Determining the Cause of a Penalty
-
I received a link removal request from a site who said that they were penalized. I confirmed that they were #1 for the competitive keyword phrase that is also their domain name and now they are #10.
Here are some things I noticed about the site:
- Over 2,500 linking domains.
- Dozens of high quality linking domains like Huffington Post and Mashable.
- Some off topic guest post links, e.g. on a SEO site.
- Guest post anchor text was usually their site name which is an exact match domain.
- Lots of top 100 resource pages that received good organic links.
- Infographics with links using their domain name as the anchor text.
- Relatively few spammy links according to Open Site Explorer.
Overall their site's links were engineered but using tactics that most would consider "white hat." I don't think they violated any Google Webmaster Guidelines. Why were they penalized?
What do you think?
-
Hi Project Labs,
In order to better understand the scenario, we would want to know if they received a link warning within Google Webmaster Tool, or just "assessed" themselves as having penalty due to steep ranking drops.
The easiest way to answer this is to comment on your points:
-
Over 2,500 linking domains.
It is very difficult for even medium size businesses to achieve 2500 unique links, so this number might have raised a flag from Google in their niche - especially if it deviated outside of the aggregate "norm" for this niche / keyword set.
-
Dozens of high quality linking domains like Huffington Post and Mashable.
This helps authority, but quickly can be trumped by negative factors....
-
Some off topic guest post links, e.g. on a SEO site.
I would recommend they contact these webmasters and have these ones removed.
-
Guest post anchor text was usually their site name which is an exact match domain.
EMD is a more difficult issue now, since EMDs by default do not rank as well.
Because people like to link to the site by name, sometimes the exact match can be a serious problem. Is this website owned by a business that has a unique name?
Example - Cheesepizza.com - owned by Cheesy Pizza Dynasty.
If this is the case, the owner should switch to using the unique brand name. In some cases there is value in creating a unique name, and building business brand signals if they do not currently have this.
-
Lots of top 100 resource pages that received good organic links.
Excellent, they would want to check for relevancy, co-citation (shared links to other websites and their main topics)
-
Infographics with links using their domain name as the anchor text.
I would remove those EMD anchor texts and move to url only, or Alloneword.com OR the second brand / business option.
-
Relatively few spammy links according to Open Site Explorer.
Overall their site's links were engineered but using tactics that most would consider "white hat." I don't think they violated any Google Webmaster Guidelines. Why were they penalized?
Anything engineered will be, or has been penalized, or demoted, and I wouldn't expect this to change.
Internal links and other areas of SEO / trust signals aside, I would recommend studying the top 20 in this niche and thoroughly analyze their backlinks:
1. Rate of build
2. Exact match vs Commercialized anchors vs brand vs branded vs other?
3. Percentage of 'engineered' links vs natural, editorial.
4. Union of links competitors share in top 5 positions in Google.Hope this helps!
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Penalty and Adwords
Hi guys, I am wondering if the google manual penalty or penalty in general (because of bad backlink profile) also means that your website is blocked for Adwords? Thanks
Technical SEO | | barobijav0 -
Query Strings causing Duplicate Content
I am working with a client that has multiple locations across the nation, and they recently merged all of the location sites into one site. To allow the lead capture forms to pre-populate the locations, they are using the query string /?location=cityname on every page. EXAMPLE - www.example.com/product www.example.com/product/?location=nashville www.example.com/product/?location=chicago There are thirty locations across the nation, so, every page x 30 is being flagged as duplicate content... at least in the crawl through MOZ. Does using that query string actually cause a duplicate content problem?
Technical SEO | | Rooted1 -
Gallery Causing Duplicate Content Issues
Hi! I have a gallery on my website. When you click to view the next image it goes to a new page but the content is exactly the same as the first page. This is flagging up a duplicate content issue. What is the best way to fix this? Add a canonical tag to page 2,3,4 or add a noindex tag? I have found a lot of conflicting answers. Thanks in advance
Technical SEO | | emma19860 -
Can increase in crawl errors in GWT) be caused by input fields and jquery?
Dear Mozzerz We took over www.urgiganten.dk not long ago and last week we opened up for indexation, after having taken the old website down for a couple of months. One week after opening for indexation we saw a huge increase in crawl errors.Google is discovering some weird links to e.g http://www.urgiganten.dk/30-garmin-urremme/ which returns a 404. In GWT we are told that we are linking to this url from http://www.urgiganten.dk/garmin-urremme. But nowhere on http://www.urgiganten.dk/garmin-urremme will you find this link. However you will find the following script in the source code, which is the only code part that contains "/30-garmin-urremme/":Can it be true that google take the id and adds it to our tld to form a url? We have seen quite a lot of these errors not only on Urgiganten.dk but also some of our other websites!
Technical SEO | | urgiganten0 -
How different does content need to be to avoid a duplicate content penalty?
I'm implementing landing pages that are optimized for specific keywords. Some of them are substantially the same as another page (perhaps 10-15 words different). Are the landing pages likely to be identified by search engines as duplicate content? How different do two pages need to be to avoid the duplicate penalty?
Technical SEO | | WayneBlankenbeckler0 -
Another 301 redirect question - penalty?
Good Morning, We have 2 sites have images and minimal text on them. The images have links that point to a 3<sup>rd</sup> site that facilitates eCommerce. Question: If we 301 redirect these sites permanently to yet a 4<sup>th</sup> site… 1) Does it violate any G’s guidelines 2) Should we delete the links embedded in the images (as they point to the 3<sup>rd</sup> site) Thanks
Technical SEO | | Prime850 -
Is there a penalty for too many 301 re-directs?
We are thinking of restructuring the URLs on our site and I was wondering if there is a penalty associated with setting up so many 301 re-directs.
Technical SEO | | nicole.healthline0 -
Is there a penalty for linking to sites that are all hosted on the same IP address?
Hi... We're doing some reciprocal link building and a gentleman has been kind enough to offer me sever additional links for the exchange. All of them (5) are on the same IP address as one of his links to which we have already linked. They are in a related field of endeavor, legal websites. If I make the swap with him, is Google going to disregard, penalize or otherwise marginalize my efforts? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | hornsbylaw0