11 000 links from 2 blogs + Many bad links = Penguin 2.0\. What is the real cause?
-
Hello,
A website has :
1/ 8000 inbound links from 1 blog and 3000 from another one. They are clean and good blogs, all links are NOT marked as no-follow.
2/ Many bad links from directories that have been unindexed or penalized by Google
On the 22nd of May, the website got hurt by Penguin 2.0. The link profile contains many directories and articles.
The priority we had so far was unindexing the bad links, however shall we no-follow the blog links as well?
Thanks!
-
Sitewide links are not the ideal, even if their are good.
I suppose the links in the good blogs are from a blogroll in sidebar, and that location for a link may sound suspect.
Said that, I would maintain them at first, concentrate in cleaning the toxic links you have detected, do a reconsideration request (and eventually uploading a disavow).
Just in the case the penalization is not quit, then I will consider the idea of asking the blogs to move the link from a sitewide situation to an editorial one (maybe creating a page: "The site we like", which should not be just a list of links but also give an explication why the blogs like those sites.
That would be helpful also for the sites themselves, because they will get rid of any suspect of manipulative link building from their side.
-
Hello!
I'm assuming those blog links are sitewide links like in the header/footer/sidebar?
In which case the question is really, is it a natural link? It's not the fact that it's a sitewide link that's really the problem. You'd expect sitewide links in some situations, for example with group company websites that link back to the main group website and this is natural behaviour. It's more where you get links that just have no reason to be there, Like, 'Blogroll:' and then 5 random unrelated sites linked by their anchor text. If on the other hand you've earned a couple of links in a list of good related resources in the sidebar, these are unlikely to cause you any problems.
If they don't 'feel natural', I would definitely ask if they can be made no-follow or better still, ask if they could each just give you one nice in-content link
ED: apologies for repeating some of the above answers, I think we all posted at the same time!
-
I think you just need to ask the question - how "natural" is it to have 8000 or 3000 links from just 1 domain? And how natural is it that it takes up a large proportion of your link profile?
The answer is likely to be not very natural at all. And for that reason, you should remove/nofollow/disavow if you can. Incidentally, if the amount of links has been inflated by tagging/category issues on that blog, then your website is potentially being linked to by masses of duplicate content, which is even more of a problem.
All 8000 links might be contextual and earned, but I'm almost certain Google would not see it that way and that's contributing to your algorithmic penalty. I'd nofollow if you can or better yet have the links removed.
Hope this helps.
-
Why are there so many links from just 2 domains?
If they are sitewide, Google is not a fan of that unless they are nofollow, however why are some nofolow and others follow? Is that not a signal to Google in some way? Why would a site naturally have some nofollow and some dofollow links to your site?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should You Link Back from Client's Website?
We had a discussion in the office today, about if it can help or hurt you to link back to your site from one that you optimize, host, or manage. A few ideas that were mentioned: HURT:
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | David-Kley
1. The website is not directly related to your niche, therefore Google will treat it as a link exchange or spammy link.
2. Links back to you are often not surrounded by related text about your services, and looks out of place to users and Search Engines. HELP:
1. On good (higher PR, reputable domain) domains, a link back can add authority, even if the site is not directly related to your services.
2. Allows high ranking sites to show users who the provider is, potentially creating a new client, and a followed incoming link on anchor text you can choose. So, what do you think? Test results would be appreciated, as we are trying to get real data. Benefits and cons if you have an opinion.2 -
Which Large Guest Blog Network is Cutts talking about?
Did you guys see Cutts Last tweet? Today we took action on a large guest blog network. A reminder about the spam risks of guest blogging: goo.gl/cnkoFA Matt Cutts (@mattcutts) Which Large Guest Blog Network is he talking about?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Felip30 -
Dump Penguin Hit Domain
Just wanting to get some feedback from others dealing with Penguin hits on client's websites. We've got one particularly client that has been hit badly because of a high proportion of link toxicity. After running the Cemper Detox Tool we found that only about 25 links are healthy. We're actually thinking of dumping the domain and moving the website to a new domain and starting again with link building (manually grabbing as many of the existing healthy links as possible on the way). Has anyone out there used this strategy? What do you think of the potential of the Sandbox of the new site vs. the Penguin hit on the old site. Do you think the 'drag' of Penguin is higher than the 'drag' of the Sandbox on rankings? Thanks guys, look forward to your insight!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | mavster0 -
Penguin 2.1 Penalty- Can't Understand why hit by it?
Hi, I have lost all my rankings after Penguin 2.1 update. I haven't did anything wrong. Want to know the root cause of the penalty so that I can overcome this. Any help would be appreciated. Website: http://tiny.cc/hfom4w
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | chandman0 -
Links via scraped / cloned content
Just been looking at some backlinks on a site - a good proportion of them are via Scraped wikipedia links or sites with similar directories to those found on DMOZ (just they have different names). To be honest, many of these sites look pretty dodgy to me, but if they're doing illegal stuff there's absolutely no way I'll be able to get links removed. Should I just sit and watch the backlinks increase from these questionable sources, or report the sites to Google, or do something else? Advice please.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | McTaggart0 -
External links without unnatural without my control
What should I do with links that Google considers link unnatural, but I have no control over them?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | soulmktpro0 -
Penguine Recovery
Our site, www.autodealerchat.com got hit hard by Google's recent Penguin update (also known as the over-optimization update). For our main set of keywords including: auto dealer chat dealer chat car dealer chat automotive chat We lost placement across the board most notably on automotive chat where we were third and are today non-existent. If you look at our site, we were following former best practices and SEOMoz recommendations. If you look at our backlinks, we were playing the white hat game like everyone else. SEOMoz tools indicated that we were tops in terms of Domain Authority, etc. according to the old rules. Everything changed on April 25th. Going forward, what are some of the things that we can do to regain some of that lost ground? Thanks in advance for the insights.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | contactatonce0 -
Feedback on link building idea
We came up with this idea at work for a client but before I initiate it I was wanting to get feedback on if this would be considered whitehat and alright to use. It is for an ecommerce site. On the order confirmation and thank you page (not email cause they are on some old system that does not send out emails) we are wanting to put a thank you for your order message and continue with a statement about how they can save money on future purchases with a link that takes them to a page with info on how to do so. That new page will have info about linking to the site from a blog or website. And will say if you link back to us and send us an email with that link as proof we will give you a promo code for your next purchase. Is this alright?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | webfeatseo0