High ranked web site on Google GONE - but webspam team says nothing wrong
-
We purchased several weeks ago a .org blog that has been highly ranked (number 1 on competetive keywords) for at least a year.
it is a blog
We moved the blog to our IP range and it went from #1 on top keyword and first page on another to the home page just gone.
Now there was a secondary page indexed that stayed on page 5 for the keyword the home page was ranked #1 but the home page (which was high ranked page is just gone)
We wrote the Google Webmaster team for reconsideration but they wrote back and said the web spam team said nothing wrong.
A contact of mine who works for one of the most well known SEO compaines in the world says because we moved it the site could disappear for a week or so but the "algos would realize" and return it to that top spot soon.
Does anyone know anything about moving a site to new IP and issues that can result?
-
Glad I was able to help - Can you kindly close out the question by marking my answer "Good Answer" - Thanks
-
Keri
Back at #1 after a few weeks just gone....crazy! I dont get it but glad to see it back where it was
Thanks for the help and great forum
-
Thank you Irving! I don't always get a chance to go back to the older posts, but I do like to do this when I have time available. It's often interesting to get the follow-up report and see how things turned out.
-
U guys are really great - following up on old posts and trying to help out. Just sheer amazing.
-
Hi! I'm following up on older questions. Did Irving's answer help you? How is the site doing now?
-
Here is an article I wrote a year ago. Not all the bullet points are applicable in all circumstances. Your site can undergo a new evaluation by Google and it may not have enough muster to survive the new world.
It is the general understanding that the “trust” for a domain is reset if any domain registration info changes. Even changing an IP address will cause the search engine to reevaluate link counts and other aspects of the web site. This document provides best SEO practices for changing an IP address and DNS server. Following all these steps will not guarantee that a site will not be impacted after the change, since as noted above there are some factors that are out of our control. The location of the new IP address also might impact Google rankings as Google sometimes like to show results based on locality matching.
Steps for Moving to a new IP address and DNS Server
- Clean up all existing internal site link errors. Many errors found on a fresh crawl may trigger a bad reaction by the search engines.
- Freeze any content changes one week prior and one week after the changeover.
- Inform contacts at Google and Bing when exactly changes will take place to the IP and DNS records.
- Check the new IP address and research if it has been blacklisted in any country whether it will be neighbor to black listed websites. Google does indirectly associate websites which reside on same class C IP address.
- If possible, it is best to ask the hosting provider for a fresh IP as opposed to a recycled IP address. Check on the history of IP addresses using a tool from ip-details.com.
- Test on local machines. Change the local dns to point to the new ip’s before going live, to verify the new servers are working.
- Make sure that all monitoring services are up and running and very thoroughly tested. Also, some services maybe tied to the old site IP addresses, make sure to check if you have any and update the IP address.
- Change the TTL (Time To Live) value of the DNS configuration to something short, like five minutes (300 seconds). This will tell web browsers to re-check the site IP address every five minutes.
- Copy site content to the new hosting environment, and make sure it is live on the new IP address.
- Test to make sure new server is working correctly. Check internal linking at the new location to make sure there aren’t any broken links. We will use crawling tools Xenu’s Link Sleuth and Screaming Frog that will crawl the website and make sure everything is in order.
- Change the DNS settings so the hostname points to the new IP address. DNS propagation is usually very fast in most locations. (approximate 30 minutes)
- All web pages need to be reachable during the whole process by Googlebot and users of course.
- Keep the old server on until cached DNS records expire. The reason to do this is because DNS records are cached for varying times at various points all over the internet. You can tell the old server is no longer needed when traffic drops to zero. Check the logs of the old server to get a clear indication when the crawling process is terminated by Googlebot.
- Check the logs of the new server to see when Googlebot starts crawling the site on the new IP address. Log into Webmaster Tools and monitor any crawl errors. Once Googlebot is happily crawling on the new IP address, you are all set as far as Google is concerned. (Errors in Webmaster can take 24-48 hours to display)
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Prioritise a page in Google/why is a well-optimised page not ranking
Hello I'm new to Moz Forums and was wondering if anyone out there could help with a query. My client has an ecommerce site selling a range of pet products, most of which have multiple items in the range for difference size animals i.e. [Product name] for small dog
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | LauraSorrelle
[Product name] for medium dog
[Product name] for large dog
[Product name] for extra large dog I've got some really great rankings (top 3) for many keyword searches such as
'[product name] for dogs'
'[product name]' But these rankings are for individual product pages, meaning the user is taken to a small dog product page when they might have a large dog or visa versa. I felt it would be better for the users (and for conversions and bounce rates), if there was a group page which showed all products in the range which I could target keywords '[product name]', '[product name] for dogs'. The page would link through the the individual product pages. I created some group pages in autumn last year to trial this and, although they are well-optimised (score of 98 on Moz's optimisation tool), they are not ranking well. They are indexed, but way down the SERPs. The same group page format has been used for the PPC campaign and the difference to the retention/conversion of visitors is significant. Why are my group pages not ranking? Is it because my client's site already has good rankings for the target term and Google does not want to show another page of the site and muddy results?
Is there a way to prioritise the group page in Google's eyes? Or bring it to Google's attention? Any suggestions/advice welcome. Thanks in advance Laura0 -
Google Ignoring Canonical Tag for Hundreds of Sites
Bazaar Voice provides a pretty easy-to-use product review solution for websites (especially sites on Magento): https://www.magentocommerce.com/magento-connect/bazaarvoice-conversations-1.html If your product has over a certain number of reviews/questions, the plugin cuts off the number of reviews/questions that appear on the page. To see the reviews/questions that are cut off, you have to click the plugin's next or back function. The next/back buttons' URLs have a parameter of "bvstate....." I have noticed Google is indexing this "bvstate..." URL for hundreds of sites, even with the proper rel canonical tag in place. Here is an example with Microsoft: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:zcxT7MRHHREJ:www.microsoftstore.com/store/msusa/en_US/pdp/Surface-Book/productID.325716000%3Fbvstate%3Dpg:8/ct:r+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us My website is seeing hundreds of these "bvstate" urls being indexed even though we have a proper rel canonical tag in place. It seems that Google is ignoring the canonical tag. In Webmaster Console, the main source of my duplicate titles/metas in the HTML improvements section is the "bvstate" URLs. I don't necessarily want to block "bvstate" in the robots.txt as it will prohibit Google from seeing the reviews that were cutoff. Same response for prohibiting Google from crawling "bvstate" in Paramters section of Webmaster Console. Should I just keep my fingers crossed that Google honors the rel canonical tag? Home Depot is another site that has this same issue: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:k0MBLFcu2PoJ:www.homedepot.com/p/DUROCK-Next-Gen-1-2-in-x-3-ft-x-5-ft-Cement-Board-172965/202263276%23!bvstate%3Dct:r/pg:2/st:p/id:202263276+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | redgatst1 -
Strong Site, Pages, Ranking Low
Hey Mozers This is a question which has been bugging me for a while now I have an authority site in my niche which has a stronger DA than pretty well every competitor, but certain sections of the site underperform. For instance, when you search for 'Jerusalem Dead Sea tour', my item, http://www.touristisrael.com/tours/jerusalem-dead-sea-day-tour/ does not appear in the first few pages. I have a page that appears on the first page, but it is less relevant than this product page. This is an example, there are tens of cases like this. So the question is, am I signalling to Google not to rank these pages, and is there something I'm missing with regards to strengthening product pages in this tour section? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ben100010 -
Does site size (page count) effect search ranking?
If a company has a handful of large sites that function as collection of unique portals into client-specific content (password protected), will it have any positive effect on search ranking to migrate all of the sites to one URL structure.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | trideagroup0 -
Is there anyway to recover my site's rankings?
My site has been top 3 for 'speed dating' on Google.co.uk since about 2003 and it went to below top 50 for a lot of it's main keywords shortly after 27 Oct 2012. I did a re-submission request and was told there was 'no manual spam action'. My conclusions is I was dropped by Google because of poor quality links I've gained over 10+ years. I have a Domain Authority of 40, a regular blog http://bit.ly/oKyi88, a KLOUT of 42, user reviews and quality content. Since Oct 2012 I've done some technical improvements and managed to get a few questionable links removed. I've continued blogging reguarly and got more active on Twitter. I've seen no improvement and my traffic is 80% down on last year. It would be great to be able to produce content that others want to link to but I've not had much success from that in over 10 years of trying and I've not seen many others in my sector, with small budgets having much success. Is there anything I can do to regain favour with Google?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | benners0 -
My site rank is not consistent. Once it at first page , then for the next week it is not found in top 100 position. Again two/ three weeks later it ranked automatically without any work. Why this is happening?
Here's the following are available in my site: robot.txt file is included sitemap available Natural link building going on. in a week total 100 links we are creating. 30 social bookmarks, 30 directory submission, 20 blog comments, 20 forum links All the blog and forum links are from relevant sources. Please help me ..
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | coldfireinc0 -
Google Web Master Tools: Duplicate Title Tags?
According to Google Web Master Tools it says my site has 910 Duplicate Title Tags. How verbose should title tags be? What's the maximum character length? For example, let's say I have an image of an iPhone 4S being held in someone's hand. How verbose of a title and how many characters am I allowed to have? Is the goal with title tags to be very specific in describing the image? In the above example, do I need to say something like: "iPhone 4S being held by white caucasian male" or will "iPhone 4S" suffice?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | asc760 -
Why our site dropped in rank for a main keyword
Hello, Our site nlpca(dot)com dropped in rank for a few terms, including the main term "NLP". Could you look at our site and tell us what might be the cause? Thank you so much, Bob
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BobGW0