How is this possible? A 200 response and 'nothing' to be seen? Need help!
-
On checking this website http://dogtraining.org.uk/ I get a 200 response. But an Oops! Google Chrome could not find dogtraining.org.uk . Same with Firefox (Server not found).
Obviously there is a problem - I just don't know where to 'start' investigating to spot the error.
Can someone help me?
Thank you!
-
Fantastic, guys, thank you!
Yes, I have a slow connection (getting it sorted soon). That's why I couldn't 'see' there 'is' a website responding correctly, although slow to load.
Ok, this gives me an excellent starting point. I'll run both pingdom and Google's speed check and see what comes up.
Thanks again!
Happy friday
-
I ran a speed test on the domain as Chris mentioneed it was running slow. I did get the domain to load, but it took a lot of time to get a visual of the site's design. Try using the following tool to run some speed tests, determine where things might be slowing down (host, server, # of files loading, # of image files loading, quality of images, resolutions, remote files and CCS scripts, etc).. could be a # of things but this is a good place to start investigating. Just enter your domain here and run the test.
It will also help you identify areas that might need looking at to help speed things up. Hope this is a good jumping off point
Cheers
-
I got the page but it was slow to be found. Maybe it is timing out for you and could be an issue with the quality of your host.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Link Spam from Competitor Help
A clients link profile is recently getting lots of spam links related to "abortion pills" and "does my husband cheat" I found a few of the sites that link, and it appears that there is some malicious code on the site injecting links at the top of the site. http://www.med-reporter.at/index.asp?men=Gesundheit&submen=Produkte&artid=1587&kategorie=&blockzl=3 Can anyone look at the link above and tell me what network or software is creating these links?
Technical SEO | | webbroi0 -
Pagination when not needed
Hello Moz, Odd one for you today. I've a site with has pagination (rel= next / prev) however its not being used correctly. I'll give you some examples: lets assume its a 5 page site with a home page, about us etc. The home page has a rel="next" tag on it leading to the next tab (about us) this goes all the way down to the final tag (contact us). Normally you use these tags for pages e.g page 1 - 5 but how much will they affect being used in the way above I'm thinking site structure. Just to add there is no view all on it either though this would make no sense in the way it is being used. Normally I would remove but the client wants to know why and I wanted to articulate better then "because its wrong" As always Moz - thanks!
Technical SEO | | GPainter0 -
I'm thinking I might need to canonicalize back to the home site and combine some content, what do you think?
I have a site that is mostly just podcasts with transcripts, and it has both audio and video versions of the podcasts. I also have a blog that I contribute to that links back to the video/transcript page of these podcasts. So this blog I contribute to has the exact same content (the podcast; both audio and video but no transcript) and then an audio and video version of this podcast. Each post of the podcast has different content on it that is technically unique but I'm not sure it's unique enough. So my question is, should I canonicalize the posts on this blog back to the original video/transcript page of the podcast and then combine the video with the audio posts. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | ThridHour0 -
Need advice on search listings and link building
Search results on my keyword (engraved wedding glasses) produces several pages of linked domains. (My domain is giftthings.net) Some are good. And admittedly, some are not so good. My question then is simply, why does seomoz link analysis show such a small number of links? And the second part of my question is, "Is there some sort of "magic number", some sort of thresh hold that triggers Google's interest? With a link list that is small but growing, am I missing something in my concern that I'm not moving up in the search listings? I've written a few articles, continuing my work on link building but I remain buried in the search results.
Technical SEO | | AhmadS1 -
Do i need to use proxy when i ping my backlinks?
I just create 50+ backlinks i would like to know when i ping those like do i need to use proxy? Thank you so much
Technical SEO | | locoto00071 -
SEO Yoast Help Needed
Anyone familar with SEO Yoast and interested in being hired to check out my settings for SEO. Thinking about 30 minute screen sharing session an helping me figure out what I am am doing wrong? Just cleaned up duplicates because of tags and now I see the images are getting duplicated as well as some of the titles. So new to Wordpress here I shine. Message me if you can help. Much Appreciated!!
Technical SEO | | Force70 -
Do I need an XML sitemap?
I have an established website that ranks well in Google. However, I have just noticed that no xml sitemap has been registered in Google webmaster tools, so the likelihood is that it hasn't been registered with the other search engines. However, there is an html sitemap listed on the website. Seeing as the website is already ranking well, do I still need to generate and submit an XML sitemap? Could there be any detriment to current rankings in doing so?
Technical SEO | | pugh0 -
My pages says it has 16 errors, need help
My pages says it has 16 errors, and all of them are due to duplicate content. How do I fix this? I believe its only due to my meta tag description.
Technical SEO | | gaji0