HUGE decrease in links since website redesign
-
We recently added several new pages pages to our website.
These new pages were constructed on a dev site, and then pushed live. Since the new site has gone live I have seen a huge decline in links.
My external followed links have dropped from 3000 to 500 and my total website links have fallen from 35,000 to 4,500.
I have done some research, and I think there is a server side issue. Where multiple versions of my URL may be running. The majority of the links built were pointing to the homepage. That being said I do not have access to our in-house dev person this week, so I am trying to identify the problem myself.
I have used screaming frog to crawl my site and did not see any errors which stand out. I realize I probably need to use 301 redirects to solve this problem, I just need some guidance on how to identify what I need to 301 redirect.
Second question.
If I move a landing page out of the global navigation but it can still be reached through other pages on the website , will this cause issues?
-
Thank you all for the detailed response.
I am going to use the suggested tools, and get to the bottom of this problem. I will report back when I have some more insight.
Once again thank you all for the detailed responses.
-
hey Nick,
I want to say I agree with what you're saying as well I just posted my response which I did not realize was not posted prior it log me out regardless of that
I believe he can do it with the tools Both you and have suggested I've given them above and Considering we are essentially saying the same thing.
it could be anything from somebody not linking the anchor text on the page to leaving the inbound link out altogether. I believe he should use his host if it's a managed hosting company for instance fire host because my site is on Nginx does all the 301 redirects for you many other web hosting companies like iWeb and data pipe will do the same.
However it seems like whoever did the coding was more of a developer/web designer then anyone who is concerned with SEO
I'm not saying that they didn't do their job right please don't think that it just sounds like SEO is not there specialty.
I have listed some methods I think will help I also believe what Nick here is saying is right on the money. Basically, your site even with the same URL when it has been recoded can have everything you think should be there but if it's not in the code the links won't work.
I hope this is been of help, and I want to say I back up what Nick has said.
Sincerely,
Thomas
-
Hi thank you for the praise I appreciate that.
I have come up with a list of tools I think you will benefit from. Primarily I know you will benefit from screaming frog however I believe there's a better method once you have it then screaming frog's own guide that is by a company called Seer it costs nothing for the guide and have given the links below that you want to check out.
I want to share what I believe happened when your site was recoded the on page anchor text for the links that are pointing at your site were either broken or the anchor text/link does not exist anymore on the webpage.
The Seer interactive how to verify back links and in view the anchor text
guide for screaming frog is designed to help people find the links however you're doing it on your own site it doesn't really matter what the purpose behind it was this tool will help you.
I have also added information from Internet marketing ninjas they have some of the best free tools on the market and their web-based I strongly suggest you using their broken link tester right away. Along with their site map generator to look for broken links and you can use the combination of Moz OSE along with majestic and SEO a-ref there built into screaming frog to see what is pointing at you.
In other important factor in this is what are you hosted on is it IIS, Apache, light speed, or Nginx.
The reason being is if I were on a host like one of my favorites for important large sites or really all websites in general it's excellent for FireHost.com
Then I could simply figure out which links are pointing to my site then have the host preferably somebody like I mentioned above that does fully managed hosting would do all the 301 redirects on the server side completely away from coding on your website and making them much faster and stronger.
He's no I recommend this regardless over the host does or not it should be implemented server-side
Please know that you're welcome to contact me I will private message you my cell phone number if you want more information I will happily tell you.
One of the easiest ways to do this would be to hire a person like Dan Shure a top rank SEO as well as a truly helpful and ethical person. You would have to contact him for an exact price.
or
Yoast to do a site analysis is price right now is approximately $1000 however many companies charge a lot more in the is a very well respected authority as a developer
https://yoast.com/hire-us/website-review/
Evolving SEO Dan Shure is a true specialist who has even done whiteboard Fridays here on Moz.com is a truly standup guy as well. Is Dan Shure does some consulting and could be asked for his pricing He has spoken at Mozcation , Distilled NYC MeetUp the list goes on. He can be reached easily at its business evolving SEO
http://www.evolvingseo.com/contact/
http://www.seerinteractive.com/
http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com
and of course myself the tools are below
http://www.blueprintmarketing.com/
http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/tools/
http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/broken-links-tool/
http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/seo-tools/google-sitemap-generator/
http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/screaming-frog-guide
http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/screaming-frog-guide#How_to_verify_my_backlink
I hope I have been of help to you,
Thomas
-
This is a good answer that just led me to think about some items that are not necessarily URL related. I'd do what Nick suggests firsts. The wisdom around the water cooler is that the most important content should be placed towards the top of your pages to ensure that spiders reach it and can get a good indication of what a page is all about. What I've seen are "professional recoded pages" by great designers who really aren't great coders or great coders who focus mostly on browser compatibility but not on how spiders might prefer the format.
What am I getting at? What is in your sidebar and where is it located in the source code of your page? I've seen two significant changes that might make a difference:
(1) Your sidebar that has lots of secondary and promotional content is appearing at the top of your page and your post content is underneath it.
(2) The page looks great but there is a ton of other junk that loads in your header tags well before your content areas on your pages. You would be incredibly surprised how "professional themes" will have options to make things so convenient for webmasters. Wordpress themes that have special options are notorious for having clickable buttons that suddenly load lots of code in the header tags.
(3) Custom javascript in the header. Typically you can load something common like jQuery and there won't be an issue or everyone would have it. You get into trouble when someone custom codes an awesome thigamajig for you not knowing what else is on your site and which may lead to errors in your header and trouble for spiders.
This is all speculation but I've found these issues crop up in the past. Good luck.
-
If I had a dime for every "professionally recoded" website that was completely hosed from an optimization standpoint...
Not sure why people are throwing out link distribution and other wild-ass-guesses that would have nothing to do with disappearing incoming links. The simplest answer is often the most accurate.
Did your site's domain change? Or did any inner page URLs change? If so, then you'll need to 301 those to their current counterparts. ScreamingFrog is good for finding broken/missing links, but you can also take a look at the Crawl Errors in Google webmaster tools to see if Googlebot is having any problems finding your pages. If no URLs were changed or removed, then it probably doesn't have anything to do with the redesign.Check with majesticseo.com and ahrefs.com to see if the links have been marked as lost or removed recently. Both of those are pretty quick to spot new and removed links.
The sharp drop in number of links could have come from one or more sites removing your link or the page/site just doesn't exist anymore. If one site with 20000 pages disappears and they had a sitewide link to you, that would explain it. Do you happen to know how many linking domains you had, compared to how many you currently have? That would be a better indicator.
And your second question (missed that the first time):
If the page is still accessible from somewhere, it won't be a "problem", but it may not rank as well. That really depends on a whole lot of other things - external links to that page, other internal links to it from and the crawlability of the site in general. But in general, no it won't be a huge problem - I have a few pages on my own site that only have one internal link from the sitemap and no external links, yet they still rank for some things. -
Thank you everyone for answering me back and I would just like to clarify a few points.
Thomas: Even though only a few additional pages were added the entire website was professionally recoded in HTML. Prior to the recode our site was coded in a combination of languages and not efficient. So even though the URL is the same the code has totally been redone.
As far as the link distribution, the links are spread out across our landing pages but slightly more skewed in the direction of the homepage.
As far as screaming frog, I will see if I can get my hands on the paid version today. I currently use the free version.
-
While I'd love to comment (and I know you're hesitant to provide a URL), I don't think that you'll get any truly useful advice that would help since there could be so many reasons why you'd encounter issues after a site design change. The useful advice comes from those who will analyze your site, see what changed and determine what changes (or open items poorly done or overlooked) might be a good indicator of how your rankings dropped. Everything else is speculating in the dark. There is no substitute to taking a good look, IMHO.
-
I can tell you without a doubt if you are in fact did replace your entire website as you state
"Since the new site has gone live I have seen a huge decline in links."
however prior to that you are talking about just adding pages. So if you could tell me yes this is a brand-new website or no I'm just adding pages it would clear up a lot and if you're just adding pages to your website I agree with Chris.
If you are in fact somebody that had their website re built or anything that would have to do with changing servers you or platforms.
Then it is most likely a 301 redirect that you need to concentrate on. If you have not implemented redirects from your old website to the new website you will lose the dramatic amount of links.
If you could tell me what is your site built from HTML and maybe you moved it wordpress or another content management system?
if so you can have these types of issues fixed very easily using cms2cms.com
if you are pointing all your links at your homepage I would try to spread them out as much as you can. Just so we're clear most websites with 35,000 links have them spread all over the place. I would advise that you do the same with yours. As that's a lot of links just to the homepage. Screaming frog is an awesome tool it should be able to actually accomplish what you're looking to do with the paid version do you have the paid version?
If you would kindly update me on this I will respond with a more helpful answer.
Sincerely,
Thomas
-
I don't think the new pages and the drop in back links are related.
As far as the second question, it could have an impact on its rankings. For example, if the page was liked to from the home page and subsequent to the change, there isn't a link from the home page, it could lose rankings because of it.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Inspection of the website is required.
Hello, Recently We have a taken a project " http://customerconnect-services.com/ " and are responsible for the Digital Marketing for the website. FYI, we have been following the best On-Page SEO practices ever since we took the project: Performing Keyword Research, Finalizing the Keywords,Using those in the Page-Title, Meta-Descriptions, Heading Tags and of course in the Content as per MOZ suggestions & SEO standards. But, we are unable to rank in first page; which is a serious matter of concern for us. We have also checked whether the Domain / URL has been blacklisted, but it's not (Not even by Google). We are therefore unable to figure out what is going wrong even after following so many best practices to get the keywords a good ranking (1st & 2nd page of SERPs). Therefore I would like to request you to provide your expert opinions in this regard by checking what is it that we are not getting right. The website url is http://customerconnect-services.com/. As this is a high-priority issue for us & the client is a prestigious one of course, please help. Looking forward to hearing from you at the earliest. Thanks & Regards,
Technical SEO | | Harini.M
Harini0 -
Is there software that makes it easier to reach out to websites and webmaster to have toxic links removed?
I'm currently trying to disavow toxic links that I have found on my site, that our previous SEO company created. Google requires that we reach out to the individual websites and try to have them removed. Does anyone know of software that makes this process automated or easer? I'm currently doing it manually, uhg! Also, is there software that can help you find toxic links? I'm currently also doing that manually, uhg! Thanks.
Technical SEO | | milehigh52800 -
How to handle pagination for a large website?
I am currently doing a site audit on a large website that just went through a redesign. When looking through their webmaster tools, they have about 3,000 duplicate Title Tags. This is due to the way their pagination is set up on their site. For example. domain.com/books-in-english?page=1 // domain.com/books-in-english?page=4 What is the best way to handle these? According to Google Webmaster Tools, a viable solution is to do nothing because Google is good at distinguishing these. That said, it seems like their could be a better solution to help prevent duplicate content issues. Any advice would be much welcomed. 🙂
Technical SEO | | J-Banz0 -
Navigation links tagged as H3
I'm reviewing a website that has used the H3 tag in the Navigation Menu. I've not seen that before and first thought is it is a dodgy. Tags should relate to content on the page not link to another page. As a result of using H3 in Nav the ratio of content wrapped in Heading tags vs body content is quite high. My recommendation is to remove H3 tag from Nav but having searched Moz and not finding an article to verify that recommendation thought I'd ask the question.
Technical SEO | | NicDale0 -
Webmaster Tools Links To Your Site
I logged onto webmaster tools today for my site and the section 'Links to Your Site' is showing no data. Also if I search using link:babskibaby.com it only shows 1 link. My site had been showing 500+ links previously. Does anyone know why this is?
Technical SEO | | babski0 -
Linking out?
First of all, sorry this Q is all in one block, but iPads don't like this site or vc/vs. When using the SEOmoz on-site keyword optimizer tool, it suggests at least one link to be to an off-site page. Would it be considered a link exchange if we linked out to an niche SUPER Authority sit that had a link back to our website? It seems like a naturally good strategy, but I'm afraid google may not agree. If the answer is no, there are many similar sites that mention our company in ver good ways, awards, etc.., but with no links. I would think this is a no-brainer. Personally I would like to eventually harvest all this press coverage to benefit our site. Btw, I was grey before I learned about SEOmoz, just like the rest of our niche. Now I'm shooting to be Snow White! Hopefully it works out. 🙂 I also wrote two landing pages that I tried to SEO the right way. I would love to hear your feedback to know if they are truly effective and if they are actually white. I think they are, but don't know "all" the rules of being white http://jamproa.com/ideology/product-innovation.php http://jamproa.com/industrial-design/what-is.php Thanks!
Technical SEO | | dmac0 -
External Sitewide Links and SEO
I have one big question about the potential SEO value -- and possibly also dangers? -- of "followed" external sitewide links. Examples of these would be: a link to your site from another site's footer a blogroll link a link to your site from another site's global navigation Aside from the link's position in the HTML file (the higher the better, presumably), are these links essentially the same from an SEO point of view or different (and how)? There used to be an influential view out there that the link juice value of a sitewide link was the same as that of a single link (presumably from the linking site's home page), even though a sitewide link may in fact result a huge number individual links. Is this true or false? What is the math here? Should one worry about having "too many" sitewide links, in the sense that this may raise red flags by way of the algo? I talked to someone a few months ago (before the recent algo updates) who believed that he had got a minus 10 penalty or whatever it was for getting too many sitewide links We offer website design and development as well as SEO, and we put a keyworded link to ourselves in the footer. I think this is a fairly common practice. Is this a good or bad idea SEO-wise? One opinion is that for external sitewide footer links, you should best have a dofollow link on the home page, but nofollow it on all other pages. What is your opinion about that? Is there anything else that is distinct, interesting or important about sitewide links' SEO value and pitfalls? Thank you!
Technical SEO | | Philip-SEO1 -
Should I have a 'more' button for links?
I have a website that has a page for each town. rather than listing all the towns with a link to each, I want to show only the most popular towns and have a 'more' button that shows all of them when you click it. I know that the search engine can always see the full list of links and even though the visitor can't this doesn't go against Google guidelines because there is no deception involved, the more button is quite clear. However, my colleague is concerned that this is 'making life hard' for the search engines and so the pages are less likely to be indexed. I disagree. Is he right to worry about this??
Technical SEO | | mascotmike0