Comparing the site structure/design of my live site to my new design
-
Hi SEOmoz team,
for the last few months I've been working on a new design for my website, the old, live design can be viewed at http://www.concerthotels.com - it is primarily focused on helping users find hotels close to concert venues throughout North America. The old structure was built in such a way that each concert venue had a number of different pages associated with it (all connected via tabs) - a page with information about the venue, a page with nearby hotels to the venue, a page of upcoming events, a page of venue reviews. An example of these pages can be seen at:
http://www.concerthotels.com/venue/madison-square-garden/304484
http://www.concerthotels.com/venue-hotels/madison-square-garden-hotels/304484
http://www.concerthotels.com/venue-events/madison-square-garden-events/304484
http://www.concerthotels.com/venue-reviews/madison-square-garden-reviews/304484
The /venue-hotels/ pages are the most important pages on my website - and there is one of these pages for each concert venue - they are the landing pages for about 90% of the traffic on the website.
I decided that having four pages for each venue was probably a poor design, since many of the pages ended up having little or no useful, unique content.
So my new design attempts to bring a lot of the venue information together into fewer pages. My new website redesign is temporarily situated at: (not currently launched to the public)
http://www.concerthotels.com/frontend
The equivalent pages for Madison Square Garden are now:
http://www.concerthotels.com/frontend/venue/madison-square-garden/304484
(the page above contains venue information, events and reviews)
and
http://www.concerthotels.com/frontend/venue-hotels/madison-square-garden-hotels/304484
I would really appreciate any feedback from you guys, based on what you think of the new site design compared to the old design from an SEO point of view. Of course, any feedback on site speed, easy of use etc compared to the old design would also be greatly appreciated.
My main fear is that when I launch the new design (the new URLs will be identical to the old ones), Google will take a dislike to it - I currently receive a large percentage of my traffic through Google organic search, so I don't want to launch a design that might damage that traffic. My gut instinct tells me that Google should prefer the new design - vastly reduced number of pages, each page now contains more unique content, and it's very much designed for users, so I'm hoping bounce rate, conversion etc will improve too. But my gut has been wrong in the past!
But I'd love to hear your thoughts, and thanks in advance for any feedback,
Cheers
Mike
-
Re: Sitemap - standard length of time is 30 days, or until you notice search engines have de-indexed the old URLs.
-
Hi Cyrus,
thanks for spending so much time looking through my site and comparing my new design with the old one - I really appreciate it. The feedback you've provided is great - I'm really happy that you like the new look and feel, and the points you've raised have certainly got me thinking.
1. I do agree, it is a little top heavy, and on the venue page the hotels are hidden beneath the fold, so you might be right that I notice a drop in conversion. I'll launch the site to a small number of visitors and collect some stats. It might not be a major issue, since the vast majority of users to the website actually land on the hotel listings page (as opposed to the general venue information page) - but I guess we'll find out
2. Mmmm, good point - I guess the only page I'm removing that Google might have thought contained high quality ranking signals would be my old venue reviews pages - they contain a lot of unique, customer reviews of the concert venue. So there is potential for weird things to happen - I'll monitor it closely.
I hadn't thought of how the website would look, or work, if Javascript/cookies were disabled, so thank you for highlighting this - I'll certainly look into this.
3. You definitely raise a worrying point here - I hadn't thought of it from a duplicate content view - I simply thought that it would be nice to show the user a sample of hotels from the general venue page, before prompting them to view the entire list. I don't know how I can change this - I guess reducing the number of hotels might help? That way, I'd be reducing the amount of duplicate content.
4. Good point, I'll read the article and put the changes in place.
5. Ah, I hadn't thought of that - I was just going to put a sitemap of the new URLs up - how long would I need to include the "old" URLs in the sitemap for?
Thanks again for all your advice!
Best wishes
Mike
-
Hi Mike,
Thanks for sharing your site. There's always a fear that any redesign or structural changes will be ill-received by Google, but we never know until we try, right?
1. Overall, I like the design, look and feel. My only possible criticism here is the layout feels a little top-heavy. With the old design I felt I could jump in and start browsing hotels right away. The new design encourages me to search first, with the hotel results somewhat hidden beneath the fold. This may have a negative effect on conversions/bounce rate - but again you won't really know until you test it.
2. Generally, I'm a fan of consolidating low-value pages, or tabbed content into a single URL. I've worked with sites that have done this and seen a modest boost in traffic. That said, it's not always roses. If Google sees high quality ranking signals on those pages, and they suddenly disappear to be redirected via consolidation, weird things can and do sometimes happen. Regardless, I'd say overall I'd recommend you continue down this course and give it a try.
- 301 redirects are in place and seem to work.
- My one small complaint is that the old content disappears if you have JavaScript disabled. (with a CSS class display=none) Not a huge deal as Google is getting better at indexing javascript dependent content, but I'm a crusty old sod who'd rather see a solution that degrades gracefully with javascript disabled, such as is found on our Moz profile pages:http://www.seomoz.org/users/profile/155620
3. The only other thing I'm midly concered by is that your landing page lists 5-6 hotels, and then the hotel page starts of by listing the same 5-6 hotels - which creates a bit of a duplicate content issue. The two pages are now very similar in content. Not sure off the top of my head how to address this, but it's something worth thinking about.
4. For your paginated hotel listings, be sure that your using proper pagination indexing techniques, such as rel="next".
5. When you make the switch, I'd keep a sitemap up of your "old" urls so that Google will crawl and "see" the redirect.
That's it! Overall, looks like you're headed in the right direction. Pay attention when you launch, and keep these issues in mind.
Hope this helps! Best of luck.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What things i should do to add more attractiveness in my site?
I have 4 years of experience in feedback and survey of different companies for the people who want to learn some from online education about how to do something? and people want to get ease in daily life skills Kroger feedback provides them with a platform to learn everything about surveys and how to drive some to its highest peaks. It all works for People out there through Education SO I have now my own website ready to go but there is a problem in its on-page ranking factors I shall be thankful to you if some from you answer my question What things I should do to add more attractiveness to my site? take a look at my recent view of my site take a look at this Kroger feedback if somebody from you can answer my request??
Web Design | | SEOTOOLS021 -
AMP vs Responsive Design? Mobile SEO
Hello !! We are developing a new website with responsive design. As is recommended, the idea would be to have a unique site for mobile and desktop, with same content and same url for both devices, using responsive design to adapt the layout depending on the device. My doubt in here is about the AMP pages? If my website has responsive design, perfectly optimized for mobile do I need somehow AMP pages? As far as I understand, these amp pages would be useful if I had different pages for mobile, but this is not the case. Am I correct or am I missing something? Thanks for your help :
Web Design | | AutoEurope1 -
HELP! IE secure page display issue on new live site
For some reason IE 7, 8, & 9 do not display the following page: https://www.jwsuretybonds.com/protools.htm All they show is the Norton seal. It shows properly in all other browsers without issue (including IE 10+), but the earlier versions flash the page for a split second, then hides everything. Can someone shed some light on this? This is a new live site we just launched minutes ago and these browsers account for 12% of our overall traffic. UGH I hate you microsoft!!! Thanks all 🙂
Web Design | | TheDude0 -
Responsive design to serve different page for IE8 - SEO Implications?
A client is planning on developing a responsive designed website which redirects visitors using IE8 to a static webpage that encourages users to visit in another browser. What are the SEO implications of a server redirect just for IE8 visitors? Possible solutions: would containing a link on the static page to "continue browsing" and give the visitor access to the entire site in IE8 work well? Or should a CSS overlay message appear to IE8 visitors, no redirect, that encourages them to visit in another browser? Or serving a separate stylesheet for IE8 visitors, and not giving a responsive experience be optimal? Any suggestions or thoughts are appreciated. Cheers, Alex
Web Design | | Alex.Weintraub0 -
How do I optimize a site designed to be one scrolling page of content?
Our website uses section ID's as its navigation so all the content is on one page. When you click About Us, the page scrolls down to About Us. Products, the page scrolls to Products section, and etc. I am getting crawl errors for meta descriptions but will this go away once the main domain has this info? We just added the meta keywords and description to the header and since the navigation sections use the same page, I assume it will correct the errors. Any other advice on optimizing for site designs like ours would be great. www.theicecubekit.com is the site. Thanks,
Web Design | | bangbang
Chris0 -
Site is losing traffic after relaunch
Hello, We've just relaunched this site in the last several days, and we're seeing some small (but stead) traffic decreases, as well as engagement decreases. We're aware that page speed (about 4 seconds from a non-cached browser) and some 404s are an issue, our team is currently working on both. But we're really looking for some constructive criticism here as to what we need to improve. Other issues to be aware of: lots of our social counts went back to 0s, as lots of URLs changed, and it wasn't possible to migrate comments from the old system, so those have gone back to 0 as well. We wonder if this might be affecting both users and search engines perception of the site. Your input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks,
Web Design | | FishAcct
Paul0 -
Critique a site I'm working on please
Hi guys, I have a list of things to do on this website that is longer than my arm but thought I would gather a few more thoughts on the site before moving on further with it. The site is here. It went live a couple of days ago for live testing. I have a news section coming very soon at theworkplacedepot.co.uk/news - it is in live testing now. One glaring issue for me is that some of the products simply aren't "buyable". What I mean by that is that the options are too vague and too vast - as an outsider I wouldnt have a clue what I was buying! Other issues: The banner at the bottom of the HP is a test - its design will be changing. The sitemap has some issues and will be addressed. There is no area yet to "log-in". However, critique for me pretty please! 🙂
Web Design | | MattJanaway0 -
Considering site navigation options
I am working on a site redesign and re evaluating concepts I haven't thought about for a few years. I generally see site navigation that is either "top-down" or "left bar". Top down navigation normally uses the left nav. for search refinements. The benefit of top nav. is that it clears up the center of the page for non navigation content. The drawback is that you can't fit as many categories in a top nav. Left side nav. can hold a long list of categories, but subcategories are often in the center of the page. In the past, I have preferred to use left nav. with a multi level scroll over search refinement. I believe this allowed users to get to their destination page with fewer clicks. (I have always believed that every required additional click causes lost customers). I also believe that this has caused me to get more juice flowing to deeper pages on sites and better long-tail conversion. This means I have had pages with a LOT of links. With this method, I have tightly controlled my categories. What on other sites are often dynamic search refinements, are on my sites additional categories. I am considering making a site with a top down navigation system. I like the additional screen space in the center I get to work with. Is my assumption about pages created by search refinement wrong? Is it ok for SEO to have a left nav that has a bunch of search refinements that are dynamically created?
Web Design | | EugeneF0