New EMD update effected my mom's legit author page? From page 1 in SERP to nowhere for her name
-
I think my mom's site, MargaretTerry.com was hit by this update for her name "Margaret Terry". Went from bouncing around the first page on google.com and .ca all the time to nowhere on the index. The results are now very strange, a mix of Youtube, linked in, and small book stores that she has done events at recently to promote her first book.
I was checking after some of my SEO buddys were freaking out about their EMD's getting hit on Sunday. She is an aspiring author with a book coming out this month. There is obviously no ads or spam content on the site... I have never done SEO for it either except a bit of on page I guess. It sucks that people might be grabbing her book soon and when they Google her name nothing shows up. This couldn't have really happened at a worse time. Not to mention the hours spent building the site to her liking, free of charge of course
Is there anyone I can contact there to help me out? Shouldn't and EMD that is someones name still rank when you search their name?
-
Being active on the Facebook page will help her shared new content on her site as it gets further developed. She can link to her blog posts once it is up and running and soon people will be bookmarking and linking to her blog versus solely following her on Facebook.
Good luck with the site, it looks like a great opportunity for building SEO experience!
-
Argh yes, content. I have been bugging her to write an about page and I have been the lazy one getting a WP blog going that matches well with the static site.
She is very active on her facebook page, so I see no reason why the blog wouldnt be quickly filled as well.
Thanks for the insight!
-
"Thank you so much for your help"
Anytime! I hate to see genuine people needing help but not knowing where to turn. I hate it almost as much as I hate none-genuine people offering to help in return for something.
"There are a lot of book stores and review sites that already have pages for her book I'm sure I can contact the owners and have them link to her home page."
That's great news! Try to be persuasive. If it looks like its failing, offer them a link back within an article on your blog section when its ready. Recipricol links aren't what they used to be but they are certainly better than no links.
I will explain more on Skype. I should be available for the next few hours at least.
Look forwards to seeing you there!
-
Yes, it took me a bit to build it to her liking before launching. I guess it could have been dancing, but it seemed to have been solid for at least a month, hence why I thought it was the update.
At least all hope is not lost. Thanks!
-
Awesome reply. Thank you so much for your help. I just assumed I would never need to do any SEO for it as no one was really competing for her name.
There are a lot of book stores and review sites that already have pages for her book I'm sure I can contact the owners and have them link to her home page.
I still don't understand how Google can value her Linked In profile more than her home page? Spokeo and 192.com that are unrelated results come up next. I mean I understand there are more than one Margaret Terry in the world but its still confusing me.
I will add you to skype as I have one more question to ask. Cheers
-
I did a little digging around your mother's site (margaretterry.com) and I don't think you have been hit by the recent updates.
Correct me if I'm wrong but it looks like the domain was created in February of this year and I assume the site didn't go live till even later?
Having looked at the site with opensiteexplorer.org, there are no links being picked up and the page (and domain) authority is 1/100. Basically your site has no authority behind it.
When you initially launch a new domain, it is not unusual to see it bounce around. I also believe that Google tends to give new domains an initial artificial boost to help get started. However after a period, the site will be expected to rank on its own. This means that if your site has no links, you will not be able to rank well.
My advice would be to start building links and authority to the site. I'm afraid it's not a quick fix but it looks like your only option.
-
I know you probably don't want to hear this, but after looking at the site itself I would say the reason is because the site has very thin content. Both Open Site Explorer and Majestic SEO have no data for looking at the link profile either. I'd imagine this is also because the site is very thin.
I think if you built out more content, you might see the site back on top in Google very easily. It's still on top in Bing.
You can also build links as Matt describes above, but I'd still try to put a little more depth into the site so people have a reason to stay. Reviews and a blog which Margaret writes actively on would be great content to provide for this.
Good luck and hope this helps!
-
Give me a shout. Id happily guide you through helping and give you some pointers.
The reason it has dropped is either because they are classing it as a low value domain for precisely the reason you explained; " I have never done SEO for it either except a bit of on page I guess."... Due to the site having no links, they think it is trying to rank for the keyword "Margaret Terry" by just having the keyword in the domain name. OR it hasn't been hit by updates - it has simply lost its freshness. It is normal for new websites to rank well temporarily while Google determines the quality of the site. Almost like they are given the benefit of the doubt for a while.
Due to the book coming out, now would certainly be the time to show Google that the site does have quality to it. This wont happen instantly but you would also hope that links will start building naturally once the book is released.
I wrote a few pointers on link building for new websites (or for sites without links) earlier in an answer to another question - you may find that useful. Clicky here.
Another fantastic way of building links for a writer's website would be to get readers to review and give their opinions on the book with a link back to their site. Review sites are great for this but also look for reading clubs and blogs.
I see that there is not a great deal of content on the site - it would help if you got some nice articles on there. I spotted a blog section - this would be the ideal place.
Let me know if you need more help, feel free to add me to Skype or Twitter should you wish. The details are in my SEOMoz profile - just click my name above.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Link's that are an internal site search?
Hi hope your're all well. I sell Red, Blue, Green Widgets within each color I have many sub types, the subtypes change all the time,and a sub type has many variations in itself. I'd like to set up links that direct customers to popular searches of sub types say: widgets.com/red/blue-spots....search string... Will Google crawl these search links and see that there is good content behind it? How does Google handle links that are also a site search? Can it be bad and should I "no follow" them? Hope someone can give me some direction on these, many thanks in advance!
Technical SEO | | Thea880 -
Could using our homepage Google +1's site wide harm our website?
Hello Moz! We currently have the number of Google +1's for our homepage displaying on all pages of our website. Could this be viewed as black hat/manipulative by Google, and result in harming our website? Thanks in advance!
Technical SEO | | TheDude0 -
Weird problems with google's rich snippet markup
Once upon a time, our site was ranking well and had all the markups showing up in the results. We than lost some of our rankings due to dropped links and not so well kept maintenance. Now, we are gaining up the rankings again, but the markups don't show up in the organic search results. When we Google site:oursite.com, the markups show up, but not in the organic search. There are no manual actions against our site. any idea why this would happen?
Technical SEO | | s-s0 -
Penguin 2.1 update, ranking dropped.
Hi, My website was hit by Google's new update like never before, first my ranking dropped back in May when Google rolled out with their second Penguin update, back then i was outsourcing my SEO since most of the time i was working on optimizing my local maps. As soon as noticed my traffic dropped i start doing SEO my self, I removed over optimized keywords on website ( title, meta description) then i analyzed my link profile and found that i had a lot of commercial anchor text linking from spammy websites, mostly blog comments. Its been over 4 months since I used Google's disavow tools in hoping that will help me get my raking back, but i still see these spammy links in my profile, 90% of them are nofollow anyways , so i'm not sure if disavow tool helped me at all. With this Penguin 2.1 update my website ended up on page 4-10 for 90% of my keywords http://screencast.com/t/3bcw8LUxpj Im not sure what would be the best way out this, should i buy a new domain and start fresh?Please let me know if you want to take a look on my link profile and give your opinion. Looking forward to your help!
Technical SEO | | mezozcorp0 -
Automate process for naming page titles?
Hi everyone, I'm new to the Moz community, but really loving it. I'm hoping some of you more experienced experts may be able to answer what is probably a pretty basic question. I'm working for a non-profit client and I used the SEOMOZ tool to run a report on their site errors. I learned that the website has 5,432 duplicate page titles. They had their website redesigned last year before I started working with them and it appears that the developers didn't take into a account the need to provide unique page title names to each page. While it may make sense to go in to add custom page titles to a handful of the pages for the site, the vast majority of the pages are allocated to products (e-commerce). Is there a script that the developers could add that would automatically add page unique page titles based on say, the title of the product? Here are a few URLs to help you get a sense of what we're dealing with. homepage: www.creativityexplored.org example level two page: http://www.creativityexplored.org/artists/douglas-sheran example product page: http://www.creativityexplored.org/shop/original-art/prints/2776/profile-of-a-lady Thank you so much for any advice you can offer. Best, Linda
Technical SEO | | LindaSchumacher0 -
Should I add my brand name to every page title
Currently for every page I automatically add my brand name Ie: poduct xxx - brand name product yyy - brand name. is this considered good or bad practice?
Technical SEO | | AsafY0 -
SEOMoz is indicating I have 40 pages with duplicate content, yet it doesn't list the URL's of the pages???
When I look at the Errors and Warnings on my Campaign Overview, I have a lot of "duplicate content" errors. When I view the errors/warnings SEOMoz indicates the number of pages with duplicate content, yet when I go to view them the subsequent page says no pages were found... Any ideas are greatly welcomed! Thanks Marty K.
Technical SEO | | MartinKlausmeier0 -
Why do I have one page showing as two url's?
My SEOMoz stats show that I have duplicate titles for the following two url's: http://www.rmtracking.com/products.php and http://www.rmtracking.com/products I have checked my server files, and I don't see a live page without the php. A while back, we converted our site from html to php, but the html pages have 301's and as you can see the page without the php is properly redirecting to the php page. Any ideas why this would show as two separate url's?
Technical SEO | | BradBorst0