Check list for Manual penalty – Before going for reconsideration
-
Hi there,
Any one please help us, in cross checking our recovery work before submitting to reconsideration request.
- Quality Check list for a Website
- SEO audit check list
Why am requesting means, our previous request was came with a negative result.
Thanking you in advance
-
Hai Marie Haynes, thanks for the valuable suggestion, am a regular follower of mytrafficdropped.com.
Yes, these kind of keyword based anchor text links are there in our back link profile. All these links were build by a free lancer seo, We identified these & collected the report from him. We started diluting these keyword based anchor text links with Brand name, read more, visit website.. etc anchor text based links. Now it's about below 1% of total back links, (143 of 3200 unique domain links from WMT). We are trying to remove as many as possible, but the removal response was negligible and some are expecting $ to remove links. Still these few links (below 1% of total links)will be consider as unnatural links..?. if I used the disavow tool, how many days will it take to remove these bad links?. Your advice is highly appreciated . It’s nice to hear you and Thanking you in advance.
-
I am going to respectfully disagree with Erwan when he says that this message could mean nothing. When SEOMoz got an unnatural links message it was part of a strange batch of messages that went out in July that said that Google was taking targeted action on certain links but was still trusting the site as a whole. However, the message that you got is indeed one about unnatural links and almost definitely should cause a loss in rankings.
Google recently handed out more of these confusing messages where it's not sure whether you should take action or not. I wrote about the difference between these messages and the one that you got here: http://www.hiswebmarketing.com/google-sends-new-confusing-unnatural-links-messages/
But those messages are different than yours. Yours is definitely a message of a manual penalty. Now, some manual penalties can affect just single keywords but often they can affect the entire site's ability to rank. According to ahrefs.com, your site has followed links from over 2300 domains. If the majority of those were self made then you can be in trouble.
With just a quick look I can see a fair number of links that Google will want to see removed:
http://meckfuture.org/clicksnm.com-13262.html
http://www.wbslink.com/Shopping/General_Merchandise/page-2.html
http://bidbid.com.ar/detail/promotional-codes-6188.htm
In order to get the penalty removed you will need to try to remove every single self made link and show your efforts to Google and then disavow the ones you can't get removed. However, if you don't have many naturally earned links then you may have difficulty ranking once you get your penalty removed.
-
Thanks once again for your time and much appreciate.. team is working on to better the user experience.
Best regards
-
Quality is a bit subjective. Google does not really like coupons/affiliate websites. You need to inspire confidence.
1/ You should insist on your original content and promote it - your blog is not easy to find from the home page.
Put a blog link top of the page - maybe add an excerpt/a quote from the last article.
2/ About us/Contact us pages are a little empty. Would be nice to have an address, a picture of the office, of the team etc.
3/ If I look one of your competitor : http://media.couponmom.com/index.php?PHPSESSID=emhecijvt7m0kpeq4qp9nlcr64&cid=275
I find the design bad but the visitor can see there's a real person behind the website.
4/ You could add a FAQ page.
5/ Another competitor have a privacy page + a california privacy rights page.
6/ You used the social facebook plugin on your blog; maye you should also use it on your home page like http://www.couponnetwork.com did.
7/ Try to get trust signals like http://coupons.com did :
http://clicktoverify.truste.com/pvr.php?page=validate&url=www.coupons.com&sealid=102
Groupon.com mention : https://www.trustedshops.com/shop/certificate.php?shop_id=X06E5E546FF38C7F9EFF97A9141038AE8
8/ Maybe it's time to rework on your design; coupons.com or groupon.com have a good one.
9/ I think you got penalized because of modified/hidden links.
When I click on Kernel picture by example, I get there : http://www.nucleustechnologies.com/buy-employee-desktop-live-viewer.php
This is not the visible link... The user should know he will be redirect on another website. There should be a text like "visit Kernel website to redeem your coupon".
10/ You got the general idea. It's all about trust and user experience!
-
Thank you very much Erwan, such a detailed reply.
One last question, We made & maintaining website, by obeying Google quality guidelines: http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=35769.
Ours is a coupon website & we are updating every thing like, content, coupons & coupon content manually. Still Google saying "We’ve reviewed your site and we believe that some or all of your pages still violate our quality guidelines". As a coupons website we are doing our best to follow Google guidelines. Can you please help us, in this regard. Any suggestion from you side, where we are missing on this parameter.
Thanking you in advance for you time.
Best Regards.
-
1/ Unnatural inbound links message does not lead necessarily to a loss of rank and a loss of traffic. Even SEOmoz.org got the same message and lost nothing (http://www.seomoz.org/blog/googles-unnatural-links-warnings). I had the same experience for a flash game website.
2/ If you actually lost ranks/traffic, you have to show your good will and give something to Google. I suggest you to use Open Site Explorer and to look for low authority linking domains.
Example : last URL = www.cheapautoexpo.com/tag/coupons/
You have 4 links on the same page - deals365.us did the same. A click = a pop-up. This looks like a bad neighbourhood.
You won't lose much by removing this kind of links. Keep a track of all the links you removed. In this case :
It will show Google you did a serious work.
3/ If you can't remove the links manually, ask the webmaster to do it. In most cases he won't answer if this is a spammy website.
Then consider using the disallow tool : https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/disavow-links-main?pli=1
4/ I would recommend you to do the same for all the low directories... and the link suggested by Google : http://www.allworldlinks.com/k/317277/online-free-coupons.html
5/ Pinpoint Designs had the same issue and wrote and article about : http://www.seomoz.org/blog/lifting-a-manual-penalty-given-by-google-personal-experience
In the reconsideration request, they mentionned :
- Who we were and what we do
- Why we believed we had been hit
- What we had done to rectify the issue (a link to the Google Docs file was attached)
- How we knew it wouldn't happen again
- An apology
- My name / contact details
They also tried to improve the quality of their website (do you have good content on your website or just coupons ?) and to get better links; they started a blog and wrote guest articles.
6/ To get better links, I suggest you to use open site explorer on competitors to see their most authoritative links. Most of time, you can also get the same link if this is a directory or a blog taking guest posts.
7/ Last but not least, Google spam team is human. Your reconsideration request depends of the employee who will deal with it... You can never be sure of the result.
Good luck ~~.
-
Hi Erwan,
Here is the message, what we got, Please have a look. Can any one please explain the seriousness or intensity of penalty?.
We’ve reviewed your site and we believe that some or all of your pages still violate our quality guidelines, which can be found here: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769#3. These guidelines outline illicit practices which may lead Google to take action on a site in order to keep webspam out of search results. In addition to this email, you may also receive a notification in Webmaster Tools regarding the outcome of your reconsideration request.
Specifically, look for possibly artificial or unnatural links pointing to your site that could be intended to manipulate PageRank. Examples of unnatural linking could include buying links to pass PageRank or participating in link schemes. Here is an article describing these techniques:
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66356.To illustrate how these articles could apply to you, here are examples of pages that contain inorganic links to your site:
{Online Free Coupons} -- http://www.allworldlinks.com/k/277/online-free-coupons.html
To find more links to your site, you can download a list in Webmaster Tools by doing the following:
1. Click on your site at https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/
2. Click on 'Traffic' and then 'Links to Your Site.'
3. Under 'Who links the most,' click 'More.'
4. At the top of the page, click on 'Download more sample links.'Please correct or remove all content that is outside our quality guidelines. You might consider reaching out to the webmasters of the sites with the inorganic links on them. For advice on how to go about contacting them, read http://support.google.com/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=9109.
Once you have updated your site, reply to this email noting the specific changes you made. Only after there has been a significant decrease in unnatural linking will we consider reviewing your reconsideration request again. If there are still links that you could not remove, we will look for an explanation of why you were unable to do so.
If you’d like more specific advice for your site, consider posting in our Webmaster Help Forum, where a community of webmasters may be able to help you. You can post to the Forum by visiting the following link: http://groups.google.com/a/googleproductforums.com/forum/#!forum/webmasters.
Sincerely,
The Google Search Quality Team
-
What manual penalty message did you get in GWT ? Low quality/spam content or unnatural inbound links ?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Looking for list Pro's & Con's of removing Folder from URL?
Hi We have a sub-folder ("/shop-by-department/") which is pretty much useless on our site and I'm looking to remove it. But the team want a list of the Pro's & Con's in doing so. So for example I'll be changing www.example.ie/shop-by-department/furniture/beds/product-a to www.example.ie/furniture/beds/product-a I know there will be an intial hit as Google adjusts to the change but think it's definitely the way to go. I was lookng for a complete list of the Pro's & Con's to send onto the team. It'll be going to the traditional marketing (print, radio, etc.) too so can ve top-level points too. Hope you can help! Thanks
Web Design | | Frankie-BTDublin0 -
Is switching from a very old HTML table site to HTML5 going to make a big difference
Hello, My site owner has been having calls that our old HTML site needs to switch to HTML5. Is it really worth the ubgrade from an archaic HTML site? Please explain. Bob
Web Design | | BobGW0 -
Going mobile: Responsive or different mobile version?
Going mobile: Responsive or different mobile version?
Web Design | | FCRMediaLietuva
Which one should we choose? Should we do responsive design or should we have a different mobile version and go m.domain.com ? http://searchenginewatch.com/sew/how-to/2253965/3-reasons-why-responsive-web-design-is-the-best-option-for-your-mobile-seo-strategy I just read this article. It seems that the responsive design is OK, but the first comment kills that opinion and says that it is pretty hard to make it OK. 🙂 So I need more opinions? What is best for people and for SEO?0 -
Lots of Listing Pages with Thin Content on Real Estate Web Site-Best to Set them to No-Index?
Greetings Moz Community: As a commercial real estate broker in Manhattan I run a web site with over 600 pages. Basically the pages are organized in the following categories: 1. Neighborhoods (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/neighborhoods/midtown-manhattan) 25 PAGES Low bounce rate 2. Types of Space (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/commercial-space/loft-space)
Web Design | | Kingalan1
15 PAGES Low bounce rate. 3. Blog (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/blog/how-long-does-leasing-process-take
30 PAGES Medium/high bounce rate 4. Services (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/brokerage-services/relocate-to-new-office-space) High bounce rate
3 PAGES 5. About Us (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/about-us/what-we-do
4 PAGES High bounce rate 6. Listings (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/listings/305-fifth-avenue-office-suite-1340sf)
300 PAGES High bounce rate (65%), thin content 7. Buildings (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/928-broadway
300 PAGES Very high bounce rate (exceeding 75%) Most of the listing pages do not have more than 100 words. My SEO firm is advising me to set them "No-Index, Follow". They believe the thin content could be hurting me. Is this an acceptable strategy? I am concerned that when Google detects 300 pages set to "No-Follow" they could interpret this as the site seeking to hide something and penalize us. Also, the building pages have a low click thru rate. Would it make sense to set them to "No-Follow" as well? Basically, would it increase authority in Google's eyes if we set pages that have thin content and/or low click thru rates to "No-Follow"? Any harm in doing this for about half the pages on the site? I might add that while I don't suffer from any manual penalty volume has gone down substantially in the last month. We upgraded the site in early June and somehow 175 pages were submitted to Google that should not have been indexed. A removal request has been made for those pages. Prior to that we were hit by Panda in April 2012 with search volume dropping from about 7,000 per month to 3,000 per month. Volume had increased back to 4,500 by April this year only to start tanking again. It was down to 3,600 in June. About 30 toxic links were removed in late April and a disavow file was submitted with Google in late April for removal of links from 80 toxic domains. Thanks in advance for your responses!! Alan0 -
How we can check whether website design is good for SEO or not?
Is there any tool available to check website design whether it is good for SEO or not?
Web Design | | ross254sidney0 -
Traffic flow going through homepage, /default.aspx, and /index.htm - How do I fix this?
In the Google Analytics visitor flow section, most of my traffic is starting off on the homepage, but a significant portion somehow is being directed to /default.aspx, as well as a minor fraction at /index.htm - see the attached image for what this looks like. My questions are, why is this happening, is it negatively affecting the site, and should I just fix it through a filter in Analytics or consult IT? Navigating to the /default.aspx page in the address bar simply returns a blank screen. Any idea of what's going on here? The logo in the top left corner of the site directs to /index.htm, so I think I have that issue solved, but /default.aspx is definitely stumping me. The server currently runs on Apache, though I don't know if it always did. My standard method of simply Googling the problem didn't give me any definitive answers, so any help would be greatly appreciated. Q12QqpC.jpg
Web Design | | BD690 -
Can external links in a menu attract a penalty?
We have some instances of external links (i.e. pointing to another domain) in site menus. Although there are legitimate reasons (e.g. linking to a news archive kept on a separate domain) I understand this can be considered bad from a usability perspective. This begs the question - is this bad for SEO? With the recent panda changes we've seen certain issues which were previously "only" about usability attract SEO penalties, but I can't find any references to this example. Anyone have thoughts / experience?
Web Design | | SOS_Children0 -
Is this going to shoot people and my clients in the foot?
I have mentioned before about rewriting search URLs to look like landing pages, in e-commerce sites. Is this going to be a bad practice to use on a wide scale? I took the time to make a module for the platform I develop on which is going to make it easier to do. Normally a search would look something like shop.com/search_controller?search_term=searchword and the search pages are disallowed in the robots.txt file. But the module I made lets you configure them to be like site.com/searchword or what ever you want it to be. It also lets you configure the meta title and the meta description of the page too. Here is a screenshot of the options. http://screencast.com/t/PwhBfSia5k The module also appends the urls to the site map of the site too. Will this get people a penalty by google? Or will it get their pages indexed? I have done similar on a small scale of like 5 words per site, I am wondering how it will be seen on a large scale.
Web Design | | LesleyPaone0