Penguin Strategy Idea
-
Hello,
So while I sit and wait for Penguin to hopefully ease up on my site, would it be smart to create a new site and then forward the old penguin hit site to it after the dust clears and any issues are better?
I have heard some people say you never recover from an algo penalty? While others say to wait it out.
So just curious what you think? Would you ditch a site that is not super followed or popular? in the attempt to create a site with no bad backlinks and start fresh?
Thank you for your thoughts
-
Sorry I didn't respond sooner Gary. I really appreciate getting a recommendation from you. I guess what I was disagreeing with was the idea that starting over was what John always recommends. I possibly misinterpreted your response though.
I have seen a couple of sites make fantastic recoveries from Penguin, but it's definitely not common. The majority of Penguin hit sites that I have seen are in the same boat as you where they appear to have done all of the right things but are still waiting for improvement. Very frustrating indeed.
-
Wow Gary great posts thank you.
so going forward, would it be smart to change my citationa to show my new domain? Or leave it in case the original site comes back?
And create new citations for the new domain?
-
"I'm going to disagree with Gary" Disagree with what? At no point did I say it was not possible to recover, I have in many post before cited that John Mueller has always said EVERY site is recoverable. Here is a link to one of those statements by John (View Question 4)
http://www.reconsiderationrequests.net/google-hangouts/12-April-2013.php?#Q4
I said "You will almost always have some suppression if you are unable to remove bad links." This Is a FACT!
It IS possible to split an arrow in half with another arrow from 100 yards but its near impossible. It is all in the wording with John and Matt, just because something is possible does not make it near impossible. I have done extensive testing on this as have you considering you have a business in this field. What is a FACT is that even if you recover you will almost always have some suppression from bad links even if you RANK #1 you could still be suffering from suppression that would give you a bigger gap between 1st and 2nd.
Recovery WILL take a very long time in most cases. The question is how long and how much time and money are you willing to invest in making this happen. The money invested can also be calculated in the loss of revenue you have every day until you do recover not just the money spent trying to fix the issue.
The cost spiral out of control when you take 6 months for example as a recovery time.
Here are the facts!
I have also had an answer on a similar topic about one great site is better than 10 semi ok sites.
1 site is better according to Google and done correctly will do great, however! Currently in many niches most of the top 10 have suppression or even a penalty and are still ranking top 10 because the whole industry is pulling dirty seo tricks. This has lead to many companies owning multiple sites as backups and because they are clean domains they are ranking up top for them. Google is unable to deal with this problem even when I report them direct to John Mueller. I know sites that have 4 sites in the top 10 listings. They make the whois private and have different contact details for each business and even if you call them they answer in the name of the domain using a simple phone number screening system.
For the last 10 years it has been more advantageous to do the things Google says do not do because you will spend all your time chasing the top 5 which will rotate and change like the wind as the churn and burn sites dominate most SME niches.Should you focus on one domain, YES because trying to do more is a real pain and putting your focus into one will yield better results. Can you protect yourself from future penalties? If you happen to make a mistake then you have no backup and you are back to square one. This is why most SME's have a backup domain or two because of the risk factor a totally ridiculous situation that Google has created because of long recovery times.
I also thought about going with an EMD as so many sites I see have he keywords in the name, so I figured to try that route too.
Another ridiculous situation, there are many issues with EMD, Google on multiple occasions have said the EMD's are bad at some point there will be a big slap on them I am sure! And all your hard work will be flushed down the toilet at the click a of button.HOWEVER! They are taking all the top rankings right now in most niches (excluding the major ones). Another reason why the churn and burn spammer community are winning again.The stumbling block Google hit last year when trying to slap these sites was that a few companies in Florida I believe said "HEY, we have been in business before the internet and called ourselves lawyers of Miami" or something like that. Matt Cutts was uable to argue the case that they did not do it because of SEO, lol and the algo was changed very very quickly.So the answer is, if you are going to use an EMD beware that you are in the firing line for a penalty in the near future. One of the main reasons is that if you want people to link to you using your company name you will basically be getting keyword rich links to your site and the Penguin Algo is looking for exactly that!Your best option is to start a fresh domain, use one of your keywords matched with a unique brand word so that you get some benefit of a keyword without being an EMD. Write new content and see how you rank.You could even keep the old domain up and remove the contact details from that site is there is no issues with the same address and keep working on it in the hope someday you will manage to recover it.
I don't like the answer I have to give you to your questions, but I have been online since 1993 and have been in the website building/SEO/SEM game since about 1997. I have seen it all, I have seen every lie, every bend of the truth and tested almost every example of what we have seen up to this date.Just because something is said as fact does not make it feasible choice. One last example of that was Google said negative SEO was not possible. They then changed their statement six months later to say it was possible but in extreme circumstances.
The real fact of the matter is it IS ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE. The ONLY time where it is possible is when the domain does not have a single link in it's profile previous to the incident that could be considered spammy, which in itself is almost impossible.Its all in the wording. Sorry to be a downer but its better to give hard truths than false hopes. There are few stories of recovery because they require to much time/money/work when compared with starting a new domain.
If you want a good shot at recovering Marie Haynes is and expert in the field and has tremendous experience, if you stand any hope of recovering it is with her.I hope your decision proves to be the right one now that you are armed with lots of knowledge
-
"My issue is though if you try and add in say a company name and phone number, will Google say "Hey this may be a different domain name and content, but the contact info is the same?'"
This is something I'm not completely sure on. What you may want to do is start a new question so that you can get the attention of people who do local SEO. You can reference this question in your new one.
"I had a local seo here in Colorado tell me that all a disavow does is tattle tells on you to Google. So basically you are telling Google to penalize you."
There are a lot of things that we don't know about the disavow tool. A lot of people have a fear that using it could be dangerous to you. I do not believe that filing a disavow is going to make Google take a stronger look at your site or penalize you further. Also, if you have a link based issue such as either a manual penalty or problems with the Penguin algorithm IMO it is not possible to remove that issue without using the disavow tool. The only exception would be if you controlled every single unnatural link linking to you and could remove them.
-
Thank you so much Marie,
You are very smart and I appreciate your time to answer my question.
If I may ask - With trying to test the waters with an additional domain, I have no problems writing new content. My issue is though if you try and add in say a company name and phone number, will Google say "Hey this may be a different domain name and content, but the contact info is the same?'
I have also had an answer on a similar topic about one great site is better than 10 semi ok sites.
My goal is just to be found. I made the mistake of hiring some seo from Digital Point, and now I am paying the price for black hat seo.
That being said, I do LOVE my domain as it is my business name, BUT I had a local seo here in Colorado tell me that all a disavow does is tattle tells on you to Google. So basically you are telling Google to penalize you. Of course they wanted $3000 for a new site and then $1500 a month to do seo on it. So maybe its just a money thing.
I also thought about going with an EMD as so many sites I see have he keywords in the name, so I figured to try that route too.
Either way I feel like I am on an Island by myself. I want to join civilization once again. I have cleaned up many links, got citations, and have a 44% bounce rate. But not listed in like the first 12 pages of google for my target keyword. So its lonely. I am lost on who to trust, so I turn to you and all of the great Mozzers
Thank you again
-
I think the answer depends on a number of things. In some cases it doesn't make sense to start over because businesses may have a lot invested in the branding of the domain name.
I'm going to disagree with Gary. I've seen John Mueller say quite the opposite and tell people that any site can recover from any algorithm change provided you do the right work. Ultimately the answer in my opinion depends on how many good links the current site has. If ALL of your rankings were based on links that are now unnatural and you're not married to your domain name then yes, I would start over.
Recovering from Penguin is definitely possible. I wrote about some of my experiences with seeing sites recover (or in some cases, not recover) from both Penguin issues and manual penalties here on Moz: http://moz.com/blog/after-penalty-removed-will-traffic-increase. I've seen sites recover completely from Penguin, but only if they've got a fantastic site that has the ability to attract links naturally.
If you do start over, make sure you don't use the exact same content as Google will often figure out that the original site is the canonical version and will attribute the old links to the new site. Also, I'm not sure that I would redirect the old site to the new unless you can confidently tell that the old site escaped Penguin. Otherwise, if you didn't get all of your unnatural backlinks you could end up redirecting Penguin issues back to the new site.
-
Thank you Gary
i do not have any manual penalties, yet even with new links, citations, and disavowing bad links I do not show up under my states simple niche
So now I am looking going towards a fresh start
what hurts is I do like my domain as it is my business name. But when I am not being found, I am not good.
So without paying 2500 a month for help, I feel like I need to do something
-
John Mueller from Google Says Yes, ditch the old site and start a fresh one.
You will almost always have some suppression if you are unable to remove bad links.
Better to start a fresh site and have no lingering issues.
301 redirecting a site with a bad backlink profile to yours with almost identical site structure will pass those bad link issues on to your new domain even if you no longer have manual penalty issues. Almost all sites have a Penguin suppression these days. Some are unnoticeable as their good links far outweigh their bad links.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Content strategy for landing pages: Topics vs Features
Hi all, We are going to create new landing pages and optimise existing pages. We have a confusion on how to employ content on these pages....whether these will be filled with content to rank for "topics" and "keywords" or direclty jump into the features are are providing. If we go with first, users may feel boring about teaching them about that topic, if we go with latter...it's hard to rank being no related content to rank for that topic. I have seen some of the websites are employing multiple landing pages where they fill with topic related content and then link to features pages. I need suggestions here. Thank you
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz1 -
How is your site holding up post Penguin 4.0 roll out?
Hi team I was reading an article this morning from Barry Schwartz at SERoundtable about the impact of Penguin 4.0 and how webmasters are reporting minimal effects since launch. There was another article posted this morning about how the roll out may have began before the launch date, which would make sense as MozCast was reporting high temperatures leading up to Friday, specifically 9/12 to 9/15. I was wondering how everyone's traffic / rankings are performing after news broke on Friday, 9/23? Were you see fluctuations before that? What are you focusing on most now that Penguin 4.0 has launched? I understand we are a few days in and this is a real time / ongoing rollout, but I would be interested to hear what everyone has been seeing so far, if anything! Hope you all are doing well and I'm looking forward to hearing from you! Good luck!
Algorithm Updates | | PatrickDelehanty
P0 -
Is it a good idea to 301 redirect one same niche site towards another site for seo benefit
Hello friends, I have 2 android niche sites, one site is running on a technology dropped domain i catch 1 year ago it has, almost 400+ domains linking to different parts of the site, the other one i established from scratch and both are running from jan 2015. Now i want to redirect first site which already has 400 links pointing towards it to the home page of my 2nd android site. Is it a good idea to do so and does it give any boost in terms of seo?
Algorithm Updates | | RizwanAkbar0 -
How to determine the best keyword strategy/purpose for a blog in 2014?
Currently our blog has been used to add content to our site targeting desired keywords (fairly top-level). For example, if we wanted organic traffic for "Some City Contractors" (by no means a longtail), we would write a blog using this key term in the Title, url, a sub heading perhaps and a couple variations of the term throughout any subheadings or body copy. I think the idea was that since there was so much work to be done to get the static site pages optimized (rewriting that copy), we just decided to crank out fresh content targeting these high level KWs, assuming a search engine result is a result and as long as we got real estate there, a click and there was a link to the relevant site page in that article, we were golden (well, maybe not golden, but good). We are now building a new, responsive site and taking care to make sure that the site's relevant pages are nicely optimized. Higher level page are optimized for high-level KWs and sub pages target longer tail KWs identified in KW research. Along the way an SEO said it was bad that so many of our blogs were better optimized for key terms than the actual site pages (i.e. service pages, things you would find in the main nav.) This does make some sense to me so... So what is the new purpose for our blogs in this new age of Google and ever-increasing social influence? Should we forget about focusing on KWs already addressed within the site's core? Focus more on interesting, super long-tails that maybe don't have a ton of traffic, but are relevant (and oh by they way, something like 3 million terms are searched for the first time each day, right?)? Or forget the keywords, as long as the topic is relevant and interesting the real pay-off is in social interactions. I'm really interested to see if this results in clear-cut answer or more of a lengthy discussion...
Algorithm Updates | | vernonmack1 -
That Penguin
Without trying to rub salt into the wounds of anyone hit hard, on the flip-side did anyone get some good news. We have one particular client that was effected in an immense positive way today, for the last four months we found it difficult to outrank one of their competitors ... but they have vanished of the face of the earth today, well Google's earth .. which meant our client moved up the SERP for a number of their key-phrases, which gave me a sense of immense delight. I could see exactly what they where doing, not so natural link building, creating a lot of sub-directories, naming each index file by the key phrase and linking all their internal links, while disturbing all their backlinks form the same source to each index page ... I wondered of they stayed under the radar cause each term was a sub-directory almost. No doubt they will be back, but not after a clean up and a restructure to their website Anyway I digress, anyone else seen any major improvements
Algorithm Updates | | Johnny4B3 -
Penguin 2.0 - Any signs yet?
I'm waiting, probing and analyzing and haven't seen any signs of a Penguin change. I am seeing some of my head terms bounce around the last couple of days. Mostly bouncing up and then back down again. I'm not sure if these are signs of an algo change starting, and working through Google's servers. Has anyone seen anything yet?
Algorithm Updates | | tdawson090 -
Awarding badges to bloggers as a link-building strategy?
Hello - In the past, doing "Blog awards" and subsequently offering winners' badges with links and anchor text embedded has been something that worked very well for a client. However, we are now noticing that the badging strategy does not seem to be producing the same results for us. We are only reaching out to quality blogs in particular niches - e.g., Top Fashion Blogs, Top Health Blogs, Top Design Blogs, etc. Most blogs that post the badges are in the PageRank 3-5 range. Has anyone else engaged in badging strategy and noticed that the success rates are declining? Could it be that in-text, contextual links are given much more weight than sidebar links? (The badges are most typically posted in bloggers' sidebars). Any insight would be appreciated, thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | brmckenna0 -
Trying to figure out why Penguin has completely buggered us up, and what to do about it
Hola All, This is a update of http://www.seomoz.org/q/gah-unfaorly-hit-by-massive-google-penalty Updated because: Google webmaster has gotten back to us that there have been no manual actions taken against us Results haven't improved one jot We're completely flummoxed as to why this is happenin Quick summary: We run the larest WordPress news site on the web, WPMU.org We're completely legit, a team of 4-5 great writers, amazing original content, massive fanbase on twitter and facebook, a 60k email list etc, established for years and years. We're absolutely not and haven't done anything gray or black, the worst we've done is including links in the footers of some themes we've distributed Since the 24th April our google referrals are down from an 8.5k daily peak to 1.5 - see the attached. Articles which have consistently attracted several hundred referrals per day have disappeared from the rankings to be replaced by republications or just links to the, for example, here's one on the dangers of searching for free WP themes, decimated: http://wpmu.org/why-you-should-never-search-for-free-wordpress-themes-in-google-or-anywhere-else/ Check out how legit we are! http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/links?site=wpmu.org And the problem: How to get our google traffic back? We're completely stuck 😕 We can't find issues within the site content, or even particularly within the backlinks (we've removed all links from Edublogs) We haven't been manually whacked, so we can't get that changed. Absolutely nothing within the penguin update should have hit us... in fact by their reckoning we should have had a massive improvement over all the trash that competes with us in the WordPress space. Help / Ideas / Feedback / Criticism / Anything desperately sought. Thanks for your time, James Screen-Shot-2012-05-03-at-10.49.40-AM.png
Algorithm Updates | | WPMUDEV0