Comparing the site structure/design of my live site to my new design
-
Hi SEOmoz team,
for the last few months I've been working on a new design for my website, the old, live design can be viewed at http://www.concerthotels.com - it is primarily focused on helping users find hotels close to concert venues throughout North America. The old structure was built in such a way that each concert venue had a number of different pages associated with it (all connected via tabs) - a page with information about the venue, a page with nearby hotels to the venue, a page of upcoming events, a page of venue reviews. An example of these pages can be seen at:
http://www.concerthotels.com/venue/madison-square-garden/304484
http://www.concerthotels.com/venue-hotels/madison-square-garden-hotels/304484
http://www.concerthotels.com/venue-events/madison-square-garden-events/304484
http://www.concerthotels.com/venue-reviews/madison-square-garden-reviews/304484
The /venue-hotels/ pages are the most important pages on my website - and there is one of these pages for each concert venue - they are the landing pages for about 90% of the traffic on the website.
I decided that having four pages for each venue was probably a poor design, since many of the pages ended up having little or no useful, unique content.
So my new design attempts to bring a lot of the venue information together into fewer pages. My new website redesign is temporarily situated at: (not currently launched to the public)
http://www.concerthotels.com/frontend
The equivalent pages for Madison Square Garden are now:
http://www.concerthotels.com/frontend/venue/madison-square-garden/304484
(the page above contains venue information, events and reviews)
and
http://www.concerthotels.com/frontend/venue-hotels/madison-square-garden-hotels/304484
I would really appreciate any feedback from you guys, based on what you think of the new site design compared to the old design from an SEO point of view. Of course, any feedback on site speed, easy of use etc compared to the old design would also be greatly appreciated.
My main fear is that when I launch the new design (the new URLs will be identical to the old ones), Google will take a dislike to it - I currently receive a large percentage of my traffic through Google organic search, so I don't want to launch a design that might damage that traffic. My gut instinct tells me that Google should prefer the new design - vastly reduced number of pages, each page now contains more unique content, and it's very much designed for users, so I'm hoping bounce rate, conversion etc will improve too. But my gut has been wrong in the past!
But I'd love to hear your thoughts, and thanks in advance for any feedback,
Cheers
Mike
-
Re: Sitemap - standard length of time is 30 days, or until you notice search engines have de-indexed the old URLs.
-
Hi Cyrus,
thanks for spending so much time looking through my site and comparing my new design with the old one - I really appreciate it. The feedback you've provided is great - I'm really happy that you like the new look and feel, and the points you've raised have certainly got me thinking.
1. I do agree, it is a little top heavy, and on the venue page the hotels are hidden beneath the fold, so you might be right that I notice a drop in conversion. I'll launch the site to a small number of visitors and collect some stats. It might not be a major issue, since the vast majority of users to the website actually land on the hotel listings page (as opposed to the general venue information page) - but I guess we'll find out
2. Mmmm, good point - I guess the only page I'm removing that Google might have thought contained high quality ranking signals would be my old venue reviews pages - they contain a lot of unique, customer reviews of the concert venue. So there is potential for weird things to happen - I'll monitor it closely.
I hadn't thought of how the website would look, or work, if Javascript/cookies were disabled, so thank you for highlighting this - I'll certainly look into this.
3. You definitely raise a worrying point here - I hadn't thought of it from a duplicate content view - I simply thought that it would be nice to show the user a sample of hotels from the general venue page, before prompting them to view the entire list. I don't know how I can change this - I guess reducing the number of hotels might help? That way, I'd be reducing the amount of duplicate content.
4. Good point, I'll read the article and put the changes in place.
5. Ah, I hadn't thought of that - I was just going to put a sitemap of the new URLs up - how long would I need to include the "old" URLs in the sitemap for?
Thanks again for all your advice!
Best wishes
Mike
-
Hi Mike,
Thanks for sharing your site. There's always a fear that any redesign or structural changes will be ill-received by Google, but we never know until we try, right?
1. Overall, I like the design, look and feel. My only possible criticism here is the layout feels a little top-heavy. With the old design I felt I could jump in and start browsing hotels right away. The new design encourages me to search first, with the hotel results somewhat hidden beneath the fold. This may have a negative effect on conversions/bounce rate - but again you won't really know until you test it.
2. Generally, I'm a fan of consolidating low-value pages, or tabbed content into a single URL. I've worked with sites that have done this and seen a modest boost in traffic. That said, it's not always roses. If Google sees high quality ranking signals on those pages, and they suddenly disappear to be redirected via consolidation, weird things can and do sometimes happen. Regardless, I'd say overall I'd recommend you continue down this course and give it a try.
- 301 redirects are in place and seem to work.
- My one small complaint is that the old content disappears if you have JavaScript disabled. (with a CSS class display=none) Not a huge deal as Google is getting better at indexing javascript dependent content, but I'm a crusty old sod who'd rather see a solution that degrades gracefully with javascript disabled, such as is found on our Moz profile pages:http://www.seomoz.org/users/profile/155620
3. The only other thing I'm midly concered by is that your landing page lists 5-6 hotels, and then the hotel page starts of by listing the same 5-6 hotels - which creates a bit of a duplicate content issue. The two pages are now very similar in content. Not sure off the top of my head how to address this, but it's something worth thinking about.
4. For your paginated hotel listings, be sure that your using proper pagination indexing techniques, such as rel="next".
5. When you make the switch, I'd keep a sitemap up of your "old" urls so that Google will crawl and "see" the redirect.
That's it! Overall, looks like you're headed in the right direction. Pay attention when you launch, and keep these issues in mind.
Hope this helps! Best of luck.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
With Google's new Speed Update, what does that mean for AMP pages?
Hey everyone! I wanted to get the other Mozzers opinions on this. With Google announcing a new Speed Update that will affect mobile rankings, I wanted to ask: How will AMP pages play into this? Let me know what you think!
Web Design | | TaylorRHawkins
Thanks!2 -
Multiple sites using same text - how to avoid Google duplicate content penalty?
Hi Mozers, my client located in Colorado is opening a similar (but not identical) clinic in California. Will Google penalize the new California site if we use text from our website that features his Colorado office? He runs the clinic in CO and will be a partner of the clinic in CA, so the CA clinic has his "permission" to use his original text. Eventually he hopes to go national, with multiple sites utilizing essentially the same text. Will Google penalize the new CA site for plagiarism and/or duplicate content? Or is there a way to tell Google, "hey Google, this new clinic is not ripping off my text"?
Web Design | | CalamityJane770 -
Avg Page Load Time Increase After Responsive Web Design
The Avg. Page Load Time has been steadily increasing after our website went responsive. What could have cause this?
Web Design | | JMSCC1 -
Website URL Structures - Which does Google prefer or does it matter?
Which URL structure does google prefer..............OR DOES IT REALLY MATTER? Option A www.example.com/services/service#1 - this is the default that wordpress uses Option B www.example.com/service#1
Web Design | | webestate0 -
How can I reduce my warnings for excesive links on our site?
Our campaign overview shows well over 100 warnings that could be hurting our google ranking based on excessive links on pages. Each page listed, however, is simply due to listing the brands we carry, and linking to the products. Is there a way to do this without hurting our ranking? A better way than linking, perhaps? Thanks in advance!
Web Design | | guycochran0 -
Critique a site I'm working on please
Hi guys, I have a list of things to do on this website that is longer than my arm but thought I would gather a few more thoughts on the site before moving on further with it. The site is here. It went live a couple of days ago for live testing. I have a news section coming very soon at theworkplacedepot.co.uk/news - it is in live testing now. One glaring issue for me is that some of the products simply aren't "buyable". What I mean by that is that the options are too vague and too vast - as an outsider I wouldnt have a clue what I was buying! Other issues: The banner at the bottom of the HP is a test - its design will be changing. The sitemap has some issues and will be addressed. There is no area yet to "log-in". However, critique for me pretty please! 🙂
Web Design | | MattJanaway0 -
What can this charity site do to improve SEO?
Hello wise ones, We have been working with the charity Volunteers of America to create a new site for their car donation program at carshelpingpeople.org They are a national charity with extensive local programs run by regional affiliates, so the site is divided into a small national section linked to Regional Affiliate sections. You get to the regional sections either by entering your zip code or clicking on your state in the bottom nav of the national pages. Right now we have developed regional sections for Michigan, Nevada, Maryland, Washington D.C., New Jersey, Delaware and the Philadelphia area. The site is about 2 1/2 months old, and while our conversion rate is pretty good (7%) our organic search ranking isn't improving as quickly as we'd like to see. Car donation is a very competitive space, and we would appreciate any advice on how to improve the SEO of the site. Thanks so much.
Web Design | | Phibnax0 -
Hosting/design company that is both cheap and has a nice partner package. Any ideas?
I need to signon with a hosting/design company that is both cheap and has a nice partner package. Any ideas?
Web Design | | christinarule0