Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.

Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).

Keyword Ranking Report Blank

Moz Bar

548

GranthamUniversity Subscriber last edited by

I have a custom ranking report set up to run every month. The module that shows the overall changes (how many improved, how many dropped, number in rank #1-3, etc.) populates with data, but the keyword ranking for tracked keywords listing is blank for all keywords, all search engines. I haven't changed anything in my campaigns - why is this reporting blank?

Thanks!
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0
GranthamUniversity Subscriber @ErinMcCaul last edited by

Thanks - I just sent an email to help team.
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0
ErinMcCaul last edited by

Hi there! Thanks for reaching out! My name is Erin, and I'm on the Moz Help Team. Sorry to hear you're running into this! I want to respect your privacy and keep your campaign details off the interwebz. Can you email us at help@moz.com and let us know the campaign/custom report that's giving your grief? We can investigate this further from there!

We look forward to seeing your email!

Erin
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0

Got a burning SEO question?

Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.

Start my free trial

Browse Questions

View

From

Sorted by

With category

Explore more categories

Related Questions

Why is on-demand crawl reporting numbers that are very different than the regualr site crawl by Moz?

When I look at the site crawl available through my dashboard, it reports 22.9K pages crawled. I just ran a on-demand crawl and it is only reporting 6K pages crawled. Why is the number so much lower?
Moz Bar | | ctripp1010

0
Fresh Web Explorer: if you put a keyword in quotes, is it case sensitive?

For example, would a saved search for "racor fuel filter" capture mentions of "Racor fuel filter"? I'm really hoping I don't have to duplicate the keywords with the alternative capitalisations!! Many thanks Steve
Moz Bar | | swbaxter

0
Rankings > Landing Page > Only UK?

Hello Is it possible to use the landing Page reports for sites in Norway .no? If we define a search engine in UK, maybe it will mess up all the other data we are collecting? Regards
Mogens Stoltz Wennersten
Moz Bar | | moggiew

0
KW Explorer is Working to Disambiguate Keywords Google Merges Together

Hey gang, Russ Jones from Moz has been doing a ton of heavy lifting work to try to get around the new problem posed by Google AdWords recent change to merged-keyword volume data. But, we're fighting back against this obfuscation in Keyword Explorer. I'm sharing two emails (slightly edited) from Russ about what we're doing here: Introduction to the Problem: Google Adwords Keyword Planner is the primary source for keyword search volume (how often a keyword is searched monthly on Google) for much of the search marketing industry. While Google has grouped together highly-similar terms for a while (especially misspellings), in June of 2016 they dramatically increased this keyword-grouping. This means similar phrases like "keyword rank", "keyword ranking" and "keyword rankings" would all be reported as having the same, combined search volume, rather than their individual search volumes. If you were to take Google's numbers at face value, you might think there are 3,000 searches per month for these 3 terms, when in reality there is only 1,000, divided amongst the 3 terms. How we are addressing it: Moz's Keyword Explorer uses a blend of data sources, not just Keyword Planner, to build our volume metrics. This gives us a distinct advantage in that we can adjust the volume of words that deviate dramatically in one data set verses another. Take for example the phrases "keyword rank", "keyword ranking", and "keyword rankings". While Google Keyword Planner might report all of these as having 1,000 searches per month, Moz Keyword Explorer can detect that these numbers are significantly higher than what our models would predict given our other data sets. We can then adjust the volume accordingly. Moreover, given our huge keyword data set, we can also identify grouped phrases (like these 3) and divide the volume proportionally to what we see in our other data sets. Thus, we address the grouping problem from multiple directions. Here's email #2 from Russ, detailing more of how we're attacking this: I have been working pretty much non-stop on this keyword volume disambiguation problem (finding the real search volume of individual keywords when Google clumps several together). I think I have settled on a pretty good solution and am working on getting it all in. For example... Google Keyword Volume for the phrases "briefcase for women" and "briefcases for women" are both at 3600 because they have been lumped together. My disambiguation script says the singular (briefcase for women) should be 2731 and the plural should be 869. Google Trends roughly agrees with this, showing that the singular is searched more than 2x the plural: https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=briefcase%20for%20women%2C%20briefcases%20for%20women&cmpt=q&tz=Etc%2FGMT%2B4 Basically, Keyword Explorer should already be providing some more accurate/segmented numbers than AdWords, and in the future, we'll get even better thanks to our clickstream data and our evolving models. Any questions, let us know!
Moz Bar | | randfish

15
I got a 404 in the Crawl Test Tool Report

I, yesterday i ran an crawl on http://www.everlastinggarden.nl and i get an 404. Does anybody know why this happens? <colgroup><col width="1535"></colgroup>
| # ---------------------------------------- |
| Crawl Test Tool Report | Moz,http://pro.seomoz.org/tools/crawl-test |
| www.everlastinggarden.nl |
| Report created: 15 Jul 18:34 |
| # ---------------------------------------- |
| URL,Time Crawled,Title Tag,Meta Description,HTTP Status Code,Referrer,Link Count,Content-Type Header,4XX (Client Error),5XX (Server Error),Title Missing or Empty,Duplicate Page Content,URLs with Duplicate Page Content (up to 5),Duplicate Page Title,URLs with Duplicate Title Tags (up to 5),Long URL,Overly-Dynamic URL,301 (Permanent Redirect),302 (Temporary Redirect),301/302 Target,Meta Refresh,Meta Refresh Target,Title Element Too Short,Title Element Too Long,Too Many On-Page Links,Missing Meta Description Tag,Search Engine blocked by robots.txt,Meta-robots Nofollow,Blocked by X-robots,X-Robots-Tag Header,Blocked by meta-robots,Meta Robots Tag,Rel Canonical,Rel-Canonical Target,Blocking All User Agents,Blocking Google,Blocking Yahoo,Blocking Bing,Internal Links,Linking Root Domains,External Links,Page Authority |
| http://www.everlastinggarden.nl,2014,404 : Received 404 (Not Found) error response for page.,Error attempting to request page | Best regards, Jos
Moz Bar | | IMforYou

0
MOZ Onpage grade and Google ranking.

I have found for years that there is not necessarily any connection between the onpage given by Moz and the SEO ranking. "F" page can be #1 in Google for long periods of time, and "A" pages can be unranked. I do not see the consistency, so I am unsure how much time to spend optimizing as suggested. I know there are many factors in rankings, but I just wanted to point out that this lack of consistency makes me hesitate to make changes to well-ranking pages -- especially with algorithm changes happening all the time. It seems that everything is considered over-optimization of late, even if it is all natural language. It is hard to NOT use words or synonyms sometimes on pages, for example... Thank you for your great product. I just want to know how my time to spend on this matter or turn my attention to off-page factors where the inconsistency is hard to figure out.
Moz Bar | | gheh2013

0
How to get Universal Results to Show in Reports?

This has been a source of frustration for me for a long time. I have asked many times and never found anything in the support documentation on how to add this. Is it something that is simply not offered? If so is it not outrageous to others that this simple feature is not present? What I want: I would like to be able to include Universal Results icons in my rank reports. Why? Well as is the case much of the time my clients Google profile is included in the maps results (thanks to our optimization services) but they are not on the first page. The client can't see the results of this type of SEO. It shows up when logged in but not in the exported reports. How easy would it be to include these? It seems like a no-brainer. If anyone knows where to add them or why they don't automatically include them please let me know. If this feature is not offered I call upon my fellow SEO's to demand this feature. If anyone knows of a way to contact the developers to recommend adding this feature I would also appreciate that information. Thank you Universal Result: Local
You're in it!
Position: before 1st natural result
Contains: 7 results
Moz Bar | | TotalMarketExposure

0
Moz reporting reliable?

I have been working with our MIS department on addressing our errors on duplicate content and titles caused by parameter URLs. MIS insists that they have solved the problem with canonical tags, which are in place. They said they were getting warnings from Google and Bing, but that after they put the canonical tags in place, those went away. They are questioning the Moz reports, suggesting that I instead rely on SEO Toolit by Microsoft. (As an aside, we are using SharePoint 2010, crossing our fingers for an upgrade to 2013, which presumably will make a lot of the issues we’re having go away). So my questions are: 1) Why are these Moz reports reporting all of these errors that have supposedly been rectified (in 2011)? Do I disregard the duplicate content/title errors on the Moz report and defer to SEO Toolkit, as MIS suggests?
Moz Bar | | SSFCU

0