Low Domain Authority & Ranking
-
My Domain Authority has tumbled in the last six months from 28 to 21.
Search traffic has dropped from about 4,500 per month to 3,000 per month with most of the drop being in the more competitive terms. Lead generation is off by about 70%.
This is after spending $12,000 on "optimization" with a MOZ recommended SEO firm and spending another $17,000 implementing their suggestions.
My real estate brokerage firm has completed some press worthy deals in the last month. If I can get these deals mentioned in a reputable newspaper like The New York Times (or other real estate publications like NY Observer, Real Estate Weekly) will this help domain authority?
If my domain authority is this low, how difficult is it to move it higher?
Before reaching out to these publications, should I create a blog post about these transactions on my website?
Any suggestions as to how I can improve domain authority? My URL is www.nyc-officespace-leader.com.
I should add that my SEO firm had about 30 toxic links removed and filed a disavow for about another 80 links. MOZ is only showing about 25 domains linking to our site. I suspect not enough to get us to rank.
Thanks, Alan
-
Hi Alan,
automation is generally bad. By linking through to other relevant pages using a variety of anchor text you give a google a warmer feeling about your site - avoiding over optimisation penalties.
Cross linking between pages. There's a lot on site link structure and what is optimum. I tend to ignore this and thing of my customers buying behaviour. So in your case If in real life you'd offer a couple of buildings to a client then link them on the website. If not, then don't.
For me social media is a waste of time. We're a B2B industrial market. See what brings traffic and conversions.
The end goal really is to produce something amazing - a labour of love. think of it as investing a dollar a day in the website. To start with nithing is going to change much. After a while compound interest is going to start giving you momentum and there will suddenly be a crux point where you realise how much of an advantage you have over your competitors. It'll take a while though.
-
Hi Bruce:
Thanks for taking the time to respond.
The link building thing is a bit challenging. I can add content, post social media, work with developers on the user interface, but the technical aspect of link building is beyond me.
If I post good content on the site and on social media will this take care of itself? If not, do you think I can outsource this to a service, or is that asking for trouble?
An SEO firm removed many links, now ranking and traffic are really poor. I suspect that the removal of links has caused this.
Best, Alan
-
Thanks for your most interesting response!!!
From what you are saying the greatest payoff will be in developing new content on an ongoing basis.
A few questions:
-I also have hundreds of product pages in the form of buildings and listings containing 50 and 300 words. Many of them don't have text links to other pages. You think I am best off just editing/adding a paragraph or so and inserting text links to other pages on the site? From your post I am unclear if you are adding the links in some sort of automated way. In any case, sounds less traumatic than a total re-write.
-Are you using posts on social media (Google+, Facebook, Twitter) to exclusively promote your site or are you engaging in any link building?
From what you are saying (as well as other opinions) I guess I need to stop thinking of gaming the system and more in terms of creating very useful content.
Alan
-
Hi Alan,
We're in a similar position. A site that had 12,000 views a month a year ago now has 6,000. There's lots of things that we are doing but one of them is rewriting that content.
It is mind numbingly boring writing fresh stuff about one almost identical product after another. So I've taken a few approaches to make it easier.
First; I don't rewrite pages. I'm treating all my pages with 2 - 300 words as introductions. So I go through and add a specific paragraph or a type of link. It's generally a job that can be done in a few hours for my 100 product pages and normally delivers 2 - 5 positions on SERPS. Then I leave it for a few weeks - burnt out with the effort. It also slowly adds more structure and makes pages increasingly valuable
Second; I spend time making new good content. It's fun, its fresh and I normally get an immediate dopamine buzz as I get some more traffic after posting it in a newsletter or on a social media site. Being rigorous in linking back to my product pages helps too,
Third; I do it by the numbers. I've looked at 7 years of search queries to my site (so lots of stuff before 'not provided') and matched that up with moz difficulty and google traffic estimates and current serps positions. So when I do spend time on a page I calibrate the amount of effort specifically to the potential payoff.
Finally - given that your pages are likely to be similar to mine - we both have competitors who have access to the same content and write similar stuff I continually look for an angle to differentiate my page. For you it may be - other companies in the building, famous people who worked there, closest Deli or starbucks. This I think works, still experimenting, because if I was google looking at a keyword space i would compare the top x pages to each other - say on word usage. The ones several SD from the mean in word variation count (all other factors being equal) are likley to be saying more interesting stuff.
-
YES, IT IS A LOT OF MONEY. $12,000 for reports, maybe $4,000 for wireframes and designs and another $11,000 for coding modifications.
I used to own a website that was struggling to maintain rank but generating enough leads to earn a good living. Now I can go feed the pigeons in Central Park. After this immense effort, following every suggestions, buying report after report, ranking is down, traffic is down, lead generation is non existent.
I would be generous if I described this so called SEO company as charlatans, imposters and clowns. When the real drop occurred after their Voodoo last spring, and I had the temerity to complain, they could only respond that I had not spent enough money and that there had been a recent Penguin update (the drop in traffic was a gradual slope occurring since they started their "magic" and did not correspond with the May 20th algorithym update. But I guess I have no recourse against these criminals. They got the maximum advertising budget out of me, collapsed my business and can now move onto their next victim.
Now, back to my original question, how I build links to worthy content? The number of sites linking to us is so low that if that number can be increased somewhat perhaps it will have a tangible effect.
Thanks, Alan
-
Hi Alan
I think you need to think about two different contexts here.
1: Google crawls fresh and unique content often. Static not fresh content is not crawled that often, Google gets to know how often to crawl your site based on how often fresh content appears. You can only make this happen by adding new unique keyword rich information.
2: Domain authoritiy and Page Rank are not the start of a good site but an outcome metric. There are no quick fixes to build a quality site.
Pick your most important pages and start there. Once Google crawls more often and finds good content and you see a rise in impressions, you are on your way on a long journey...
Think also about your site from another users perspective, does it look appealing, is the content relevant to me, is the information well presented etc.
Building links: There is a great blog here on Moz about building quality relevent links. Follow it and plan time to do this
Hope that helps
Bruce
-
Hi Bruce:
Also, I have found that pages that I have re-written, that provide quite useful information do not attract links (such as http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/blog/how-long-does-leasing-process-take).
How can I go about attracting links for such pages?
Is it far to say that since the site has so few links, that attracting a few quality links should have a noticeable effect on Domain Rank?
Thanks, Alan
-
Hi Bruce:
Thanks for the response. Our bounce rate has held steady in the 68-72% range in the last year. So has the click thru rate, ranging between 2.59 and 2.31 per visit.
Our site consists of the following types of pages
-330 Listing pages. 200 are set to no-index, follow. Only about 50 have more than 300 words.
-150 Building pages. About 140 have about 250-300 words.
-35 Blog pages. Only four entries written this year.
-Another 60-75 static pages (neighborhood, types of space, about us, services).How much of this do we need to rewrite to get an improvement in Domain Authority? Obviously re-writing hundreds of pages is a huge task.
Also, once these pages are promoted do we need to promote them to get links? Or will those links develop naturally if the content is of high quality?
Am I correct in assuming that a site with a Domain Authority of 21 is not going to have the potential to rank well? Being that the Domain Authority is pretty bad, how difficult would it be to get it back to say 30-33?
Thanks, Alan
-
Hi Alan
Sounds like a bit of a headache. First things first...don't assume all drops etc are negative. Often big drops in search via good SEO are a sign that you might be serviing better content and this must be also compared to other metrics like bounce rates etc.
Domain rank drops can also mean that sites which are also high ranking have been removed, because their links where not related to your content and therefore in the longer term, could be damaging. Remember links should be from sites which are somehow related to your site. Google is striving for better service delivery to all searchers and therefore does not want links from a site selling widgets to be linking to sites selling cakes, unless the widget is something to do with cakes.
Press coverage, tends to have no-follow links and therefore check out the value of a link before spending time trying to get the link.
Domain Authority comes from quality linked content and therefore high ranking links in your industry sector should be sought. Links are like roots, tiny capillary fibres that grow to big anchor roots in time.
Improve your content and make it fresh. This will do wonders for natural links and google serving up your site. Track keywords and distil the essence of your site pages to ensure that not one hit is wasted. I could be wrong but Google also monitors BOUNCE RATE.
Hope that helps somewhat
Bruce
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Using a Sub Domain as a Main Domain?
Hi, I'm working on a site at the moment and the sub domain is acting as the main domain. This occurred when the site was redesigned and built on a sub domain for testing but it was never moved to the main domain when it went live (a couple of years ago). So little or no pages are live on domain.com but all on sub.domain.com. It's a large company but they have very poor rankings. Would you recommend that they move the sub domain back into the root folder? Does this involve renaming/re-pointing URLs? Thanks Louise
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MVIreland1 -
Pros & Cons of Switching Your Main Domain to Mask Links & Combat EMDs
Hello Mozzers, I'd love to receive some advice for a client of mine and insights you may have regarding pros and cons on changing your main domain to mask links. Within a competitive niche there are about 4 different sites that routinely rank 1-4. Our site crushes all three on just about all metrics except we have a high volume of nofollow links and our site remains at #4. Our site is much older so we have significantly more links than these smaller sites, including pre-penguin penalty spammy links (like blog comments that make up 50+ nofollow links from 1 comment per domain). Obviously we are attempting to remove any toxic links and disavow, however the blog comment nofollow links skew our anchor text ratio pretty intensely and we are worried that we aren't going to make a dent in removing this type of links. Just disavowing them hasn't worked alone, so if we are unable to remove the bulk of these poor quality links (nofollow, off-topic anchor text, etc..) we are considering 301 redirecting the current domain to a new one. We've seen success with this in a couple of scenarios, but wanted to see other insights as to if masking links with a 301 could send fresh signals and positively effect rankings. Also wanted to mention, 2 of the 3 competitors that outrank us have EMD's for the primary keywords. Appreciate your time, insights, and advice on this matter.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Leadhub0 -
Urgent Site Migration Help: 301 redirect from legacy to new if legacy pages are NOT indexed but have links and domain/page authority of 50+?
Sorry for the long title, but that's the whole question. Notes: New site is on same domain but URLs will change because URL structure was horrible Old site has awful SEO. Like real bad. Canonical tags point to dev. subdomain (which is still accessible and has robots.txt, so the end result is old site IS NOT INDEXED by Google) Old site has links and domain/page authority north of 50. I suspect some shady links but there have to be good links as well My guess is that since that are likely incoming links that are legitimate, I should still attempt to use 301s to the versions of the pages on the new site (note: the content on the new site will be different, but in general it'll be about the same thing as the old page, just much improved and more relevant). So yeah, I guess that's it. Even thought the old site's pages are not indexed, if the new site is set up properly, the 301s won't pass along the 'non-indexed' status, correct? Thanks in advance for any quick answers!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JDMcNamara0 -
Why does a site have no domain authority?
A website was built and launched eight months ago, and their domain authority is 1. When a site has been live for a while and has such a low DA, what's causing it?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | optimalwebinc0 -
Compare the rankings
Hi All, I have an example 2 domains are targeting the same keyword, one of them ranks higher then another. Here is the image from OSE http://www.freeimagehosting.net/udq2f Would you be able to tell ( based on the image )which of the domains is winning , "domain 1" or "domain2" and what exactly the " looser " should do to improve its rankings Rgds Webdeal
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Webdeal0 -
Can SEO increase a page's Authority? Or can Authority only be earned via #RCS?
Hi all. I am asking this question to purposefully provoke a discussion. The CEO of the company where I am the in-house SEO sent me a directive this morning. The directive is to take our Website from a PR3 site to a PR5....in 6 months. Now, I know Page Rank is a bit of a deprecated concept, but I'm sure you would agree that "Authority" is still crucial to ranking well. When he first sent me the directive it was worded like this "I want a plan in place with the goal being to "beat" a specific competitor in 6 months." When I prodded him to define "beat," i.e. did he mean "outrank" for every keyword, he answered that he wanted our site to have the same "Authority" that this particular competitor has. So I am left pondering this question: Is it possible for SEO to increase the authority of a page? Or does "Authority" come from #RCS? The second part of this question is what would you do if you were in my shoes? I have been devoting huge amounts of time on technical SEO because the Website is a mess. Because I've dedicated so much time to technical issues, link-earning has taken a back seat. In my mind, why would anyone want to link to a crappy site that has serious technical issues (slow load times, no persistent cart, lots of 404s, etc)? Shouldn't we make the site awesome before trying to get people to link to us? Given this directive to improve our site's "Authority" - would you scrap the technical SEO and go whole hog into a link-earning binge, or would you hunker down and pound away at the technical issues? Which one would you do first if you couldn't do both at the same time? Comments, thoughts and insights would be greatly appreciated.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | danatanseo1 -
Does a dash in your domain name effect your ranking?
Does a dash in your domain name effect your ranking? or it dosen't really matter?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Radomski0 -
Rankings Issue
Hey guys, and gals, So our site http://www.motorcyclecenter.com/ is having the hardest time ranking in the big G. We've built links, optimized, and all the other basics. If you guys have a chance, could you take a glance, and tell us what you think, as to why this site is having such a hard time. Much appreciated!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | leatherupseo0