Error 4XX showing by SEOmoz tool
-
Hi,
I am a SEOmoz user. Can anybody guide me how to fix 4XX errors as i got reported by "Crawl Diagnostics Summary". There are many referring URLs reporting same error. Please guide me what to do and how to fix it??
Thanks
-
Hi Vijay,
First off have you given Roger (Moz robot) enough time to recrawl the site and discover that you have fixed the errors? You can see the last crawl date at the top of the reports normally.
Google has some tips on fixing 404's - https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/2409439?hl=en
You can also double check live 404's here - http://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/
I also bet if you take a search through the Moz community you can find some other peoples fixes for 404's
Hope that helps.
-
Yes, there is referrer column which says www.acelerartech.com/sitemap.xml. This is my website and there are almost 286 errors detected by crawl diagnostic summary.
Here is the categorization of the errors : -
-
4XX errors
-
duplicate page content
-
Duplicate page title
-
Missing Meta Tags
5)Title element is too long
- Title element is too short.
However i configured and fixed most of the errors but got to failed solving 4XX errors and rel=canonical (which says status as true). I checked on those links and found that those links should me there on website. Then why those links are reported in 4XX as these links are in use.
please check http://www.acelerartech.com/printmail/case-study/media-industry-case-study
Please provide your valuable suggestions and guide me what exactly to do?
-
-
Hi! If you download your crawl report as a CSV, there will be a column there showing you the referring site that linked to the 404.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Moz Crawl Report Increase in Errors?
Has anyone else noticed a huge increase over the past couple weeks in crawl issues in their dashboards? Without being able to see historical data week over week, I can't tell what's been added. Is this some update with the tool? I'm not seeing any health issues with this feature on the Moz Health page, it just seems strange that I'm seeing this across all our accounts.
Moz Bar | | WWWSEO0 -
4XX client error with email address in URL
I have an unusual situation I have never seen before and I did not set up the server for this client. The 4XX error is a string of about 74 URLs similar to this: http://www.websitename.com/about-us/info@websitename.com I will be contacting the server host as well to troubleshoot this issue. Any ideas? Thanks
Moz Bar | | EliteVenu0 -
Keyword Difficulty tool showing Google search volume or Bing?
Hi, I plugged in a bunch of keywords to know their search volume, chose Google from the drop down and then chose English from the next dropdown and clicked on Check dificulty. It shoes me "Bing Search Volume (Exact Match)" on top but shows the name of the keyword and "for Google CA" on the left. Is the search volume for Google? or Bing? and the difficulty as well? Google or Bing? "
Moz Bar | | SpaMedica0 -
Use of Keyword Analysis Tool (espcially regarding search volume)
Hello! I am fairly new to Moz and just starting to explore the available Research Tools. At first glance, I was very excited about the Keyword Analysis tool, but I quickly realized that (a) I wasn't receiving the information I needed and (b) I didn't know what to do with the information it gave me. So... Two specific questions: Is there any way to see the Google Search Volume instead of the Bing Search Volume? The overwhelming majority of our organic site traffic comes from Google, so it seems silly to look at the Bing search volume. How do you deal with the fact that this tool only returns search volume based on an exact match? As we know, there are some many ways the same general query could be entered, but it seems ridiculous for me to sit there and run the tool against every iteration I can think of just to get a general sense of the search volume. Two general questions: What do you find helpful about the Keyword Analysis tool and how does it inform your SEO work? What other tools do you recommend to help determine Google search volume for keywords? Thanks in advance for your help and advice!
Moz Bar | | Marketing_Dept0 -
How does it work Fresh Web Explorer Mention Tool?By given information is right or wrong?
Fresh Web Explorer Mention Tool show two new brand mention urls on my campaign dashboard but i have checked through this urls we don't have any brand and keywords related to my campaign in this urls. So, why it is mentioned that "you have new brand mentions" in this url? Kind for information i have mentioned those urls when show my brand: http://www.slideshare.net/acoleman2/principles-of-micro-economics http://www.scribd.com/doc/237030746/Children-s-Spaces
Moz Bar | | surabhi60 -
My product pages have no weight / links from root domains with the Moz tool bar
Hi, When I view my home page (http://www.arkwildlife.co.uk) with the Moz toolbar, I see a good PA and a good amount of links from root domains. As I go down the site, it seems to get worse. The category pages (http://www.arkwildlife.co.uk/Category/0/Straight_Foods.html) have a little but not much and then from this point onwards, it's nothing. The product page (http://www.arkwildlife.co.uk/Item/Straight_Foods~Sunflower_Seeds/SUNH/Premium_Sunflower_Hearts.html) is reporting to have no root domain links but I am not sure why. Interestingly, when I click through to a review page (http://www.arkwildlife.co.uk/StockReview/0/SUNH/0/Premium_Sunflower_Hearts.html) it does have some juice. Would anyone be able help on why this is happening and what I need to be looking at in order to resolve it please? EDIT: I've been looking at the hyperlinks and notice something odd. If I review the score with the first link below, it gives a score of 1, but the second gives a PA of 13 with one root domain linked. 1:http://www.arkwildlife.co.uk/Item/Straight_Foods~Sunflower_Seeds/SUNH/Premium_Sunflower_Hearts.html 2:http://www.arkwildlife.co.uk/Item/Straight_Foods%7ESunflower_Seeds/SUNH/Premium_Sunflower_Hearts.html Please note the "%7E" instead of the "~" in the URL. The browser appears to show the ~ character no matter what but the rank of the page changes. I don't understand what the Moz toolbar is doing with this. Note: This behaviour only happens in Mozilla Firefox, in chrome both the rankings are zero for each URL. Many Thanks.
Moz Bar | | nawgie0 -
Crwal errors : duplicate content even with canonical links
Hi I am getting some errors for duplicate content errors in my crawl report for some of our products www.....com/brand/productname1.html www.....com/section/productname1.html www.....com/productname1.html we have canonical in the header for all three pages <link rel="canonical" href="www....com productname1.html"=""></link rel="canonical" href="www....com>
Moz Bar | | phes0 -
What is the best tool to track US positions from the UK?
We are currently tracking the rankings of a US-based client (we are UK-based) and it appears we are seeing some considerable differences in positions. To check ranks we often use Fat Rank which can be set to a US-based search and a manual search on Google.com. However, our American client is receiving different results (actually higher positions than we have recorded!) and is claiming to have used both a manual check on Google.com and the following tool.
Moz Bar | | Webrevolve
http://smallseotools.com/keyword-position/ Would anybody be able to tell me how accurate this tool is regarding US-based positions?
We’ve since made use of the tool too and it adheres to the rankings that the US-based client is claiming – rather than our checks using Fat Rank and Google.com.0