URL redirecting domains
-
Hi
Is there anything wrong/dangerous forwarding a clutch of domains to a sub page (landing page) on a different domain ?
Say Brand X buys Brand Z and wants to close down Brand Z site but have Brand Z domain fwd to a landing page (explaining the company acquisition) on Brand X site. In addition Brand Z had a few related but unused domains forwarding to Brand Z doman & now also wants those fwd'd to the new landing page on brand X
Since the reasons for doing this forwarding are legitimate company reasons relating to an acquisition i would have thought it should be ok but can anyone think of a reason why could be bad since i remember in the old days peeps used to redirect domains for seo reasons so worried fwd'ing a load of domains could cause some sort of negative flag with big G ?
Also do domain redirects transfer the authority/juice from the old site/domain to the new destination page (new landing page on brand x site) similar to how a 301 redirect works ?
Many Thanks
Dan
-
Good stuff ! thanks for all your help Aleyda
-
Your registrar usually gives you the option to choose if it's a temporary or a permanent situation so it forwards with 302 or 301 depending on that. Nonetheless, you can check directly yourself very easily with: http://web-sniffer.net/ by taking a look at the HTTP response header of the forwarded domain (and see if it's a 301). Good luck with the new domain
-
Thanks Aleyda
yes have done this already
Im just trying to establish if this acts like a 301 still in regard to the passing of old domains authority to the new url being fwd'd to ?
Thanks
Dan
-
Hi Dan, my domain registrar let me forward to any URL (not necessarily another domain root) so there shouldn't be an issue to do it. I recommend that you check with your registrar if you can do the same with yours. Thanks
-
Thanks Aleyda
Its going to redirect/forwarding to a specific landing page on the new domain, not the domain itself
Many Thanks
Dan
-
Hi Dan! Thanks for the clarification. This change it all really and is pretty straightforward then: You should directly go to your domain registrar and set the "Domain Forwarding" option to go to the new domain.
-
Hi Aleyda
Thanks so much for spending the time to write such a detailed and informative reply
However its the domain being redirected not the pages, since all the old pages have been removed from the web & hosting shut down (due it being an acquisition & not a migration). This means no opportunity for a .htaccess file as far as i understand since that requires a server to sit on doesnt it? and there isnt one anymore.
So we have just redirected the old domain to a landing page on the acquiring companies website via standard domain forwarding within the dns control panel. Do you know if this will act like a 301 i.e. transfer the old domains authority to the landing page ?
Many Thanks
Dan
-
Hi Dan,
What is is important in these types of scenarios is that you make sure that the redirects are relevant from a user and SEO perspective, since although the link popularity from the old pages will pass by just 301-redirecting them to their new location, what it is important to preserve is also the relevance of these redirects, since these old pages could be already not only externally linked, but also ranking for keywords relevant to their specific content, so if you do a "bulk" redirect to a new page that is not optimized for these keywords (and is very unlikely that a single page is optimized and relevant for a high diverse amount of content and keywords that are at the moment covered through many different pages) you will lose those rankings.
Because of this, take a look at which are the keywords bringing organic traffic to the "old pages" you want to redirect and what you should do to preserve this organic traffic is to redirect them to the new pages on your new domain that also cover these topics, so they will still be relevant for them and when you redirect to them, you won't not only refer the popularity but also keep the rankings and make sure that your users are finding that they were looking for (or at least, something similar).
In case you need to provide information to your users telling them that they're being redirected since the old pages have been migrated because of an acquisition, you can do it so through a message "banner" like the one that Yahoo uses here to warn visitors that they have been redirected to another language version, in a non-intrusive way.
The best way to implement 301-redirects is server side. In case you're using an Apache server then you will need to edit your .htaccess file that you can access easily via FTP for example, and should be located in your root domain.
If you would redirect your old domain pages to a new one preserving the URL structure you would be able to do this with rewriting rules, very straightforward in this case:
Options +FollowSymLinks
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.olddomain.com$ [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.newdomain.com/$1 [R=301,L]Nonetheless, if you need to implement them in a page to page level, since the URL names of in the new domain are not the same than in the old one, you might need to implement them in a page to page basis:
Options +FollowSymLinks
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule ^oldurl.html$ http://www.newdomain.com/newurl.htmlI hope this helps!
Aleyda
-
Many Thanks Sorina !!
I thought 301 redirects are on the .htaccess file which requires a file lstill to be on a server containing the 301 instruction. Since the server/hosting is being deleted then i cant see how its possible to leave a 301 redirect on there and the redirect hence must take place in/on the dns record ?
-
From what I saw Google makes efforts in identifying sneaky domain redirection techniques, so I believe when you do a legit one like you described above there are no risks.
As for domain redirects/301 redirects - these aren't different redirect types, just different way of saying it. What a consider a "domain redirect" must be a 301 redirect in order to pass link juice. If you have doubts about how these work, contact your hosting provider to make sure what they call "domain redirect" is actually a 301 http responce status code that the server sends out for that domain.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Are you Able to keep 100% traffice when do domain redirect?
Let's say you consider re-branding and purchased a new domain, however, during past 3-5 years your page has got some content, CF, TF which appears to be quite good and not easy to build within a few mths. GWT says if you do 301 redirect from the old domain then you should transfer 100% juice from the old domain as well as the juice from old external links to old domain to the new one I did some Tech Seo improvements and while ago and my experience is GWT says one but life shows slightly opposite. This is a big thing with no Emergency exit so I have got some concerns. What is your experience with that? Have you done any transfers if so what was the result? Thanks in advance for your feedback
Technical SEO | | Miniorek0 -
Search Console - Should I request to index redirected URL or Mark as fixed?
Hi all, Many blog posts used to be showing 404s when doing crawl tests and in search console (despite being there when visited.) I realized it was an issue with URL structure. It used to be example.com/post-name I've fixed the issue by changing the URL structure in Wordpress so that they now follow the structure of example.com/post-type/post-name According to sitemaps, Google has now indexed all posts in /post-type/post-name. My question is what to do with crawl errors in Search Console that are still there for example.com/postname. When I fetch, I get a redirect status (which is accurate). At this point should I request to index or mark as fixed? Thank you!
Technical SEO | | MouthyPR0 -
Domain Authority
Hello everyone, My question is: is there any manual way to increase domain authority, rather than link building to domain (homepage) ? Thanks Eugenio
Technical SEO | | socialengaged0 -
Changed URL of all web pages to a new updated one - Keywords still pick the old URL
A month ago we updated our website and with that we created new URLs for each page. Under "On-Page", the keywords we put to check ranking on are still giving information on the old urls of our websites. Slowly, some new URLs are popping up. I'm wondering if there's a way I can manually make the keywords feedback information from the new urls.
Technical SEO | | Champions0 -
301 Redirect & Linking Root Domain Count
Howdy Mozzers! If I do a 301 redirect from a domain that say has 200 linking root domains, to a fresh domain will the fresh domain now (when updated) have a linking root domain count of 200? Also, is it beneficial or detrimental to do a 301 redirect for an unrelated website i.e. garden hose website, to a children's playgorund equipment website in order to capture the link juice? Best
Technical SEO | | clickfactory0 -
Domain redirect seo
Hello, my domain www.pacomarca.com and when i start the new campaing i get this pronblem: We have detected that the domain www.pacomarca.com and the domain pacomarca.com both respond to web requests and do not redirect. Having two "twin" domains that both resolve forces them to battle for SERP positions, making your SEO efforts less effective. We suggest redirecting one, then entering the other here. my domain is in networksolutions.com. how can i resolve it? many thanks Gonzalo
Technical SEO | | Kuna0 -
Do search engines treat 307 redirects differently from 302 redirects?
We will need to send our users to an alternate version of our homepage for a few hours for a certain event. The SEO task at hand is to minimize the chance of the special homepage getting crawled and cached in the search engines in place of our normal homepage. (This has happened in the past so the concern is not imaginary.) Among other options, 302 and 307 redirects are being discussed. IE, redirecting www.domain.com to www.domain.com/specialpage. Having used 302s and 301s in the past, I am well aware of how search engines treat them. A 302 effectively says "Hey, Google! Please get rid of the old content on www.domain.com and replace it with the content on /specialpage!" Which is exactly what we don't want. My question is: do the search engines handle 307s any differently? I am hearing that the 307 does NOT result in the content of the second page being cached with the first URL. But I don't see that in the definition below (from w3.org). Then again, why differentiate it from the 302? 307 Temporary Redirect The requested resource resides temporarily under a different URI. Since the redirection MAY be altered on occasion, the client SHOULD continue to use the Request-URI for future requests. This response is only cacheable if indicated by a Cache-Control or Expires header field. The temporary URI SHOULD be given by the Location field in the response. Unless the request method was HEAD, the entity of the response SHOULD contain a short hypertext note with a hyperlink to the new URI(s) , since many pre-HTTP/1.1 user agents do not understand the 307 status. Therefore, the note SHOULD contain the information necessary for a user to repeat the original request on the new URI. If the 307 status code is received in response to a request other than GET or HEAD, the user agent MUST NOT automatically redirect the request unless it can be confirmed by the user, since this might change the conditions under which the request was issued.
Technical SEO | | CarsProduction0 -
Domain Redirect Issues
Hi, I have a domain that is 10 years old, this is the old domain that used to be the website for the company. The company approximately 7 years ago was bought by another and purchased a new domain that is 7 years old. The company did not do a 301 redirect as they were not aware of the SEO implications. They continued building web applications on the old domain while using the new domain for all marketing and for business partner links. They just put in a server level redirect on the folders themselves to point to the new root. I am on Tomcat, I do not have the option of a 301 redirect as the web applications are all hard coded links (non-relative) (hundreds of thousands of dollars to recode) After beginning SEO; Google is seeing them as the same domain, and has replaced all results in Google with the old domain instead of the new one..... My questions is.... Is it better to take the hit and just put a robots.txt to disallow all robots on the old domain Or... Will that hurt my new domain as well since Google is seeing them as the same? Or.... Has Google already made the switch without a redirect to see these as the same and i should just continue on? (even the cache for the new site shows the old domain address) Old Domain= www.floridahealthcares.com New = www.fhcp.com *****Update after writing this I began changing index.htm to all non relative links so all links on the old domain homepage would point to fhcp.com fixing the issue of the entire site being replicated under the old domain. I think this might "Patch" my issue, but i would still love to get the opinion of others Thanks Shane
Technical SEO | | Jinx146780