Google using descriptions from other websites instead of site's own meta description
-
In the last month or so, Google has started displaying a description under links to my home page in its search results that doesn't actually come from my site.
I have a meta description tag in place and for a very limited set of keywords, that description is displayed, but for the majority of results, it's displaying a description that appears on Alexa.com and a handful of other sites that seem to have copied Alexa's listing, e.g. similarsites.com.
The problem is, the description from these other sites isn't particularly descriptive and mentions a service that we no longer provide.
So my questions are:
- Why is Google doing this? Surely that's broken behaviour.
- How do I fix it?
-
I (finally) see the confusion - a good reason for me to be careful in word choice. I didn't say "duplicate content" I said "duplicated" content. What I meant was "repetition" not duplicated but I guess because we see "duplicate content" every day as SEOs I chose the wrong phrase. What I meant was the duplication / repetition that can happen in the title, as in my example:
"Brisbane SEOs and digital marketing services in Brisbane | SEO | Marketing"
I have many times seen replaced title/description if keywords are repeated in the titles. I have always cleared it up with noodp and noydir. In this case I stated that I didn't think that was the real issue but it is one that causes problems.
So the examples I copied in didn't have to do with "duplicate content" as it relates to rel=canonical but it has to do with "duplicated" title keywords. Obviously I wasn't clear enough in the original post and I'm glad to know that. I still think my advice will work and for the reasons I stated, just with better phrasing. I definitely didn't mean to be confusing so thanks for pointing it out.
Hope that clears up the misunderstanding and thanks for helping me give better advice - appreciate it.
~Matt
-
brisbane web development may get more searches but I also don't rank nearly as well for it as I do for terms with freelance in it.
Most of the enquiries I get follow on from searches that contain freelance and brisbane in the query, whereas brisbane web development is the only one of about 30 keyword phrases that I've been tracking that is showing the correct description.
As far as changing over time: it's only in the last month that these incorrect descriptions have shown up; everything's been fine up until now.
-
If you look at the conversation between Matt and I, you will see that your meta you do not want is showing in dmoz and a few directory sites. Since the query, freelance web design brisbane is a low volume query, and brisbane web development is getting 2400 searches per month, I would not worry too much about it.
Every search I did that I was able to find you had corrected meta. The one you don't like was last used on your site in mid 2011 it appears. I think over time it will change, but putting too much into it is not worth the time.
All the best.
-
Matt,
This info from google doesn't have anything to do with duplicate content.
The first one is about title tags and even that says they (Google) may try to improve the title. Nothing about the meta.
The second is from a Google forum in 2008 and says to first check dmoz to see if the meta is appearing there. If you just say, hey use noodp, noydir, you are making an assumption that is problematic.
The third where you have John Mueller, it is again about Titles and not using keyword stuffing.
Here is the issue Matt: When you state something like that (and I have made the same mistake) and leave a lot out, someone who doesn't do this day to day, assumes something that is simply not true. Frankly, I know of no instance where duplicate content has caused a SERP snippet to change.
Yes, you can use noodp, noydir, but you need to explain why and not say its because of duplicate content. The snippet he gives says "Provides a range of web design and print design services." If you put that search on Google.com.au, there is no duplicate content issue.
Yes, that does appear on dmoz, not on Yahoo Directory. But, it also appears on several directory type sites. Will using noodp keep it from happening? Only if that is the source.
So, I have thumbed you up for the courtesy of a reply to me (evens out the thumb down). Thanks for the reply and, feel free to let me know if I stray or if you believe something here is incorrect. I am open to being wrong and having it pointed out.
All the best,
Robert
-
Robert, if you do a search for freelance web design brisbane (result is on the first page for me in google.com.au), you'll see the sort of thing I'm referring to. This is what's coming up for most of the keywords I'm tracking for my site.
If you do a search for brisbane web development (result on page 9 although a few days ago it was page 15), you'll see the snippet saying what my meta description tag for the home page says, i.e. what I want it to say.
-
http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=35624
"Avoid keyword stuffing. It's sometimes helpful to have a few descriptive terms in the title, but there’s no reason to have the same words or phrases appear multiple times. A title like
"Foobar, foo bar, foobars, foo bars"
doesn't help the user, and this kind of keyword stuffing can make your results look spammy to Google and to users."If we’ve detected that a particular result has one of the above issues with its title, we may try to generate an improved title from anchors, on-page text, or other sources.
Google's suggestion is basically what I said above:
If you're concerned about content in your title or snippet, you may want to double-check that this content doesn't appear on your site. If it doesn't, try searching Google.com for the title or snippet enclosed in quotation marks. This will display pages on the web that refer to your site using this text. If you contact these webmasters to request that they change their information about your site, any changes to their sites will be recognized by our crawler after we next crawl their pages.
In addition, John Mueller gave this advice in a post on one of Google's blogs:
"In general, when we run across titles that appear to be sub-optimal, we may choose to rewrite them in the search results. This could happen when the titles are particularly short, shared across large parts of your site or appear to be mostly a collection of keywords. One thing you can do to help prevent this is to make sure that your titles and descriptions are relevant, unique and compelling, without being "stuffed" with too much boilerplate text across your site."
---------------------------------
(Pretty much sounds like what I said but you thumbed me down for.)
-
Matt,
Where are you getting: **Usually it's duplicated content that gets your meta replaced **
I cannot find any reference to it anywhere in GWMT, etc.
Thanks,
Robert
-
I think I understand, but want to be sure. The first img attached is my listing in SERPs here in US with my homepage drumbeatmarketing.net/ Below the SERP link for the query are sitelinks.
The next is your Home Page meta per SEOmoz tool
The next is your About Page meta per SEOmoz tool
The last is your SERP page from Google.com.au showing ABOUT page as the first page to show. Note query was Tyssen design australia
Note that the SERP snippet and the meta you have are the same for that ABOUT page. This would mean that Google is showing precisely what you are asking for it to show.
If this was recently changed, it may not yet have been reindexed hence the need to resubmit sitemap or do a fetch as google on that page as I previously gave you.
I thought this might be a site link issue originally and should have done a bit more investigating and asked you more. If what you are seeing and what I am seeing is the same, then the issue is that you are assuming your homepage is what is first in SERP and it is About page. Short of that, I would need to know what meta you have for homepage, what query gives wrong result, etc.
Hope this helps you out.
Robert
-
Hi Robert, no they're definitely not site links, can verify that they're search results snippets.
-
John,
I would be curious to see if this changes anything for you. I have sites that are listed with the Open Directory Project (aka dmoz) and with Yahoo (we paid for the listings in Yahoo for our client). I do not see Google grabbing those descriptions any longer for use in the SERP snippet.
One thing I would suggest if you believe the noodp, noydir (both good links) change will make a difference is to resubmit your sitemap and/or run a couple of Fetch as Googles on some of your site url's like your home page where you are seeing this. I doubt anything will change.
Also, it sounds as if what you are talking about are site links as opposed to the search snippet that draws from the meta description. With site links, you can turn those off (demote them) for ninety days if incorrect. Go into WMT and on your site you will see: Configuration. Click and you will see sitelinks. Note that if you are doing this for your home page you add nothing to the url that you see first.
Here is info straight from GWMT:
Demote a sitelink URL:
- On the Webmaster Tools Home page, click the site you want.
- Under Site configuration, click Sitelinks.
- In the For this search result box, complete the URL for which you don't want a specific sitelink URL to appear. (How to find the right URL.)
- In the Demote this sitelink URL box, complete the URL of the sitelink you want to demote.
I think you will find this much more effective.
Best
-
Thanks, I've just done both of those.
-
You should include a noodp, noydir tag to try to prevent this. I saw your title & description and they look fine. Usually it's duplicated content that gets your meta replaced (say Brisbane SEOs and digital marketing services in Brisbane | SEO | Marketing" That would get you replaced in a heartbeat.
For yours, I don't see that - but they must think the Alexa is more relevant.
-
Change Alexa and ping those changes to Google.
-
Add noydir and noodp to your meta tags.
Hope that helps!
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What's the best way to integrate off site inventory?
I can't seem to make any progress with my car dealership client in rankings or traffic. I feel like I've narrowed out most of the common problems, the only other thing I can see is that all their inventory is on a subdomain using a dedicated auto dealership software. Any suggestion of a better way to handle this situation? Am I missing something obvious? The url is rcautomotive.com Thanks for your help!
Technical SEO | | GravitateOnline0 -
Pro's & contra's: http vs https
Hi there, We are planning to take the step and go from http to https. The main reason to do this, is to mean trustfull to our clients. And of course the rumours that it would be better for ranking (in the future). We have a large e-commerce site. A part of this site ia already HTTPS. I've read a lot of info about pro's and contra's, also this MOZ article: http://moz.com/blog/seo-tips-https-ssl
Technical SEO | | Leonie-Kramer
But i want to know some experience from others who already done this. What did you encountered when changing to HTTPS, did you had ranking drops, or loss of links etc? I want to make a list form pro's and contra's and things we have to do in advance. Thanx, Leonie0 -
'No Follow' and 'Do Follow' links when using WordPress plugins
Hi all I hope someone can help me out with the following question in regards to 'no follow' and 'do follow' links in combination with WordPress plugins. Some plugins that deal with links i.e. link masking or SEO plugins do give you the option to 'not follow' links. Can someone speak from experience that this does actually work?? It's really quite stupid, but only occurred to me that when using the FireFox add on 'NoDoFollow' as well as looking at the SEOmoz link profile of course, 95% of my links are actually marked as FOLLOW, while the opposite should be the case. For example I mark about 90% of outgoing links as no follow within a link masking plugin. Well, why would WordPress plugins give you the option to mark links as no follow in the first place when they do in fact appear as follow for search engines and SEOmoz? Is this a WordPress thing or whatnot? Maybe they are in fact no follow, and the information supplied by SEO tools comes from the basic HTML structure analysis. I don't know... This really got me worried. Hope someone can shed a light. All the best and many thanks for your answers!
Technical SEO | | Hermski0 -
Trying to get google to know my site is a magazine site is this wrong
Hi, i have put a line to describe what my site is at the top of my site and i want to know if this is wrong or not. We have dropped frok being number one in google for lifestyle magazine to now number seven. Before we had to redo our site we were number one and then we dropepd to around number four when we finished the site and now we are number seven and i need to try and get back up there. To help google know we are a lifestyle magazine i have put a line at the top of the site and i want to know if this looks out of place and if i should take it down. i need advice on how to get google to know we are a lifestyle magazine and get back in the top five of google my site is www.in2town.co.uk any help would be great
Technical SEO | | ClaireH-1848860 -
Blank pages in Google's webcache
Hello all, Is anybody experiencing blanck page's in Google's 'Cached' view? I'm seeing just the page background and none of the content for a couple of my pages but when I click 'View Text Only' all of teh content is there. Strange! I'd love to hear if anyone else is experiencing the same. Perhaps this is something to do with the roll out of Google's updates last week?! Thanks,
Technical SEO | | A_Q
Elias0 -
Google Webmaster Site Performance
In webmaster tools, under labs/site performance google provides your ave page load time. When google grades a page, does it use how long that specific page loads -or- Does google use the overall ave page load time for the domain as provided in lab/site performance
Technical SEO | | Bucky0 -
Will changing our colocation affect our site's link juice?
If we change our site's server location to a new IP, will this affect anything involving SEO? The site name and links will not be changing.
Technical SEO | | 9Studios0 -
Domain Transfer Process / Bulk 301's Using IIS
Hi guys - I am getting ready to do a complete domain transfer from one domain to another completely different domain for a client due to a branding/name change. 2 things - first, I wanted to lay out a summary of my process and see if everyone agrees that its a good approach, and second, my client is using IIS, so I wanted to see if anyone out there knows a bulk tool that can be used to implement 301's on the hundreds of pages that the site contains? I have found the process to redirect each individual page, but over hundreds its a daunting task to look at. The nice thing about the domain transfer is that it is going to be a literal 1:1 transfer, with the only things changing being the logo and the name mentions. Everything else is going to stay exactly the same, for the most part. I will use dummy domain names in the explanation to keep things easy to follow: www.old-domain.com and www.new-domain.com. The client's existing home page has a 5/10 GPR, so of course, transferring Mojo is very important. The process: Clean up existing site 404's, duplicate tags and titles, etc. (good time to clean house). Create identical domain structure tree, changing all URL's (for instance) from www.old-domain.com/freestuff to www.newdomain.com/freestuff. Push several pages to a dev environment to test (dev.new-domain.com). Also, replace all instances of old brand name (images and text) with new brand name. Set up 301 redirects (here is where my IIS question comes in below). Each page will be set up to redirect to the new permanent destination with a 301. TEST a few. Choose lowest traffic time of week (from analytics data) to make the transfer ALL AT ONCE, including pushing new content live to the server for www.new-domain.com and implementing the 301's. As opposed to moving over parts of the site in chunks, moving the site over in one swoop avoids potential duplicate content issues, since the content on the new domain is essentially exactly the same as the old domain. Of course, all of the steps so far would apply to the existing sub-domains as well, IE video.new-domain.com. Check for errors and problems with resolution issues. Check again. Check again. Write to (as many as possible) link partners and inform them of new domain and ask links to be switched (for existing links) and updated (for future links) to the new domain. Even though 301's will redirect link juice, the actual link to the new domain page without the redirect is preferred. Track rank of targeted keywords, overall domain importance and GPR over time to ensure that you re-establish your Mojo quickly. That's it! Ok, so everyone, please give me your feedback on that process!! Secondly, as you can see in the middle of that process, the "implement 301's" section seems easier said than done, especially when you are redirecting each page individually (would take days). So, the question here is, does anyone know of a way to implement bulk 301's for each individual page using IIS? From what I understand, in an Apache environment .htaccess can be used, but I really have not been able to find any info regarding how to do this in bulk using IIS. Any help here would be GREATLY APPRECIATED!!
Technical SEO | | Bandicoot0