Site Rebuild -Larger to smaller
-
Hi All,
We are rebuilding an existing site which has around 230 Pages (lots of content not required) down to around 20. Whats the best way to 301 redirect the pages that are going to be removed- (we wont be able to use .htaccess because we are moving to Adobe Business Catalyst)
Thoughts? We are trying to preserve as much SEO value as possible.....
-
Hi there, thanks for your question! You've received some excellent responses. Did any of them help you resolve your issue? We'd love a status update, thanks!
Christy
-
Peter - no worries at all. Beers on me next time you're in Boulder, Colorado...
-
@Jeff - sorry was obviously writing my response when you had posted yours. Almost a snap!
Peter
-
Hi
For pages that continue to exist obviously you need to redirect them to the new page URL.
For pages that you are removing, first off try to find the best match page to what they were about and redirect them.
For pages for which there is no obvious replacement, I will still redirect them anyway, but maybe to the home page of the site.
Google will re-crawl all new pages even when they match, to check content. In the context of a complete change of content for a page, very little if any SEO value will be retained but at least if someone is clicking an old link left on the web to a page which no longer exists they will be taken to a useful navigable page on your site.
Although you can no longer use .htaccess redirects, you can still do 301 redirects in Adobe Business Catalyst. Please see the documentation here: http://helpx.adobe.com/business-catalyst/partner/redirect-page-urls.html
I hope that helps,
Peter -
It appears that the Adobe Business Catalyst system does allow you to create 301 redirects through the admin system:
http://helpx.adobe.com/business-catalyst/partner/redirect-page-urls.html… as well as be able to upload a .csv or .tab file to do a bulk listing.
I'd recommend 301 redirecting pages to a similar top-level category, so that the end user isn't confused when they arrive there.
That said, going from 230 pages to 20 is going to reduce the content of the site by 10x. I'd imagine that doing so is going to kill most of your SEO rankings. I'd just make sure to let the client know in writing that this is a pretty bad idea from an SEO rankings perspective.
We have a similar client that ranks extremely well for seminars and conferences, and their older conferences are still available on their site for people to reference. Some of them rank very well, even years later. The client wanted to remove these from their site, but we did some tracking and measurement and showed them that they were getting many new clients based on these older pages. As well as taking up spots on search results pages that their competition wouldn't get.
If there's one thing that Google likes, it's relevant content on a site. So I would make those 20 pages really count. Make the content extremely engaging to the end user. Watch the bounce count.
Hope this helps!
- Jeff
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does adding new pages, new slugs, new URLS in a site affects rankings and visibility?
hi reader, i have decided to add new pages to my site. if i add new urls, i feel like i have to submit the sitemap again. my question is, does submitting sitemap again with new slugs or urls affects visibility is serps, if yes, how do i minimize the impact?
Web Design | | SIMON-CULL0 -
What do you use for test rendering your dev site?
I'm redesigning our company ecommerce site and need to test render an infinite scroller to ensure that it is as SEO friendly as possible. My problem is that I cannot view it in Webmaster Tools since I am blocking the site from crawlers using robots.txt. I know I could simply unblock Google temporarily but I really would rather not make my dev site available to search engine crawlers.
Web Design | | bearpaw0 -
W3C My site has 157 Errors, 146 warning(s) Is it an issue?
Is having this number of W3C errors & warnings an issue and will be impacting my site's performance? When the site was built 6 months ago my developers told me that it "was nothing to worry about", but I have read that any errors aren't good, let alone the huge number my site has? Your advice please Thanks Ash
Web Design | | AshShep10 -
On site SEO opinions
Hi all, I have been testing different configurations for my on-site SEO for a while now and I think I am pretty much there. However it is always nice to know what other SEO's think about my keyword density and usage. My site is http://www.tomlondonmagic.com I am curious as to what you think regarding landing page content, whether you need lots or text or little text? I have just removed links in the text as I feel I want to keep as much juice on my landing page as possible. Thanks all!
Web Design | | TomLondon0 -
International SEO issues for multiple sites
We currently have 3 websites: oursite.co.uk oursite.fr oursite.ch We also own Oursite.com, and that URL currently redirects to Oursite.fr. We are considering a complete site redesign and a possible merge of the 3 sites. Assumptions: ** the 3 sites currently receive organic search traffic to varying degrees
Web Design | | darkgreenguy
** Oursite.ch is almost identical to Oursite.fr in terms of the site content
** Our target market is NOT the USA for English-language searches. It is the UK. With a re-design, we see our options as follows: Merge the 3 sites and make Oursite.com the "main site" and then have subfolders as follows: /uk /fr /ch Keep the 3 sites as they are. We see Option 1 as the best in terms of saving time when updating the site, and saving money paid to the site developers (1 site vs 3 sites). We see Option 2 as the best in terms of ability of the site to rank, as well as confidence of searchers when seeing our site in the search results (in other words, a person searching in France would be more likely to buy and/or submit a form on our site if they saw Oursite.fr vs Oursite.com/fr). I guess we're looking for some suggestions/guidance here. Are we missing any big issues? Does anyone have experience with an issue such as this? Thank you in advance...
-Shawn0 -
Mobile Site Pages: Word Count Help
Hi there I am doing a mobile website for a client and they asked me what the dieal word count would be per page. They are SEO conciosu but we are not doing SEO on this site. I would just like to know a general rule of thumb. Regards Stef
Web Design | | stefanok0 -
Mobile sites! Any advice or suggestions for building one?
Hello Mozland, I'm looking to have a mobile site built. We have a fair amount of traffic coming from smart phones, tablets etc and want to capture this traffic better. Do you have any advice on how to have it built properly, if/how it can be optimised, what good features to include, or anything else you think might be of help? Many thanks Martin
Web Design | | Martin_S0 -
How to serve a Mobile & Full Site using one URL?
Hello, Does anyone know of any resources or tutorials that outline how to serve a smartphone-formatted website using the same URL as the full site? I know that one solution is using media-queries to serve a seperate CSS stylesheet, but you still have the full HTML source code. In other words, I might want to serve a smartphone & desktop user different content, but under one URL. WP Touch (Wordpress Plugin) is a perfect example of what I mean, but how is it technically achieved? It serves two different sets of HTML for smartphone & full, but using one URL http://www.bravenewcode.com/store/plugins/wptouch-pro/
Web Design | | petecampbell-bmi0