Replacing text with images
-
Hello,
My client is a "cheap calls" site which is offering calls to around 300 countries in the world. The pages for each country are almost the same, as they are mostly terms and conditions of making a call and explanation of the process how to do it. The copy is quite long (more than 850 words) and the country name is repeated about 26 times in the text. The country name and the phone number is the main difference between the pages, which makes them almost the same. I have recommended to add testimonials to each country and towns within the country, but I am afraid it will not dilute the similarity between the pages enough for Google to stop seeing them as duplicated. Also the client do not exactly rush to publish the testimonials for every country.
The rankings are not too bad and all seems fine, but in the long term I know we need to do something. I am not sure if the client would agree to shorten up the copy, as they believe in old style seo with keyword stuffing and bolded keywords but I would like to overcome that problem with exchanging the most of the copy with an image. I would write a new copy for each page making it unique (around 2-3 paragraphs) and the rest would be an image stating exactly the same thing as the copy now to provide the same amount of info to the user.
Theoretically it should help to resolve this problem, but would like to check if anyone has done something like that and if it worked/may work. Are they any other implications?
-
Adrian,
You are on the right track and are trying your best to advise this client with SEO best practices. Pat yourself on the back for that one.
I've had this similar situation a few times and instead of using an image I used either an iFrame or a script. An image might work as well. This is not spammy or blackhat or anything like that. It is quite common for site-wide text like terms of service, privacy policy, FAQ, shipping policy, etc... to be shown on every page of a site in this manner. It is especially common on eCommerce sites with regard to shipping, return policy... No matter what just make sure it is all viewable from the major mobile devices.
An easy way to test things out is to just choose a few location pages, remove the boilerplate copy (replace it using the method of your choice), write your unique content and give it a few weeks/months to see how it competes in the SERPs. For better or worse this should give you the answer.
In the long-run, however, these doorway pages you described are obviously a bad idea so they should have a plan in place on what to do if when those pages fall from the rankings.
-
You should read this to the website owners
Minimize similar content: If you have many pages that are similar, consider expanding each page or consolidating the pages into one. For instance, if you have a travel site with separate pages for two cities, but the same information on both pages, you could either merge the pages into one page about both cities or you could expand each page to contain unique content about each city.
http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=66359
-
You really have one arm tied behind your back on this one. I like the idea of the image as a solution, but I worry that might see it as "gaming" in some way as its an very unusual thing to do, especially if the image is very big. Its hard to know without doing on some selected pages and see what happens.
I think you would be better off convincing your client that is bad practice (maybe show him them comming up as dup error in the moz report). Maybe he harsh with him, tell him he can keep the text as it is if he wants, but he will never rank with those pages.
-
Thank you for your replies.
Taking aside making the site 1 pager, what do you think about the method of replacing the duplicated copy with the image. Would it work?
-
Yes it may, but I thing you still need to beef up the unique content rather then just hide the duplicate content. may be explain to them, that a one page may rank well in all these towns, but Google is going to look at these 1,000 page s and say we are only going to rank one of them and not very well.
-
Hi Simon,
It is all in English and targets people in UK who wish to call different countries. It is not that site, but has the same problem http://www.bubblecall.co.uk/. Do you think hreflang would still be valid?
-
I wish, but unfortunately i cannot see the client agreeing to turn 1000 pages site into a 1 page site. They create new pages for every town in each country and continents too adding duplications.
They also double these pages by doing not only "cheap calls" pages for towns, countries and continents but also "cheap phone card" pages for all of those.
I need to play with what I have got, so replacing duplicated text with image and adding unique paragraphs should help the problem. What do you think?
-
If I understand your situation correctly then this could well be an opportunity to implement hreflang. This would ensure the correct version appears in search and you would avoid potential duplication issues. It doesn't matter if you content is in different languages or the same language with different countries being targeted, hreflang will be relevant.
Check out http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/new-markup-for-multilingual-content.html
-
Maybe this should all be on one page that may rank well, turn a problem into a win
-
Hi Alan
Thank you for your reply.
The case with this site is that it is targeting only UK based audience (cheap calls from UK to other countries), so every page is in English. If I create 300 tlds in English I will have duplicated content among 300 domains anyway:(
-
I agree with Alan, just make sure you point the domains to the right targeted country in Webmaster tools.
-
Maybe get some international tld domains. There is no problem with having a duplicate site if they are in different tlds
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
International website - Image names
Hello All! In an international website, it is recommended to have a copy of every image for every language in the website (with translate filenames)? or it is better to use only one copy of each image and change only the alt attributes? Thanks for the help.
On-Page Optimization | | dMaLasp0 -
Clickable Images Question
This may seem like a minor issue but it is something that has been bothering me. When I write a blog post and place images within the text, is it better to have the image linking to nothing or link to the image url. I am guessing that unless I wish the image to rank for a certain keyword then it is not worth it linking to the image url. But would just like clarification if there is a more deep seated reason. Thanks Mark
On-Page Optimization | | markmiton0 -
Image File Names for eCommerce?
Hi everyone! I'm wondering about naming my product photo file names for an E-Commerce site. Let's say I say have product named Abe Lincoln in the **Print **category for sale with 4 images, relatively similar but from different views for example.Could I name them as follows? 1) abe-lincoln-print.jpg 2) abe-lincoln-print-side-view.jpg 3) abe-lincoln-print-close-up.jpg 4) abe-lincoln-print-font-view.jpg Or is that too many keywords for the page? Should I be worried about keyword stuffing? Plus once I add in title and alt tags and descriptions this could also increase the keyword count for "abe lincoln print"?
On-Page Optimization | | TheFlyingSweetPotato0 -
Image heavy pages: Google friendly fonts / seo text etc
Hi Google friendly fonts - are these in wide use now, do they work ? If you have image heavy site do they work just as well as using what we used to call 'seo text'. I have heard that 'seo text' not really used anymore or at least rebranded to 'helpful, informative paragraph or two of body copy about the page with a couple of the pages target keywords in it'. I take it if fonts in image not google friendly then should still ask dev for some space to fit in a para or two of some proper body copy, with couple of pages target kw in it ? Also looking like if i succeed in this request will be below the fold, how hard should i fight for it to be above the fold ? cheers dan
On-Page Optimization | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
Alt image tags not being read by on-page optimization tool
Can bots see the keyword among other words in aIt image tags? For example, if the keyword is upholstery leather and the image tag says "our upholstery leather collection" will the keyword be recognized? Another example is buy leather. I have a image tag on a slide that reads "free samples before you buy leather" but an on-page analysis in moz does not show an alt tag title for buy leather? Same problem with an moz on-page analysis of the term upholstery leather. Thanks! Hunter
On-Page Optimization | | leatherhidestore0 -
Google images hits distorting my results. What to do.
Hit from google images seem to be distroting my results. I sell airport taxis so want rid of any hots that came through google images as there no buying intent Aanlytics shows (when i click in) Traffic Sources > Search Engine Optimisation > Quires 250 clicks All of which came from quires related to generic taxi terms which I do (unfortunately) rank for in search. I imagine these generated because I have a taxi cab image in page one of google images. So when people search for a picture of a taxi they click mine. However in SEO MOZ the traffic data tab shows: google = 219 clicks images.google = 3 clicks This should be the other way round shouldn't it?
On-Page Optimization | | smashseo0 -
Keyword text block on homepage - keep or do away with?
One of my sites is getting a major refresh on the home page, which is good and bad. The legacy homepage was very long, and had a lot of text (thousands+ of words) in the body, with about 450+ links (internal/external) on the page. A ton of graphics, etc etc. Yuck. The revamped homepage is much improved. Very short, visual, fast, and SEO optimized. It's more of launching pad into the rest of the site. But, the text in the body is much less, perhaps a 100 words or so. The worry is that with so little text, matching the target kw count will appear as stuffing. The 'solution' was to include a visible text box at the bottom of the page, with about 300 words, basically what would typically appear in an 'about' section of a site. But instead, its located on the bottom of the homepage to beef up the pages content, and to avoid looking too 'stuffed'. Visually, its unattractive IMHO and while the text is good and informative, its under the fold and will likely not change that much going forward. This all seems very 10 years ago to me, but I'd like a second opinion. Is this box of text a good strategy?
On-Page Optimization | | EricPacifico0 -
How impactful will text at the bottom of the page be?
If the most important content for humans on my page is images (e.g., a picture gallery), but there is very little text high up on the page, how impactful will a text description at the bottom of the page be? I've seen a few other sites put content paragraphs at the bottom of their pages. LIke so: http://www.purpletrail.com/invitations-online http://www.tinyprints.com/ Is this something I would do well to emulate?
On-Page Optimization | | Ehren0