Why would google favour overseas retailers? Really weird results..
-
Why would google favour results from overseas retailers for queries in the UK? It's weird since most won't ship to the UK and the same products are found at dozens of UK retailers. It's not the case that the overseas sites are necessarily bigger brands or better SEO optimised, so having asked the leading agencies in the UK and them being stumped I was curious if this was something anyone else had seen? Our theory is that this can only be a poorly disguised attempt to drive Adwords.
-
Page 2 and 3 is particularly bad but even page 1 is bad. Some terms in the industry show US retailers on position 1 that don't even ship to the UK.
I really don't think people from the UK interact that much with some of the sites on page 1 - by contrast leaving aside Amazon and Ebay they would be unknowns here to 99% of people. I also don't think it is results from google.com since why would random foreign language retailers appear so high up (in fact if we assumed they were showing USA results, I would be asking why so few US retailers show compared to those from New Zealand and South Africa).
Having put this one to Rand I think the issue here isn't as easily solved as I hoped but you are right about their results. When they are this bad people will switch to Bing.
-
I see. Page 2 and 3 is pretty far down the chain. My guess is that Google knows how much people in the UK interact with the .com version of websites via social, email, price comparisons, research, and on and on, to the point that they include some results no matter what--unless, like you said, someone specifically says UK only. Is this a negative? Maybe for some searches, but on average users are going to the .com as well by choice.
I guess that's an issue for a retailer that's solely UK based, but a non-issue for the percentages when you get into them at the level Google deals with. ultimately they want to keep providing a service that people find valuable, so if it gets too far afield they'll go to Yahoo or Bing.
-
Hi Ryan
I checked preferences and also ran the same search incognito. I have also asked people living 200 miles away to do the same and everyone is getting the same results. The only way Google displays relevant results is by going to advanced search and then requesting only pages from within the UK.
If you try that search yourself on google.co.uk do you get a bunch of overseas retailers including American especially on pages 2-3?
Just wondering if perhaps it is an issue only for searches performed from within the UK..
-
I don't think it's on a term by term basis. Either people are experiencing search directly from google.com or they're being redirected to google.co.uk and getting results there. If you look in the search preference section of your various browsers you'll likely see that it's set to google.com by default and is relying on the search engine to redirect you to google.co.uk based on your IP. if you change this to google.co.uk within the browser you won't get sent to google.com.
-
Thanks for coming back to me and for a moment I thought that answered the question but checking various product terms on Google UK shows me the same results on four different devices and across Chrome, Safari and IE.
I noticed that the article referenced Office Desks producing US results but that term seems to be back to normal.
Given the above the mystery remains!
-
Hard to say. It looks like this has been more pronounced issue recently (https://www.venndigital.co.uk/blog/2015/01/is-google-killing-uk-businesses-organic-traffic/) and could be partly a glitch. There have been several big shifts going on in this time frame though...
- Ongoing EU legislation / voting to break up Google.
- Firefox makes Yahoo the browser's default search engine.
- Google incorporates Google Wallet into Gmail in the UK.
- And per that article, Google.com starts appearing in search instead of Google.co.uk.
There's even more coverage of it here: http://www.thesempost.com/google-chrome-redirecting-uk-users-google-com-instead-google-co-uk/ but my guess is that these things are somewhat related. From that article, John Mueller from Google suggests you submit this form if it's affecting you: https://support.google.com/websearch/contact/ip. Personally I've seen the behavior in other browsers other than Chrome: Opera for example.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Training - How Google Crawls & Indexes Websites
Hi Does anyone know of any online training resources/webinars/training UK based that will cover the following for SEO: Why monitoring how search engines crawl and index content is important and how this can improve your SEO performance Using Google advanced operators to evaluate website indexation How to use log file data to gain insight into how search engines crawl and index content Techniques to control how search engines crawl and index content How search engines deal with JavaScript, common frameworks and SEO considerations I'm trying to develop my technical knowledge - I have always been more focused on content/KWD research/optimisation. Thank you
Algorithm Updates | | BeckyKey0 -
Keywords in Paragraphs: How much do they matter at Google?
Hi all, Generally we care a lot about keywords at headings, title tags, URL, etc. always. But I wonder how much impact they have being in paragraphs. How much do they matter at paragraphs? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Is there any way to prevent Google from using structured data on specific pages?
I've noticed that Google is now serving what looks like host-specific video cards on mobile for our site. Is there any way to control which videos are included in these lists without removing the structured data on those clip pages or user pages? We don't want to noindex those pages but we don't want content from those pages to appear as video cards. 1kzPW
Algorithm Updates | | Garrett570 -
Does a KML file have to be indexed by Google?
I'm currently using the Yoast Local SEO plugin for WordPress to generate my KML file which is linked to from the GeoSitemap. Check it out http://www.holycitycatering.com/sitemap_index.xml. A competitor of mine just told me that this isn't correct and that the link to the KML should be a downloadable file that's indexed in Google. This is the opposite of what Yoast is saying... "He's wrong. 🙂 And the KML isn't a file, it's being rendered. You wouldn't want it to be indexed anyway, you just want Google to find the information in there. What is the best way to create a KML? Should it be indexed?
Algorithm Updates | | projectassistant1 -
Has Google lost its mind? I am the only link in every SERP for a query?
I run a small online debutante dress store and have been doing some onsite seo recently. Anyways, when I search for the search query "deb dress style guide" my site is the only search result for the first three pages of Google Australia (my target market). Just endless links to my site. I have competitors in my niche who all have websites worthy of listing in the SERP as shown when you google "deb dresses". Can anyone explain whats going on?
Algorithm Updates | | mydebdress20 -
Why does Google Alerts call my website a blog?
Our company started a WordPress blog about 14 years ago. It has since added a third-party forum, a user-submitted photo gallery, and a huge database of searchable products. We also have almost 4000 posts. With all that said, Google Alerts often lists our content under blogs rather than websites. Sometimes it shows up in both? Does anyone know what criteria Google uses for determining the type of content, and how we can signal to them that we are a website?
Algorithm Updates | | TMI.com0 -
Why does Google say they have more URLs indexed for my site than they really do?
When I do a site search with Google (i.e. site:www.mysite.com), Google reports "About 7,500 results" -- but when I click through to the end of the results and choose to include omitted results, Google really has only 210 results for my site. I had an issue months back with a large # of URLs being indexed because of query strings and some other non-optimized technicalities - at that time I could see that Google really had indexed all of those URLs - but I've since implemented canonical URLs and fixed most (if not all) of my technical issues in order to get our index count down. At first I thought it would just be a matter of time for them to reconcile this, perhaps they were looking at cached data or something, but it's been months and the "About 7,500 results" just won't change even though the actual pages indexed keeps dropping! Does anyone know why Google would be still reporting a high index count, which doesn't actually reflect what is currently indexed? Thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | CassisGroup0