How is it possible that Interflora can bounce back from a Google penalty so quickly - is that normal?
-
As far as I understand it Interflora was removed from Google organic search results on February 20th.
I guess no one knows for sure why they were delisted other than Google but I have heard theories such as giving flower bribes to bloggers in return for links How sweet - and placing paid follow links inside advertorials within local newspaper sites.
Whatever the reason for their de listing it seemed Google must have wanted to send out a strong message since even a branded search wasn't ranking.
Fast forward 13 days to today and I now see Interflora ranking not only for their brand but also for flower delivery London etc etc...
How is it possible that they managed to get back in the SERPs so quickly? Is it normal to get a penalty and be back up and running at position 1 in less than 2 weeks? Is that normal for a penalty?
I was under the impression that being caught gaming Google to the extent where they delisted you was something far more serious and had much longer term repercussions?
-
"All" was probably a poor choice of words. Sorry.
Do any of us really know what blackhat SEO is anyway?
-
Your comment " All these big brands know black hat SEO and know they can get away with it so they do it." seems to broadly attack branded SEO work. Not all brands know black hat SEO. In fact, I've found more brands doing black hat and not knowing it was black hat. SEO is a mystery to brands.
Brands want results so it is on the part of the SEO or agency to educate on risks etc. I'm guessing most folks don't educate their bosses.
-
I didn't say there weren't?
-
It's not all the big brands. There are ethical SEOs working at brands.
-
They're a big brand. That's it. They knew what they were doing, got caught, got out. Very simple when you're a big brand. Same thing with iAquire. They were buying links, knew they were being naughty, got caught, got out. Big brand with big connections. Same story with most big brands. I actually just talked to a guy from Dunn & Bradstreet about this. All these big brands know black hat SEO and know they can get away with it so they do it.
-
People keep talking about how Interflora is getting favor because they're a brand, but I think it's possible that this could be no different than any other website with an unnatural links penalty.
If the penalty was due to one particular type of link (i.e. the advertorials) it's conceivably possible that they were able to get these removed very quickly and then file for reconsideration.
I've had reconsideration requests come back successful after only 3 days.
-
Or maybe they sent some flowers to Matt Cutts - Sorry that was terrible humour
-
Provided what I read was true, interflora were aware prior to the penalty that they were in trouble and were taking steps to remedy the situation by getting the links removed. It could be that their recovery is part of a settlement of sorts, they are a big brand, they took quick action, and this sort of recovery is hardly unprecedented (BMW recovered in 4 days after their penalty via Nick Wilsdon (credit where it's due)).
They apparently still haven't recovered for Valentines or Mother's day, which may be the penalty that lasts, but google got their message out about advertorials quite effectively and that is probably what they were after.
In addition I would imagine that Google's Chrome marketing ad from a while back was an argument in interflora's favour. It actually features items being sent to reviewers to review and it's hardly a huge step to see interflora's blogger flower deliveries as the same thing.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Engagement - but high bounce rate?
Hey gang. So I am a writer/amateur SEO/outreach guy for my agency. We have a client that fixes garage doors only in the the city of Portland Oregon. I wrote him a blog (this is not the real title) Called 5 ways to fix my garage door fast. It is doing pretty well and getting over a thousand visitors a month. But we all know that people coming to that blog could be from anywhere in the world, and most likely are not going to purchase garage door repair service from my client. We all know that. And that's why the page has a 98% bounce rate, but an overall good time on page. My superior sat me down and told me that I have to stop writing content like this, because all the content we write should be location focused. He said having a high bounce rate like that is actually bad for the site and is not helping at all. What do you guys think? Is he spot on? Thank you!
Link Building | | Meier0 -
Can a homepage have a penalty but not the rest of the pages?
I've got an unusual issue. I set up a new website with new content and moved old (blog) content to the new site. On the old site, most of the blog content wasn't ranking after the Oct update. On the new site it all started ranking again after I redirected old URLs to new URLs. However while all the blog content ranks, the homepage doesn't rank for the new brand term. There are multiple articles in press that refer to the new website using the branded terms as anchor text, but it's still not ranking. Is it possible that the redirected homepage (and only the hompage) from the old site is carrying a penalty? If so, should I not redirect the homepage of the old site but all of it's sub pages?
Link Building | | ServiceCrowd_AU0 -
How to Recover From a Google Penguin Penalty?
My web site is hit by penguin penalty and got the mail from Google to my web master tool saying. "Google has detected a pattern of artificial or unnatural links pointing to your site. Buying links or participating in link schemes in order to manipulate PageRank are violations of Google's Webmaster Guidelines.
Link Building | | tinyinnovative
As a result, Google has applied a manual spam action to xxxxx.com/. There may be other actions on your site or parts of your site.
Recommended action
Use the Links to Your Site feature in Webmaster Tools to download a list of links to your site.
Ensure that unnatural links pointing to your site are removed.
When these changes are made, and you are satisfied that links to your site follow Google's Webmaster Guidelines, submit a reconsideration request. If you're unable to remove links pointing to your site, please provide as much detail as possible in your reconsideration request.For an updated list of manual actions currently applied to your site, visit the Manual Actions page. If no manual actions are listed, there is no longer a need to file a reconsideration request."0 -
01 November 2013 - A possible Google's update??
Hello Guys! On 01 November 2013, one of our website's traffic has been dropped by more than 70%. We had added plenty of domains to the disavow tool, I am just wondering if its a Google's update or the disavow tool has destroyed the site? Any ideas? 9p3sN3p.jpg
Link Building | | TheSEOGuy10 -
Can i help google find my new backlinks quicker?
i have been building links for the past month or so and google has still not added my links. my website has been up and working for 7 years now with 1000's of entries a year and it is mostly indexed. but i cant seem to get my new backlinks to be added. any expert advice?
Link Building | | amoseshet0 -
Can No Follow Links Hurt Rankings?
Thanks to sites like SEOmoz and good folks like yourselves I was able to understand enough about SEO to know that the company we outsourced the SEO to were doing at best a sloppy job. I have seen that the link profile of site is totally unnatural in terms of factors such as relevancy and anchor text but also that around 95% of the 800 links are no follow. My question is whether these low quality no follow links causing unnatural anchor text ratios and poor link relevancy would hurt our rankings? I am basically wondering if I have to now go and try to have all those links removed somehow to avoid any problems going forward?
Link Building | | Luia0 -
Google penalizing sites because of press release pages?
Does anyone know of situations i can look up where Google penalized a site because of press release pages (hosted on a non owned major site like prweb or whatever), where the prweb page obtained back links from a group of sites that Google felt was part of a "farm"?
Link Building | | joemas990