What is the full User Agent of Rogerbot?
-
What's the exact string that Rogerbot send out as his UserAgent within the HTTP Request? Does it ever differ?
-
I know this is an insanely old question, but as I was looking it up as well and stumbled on this page I thought I would provide some updated info in case anyone else is looking.
The user agent can't be found on the page that is listed anymore. However it is on https://moz.com/help/guides/moz-procedures/what-is-rogerbot
Here is how our server reported Rogerbot in its access logs (taken from May 2013). Notice that there is a difference with the crawler-[number]
rogerbot/1.0 (http://www.seomoz.org/dp/rogerbot, rogerbot-crawler+pr1-crawler-02@seomoz.org
rogerbot/1.0 (http://www.seomoz.org/dp/rogerbot, rogerbot-crawler+pr1-crawler-16@seomoz.org)[updated link added by admin]
-
Best way to get that info is to hit up Site Support - via http://www.seomoz.org/dp/rogerbot
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Unsolved Rogerbot blocked by cloudflare and not display full user agent string.
Hi, We're trying to get MOZ to crawl our site, but when we Create Your Campaign we get the error:
Moz Pro | | BB_NPG
Ooops. Our crawlers are unable to access that URL - please check to make sure it is correct. If the issue persists, check out this article for further help. robot.txt is fine and we actually see cloudflare is blocking it with block fight mode. We've added in some rules to allow rogerbot but these seem to be getting ignored. If we use a robot.txt test tool (https://technicalseo.com/tools/robots-txt/) with rogerbot as the user agent this get through fine and we can see our rule has allowed it. When viewing the cloudflare activity log (attached) it seems the Create Your Campaign is trying to crawl the site with the user agent as simply set as rogerbot 1.2 but the robot.txt testing tool uses the full user agent string rogerbot/1.0 (http://moz.com/help/pro/what-is-rogerbot-, rogerbot-crawler+shiny@moz.com) albeit it's version 1.0. So seems as if cloudflare doesn't like the simple user agent. So is it correct the when MOZ is trying to crawl the site it uses the simple string of just rogerbot 1.2 now ? Thanks
Ben Cloudflare activity log, showing differences in user agent strings
2022-07-01_13-05-59.png0 -
Allow only Rogerbot, not googlebot nor undesired access
I'm in the middle of site development and wanted to start crawling my site with Rogerbot, but avoid googlebot or similar to crawl it. Actually mi site is protected with login (basic Joomla offline site, user and password required) so I thought that a good solution would be to remove that limitation and use .htaccess to protect with password for all users, except Rogerbot. Reading here and there, it seems that practice is not very recommended as it could lead to security holes - any other user could see allowed agents and emulate them. Ok, maybe it's necessary to be a hacker/cracker to get that info - or experienced developer - but was not able to get a clear information how to proceed in a secure way. The other solution was to continue using Joomla's access limitation for all, again, except Rogerbot. Still not sure how possible would that be. Mostly, my question is, how do you work on your site before wanting to be indexed from Google or similar, independently if you use or not some CMS? Is there some other way to perform it?
Moz Pro | | MilosMilcom
I would love to have my site ready and crawled before launching it and avoid fixing issues afterwards... Thanks in advance.0 -
Rogerbot's crawl behaviour vs google spiders and other crawlers - disparate results have me confused.
I'm curious as to how accurately rogerbot replicates google's searchbot I've currently got a site which is reporting over 200 pages of duplicate/titles content in moz tools. The pages in question are all session IDs and have been blocked in the robot.txt (about 3 weeks ago), however the errors are still appearing. I've also crawled the page using screaming frog SEO spider. According to Screaming Frog, the offending pages have been blocked and are not being crawled. Webmaster tools is also reporting no crawl errors. Is there something I'm missing here? Why would I receive such different results. Which one's should I trust? Does rogerbot ignore robot.txt? Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Moz Pro | | KJDMedia0 -
Rogerbot getting cheeky?
Hi SeoMoz, From time to time my server crashes during Rogerbot's crawling escapades, even though I have a robots.txt file with a crawl-delay 10, now just increased to 20. I looked at the Apache log and noticed Roger hitting me from from 4 different addresses 216.244.72.3, 72.11, 72.12 and 216.176.191.201, and most times whilst on each separate address, it was 10 seconds apart, ALL 4 addresses would hit 4 different pages simultaneously (example 2). At other times, it wasn't respecting robots.txt at all (see example 1 below). I wouldn't call this situation 'respecting the crawl-delay' entry in robots.txt as other question answered here by you have stated. 4 simultaneous page requests within 1 sec from Rogerbot is not what should be happening IMHO. example 1
Moz Pro | | BM7
216.244.72.12 - - [05/Sep/2012:15:54:27 +1000] "GET /store/product-info.php?mypage1.html" 200 77813
216.244.72.12 - - [05/Sep/2012:15:54:27 +1000] "GET /store/product-info.php?mypage2.html HTTP/1.1" 200 74058
216.244.72.12 - - [05/Sep/2012:15:54:28 +1000] "GET /store/product-info.php?mypage3.html HTTP/1.1" 200 69772
216.244.72.12 - - [05/Sep/2012:15:54:37 +1000] "GET /store/product-info.php?mypage4.html HTTP/1.1" 200 82441 example 2
216.244.72.12 - - [05/Sep/2012:15:46:15 +1000] "GET /store/mypage1.html HTTP/1.1" 200 70209
216.244.72.11 - - [05/Sep/2012:15:46:15 +1000] "GET /store/mypage2.html HTTP/1.1" 200 82384
216.244.72.12 - - [05/Sep/2012:15:46:15 +1000] "GET /store/mypage3.html HTTP/1.1" 200 83683
216.244.72.3 - - [05/Sep/2012:15:46:15 +1000] "GET /store/mypage4.html HTTP/1.1" 200 82431
216.244.72.3 - - [05/Sep/2012:15:46:16 +1000] "GET /store/mypage5.html HTTP/1.1" 200 82855
216.176.191.201 - - [05/Sep/2012:15:46:26 +1000] "GET /store/mypage6.html HTTP/1.1" 200 75659 Please advise.1 -
Is seomoz rogerbot only crawling the subdomains by links or as well by id?
I´m new at seomoz and just set up a first campaign. After the first crawling i got quite a few 404 errors due to deleted (spammy) forum threads. I was sure there are no links to these deleted threads so my question is weather the seomoz rogerbot is only crawling my subdomains by links or as well by ids (the forum thread ids are serially numbered from 1 to x). If the rogerbot crawls as well serially numbered ids do i have to be concerned by the 404 error on behalf of the googlebot as well?
Moz Pro | | sauspiel0 -
Can we assign multiple admins and users with different role in one PRO account?
We wish to give different login details to authorized personnel without handing out the main account ownership login.
Moz Pro | | solution.advisor0 -
Any SEO moz users notice a HUGE change in OSE (Open Site Explorer) link data numbers?
Hi All, I am having some serious concern with OSE data recently for numerous clients, one client I want to talk about today has the following data from OSE for the month of August 2011 compared with July 2011: Total links to the domain: (decrease of around 100,000+)
Moz Pro | | ColumbusAustralia
External Followed links: (decrease by around 5,000)
**Linking Root domains: (decrease of over 60) ** The crazy thing is that the domain authority has actually gone up by around 5 points for this client even though every thing has suddenly gone down? Also funny thing is we have been link building quite strong for this client over the last 12 months using only high quality sources from out niche. I am worried that their is serious issues with the data, I realise we saw some updates to OSE recently yet I am suprised it can be this drastic. Kind Regards. PSV1
