Ecommerce Website Product Rich Snippet Image
-
Greetings Mozzers,
I'm working on an ecommerce site and my goal is to have the product rich snippets on each of them however, I would like an image to start displaying in the SERPs. Looking for some guidance on this issue. Here is a well phrased questioned I found that sums up my thoughts:
Product schema has the "image" attribute, but it is not displayed in rich snippets in SERP. However, there is recipe schema and it allows to show image directly on SERP. It means that we can define two entities on a page (product and recipe, it is allowed) and it should display an image from recipe's part + the rest of information (price, availability) from product's part. I know it is a dirty hack and semantically incorrect, but will it work? If so, would it affect rankings or not? Any other drawbacks?
Thank you for any advice/clarification!
-
Great thought, I'll try to make sure the intent is actually have the cooking recipes for the product in a prominent place, and then have products beside it to show you can buy this product to complete your recipe.
Thanks for you time!
-
I'd be careful as I still don't know if Google would class a product formula as a 'recipe'. It certainly wouldn't if your product was shampoo - and I don't know if the edible nature of your product fits the bill.
A big part of Google guidelines come down to 'intent' and when a user searches recipes it's because they want to make something themselves, not buy something and that may be where you come into some conflict!
Good luck!
-
Thank you for your advice and thoughts on the matter. The product I'm selling is coconut oil, thus we actually do have recipes on the page as well. I'm thinking since it is a product page and we do have recipes, the potential of both displaying has to be an increased possibility.
-
Well I have to commend you for thinking outside the box - I've seen a few attempted approaches at this but never pulling in recipe snippets before.
Would it work - I don't think so, I think Google calls on the Rich Snippets (excluding Authorship) only in relational context. Basically what this means is Google is well aware based on the user search if someone is looking for a product or a recipe and from my understanding would likely only pull the appropriate micro-form data. That being said, I've not tested this. Your best bet would be to start by using the rich snippet test tool to see what displays (http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets)
As for what would happen if it did work - you wouldn't see any impact negatively on your SEO I imagine, but you certainly would see a spike in CTR which would ultimately boost your SEO. People love pictures and you'd be in a unique and highlighted position for that search result.
However, at this point I feel it's fair to warn you that you may be in a grey area when it comes to Google's policy. In the Rich Snippets Guidelines (https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/2722261?hl=en) it is discussed that webmasters have a responsibility to ensure that their information is properly represented and not misleading. While you aren't exactly tricking your clients, the fact that you are declaring a product image in the recipe category may in fact violate this policy. This policy is not an automatic one and therefore not black and white. It's really up to the Rich Snippets Manual Review team (which is surprisingly extensive). Punishments can include manual removal from the rich snippets program permanently and manual trust/quality penalties that would harm your SEO long term.
So while this may be possible, and may be temporarily beneficial I would personally advise against anything but proper micro-form markup.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is it possible to find out how many indexed pages a website had at particular dates in the past?
I've found all kinds of websites and tools that can tell me how many pages a site has indexed currently, but how about historically? Does such a tool exist?
Competitive Research | | bigvibes9090 -
Relevancy vs Quality of the website in blog commenting
For example, I would like to comment on a do follow blog with my link inserted in the comment. The blog post is relevant with the link i inserted however there are too many spammy links on the comment. Will this affect my website in terms of "link neighborhood" even my site is relevant to the blog? how do you judge whether the blog is worth commenting and putting your link on it? Does link building on blog comments actually hurt the page rank of websites if it go wrong such as spammy sites?
Competitive Research | | andzon0 -
How does my competitor website jump from a natural ranking of 10 to 1 in a matter of days?
OK this has really got me baffled, and I really hope the MOZ community can give me the answers I am seeking.... My statements and queries below are my own opinions and thoughts. I am not an experienced SEOer and I am learning all the time, so if I have written something incorrectly, please feel free to correct me 🙂 I have been told that natural rankings take time, and I have read with the recent algorithm changes from Google, that purchased links do not have an effect like they used to. I have also read somewhere that google has clamped down on bogus article writing (MOZ please clarify) But what I am seeking some clarification on is, how does my competitors website, that has had a natural rank of #1 in the past, suddenly drop off; for a lengthy period of time, then suddenly re-appear at #10 on page #1, then some three/four days later, hit #1? I have read that natural rankings are purely natural. I.e. a domain owner cannot pay google to boost their natural ranking. But is this really true? Why is it when I speak to a close colleague of mine in the same industry, he mentions that his maps listing has dropped off, and after making a couple of phone calls to his SEO guys in India, maybe a day or two later, magically his maps re-appear? I really am starting to question is a "natural ranking" really "natural?" I have heard that some of these SEO agencies do have some tools that dramatically effect the natural ranking of a domain. What are these tools?
Competitive Research | | Giorgio680 -
How can this website be ranking so well?!
This website: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/domains?site=www.webuycarsyourway.com.au is ranking on page one for about 75% of a list of 300 car related keywords. They don't appear to have done any link building, no social media, appeared out of nowhere in April 2012 and SEMRush reports between 5,000 and 10,000 visitors per month. The only thing I can see is they have a landing page for every keyword with the keyword in the URL. But surely that can't be the only reason they're ranking well ? ?
Competitive Research | | eatyourveggies0 -
Ecommerce Duplicate Content
Hello Everyone I would like to launch an ecommerce website. Most of the competitors in the same market are using some duplicate content for their product description What should I do? Use the same duplicate content knowing that everyone else is doing the same or rewrite it. Will I get penalized by Google if I use duplicate content? If I don’t will I get a better ranking that my competitors? Thanks for your help Joel
Competitive Research | | slv_link0 -
Free tools to discover traffic for a website?
Are there any free tools to learn traffic data (especially organic traffic data) from a site or blog?
Competitive Research | | nicole.healthline0 -
Image only site on top of Google
Hi Everyone, I'm trying to rank in Google for 'Hid xenon' in the netherlands, but there is one site above all results: http://bit.ly/qlsjne As you can see the site almost has no backlinks, and has not a single word in it's content, all images. it's a keyword only domain, and that's probably the only reason why it's ranking that high, but that means then that i can never get higher then him in Google because of it's domainname? Even when it's such a shitty site? Thank you, regards yannick
Competitive Research | | iwebdevnl0 -
Why do some websites that have hardly any backlinks, poorly optimised get placed above sites that are doing all they can with SEO?
For example take these two websites. www.rfasecurity.co.uk is a site that Iam working on and have had some success with yet snifferdogs.org.uk seems to be poorly optimised with little backlinks and still gets place higher. is it due to the key word in the domian name? The key search word is sniffer dogs New at this so any help would be appreciated regards Dave
Competitive Research | | ThePod0