New Section On Site Worth It?
-
We have been kicking around this idea for a while now, and I wanted to get the communities honest opinion before we begin building it.
So we create a lot of posts on social media showcasing articles we find on SEO, tips and tricks, reviews, etc. We were thinking rather than always linking out to the other sites, we are going to create a section on our site called "From Around The Web" and have brief breakdowns of what was covered, then provide a link to the full article. Most of these would be between 300-500 words, and be optimized around what we were linking to and writing about.
So since the content would not be "in-depth" would this hurt us in any way? To me, it doesnt not make sense to send people to the other article right away, when we can summarize it and link to the full articles from our site. (Most people dont want to read a 3000 word article on SEO, especially small business owners who just want the breakdown) Thoughts? Think it will help, or not be useful enough to invest labor in?
-
I don't have any problem linking out if I know the site that I am linking to really really well. I don't see anything wrong with your list of "SEO and Marketing Resources" if you want to recommend them to your clients.
I am assuming that you would like to have content on your website that educates your visitors and showcases your expertise. If that is the goal, I would be concerned about finding articles other website and using them as the basis of a short article on my site. All that does is turn your website into a signpost that promotes other people.
I would rather spend a little extra time per article and write a library of articles on my own site that explain mostly evergreen topics. Why? If these resources are being prepared as a knowledge base for current and potential clients then I would want to keep them on information that I produce and control than send them out to other websites where my branding and expertise is lost.
Using articles on other websites might seem like a time-saving effort that saves you from explaining the nitty-gritty - you just link to it. But it doesn't have the same impact as explaining the nitty gritty on your own site and keeping your voice and your branding in the visitors mind.
What happens when the other website deletes that article or goes out of business or starts publishing stuff that you don't agree with? This is going to happen eventually. Then all of the work that you put into that article is gone.
Also, this isn't going to earn you likes, links, tweets and mentions. It is going to earn those things for the other guy. You are simply turning your website and your labor into an advertising effort for other people in your industry.
Why not build a resource for yourself? Write a weekly or monthly original stand-alone, evergreen article service that people can subscribe to, tweet about, mention, link to and like.
That is how I would approach this.
-
I appreciate the advice and detailed response. I have a few questions:
First, if you do not recommend linking out, what about this page then? We have this set up for a user-resource. Most of the links are quality stuff, linking out to search engine land, MOZ, etc.
http://www.webdesignandcompany.com/seo-resources
I noticed that you mentioned putting my name in the URL vs. being generic. Are you saying this due to the possible social media profile interest?
The main reason for doing the short blurbs and linking out is time. We have had a very steady influx of clients this year, and time to work on our own site is a bit low. If we optimize it well, do you see us spending the time to set up being worth the effort and labor? I am estimating at least an hour per article, maybe 2-3 to make sure its "read-worthy".
-
Here is what I would do...
First, I agree that the small biz owner does not want the 3000-word SEO article.
So, instead of writing a rehash of somebody else's article, I would write a simple, basic, 100% stand alone article that explains the topic to a noob. Most of your visitors don't want the 3000-word so don't try to feature the other guy's article. Feature yourself.
Instead of making an "Around the Web" section on the site, I would make a "Small Biz Tips from David-Kley".
You might be inspired by articles written by others, but don't allow them to set your course.
Instead, I would be writing short, clear, EVERGREEN, concepts. That makes you independent of the other guy's content. That keeps the visitor on your site and reading a second and third article from you. Soon you will have a big collection and topics that fall into categories and you can cross-market same-category articles to the visitor, building an impressive resource library that is under your own brand.
Start with a plan of what you want this content to be... answering frequent client questions, explaining basics, addressing stuff that clients don't ask about but really need to know.
Begin with the end in mind and they work towards it.
(I am just going to talk honest stuff here. It might get people's panties in a twist. But, I would not want to be linking out to a bunch of SEO sites. No sir. Not only might they be bad neighborhoods (sorry guys) but I don't know if I am gonna be agreein' with all of the stuff that they wrote in 2011 or what they will write next week. Ain't linkin' to them. No way.)
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should m-dot sites be indexed at all
I have a client with a site with a m-dot mobile version. They will move it to a responsive site sometime next year but in meanwhile I have a massive doubt. This m-dot site has some 30k indexed pages in Google. Each of this page is bidirectionally linked to the www. version (rel="alternate on the www, rel canonical on the m-dot) There is no noindex on the m-dot site, so I understand that Google might decide to index the m-dot pages regardless of the canonical to the www site. But my doubts stays: is it a bad thing that both the version are indexed? Is this having a negative impact on the crawling budget? Or risking some other bad consequence? and how is the mobile-first going to impact on this? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | newbiebird0 -
Is it worth Disavowing 15 links?
After a few months of blogging and redoing the home page, my client moved up from #40 to #1 for terms like "baltimore office furniture", "cubicles washington DC" etc. I did not do any link building for this campaign. This week, ranks are falling like a stone, and after months at #1 we're now back to #23 and lower for these terms. For the six months prior to August, we were getting about 10 clicks from referrals each month. Half way through August, we already have 35, and they are from spammy sounding sources like "search-error.com" and "search.pch.com". (screen shot attached) Should I disavow these links? There are about 20 different sources I do not recognize (see screen shot). Thanks! 6sD3oLL
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | aj6130 -
Open Site Explorer - Spam analysis: need help with inbound links... from my site!
hallo, reading my spam analysis report from open explorer, I found somenthing I don't understand (please see attached image): The long list of links inside the red rectangle are inbound links with a spam score of 5 coming from my same site. How is that possible? Should I remove those links? Also , I see that many of those links are links present in the top navigation bar (about page, home page, service description etc.) or in the sidebar section of the website (categories, recent posts, recent comments). Should I treat them differently? Thank you for your time.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | micvitale0 -
Mobile Site Annotations
Our company has a complex mobile situation, and I'm trying to figure out the best way to implement bidirectional annotations and a mobile sitemap. Our mobile presence consists of three different "types" of mobile pages: Most of our mobile pages are mobile-specific "m." pages where the URL is completely controlled via dynamic parameter paths, rather than static mobile URLs (because of the mobile template we're using). For example: http://m.example.com/?original_path=/directory/subdirectory. We have created vanity 301 redirects for the majority of these pages, that look like http://m.example.com/product that simply redirect to the previous URL. Six one-off mobile pages that do have a static mobile URL, but are separate from the m. site above. These URLs look like http://www.example.com/product.mobile.html Two responsively designed pages with a single URL for both mobile and desktop. My questions are as follows: Mobile sitemap: Should I include all three types of mobile pages in my mobile sitemap? Should I include all the individual dynamic parameter m. URLs like http://m.example.com/?original_path=/directory/subdirectory in the sitemap, or is that against Google's recommendations? Bidirectional Annotations: We are unable to add the rel="canonical" tag to the m. URLs mentioned in section #1 above because we cannot add dynamic tags to the header of the mobile template. We can, however, add them to the .mobile.html pages. For the rel="alternate" tags on the desktop versions, though, is it correct to use the dynamic parameter URLs like http://m.example.com/?original_path=/directory/subdirectory as the mobile version target for the rel="alternate" tag? My initial thought is no, since they're dynamic parameter URLs. Is there even any benefit to doing this if we can't add the bidirectional rel="canonical" on those same m. dynamic URLs? I'd be immensely grateful for any advice! Thank you so much!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Critical_Mass0 -
Traffic down after site migration
Hi! I've been working on a campaign for http://www.alwayshobbies.com/, which has seen a 35% in drop in traffic since changing ecommerce platforms. It's now been two months, but there is no sign of recovery. We are in the middle of cleaning up the link profile as part of a resubmission request, but that has been ongoing since before the migration. A lot of redirects were needed after 10k 404s appeared in Webmaster Tools after the new launch, but these have been reduced to around 500. We've been pretty thorough here, but I thought it would be worth checking in case there's something we've missed.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | neooptic0 -
Should I start new domain and redirect site?
I recently my rankings for http://www.top-10-dating-reviews.com (some adult content) drop off a cliff. Google tells me there's no manual penalty therefore it might be algorithmic. I don't know why my rankings went but I think it could be that I added A LOT of category pages pulling the same content from posts and this could have caused both duplicate content issues and too many on page links causing an algo penalty. Ive deleted the categories and therefore fixed duplicate content issue (perhaps you guys could check out the site and see that you agree with me) but rankings have not improved even thougo most of the pages have been recrawled. I read somewhere its extremely hard to recover from such a penalty so should I move my site to a and domain and redirect all urls? I can't think of another solution. Any help appreciated!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SamCUK0 -
Stupid Question?? Is [painter new york] the same keyword as [painter in new york]?
Hi, This may be a stupid question but... Google ignores short/common words like 'in', so if I optimize a page for 'painter in new york' will it rank just as well for 'painter new york'? In Google's keyword tool, exact match gives [painter new york] 140 searches per month but [painter in new york] gets < 10. However, it is much more difficult to write 'painter new york' naturally into body copy than it is 'painter in new york'. So what do I do? Thanks 🙂
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | StrayCat0 -
Redirect micro-niche site to bigger niche site?
I have a micro niche site that performs reasonably well (page 1 at least) for it's main keywords. It is an exact match domain. To save the ongoing maintenance of a site that gets less than 10 visitors a day, I was thinking of redirecting this micro niche site to a bigger site (a niche site that the micro niche fits into, if that makes sense!) Would I lose rankings because of the power that the EMD provided? Would it be better keeping it there for the backlink it provides to the bigger site (although on the same C Class IP)
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BigMiniMan0