Awful ranking after site redesign
-
Hello everyone,
I have a situation here and I’d like to have your opinion about it.
I am working on a site which has been recently redesigned from scratch: in a nutshell, as soon as the new site went live their rankings dropped and, of course, so did their visitors and so on..
The guys who redesigned the site didn’t do any 301 redirect whatsoever, so now the old pages are just 404s and blocked by robots. My question is: if they 301 redirect now, do you think it would be possible they could get their rankings back?
One more thing: when they launched the new site, the indexed pages basically doubled overnight; there were 700 and now there are 1400. Do you think this could affect their ranking as well?
Thank you for you insights
Elio
-
Hello everyone and thank you for your answers. I sincerely appreciate it!
I didn’t follow the redesign phase, I’ve just jumped on board now so I actually have no idea why they didn’t go for the 301 solution.
As Monica pointed out the 404ed pages were actually valuable pages and, at least in my opinion, this is proved by the fact that now their traffic is close to 0. Their traffic literally dropped in a matter of days (kind of scary to see such a steep fall). I agree with Travis when he says that just the valuable pages should be 301ed, but the thing is that they sell their products online, meaning that hypothetically every (product) page is equally important. They were neither old nor poor quality…I guess they just skipped the 301 step. I will do some more research but I guess that, as you guys suggest, the best way to go is 301 all those pages and see what happens.
I have no idea if they did anything on the social side but that’s worth investigating some more.
Thank you very much for now! I will keep you updated
Cheers
-
I would imagine if the pages were previously ranking they had value. The rule of thumb is to discard pages not ranking on pages 1-3. Since there has been such a decrease in traffic it is reasonable to assume that valuable pages have been 404ed when they should have been 301ed.
I have migrated 7 sites over the past 5 years, so I feel reasonably comfortable saying the duplicated pages are causing the influx in indexed pages. Redirecting the 404 pages is the strongest strategy right now. They basically created 700 valueless pages that won't rank until they are fully indexed and gain some value to the engine, which could take months. It is starting over from 0, which is why the 301 redirects are "normally" best practice.
Any 301 will lose a little bit of link juice. It goes from having a strong page rank alone to diluting its value by sharing it with another link. While it will help salvage some of the sites juice, it won't put them on page 1.
You can wait for these pages to start ranking alone, but that could take months based on the level of on page op and if there are any good links pointing at those pages currently. I am not a fan of the wait and see game, therefore, I try to do everything I can up front. The 301 redirects of the old pages would be best practice in this situation.
-
You can recover page authority from a 404 page for a surprising amount of time--I once did a 301 redirect on some pages that had been 404 for a couple of years and they quickly gained rank. What was the thinking behind not redirecting old pages? Were they poor quality? You don't have to redirect all of them at once--you can start with the best pages (and at least some of them must have been good since you had traffic to lose).
-
When a page is a 404, The Googles will come back to it in an undisclosed period of time. This is in order to make sure the page is really gone. Now if the pages that are gone used to receive referral traffic, it would be super handy to get those pages up soon, forget about the search engines. That way, you're recovering links and pages for the right reasons.
What should be your first order of questioning is if those pages were worth anything to begin with. I can rank a site for 'left handed profession city st', overnight. It doesn't mean any of that is going to work for the client.
But if they didn't redirect any of the old pages to their new, relevant, equivalents - I highly doubt they took the time to block those pages via robots.txt. If they did, wow. I'll leave it at that.
The increase of indexed pages could be due to any number of things. Perhaps a site search function is misconfigured? Perhaps the site uses tags in a way I wouldn't recommend? Perhaps the CMS, if there is one, is prone to duplicate content.
That's pretty much the best I can do without a specific example. Anyone with more 'skeelz' than I would be guessing as well. But thanks much for your question.
-
Ugh... I hate when this happens. It is such a pain in the butt to fix.
1st, you absolutely need those 301 redirects. Don't wait any longer to get them done. Those 404s are affecting your rankings considerable at this point. Basically you have 700 of them, whoa.
Secondly, the double index is because you have 700 new pages added to the 700 old pages. You can wait it out if you want to, but I don't recommend it. Get rid of the no follow on those old pages, 301 them so that the rankings might be salvaged. Once the new pages start ranking on their own you can get rid of the 301s. But, for now, get them going.
The 301s add a little bit of juice to the new pages, and that is a good thing. The reason they are important is because they are still ranking and bringing traffic to your site. The new pages will start to get some traffic which in turn will help their rankings.
Did you do anything on social with the site redesign? If you send out a post you might be able to salvage some traffic from you followers. Social signals will also help the rankings of the new pages.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
keywords are not ranking as per the expectation and need site review too
Hello, Recently We have a taken a project " http://customerconnect-services.com/ " and are responsible for the Digital Marketing for the website. FYI, we have been following the best On-Page SEO practices ever since we took the project: Performing Keyword Research, Finalizing the Keywords,Using those in the Page-Title, Meta-Descriptions, Heading Tags and of course in the Content as per MOZ suggestions & SEO standards. But, we are unable to rank in first page; all the considered keywords have a ranking of 51+ which is a serious matter of concern for us. We have also checked whether the Domain / URL has been blacklisted, but it's not (Not even by Google). We are therefore unable to figure out what is going wrong even after following so many best practices to get the keywords a good ranking (1st & 2nd page of SERPs). Therefore I would like to request you to provide your expert opinions in this regard by checking what is it that we are not getting right. The website url is http://customerconnect-services.com/. As this is a high-priority issue for us & the client is a prestigious one of course, please help. Looking forward to hearing from you at the earliest. Thanks & Regards,
Technical SEO | | Harini.M
Harini2 -
Query on Site Architecture
Hi All, When I check on my ecommerce site in one of the architecture tool in that my Ecommerce Homepage interlink with 765 pages whereas when I check few competitors and big brands then there homepage linked with 28 pages, 33, 47, 57 etc not like my site 765 pages. Do I am wrong anywhere? Can you please check the screenshot of mine & one of the competitor's site architecture? Because as per me site architecture also play good role in google organic ranking. vXs5dh2 16wre
Technical SEO | | pragnesh96390 -
Why are these blackhat sites so successful?
Here's an interesting conundrum. Here are three sites with their respective ranking for "dental implants [city]:" http://dentalimplantsvaughan.ca - 9 (on google.ca) http://dentalimplantsinhonoluluhi.com - 2 (on google.com) http://dentalimplantssurreybc.ca - 7 (on google.ca) These markets are not particularly competitive, however, all of these sites suffer from: Duplicate content, both internally and across sites (all of this company's implant sites have the same exact content, minus the bio pages and the local modifier). Average speed score. No structured data No links And these sites are ranking relatively quickly. The Vaughan site went live 3 months ago. But, what's boggling my mind is that they rank on the first page at all. It seems they're doing the exact opposite of what you're supposed to do, yet they rank relatively well.
Technical SEO | | nowmedia10 -
In the middle of a site redesign, looking for some advice at a glance.
Greetings, hope you're doing awesome today! I have a current client in an industry niche, I got them to do a site redesign, based on the many factors needing correction on the current site. I have a good 40 some items still to address, from my frequent manual site audit / proofreading. Reason I am here, is that I'm seeking fresh eyes to address anything I may have missed, of course at a glance, I don't expect a site audit, but do have some concerns about url structure and page titles as you move from category to category. It's a bigcommerce site, so some things that are normal SEO actions aren't as simply implemented. Also, since this is a client, and I'm sure they have competitors using sites like this, I need to keep the url private as well as any specifics, of course for readers in the future, I can or you can mention general issues and solutions. Thank you and please, if interested, will send url at request, can send both the live and dev urls.
Technical SEO | | Deacyde0 -
Why is my site not being indexed?
Hi, I have performed a site:www.menshealthanswers.co.uk search on Google and none of the pages are being indexed. I do not have a "noindex" value on my robot tag This is what is in place: Any ideas? Jason
Technical SEO | | Jason_Marsh1230 -
Will Google Also Penalize Desktop Rankings If Your Site is Not Mobile Friendly?
Apologies if this question has already been answered. I was unable to find it. For desktop organic rankings: Will Google take into consideration mobile-readiness as a ranking factor? Thanks in advance for any reply, Kind regards,
Technical SEO | | Eric_Lifescript
Eric Darby1 -
Unstable ranking
Hello, I own a website wich lately (since like few months ago) have a unstable ranking, I mean that one day I get 800 organic visits (good sells) and then a week when organic visits fall to 700,600,500,400.. then up again Why does this happen? I am lossing ranking :S site : todorepuestoselectro(dot)com Thank you very much im learning a lot here!
Technical SEO | | matiw0 -
Partial Site Move -- Tell Google Entire Site Moved?
OK this one's a little confusing, please try to follow along. We recently went through a rebranding where we brought a new domain online for one of our brands (we'll call this domain 'B' -- it's also not the site linked to in my profile, not to confuse things). This brand accounted for 90% of the pages and 90% of the e-comm on the existing domain (we'll call the existing domain 'A') . 'A' was also redesigned and it's URL structure has changed. We have 301s in place on A that redirect to B for those 90% of pages and we also have internal 301s on A for the remaining 10% of pages whose URL has changed as a result of the A redesign What I'm wondering is if I should tell Google through webmaster tools that 'A' is now 'B' through the 'Change of Address' form. If I do this, will the existing products that remain on A suffer? I suppose I could just 301 the 10% of URLs on B back to A but I'm wondering if Google would see that as a loop since I just got done telling it that A is now B. I realize there probably isn't a perfect answer here but I'm looking for the "least worst" solution. I also realize that it's not optimal that we moved 90% of the pages from A to B, but it's the situation we're in.
Technical SEO | | badgerdigital0