What is the best way to use canonical tag
-
Hi, i have been researching this since yesterday and have looked at this subject many times before but still cannot get my head around it.
i done a report on my site which was very useful, i used http://www.juxseo.com for my site www.in2town.co.uk
and it brought me some useful information but part of that info was it was telling me that i should have on my home page a canonical tag which would improve my seo.
Now i am using sh404sef for my friendly urls and i am using joomla 3.0 and when i approached the makers of the sh404sef to ask about the tag they said i would need to be careful of using it as it could damage my site and my rankings.
i have read lots of information but still do not have a clear understanding behind it.
can anyone please explain the best way to use this and should i be using where i may have some sort of duplicate page, any help to understand this would be great.
-
Hi Tim,
Thank you for using sh404sef! We are working on a you moz post for Joomla 3 SEO. Your input is welcome.
We have a couple references regarding duplicate content & Joomla. (see below)
http://anything-digital.com/sh404sef/news/canonical-urls-and-joomla-seo.html
http://anything-digital.com/sh404sef/news/ranking-factor-dilution-and-joomla-seo.html
Thank you,
Jess
-
thank you everyone for your help, this explains it a lot better, thanks for this.
-
Hi Tim,
Yes a canonical tag is useful for resolving duplicate content, and acts in a similar fashion to a 301 from the perspective of search engines and passing of link juice, yet allows users to view the original page. So the use depends on the context of your duplicate content issues.
For example say you have a common issue, multiple versions of the home page under /, /index.aspx and /home these are all versions of the same page, no content has changed, what the user sees is not reliant on anything in the URL. In this case a 301 is your best bet back to the root version of the page you want, it shall also help prevent people building links to the various versions as when they take the address from the URL bar it shall already be the version you have selected.
Now say your a retail site selling frogs (Don’t ask, i have a fondness for using frogs in my examples) and you have a product listing page of all the frogs you sell. this could stretch over multiple pages and be paginated. For example /frogs, /frogs?page=1, /frogs?page=2 etc. In this case you don’t really want all these versions of what is effectively the same page ranking, particularly as content won’t change much and can be seen as duplicate. Additionally you don’t want any link equity being split between all the paginated versions however you DO want the user to be able to view these pages. In this case the use of Canonical can be perfect (or rel next/prev but I’ll ignore that for now)
Now it gets a little more complicated and we begin to get to the areas where you can hurt yourself from an SEO perspective. Say your customer can sort by clolour of frog aswell, this adds another parameter to your URL and more duplicate content. i.e /frogs, /frogs?colour=red, /frogs?frogs=blue. Here you can do the same as above and canonical back.
This is where the potential danger lies - The URLs you have canonicalled back will not be ranked in search engines, now say Red frogs are a massive seller and really popular with customers, you may want this page to rank, and canonical tags can prevent this. This is the kind of situation that can cause you a mischief. Have a read of Dr Pete’s 'What page is canonical below' for a more detailed explanation.
Hope this helps you out.
Thanks, Tom.
Heres a few extra resources you may or may not have already discovered:
-
Hi,
The canonical tag is used to give authority to a specific page on your site where other pages have the same or very similar content.
You can place a canonical link element in the head section of all non-canonical pages with the same or similar content to tell Google that there is a page on your site that you would like them to index for this content.
Generally it's ecommerce websites that benefit here, as they may have several routes by which you could reach the same product information, for example, you could have a product under several different sub-categories. You would want to place a canonical tag on each page to point to one specific page.
Check out the Google Webmaster Tools explanation for more detail https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/139394?hl=en
Hope this helps.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Hi! I first wrote an article on my medium blog but am now launching my site. a) how can I get a canonical tag on medium without importing and b) any issue with claiming blog is original when medium was posted first?
Hi! As above, I wrote this article on my medium blog but am now launching my site, UnderstandingJiuJitsu.com. I have the post saved as a draft because I don't want to get pinged by google. a) how can I get a canonical tag on medium without importing and b) any issue with claiming the UJJ.com post is original when medium was posted first? Thanks and health, Elliott
Technical SEO | | OpenMat0 -
Which address do I use for citations
Hello, When I created my google places, I entered my address and when I got my google places activated I noticed that the address google places was displaying was a short abbreviation of my address. So my question is when it comes to creating citations for my listing do I grab the address google places generated for me in the listing or the long version of my address? I've just heard when it comes to creating citations, you need to make sure it is identical across the board. I hope this makes sense. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | fbbcseo0 -
Canonical tag refers to itself (???)
Greetings Mozzers. I have seen a couple of pages that use canonical tags in a peculiar way, and I wanted to know if this way of using the tags was correct, harmless or dangerous: What I've seen is that on some pages like: www.example.com/page1 There's a canonical tag in the header that looks like this link href="http://ww.example.com/page1" rel="canonical" It looks as though the tag is "redirecting to itself", this seems useless (at least to me). Is there a case where this is actually a recommended practice? Will using the canonical tag in this way "hurt" the page's ranking potential? Cheers Jorge
Technical SEO | | Masoko-T0 -
Which Web host do you use?
A friend of mine has a successful website which is hosted by the company he used to use for developing his site. As he no longer uses them feels he should use it. Who do you use for hosting a small to medium sized business?
Technical SEO | | Ant710 -
Best way to get SEO friendly URLSs on huge old website
Hi folks Hope someone may be able to help wit this conundrum: A client site runs on old tech (IIS6) and has circa 300,000 pages indexed in Google. Most pages are dynamic with a horrible URL structure such as http://www.domain.com/search/results.aspx?ida=19191&idb=56&idc=2888 and I have been trying to implement rewrites + redirects to get clean URLs and remove some of the duplication that exists, using the IIRF Isapi filter: http://iirf.codeplex.com/ I manage to get a large sample of URLS re-writing and redirecting (on a staging version of the site), but the site then slows to crawl. To imple,ent all URLs woudl be 10x the volume of config. I am starting to wonder if there is a better way: Upgrade to Win 2008 / IIS 7 and use the better URL rewrite functionality included? Rebuild the site entirely (preferably on PHP with a decent URL structure) Accept that the URLS can't be made friendly on a site this size and focus on other aspects Persevere with the IIRF filter config, and hope that the config loads into memory and the site runs at a reasonable speed when live None of the options are great as they either involve lots of work/cost of they involve keeping a site which performs well but could do so much better, with poor URLs. Any thoughts from the great minds in the SEOmoz community appreciated! Cheers Simon
Technical SEO | | SCL-SEO1 -
The best way to organize a gallery for SEO?
I need to redo the following gallery
Technical SEO | | UnderRugSwept
http://goo.gl/PFvjE
because besides the fact that it looks ugly, it's an SEO mess. Since all the pages are comprised of images, and the only text is the navigation, I'm getting duplicate content issues. I tried adding a little paragraph of text on some of the pages, but this thing needs a total revamp. My main question is this: is that menu being repeated on all the pages really a good thing? What good is it to, say, on the fire patches page, to have a menu that includes all these keywords for sports patches? Would it be better to just have a main gallery page that lists the main patch types: applique, motorcycle, Scouting, ect, and then once you get to that page, list all the different sub categories?0 -
What's the best way to switch over to a new site with a different CMS?
Is it better to 301 or to closely duplicate each page URL when switching over to a new website from an established site with good ranking and a different CMS ( Drupal switching to Wordpress)?
Technical SEO | | OhYeahSteve0 -
I am wondering if I should use the Meta 'Cache" tag?
I am working on removing unnecessary meta tags that have little impact on SEO and I have read so many mixed reviews about using the Meta 'Cache' tag. I need to informative information on whether or not this tag should be used.
Technical SEO | | ImagetecLP0