related. Does anyone know of a good one? If not, would anyone have an interest?
Industry News | | RobertFisher1 -
Where to Look for a Standard 9-5 SEO Job
Hello, I'm looking for a standard 20-30 hour a week SEO job. I'd like to make $30/hour. My resume is here. So far I'm making a list of all the SEO companies in Boise, Idaho. Then I'm going to also call up the larger companies in my local area. I'm interested in knowing how to best look for a job, and if there are any national companies where I could do work locally for. Let me know what other information I can provide.
Industry News | | BobGW0 -
Will Google ever begin penalising bad English/grammar in regards to rankings and SEO?
Considering Google seem to be on a great crusade with all their algorithm updates to raise the overall "quality" of content on the Internet, i'm a bit concerned with their seeming lack of action towards penalising sites that contain terrible English. I'm sure you've all noticed this when you attempt to do some proper research via Google and come across an article that "looks" to be what you're after, then you click through and realise it's obviously been either put together in a rush by someone not paying attention or putting much effort in, or been outsourced for cheap labour to another country whose workers aren't (close to being) native speakers. It's getting really old trying to make sense of articles that have completely incorrect grammar, entirely missing words, verb tenses that don't make any sense, randomly over-extravagant adjectives thrown in just as padding, etc. etc. No offense to all those from non-native speaking countries who are attempting to make a few bucks online, but this for me is becoming by far more of an issue in terms of "quality" of information online as opposed to some of the other search issues that are being given higher priority, and it just seems strange that Google have been so blasé about it up to this point - especially given so many of these articles and pages are nothing more than outsourced filler for cheap traffic. I understand it's probably hard to code in something so advanced, but it would go a long way towards making the web a better place in my opinion. Anyone else feeling the same way? Thoughts?
Industry News | | ExperienceOz1 -
How should I outsource my small business SEO needs?
Fellow MOZers, I run a small ecommerce business called mrpearl11.com, and I need assistance in outsourcing my SEO. A little about us: We sell a variety of import merchandise, but specialize in closeouts (buying merchandise at very low prices) which can translate into some real exceptional value to our customers. The buying part of the business is strong, but our online presence is weak. We have a decent high-level understanding of SEO, but I do not have the in-house skill sets necessary to truly leverage the SEO tactics and strategies that I believe we need to integrate into our processes. Thus we have a very weak SEO presence. Basically starting from scratch. Right now, we are focusing on content. Item-level content. Subcategory and category level content. General website content (about us, contact us, the checkout process, etc...) with the goal to provide a great user experience. We believe we have the right prices on the right merchandise, and that if we can set a strong foundation of content so that the user experience is positive, our future marketing efforts will have a better ROI. However, keyword analysis and targeting, data-mining, A/B testing, link acquisition, etc etc etc, really don't exist as a part of our processes on a professional level. I could try to train my in-house crew, but I think that from time a time and cost perspective, we'd be better served by outsourcing. My question to the MOZ community is how should I address my small business SEO needs? There are probably a lot of ways to go from here, but I want to start with a person or an agency, build a relationship, and move forward taking one step at a time. I don't want to jump into some kind of commitment where we're spending big bucks out of the gate, but on the other hand if we can build a track record of proven results that have a good ROI, I'm not afraid to scale up. Please share your thoughts, and feel welcome to ask questions 🙂 Thanks! Adam
Industry News | | Adam-Perlman0 -
SEO Company In France
Hi Guys I am currently looking for an SEO company in France. Cant anyone recommend a good reputable agency? Thanks
Industry News | | EwanFisher1 -
Want to a Medium Cost Seo Firm
Hi, I have a website which is ranged in medium scale, I want some medium cost seo company to do the seo work for my site. I willing to pay upto $500 p/m. Waiting for the replies.
Industry News | | Dexx220 -
Who would you like to ask a SEO question the most?
I was wondering about which people in the industry you'd like to ask a question the most in the q&a? On my list is Matt Cutts (obviously), Marshall Simmonds, Jimmy Wales and Biz Stone.
Industry News | | ThomasHgenhaven0