Link removal
-
We were hit by penguin and have been going through the process of removing bad links. Things were looking up but then wasa 20% jump in our bad links.
They all seem to be related. There are over 100 different domains that all seem to go back to mbiz. examples include
http://www.5stone.com.cn/Literature-holders-.html
http://www.building-stone.com/Display-furniture.html
http://www.china-tombstone.com/Display-exhibition-products-.html
It looks like they have automatically gathered data from google to create these pages. I would hope that the guys at Google are clever enough to be aware of these sorts of links. But if not I need to get them removed.
I have tried whois but I cant find out how to contact these guys. Has anyone got any bright ideas?
Thanks
-
You should definitely be able to ignore these as they're quite common (not specifically these websites, but these types of links). That said, if you are under penalty and can't work out which links are causing it, having cleaned up all the rest, I'd go for a disavowal. If you are 100% certain that the penalty is due to Penguin, approaching the manual webspam team isn't likely to help you at all. But getting that disavowal in before the next Penguin update (which, despite Google's updates of this week - Panda and "payday loans" - can't be far away) might help.
-
This is true Gary, but only if you're dealing with a manual penalty. The OP has a Penguin issue so no one from the webspam team is going to be reviewing their links. Still, there's no harm in making a spreadsheet in case the site were to undergo a manual review in the future. And, there's no harm in working hard to get links removed rather than just disavowing. But, in most cases the ROI just doesn't make sense. For Penguin issues I generally try to remove the links that I can easily remove and then disavow the rest.
-
Thanks for the kind words Tim.
And...thanks for pointing out that statement on my site. You're right...that post was written a while ago. In fact, it was written before the last Penguin refresh. When Penguin refreshed in October of 2013, the only sites that I saw making any kind of a recovery were ones that had done a thorough disavow. As such, I now DO recommend using it for Penguin recoveries. I've edited my post.
Submitting a disavow will definitely not flag your site for a manual review. John Mueller has mentioned this several times in webmaster central hangouts.
-
Hi Marie thanks for your response. Have been reading through your blog with interest. Re penguin you said
"I am still really cautious in my use of the disavow tool. I use it for getting manual unnatural links penalties removed. At this point though I still do not condone using the tool as a method to recover from Penguin unless you have a site with which you are willing to experiment
I realise that this was a few months ago and things move on but I'm concerned that submitting a disavow file might flag our site up for further investigation by google. Is there any evidence of this?
As i mentioned we have not had any manual penalty or unnatural links notifications
-
John Mueller at Google has said many times before that if it is not easy to find contact details don't waste your time, disavow and move on.
The web spam team want to see a good faith effort, not a miracle. Create an excel spreadsheet of all the links and mark next to each link if you were able to find contact info or a form and what action was taken. A word in each column as a reference is enough. Upload it as a google doc with your reconsideration request.
If they can see you really worked hard at going through all the links even if you have little removal success you stand a high chance of getting the manual penalty removed if you have disavowed all the bad stuff.
-
These links are popping up on pretty much every link audit that we do now. Often they are nofollowed, but it appears that yours are not. They're not ones that you made yourself and I really believe that they can be ignored. With that being said, there's no harm at all in disavowing them.
If you've got an algorithmic issue (Penguin) then contacting the site owner is nowhere near as important as when you have a manual penalty. As such, I'd just disavow and ignore.
-
Google tries to be smart enough to recognize when this sort of this is going on. They get it right the majority of the time, but I've encountered times where Google didn't recognize some sites as scrapers like this, and our client's site was still incurring a penalty. I know for a fact that is was scraper sites like this, because Google told me as much when they responded to my first reconsideration request.
Short version: Probably won't hurt you, but it is possible. I would disavow this stuff to be safe.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Link Building
I have a question as competitor made backlinks on longtail keywords and just for one specific post, If I wanna rank in Google SERP, then should I have to do the same strategy as my competitor did. or can I use just my own keywords to get rank?
Link Building | | aamirmurtaza670 -
Drop in Rankings After Removing Links
So I removed some links to a particular homepage for one of the sites we own, this page had A LOT of links pointing to it using exact match anchors. And for the most part the links were coming from low quality pages/content. After removing a good chunk of them I noticed are rankings went down from around 8-9th two weeks ago to 21 as of today. Has anyone else had a problem like this before? I'm thinking about restoring some of these links now to see if I can recover some of that. Any thoughts on doing this? Thanks
Link Building | | ThridHour0 -
Does This Link Have Value?
Hi Mozzers, A client paid to publish a white paper, thinking that the link to the web site is beneficial. The link does redirect back to the web site, but is in a format that I've never seen: http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=001YdyyLrzOQJxM87SJZkJYVbQKSdCmFpwqg1fuX3yqVqpGboUjdSaHv9IdW5HsQpgmvwOrg5N4T3DNHYV8e1UVe_YCua_XQCFykoSJvu1HzDyb-3x-aFcPU-ER-vwWxq4- Does this link have any value?
Link Building | | waynekolenchuk0 -
Link in the footer
we have a sponsored link in the footer of a website, and since that footer is displayed on each page of that site, it shows that we have thousands of links coming from that site. my question is : does Google consider this as spamming? and does it help us , harm us, or has no effect?
Link Building | | puremobile0 -
Buy links
I know that many of you are against the whole thing with buying links. Your feelings put aside. Will it be better for my site to buy links or even do link exchange? Haven´t the crawlers been thought by now how to find these untrue links? I have read somewhere that the stop after 100 links, aren´t they smarter than that?
Link Building | | mato0 -
Confirming unnatural link removed
My SEO firm confirmed on 4/5 that they've removed links from a site www.fantake.com. However, as of today, it still shows on GWM there are 1100 links coming from that site. Questions: where can I find out bad links from root domain listed on GWM? There are some domains showing they have hundreds of links to our site. Between the lag time of GWM crawling, is there a tool that I can use and verify if a link is indded removed?
Link Building | | ypl0 -
Text Link vs image link?
Which passes most link juice a text link or an image with the correct 'alt' attribute? Do the pass the same amount or is one more valuable than the other?
Link Building | | SamCUK0 -
Why does my website have 2,000+ links, but only 16 linking root domains?
Why does my website have 2,000+ links, but only 16 linking root domains?
Link Building | | thestudio40