Post penguin & panda update. what would be a good seo strategies for brand new sites
-
Hi there. I have the luxury of launching a few sites after the penguin and panda updates, so I can start from scratch and hopefully do it right. I will get SEO companies to help me with this so i just want to ask for advices on what would be a good strategies for a brand new site. my understand of the new updates is this
-
content and user experience is important, like how long they spend, how many pages etc
-
social media is important. we intent to engage FB and twitter alot. in New Zealand, not too many people use google+ so we will probbaly just concentrate on the first two
-
hopefully we will try to get people to share our website via social media, apparent that is important
-
should only concentrate on high quality backlinks with a good diverse set of alt tags, but concentrate on branding rather than keywords.
Am i correct to say that so far? if that is the principle, what would be the strategy to implement these goals? Links to any articles would also be great please. Love learning.
i just want to do this right and hopefully try to future proof the sites against updates as possible. i guess quality content and links will most likely to be safe. Thank you for your help.
-
-
thank you for the great advices Kurt. have a lot of think about how to best move forward and get people involved, and more importantly, how to capture all that seo juice so i wont loose any.
seo seems alot more fun now then before when it was just about linking
-
Hi Btrinh,
Social engagement is about connecting with people. It’s about responding to people’s comments, asking questions, etc. The point is to create a relationship with people or create a community of people. It’s not something that has a direct connection with SEO, but rather an indirect connection. By forming these relationships/communities, it makes it so people are more likely to consume your content and then link, Like, Share, retweet, +1 etc. when you push content out (the content still needs to be good). They are also more likely to tell others about your organization. So, it provides indirect SEO benefit as well as many other non-SEO benefits.
Good on-page optimization is a must, but link building is different today. For link building, I think the focus today needs to be on doing a great job with your company/website, creating a good user experience on your website, creating great content, connecting with people personally and on social sites so you can push your content out and get people to respond by linking, Liking, retweeting, etc.
Most of the old link building strategies which focused specifically on getting a link, especially one with your target anchor text, aren’t of much benefit anymore. Some can provides some value if done while also doing natural link building. You might get some benefit from article marketing if you produce good enough content that people use your stuff. You don’t get any value from links on the article sites themselves. There is also value to contacting relevant websites and asking for a link, but that is best done by first forming a relationship with someone who works on the website and you are giving them a good reason to want to link to you (your company is good, you have good content, etc.).
The point is that Google has always wanted links to come naturally, either because someone likes your company/website or you produce great content. Up until recently, they weren’t technically able to enforce that, so people were able to come up with unnatural link building strategies that worked. Now, they’ve advanced their tech to where those unnatural strategies generally don’t work anymore.
-Kurt Steinbrueck
OurChurch.Com -
thank you so much Kurt. Its great to know that everything you said agrees with everything i have read, and i appreciate the finer details that you have raised. however a few quick questions if i may please
1- engaging people. how would i do this to capture the social signals. what i mean is this. i can get people to talk on my FB page, thats not a problem. but i assume my website wont see any of this. So does this mean i have to somehow import this into my site? Like i need to allow people to comment inside the website via their FB account?
2- yes two of the sites that we are building will have lots of videos as well, so im glad you raise the importance of videos.
3- natural link building. from the way you describe, does this mean i dont need to hire seo companies to do linking work anymore, and only ask for their help with onpage SEO? since alot of them do talk about offering natural link building, submit articles to forums etc.
thank you Kurt
-
Hi Btrinh,
It sounds like your moving in the right direction and Pedram had some great advice. To answer your more specific questions...
- Effectively incorporating social media into your SEO can involve a lot of things, but I'd suggest you primarily focus on two things, sharing content (and having your content shared) and engaging people. Sharing content yourself is easy enough, but getting other people to share it is trickier. People need a reason to share something and the best reason is if it impacts them and they feel compelled to share. Things that impact people are things that are funny, moving, very interesting, about a cause they like, and even sometimes if something is a great deal. Beyond sharing content you want to engage people. Ask for opinions. Ask questions. When people post on your account, respond. Share other people's stuff, etc.
- Natural links means people link to your site of their own desire without reward. This usually means that either your company does a good enough job that people recommend/talk about you or that you produce content that is valuable enough to link to. By the way, you referred to "alt tags", but I think you mean anchor text. Alt tags are generally used with images. Assuming you mean anchor text (the text of the link), you want a combination of branding, naked URLs, keywords (and variations), and random words (click here, etc.). The thing is, that if you are getting most of your links by producing great content and doing a good job with your company/website, then this will happen naturally.
- Keyword research is essential. You need to know what keywords to target in your content and, to some extent, your link building. On-page SEO is still very important, so using keywords in your content is important. As for link building, I prefer a natural approach (as described above), but even with a natural approach you can target keywords by including them in content titles and things like that. It's natural for someone to link to an article using it's title as the anchor text. So, using a keyword in the title, can get you keyword-rich links naturally.
- I like video content as well. Done right, it can be very cost effective. Video has two other great benefits. If you are using people, you can create a stronger connection with people than they get from reading an article. Secondly, Google uses a different algorithm for the videos used in their blended results. So, if your site doesn't have enough authority to rank well with a page, it may still be able to rank well with a video.
- I use Google Analytics. It isn't perfect, but it's good.
Kurt Steinbrueck
OurChurch.Com -
Thanks pedram. ok i think in principle i might be right, but in details, i have no idea what it means. so i guess some specific questions might be
- how to effectively incorporate social media into SEO? are we specifically talking about people sharing pages from the website onto social media? Is a FB like or a comment enough, or do we need to encourage sharing more?
- natural links, yes - but what does that mean. it is diverse alt tags, make sure each link is surrounded by organic text, diversify sources of backlinks?
- if keyword is less important, is it still important to do keyword research and integrate into content?
- what about video content?
- you talked about analytic pacakage, is google analytics not powerful enough?
-
You're certainly on the right track. Starting from scratch is always a fun thing (if you're an SEO nerd like I am). You can set rules and goals in place from the get go and make sure best practices are followed as fresh content is always delivered and updated.
Content and user experience certainly are a big big plus. Make sure to do some good keyword research and tastefully integrate them within your content. Install a good analytics package and monitor user engagement. Social media definitely is another great outlet - make sure to use it effectively, especially Google+. I've seen some pages rank higher just by sharing on G+ (of course there are a lot of other factors, but this is just a correlation, not causation). Even if a lot of people don't use it, it's important to have a presence.
Dont' build crappy links. As you said, stick with quality over quantity - always. The more natural your content and the more quality it is, the more it will get shared and the more it will get linked to.
In short, you're on the right track
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Have we been hit by an update?
Hi Everyone : ) We have an E-commerce website has been getting less and less organic traffic each month since October 2015 after it had received a massive spike overnight! I can't see any logical reason for it or find any updates that would have caused this. Have anyone got an idea? I know I am not giving much information out but wondered if anyone else had seen a similar issue. aZ7F6YA
Algorithm Updates | | O2C0 -
Why is old site not being deindexed post-migration?
We recently migrated to a new domain (16 days ago), and the new domain is being indexed at a normal rate (2-3k pages per day). The issue is the old domain has not seen any drop in indexed pages. I was expecting a drop in # of indexed pages inversely related to the increase of indexed pages on the new site. Any advice?
Algorithm Updates | | ggpaul5620 -
Google's Mobile Update: What We Know So Far (Updated 3/25)
We're getting a lot of questions about the upcoming Google mobile algorithm update, and so I wanted to start a discussion that covers what we know at this point (or, at least, what we think we know). If you have information that contradicts this or expands on it, please feel free to share it in the comments. This is a developing situation. 1. What is the mobile update? On February 26th, Google announced that they would start factoring in mobile-friendliness as a ranking signal. The official announcement is here. Of note, "This change will affect mobile searches in all languages worldwide and will have a significant impact in our search results." 2. When will the update happen? In an unprecedented move, Google announced that the algorithm update will begin on April 21st. Keep in mind that the roll-out could take days or weeks. 3. Will this affect my desktop rankings? As best we know - no. Mobile-friendliness will only impact mobile rankings. This is important, because it suggests that desktop and mobile rankings, which are currently similar, will diverge. In other words, even though desktop and mobile SERPs look very different, if a site is #1 on desktop, it's currently likely to be #1 on mobile. After April 21st, this may no longer be the case. 4. Is this a boost or a demotion? This isn't clear, but practically it doesn't matter that much and the difference can be very difficult to measure. If everyone gets moved to the front of the line except you, you're still at the back of the line. Google has implied that this isn't a Capital-P Penalty in the sense we usually mean it. Most likely, the mobile update is coded as a ranking boost. 5. Is this a domain- or page-based update? At SMX West, Google's Gary Ilyes clarified that the update would operate on the page level. Any mobile-friendly page can benefit from the update, and an entire site won't be demoted simply because a few pages aren't mobile friendly. 6. Is mobile-friendly on a scale or is it all-or-none? For now, Google seems to be suggesting that a page is either mobile-friendly or not. Either you make the cut or you don't. Over time, this may evolve, but expect the April 21st launch to be all-or-none. 7. How can I tell if my site/page is mobile-friendly? Google has provided a mobile-friendly testing tool, and pages that are mobile-friendly should currently show the "Mobile-friendly" label on mobile searches (this does not appear on desktop searches). Some SEOs are saying that different tools/tests are showing different results, and it appears that the mobile-friendly designation has a number of moving parts. 8. How often will mobile data refresh? Gary also suggested (and my apologies for potentially confusing people on Twitter) that this data will be updated in real-time. Hopefully, that means we won't have to worry about Penguin-style updates that take months to happen. If a page or site becomes mobile-friendly, it should benefit fairly quickly. We're actively working to re-engineer the MozCast Project for mobile rankings and have begun collecting data. We will publish that data as soon as possible after April 21st (assuming it;s useful and that Google sticks to this date). We're also tracking the presence of the "Mobile-friendly" tag. Currently (as of 3/25), across 10,000 page-1 mobile results, about 63% of URLs are labeled as "Mobile-friendly". This is a surprisingly large number (to me, at least) - we'll see how it changes over time.
Algorithm Updates | | Dr-Pete15 -
Penguin hit | Immediate?
Last year we fell off google rankings fairly quickly (mid-2013), out of the blue. We thought it was Penguin; but after looking at Analytic data of organic google visits; there seems to be no drastic loss of traffic at any time. Our site's loss of traffic is a gradual decline, not immediately noticeable, as in this video (~33:00 minutes in ). If there is no drop in organic google traffic that's noticeable, can I safely assume our drop in rankings wasn't due to an algorithm update?
Algorithm Updates | | godreamvacations0 -
How to content marketing: Should my blog posts link to my sales page?
Hi, I've been doing a weekly blog making sure that each blog post contains my money keywords in the text, sometimes in h2 tags etc. My blog posts never contain any links to my actual sales page. Should I link each blog post to my sale page or is it overdoing it? Will internal linking of all my blog posts to my sales page will improve its page authority or have any SEO benefits? What about using exact match anchor text on these internal links? I couldn't find any resource online about this matter. Thank you for your opinion and help! -Marc
Algorithm Updates | | marcandre0 -
My Site PR lost to PR4 ! I worked as per SEOmoz Suggestion - No Traffic Drop, Organic Search is good and higher than referral or Direct Traffic !
My Site PR5 lost to PR4 ! I worked as per SEOmoz Suggestion - No Traffic Drop, Organic Search is good and higher than referral or Direct Traffic ! What might be the problem ? Nov 29-2012 my site was hacked very badly and google Blacklisted me for the first time and if you see now " it says, Past 90 days nearly 19 times my site was acted as medium to spread virus" Even thought we checked our FTP, Cpanel or Home Directory - Everything seems good. My domain which was hosted - has other domains in the same network and some are porn - those sites are injecting malicious code ! May be that's the reason or please give me some idea how to improve it !
Algorithm Updates | | Esaky0 -
Any insight on what factors Penguin is looking at?
Anyone have insight into what specific factors penguin is targeting and how it works? Matt Cutts seemed to infer that the site was targeting things such as spun content, keyword stuffing, etc. but most of the sites that have been hit that I've seen aren't doing any obvious content spamming like that. For example: Is penguin looking primarily at onsite or backlink factors? Does Penguin just discount spammy backlinks, or does it apply an additional penalty to sites that have poor quality backlinks? Anyone noticing specific onsite or offsite factors that correlate with whether a site has been hit or not?
Algorithm Updates | | AdamThompson3 -
How did NexTag.com Survive the Algorithm Update?
After going through numerous post-algo update articles I find one price comparison site to have gone though unscratched - NexTag.com Question: What contributed to their success? Was it sheer domain authority, content quality, unique toolset... or something else?
Algorithm Updates | | Dan-Petrovic0