Why can't I rank for my brand name?
-
We are soon to launch a new company in New Zealand called Zing. I have been tasked with the challenge of ranking as highly as possible for anything to do with Zing before launch in February. Zing is in the financial industry so my colleagues thought that it would be a good idea to make a small blog (very small with literally one post) that reviewed other financial lenders. This sight stayed online for a couple of months before it was replaced. The official website is still yet to launch, so as an in between, I asked that we make a splash page with a small competition on it (see here at zing.co.nz). I would have preferred there were more keywords on the website but this was not achieved. I am still pushing for this and am hoping to get a few pages on there in the near future. Instead of getting the keywords on the splash page, I was given permission to start a subdomain, (blog.zing.co.nz). This contains many more common search terms and although its not quite doing the job I would like, the rankings for Zing have started to increase. At the moment, we are ranking number 1 for a few brand related keywords such as zing loans. This is why I feel something is wrong, because we rank number 1 for over 10 similar terms but yet we DO NOT EVEN APPEAR on the search engines at all for Zing. Have we been penalized? Do you have any suggestions at all? Do you think we could have been penalized for the first average blog? Maybe I messed up the swap over? Any help would be hugely appreciated!
-
Yep, seems right. I'd say you don't have enough authority yet to rank for a generic term. You would have to be #1 for "zing company" first i believe. But you are on the right path... just need to build more brand awareness and let google better learn the association between "zing" and your company.
My guess is that once you reach a certain "authority", you should see your rankings jump for "zing".
-
Ok well that is (kind of) reassuring! I'm finding link building to be quite difficult but I presume its one of the missing links for us at the moment. Thanks again for your help, all of our thoughts are with you and everyone in Australia right now.
-
I found this reply very helpful and will be taking your advice closely! Thanks especially for the Google + / URL advice! I agree it is a bit of an uphill battle as I know that the expectations in-house are a little bit over the top. All I can do is keep working hard and try to get on the first page by launch. I just don't understand why we wouldn't be ranked 359th? I think I might start up a new post to do with link building as I am finding it extremely difficult while we have such little content! Thanks again for your help.
-
It doesn't same particularly strange, no — you can rank for certain terms and not appear at all for others. I'd give it time, continue with your link-building and content efforts, and re-evaluate once you've actually launched.
-
A quick look and it doesn't seem like you have a lot of links yet, which isn't surprising since you haven't launched. You will have some work to establish your brand in Google. It might help to grab a business Google+ page, as it looks like right now you have a personal one. Also, in the link to your G+ profile, never use the /b in the url, this is part of the admin page url. Getting ranked for the term zing means you have to show Google that if people search zing, they are looking for you. I think this will be a difficult task with the word, but as was mentioned start with social profiles before launch, after launch focus on NAP listings, a press release for sure, and niche specific links. If I named a company Michael Jordan, even if I did everything right to establish a brand, it's not likely I would rank when people searched Michael Jordan, so just keep that in mind. There are many other sites using zing in there name or even having the domain zing.com. You have an uphill battle my friend, good luck!
-
Thanks for that Thee, I will do the NAP listings after launch, as my colleagues have requested me not to do it at this time. Do you have any comments about my question? Do the rankings in my reply to Oleg seem natural to you? (Regarding the search term zing not even showing up in the search results when our website is even called www.zing.co.nz)
-
Thanks for the awesome reply Oleg! We are a New Zealand only company so we will only be aiming for number one here. Thanks a lot for your great advice, I'm yet to create a wikipedia page or use freebase.com. I have been tracking quite a few keywords but not the ones with company. I'll get onto that asap. We are not a payday loans company but will be breaking into the market somewhere between the 2nd and 3rd tear lending zones. We have some ground breaking technology that lets us only except loans for people who have every capability of paying it back, where as payday lenders tend to target the lower socioeconomic groups. Our main target audience will be people like me, young tech savvy professionals who want to do more with life (our tagline). For example, getting an early bird ticket to a new years festival.
Heres how we are ranking at the moment for the terms you mentioned:
zing short term loans - #1zing loans - #1
zing company nz - #2
zing nz - #5
zing company - #21 (I haven't tried to optimize for this yet so will work on that due to your recommendation)
zing - We don't show up once in all 358 results.
Does this seem natural? I mean if we were in the results at all I wouldn't be so worried...
-
Great answer Oleg, I would just like to add that on top of the social presence that you should also be looking at NAP listings for the company.
-
Thanks a lot for the reply! The problem that I find, is that we don't rank on ANY of the 37 pages of results. I don't understand how we could possibly be ranking number 1 for so many terms with zing in them yet not even in the search results for Zing.
The company will be New Zealand only and will have huge brand exposure. From my research of competitors, I have found that a large majority of the search terms are branded, rather than generic terms such as short term loans. I also feel that it will be a lot easier to rank in the top page for the term zing, than it will be to directly compete with other lending companies when we are so new. I of course plan on doing that later!
Anyway, does this seem odd to you? I mean i searched through all 37 pages and... nothing.
-
Its a very generic term that actually has a dictionary definition. On top of that, there are dozens of other brands that use the same name. Google is getting a lot of feedback coming in for the term "Zing" so it will be difficult to rank #1. If you play your cards right, you will probably get it in NZ first. You should track brand association by genericizing your keywords and looking for improvement. e.g. "zing short term loans" -> "zing loans" -> "zing company nz" -> "zing nz" -> "zing company" -> "zing"
How to establish your brand:
- Social media presence. go to www.knowem.com and create profiles for your brand on as many of these sites as possible, linking back to your company website. Be sure to load up a bunch of company info to each social media property and do some interlinking.
- Create a wikipedia page. This is one of the sources that Google uses in it's knowledge graph and to judge entity relationship signals.
- Create entities + relationships on freebase.com
- Create a google+ brand page and link up with publisher markup
Ultimately, you are going to have to convince google that when a visitor seaches for "zing", they are actually looking for your company.
p.s. are these payday loans?
-
"Zing" is a fairly generic term, so I wouldn't expect to be able to rank in the first page with almost no content or links on a brand-new site that hasn't launched yet. The blog is a good effort, I'd keep working in that direction, as well as developing the social media pages you guys have set up.
Ranking for this branded term is unlikely to have a meaningful effect for traffic or conversions, though. What's the intention behind this goal?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What should I name my Wordpress homepage?
I work almost exclusively in wordpress now. And I always hesitate when it comes to naming a site's homepage. I have to give it a name - right? I usually pick the business name or /home. And then that is identifies as the site's static homepage in the Wordpress settings and it works just fine. But I've started to get warning that it is an issue because it creates redirects. For example, I just ran the Ryte service analysis on a website and it warned me about "Non-indexable pages with high relevance" and it's basically my homepage that has 29 incoming links that "passes all pagerank to https://ourdomain/home But what am I supposed to call my homepage if not "Home"? It's not like the old days where anyone has to type it in. The root domain loads the homepage just as it should. Can anybody advise me regarding best practices for what to name a Wordpress homepage for good SEO? With thanks in advance for your help.
Technical SEO | | Dandelion0 -
Review rich snippet isn't appearing anymore
Hi, We have recently lost the review rich snippet for product that used to consistently show it for a long time. On top of that we have also lost the breadcrumb. The markup hasn't changed on these pages and gwt data tool tester doesn't show any anomalies. A few weeks back we have deployed a new property that list reviews from the first site without actually being under the same domain. Would that be an issue, review may have been considered as plagiarism somehow? Is there a way for us to confirm this theory? What are others factors that may have lead us to lose those rich snippet? Thanks
Technical SEO | | mattam0 -
Is it a Panda/Penguin hit? Or it's just a natural ranking drop?
My traffic comes from google. This is the traffic profile. Does it look like a Panda or Penguin hit? I have a hard time determining it myself. Thanks. ne0r7kg.png
Technical SEO | | ChelseaP0 -
John Mueller says don't use Schema as its not working yet but I get markup conflicts using Google Mark-up
I watched recently John Mueller's Google Webmaster Hangout [DEC 5th]. In hit he mentions to a member not to use Schema.org as it's not working quite yet but to use Google's own mark-up tool 'Structured Data Markup Helper'. Fine this I have done and one of the tags I've used is 'AUTHOR'. However if you use Google's Structured Data Testing Tool in GWMT you get an error saying the following Error: Page contains property "author" which is not part of the schema. Yet this is the tag generated by their own tool. Has anyone experienced this before? and if so what action did you take to rectify it and make it work. As it stands I'm considering just removing this tag altogether. Thanks David cqbsdbunpicv8s76dlddd1e8u4g
Technical SEO | | David-E-Carey0 -
Http to https - is a '302 object moved' redirect losing me link juice?
Hi guys, I'm looking at a new site that's completely under https - when I look at the http variant it redirects to the https site with "302 object moved" within the code. I got this by loading the http and https variants into webmaster tools as separate sites, and then doing a 'fetch as google' across both. There is some traffic coming through the http option, and as people start linking to the new site I'm worried they'll link to the http variant, and the 302 redirect to the https site losing me ranking juice from that link. Is this a correct scenario, and if so, should I prioritise moving the 302 to a 301? Cheers, Jez
Technical SEO | | jez0000 -
Why is the report telling I have duplicate content for 'www' and No subdomain?
i am getting duplicate content for most of my pages. when i look into in your reports the 'www' and 'no subdomian' are the culprit. How can I resolve this as the www.domain.com/page and domain.com/page are the same page
Technical SEO | | cpisano0 -
301 Redirect Have no ranking
Hi Guys wonder if you can help my site www.economy-car-leasing.co.uk has just been 301 from www.economyleasinguk.co.uk The reason for the move is the site is going to be structured for both cars and vans separately we did the 301 around 8 weeks ago and initially we thought everything went well, all the new site was indexed within 24 hours, we updated WMT on the old site we monitored around 150 keywords many were top 10 in Google 99% were top 5 pages However 8 weeks on we do not rank for hardly anything, i have confirmed all the redirects are working, we have 200 ok from the home page and all the other canonical pages return 301 we just implemented the canonical tag to all pages. we did factor that we will get some down time but not 8 weeks worth, i have done a 301 on this scale before with no real loss of rankings (Different site) Really tempted to put the old site back however its not what i want to do, Bing seems to have picked up on the change really well but im thinking Google just needs time The change looks like its done perfectly and everything is working as it should however it looks like that none of the original rankings or juice has been pushed over from Google yet and im wondering how long does it typically take to get the site ranking again site have gone from 17k unique s per month to less than 2k Paul
Technical SEO | | kellymandingo0 -
Why won't the Moz plug in "Analyze Page" tool read data on a Big Commerce site?
We love our new Big Commerce site, just curious as to what the hang up is.
Technical SEO | | spalmer0