Moz local...worth $84 a year?
-
I am currently showing up in local results for my business but when i run a Moz local test, it shows that i only have a current score of 29% and by using Moz Local it says i could get to a score of 86%. Will enrolling in Moz local help my pages to rank higher in the search engines for different queries, or does it just help my site show up in the local results at the top of the serps? I only have one business in one city so it might not be worth it for me. My business is a service though and i travel to many different cities. Any input on this would be greatly appreciated.
thanks mozzers!
Ron
-
Hi Ron!
Thanks for letting me know you have some additional questions. Moz Local will help you get your data correct on these 7 partners:
Infogroup
Best of the Web
Localeze
Factual
Foursquare
Superpages
Acxiom
Any other platforms, you will need to manage manually.
Yes, you can absolutely use the city landing for each listing - you do not have to use the homepage. Hope this helps!
-
Also, can i use a deep page on my website instead of the home page. We provide services all over Texas but there is a deep page on my site dedicated to the city location of my business that would be better to list on the local search results.
-
I used your "check my isting" and i see a lot of my listings that have the name of my business wrong. When i use Moz local, will it correct all those listings for me?
-
Hi Ron!
While I won't try to sell you on Moz Local (hee hee) I will provide answers to two important questions you've asked.
-
Moz Local is used by both single location and multi-location businesses. We have lots of both types of customers using our product effectively. You can have just one Moz Local listing or hundreds of them - whatever your business needs.
-
Moz Local is not a ranking service. The main benefits of using Moz Local are:
-
We help ensure that your data is correct on the 5 major US aggregators + 2 other important platforms. The concept here is that correct data upstream should help to generate correct data downstream, as illustrated by this infographic: http://moz.com/learn/local/local-search-data-us
-
Moz Local will also help you close out duplicate listings on the 7 partners in our network.
-
Finally, Moz Local will show you some data about your listings on 8 additional non-partner sites so that you can take manual action on inconsistent, incomplete or duplicate listings.
Now, granted, getting your listings complete and consistent should help with your local search rankings, but it's important for me to be clear that we do not monitor or guarantee search engine rankings in any way.
Hope this helps! Please, feel free to let me know if you have any further questions.
-
-
For $84 a year Moz Local is a no-brainer in my book.
Compared to other options like the frustrations and time investment of doing manual submissions OR paying $500 which is what some other services cost. Of course that cost is not comparing apples to apples, and if you have problems or lots of locations you may additionally need that $500 service. But as a starting point Moz Local is highly justifiable I think.
-
It may help them rank better (by virtue of all listings being consistent) but there's no guarantee. Not sure why it says that in the q and a. Perhaps just omission of the fact that a single location business can use it too.
-
Will it help my pages to rank for local queries better?
Why does it say in the q and a that it is only for businesses in multiple locations?
-
Another way to ask that question is "Is it worth $84 to for a little help getting all of your listings in local data bases all lined up and consistent?" Or, " What might happen sites without consistent NAP info across all the databases the next time google updates its local algorithm and can I be doing anything now that might be helpful?"
You absolutely can do it yourself without paying for it. I've used numerous services in the past (for clients) and when moz started it's service, I didn't hesitate to use it--it was far less expensive and a lot easier to understand. If the the $84 isn't too much for you to do, I'd say it's worth it.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Local Listing Visibility for Regional Queries
I manage a variety of small local programs that are located in areas that are more known by the region than they are by the town (the Adirondacks and the Catskills to be specific). In the past, the local algorithm understood that when the query was related to the region, it would show a variety of results from that region. It seems that for the Catskills they have changed the algorithm to pinpoint the center of the region and only show results that are in the near vacinity of that pinpoint, rather than a variety of results from the region. The Adirondacks however is still showing a variety of results. For those of you not familiar, the Adirondack are 9,375 square miles and the Catskills are 5,892 square miles and are both very rural mountain regions and popular travel destinations. Google clearly understands that these regions are geographically oriented and shows a local pack for relevant results such as "Catskills Resorts" or "Catskills Restaurants", but over the past few weeks, they have started only showing 2 results for the query Catskills resorts, both located near Shandaken, NY becasue that is where Google has deemed the marker for the Catskills is (https://www.google.com/maps/place/Catskill+Mountains/@42.009289,-74.3996212,14z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x89dc665668f82f31:0x3b012376423b8efa!8m2!3d42.0092908!4d-74.3821116) In reality, there are hundreds of resorts within the Catskills. (Note there is a Catskill, NY within the Catskills, however Google is not even confusing this town with the region). Does anyone have ideas on how to get Google to understand that the Catskills are more than Shandaken, NY? I feel like we suddenly have no hope of ranking locally and most of the businesses I manage are located in very small towns that people are not specifically searching for.
Local Listings | | Your_Workshop0 -
Website with higher domain authority and good content not ranking locally?
I've got a client that has a higher domain authority than top ranking sites, is pretty well optimized from a content perspective, has good local reviews but still isn't ranking well at all... often not at all in local results. We don't show in map pack or even regular organic listings in a pretty small city. They are a local sign shop- so they make business signs/church signs etc. Have you seen anything negatively impacting local rankings that is worth digging into as possible cause? A few historical insights: They had some spammy backlinks (we think a competitor was being shady) that I've sent disavow files into Google for They had a previous SEO person create 100's of orphan pages for every possible city + offering combination you can think of- I've cleaned those up via 301 redirects Should I just keep waiting, doing content optimization or am I missing something else?
Local Listings | | karmadigital0 -
Single Local Result on Google... Wut up with that?
I'm seeing, for several different locations, single businesses suddenly coming up for searches on local services, where there used to be 3-Pack results. Now it's like a knowledge panel result on the right. Anyone else seeing this? Any ideas as to what's going on... and if there's anything that can be done to revert it? (influence the type of local result). Thanks!
Local Listings | | WP-Pro1 -
No Appearance in Local pack - group practice favored
Hi, One client has a website, Google My Business etc of his own. He ranks ok to good locally for search terms. However, his entry simply won't show up within the local n-pack (where it objectively should) and also does not appear in the map. It seems to me that instead a group practice with a colleague that has both their names in its name/title. (Moreover, it is in the same spot - they decided to go with different websites and entries of their own, though.) For some reason, this practice is also connected to the ranking website of our client. I suppose (NAP problems and previously used phone tracking numbers aside) that this group practice essentially blocks the real client-entry from appearing. Has anybody made such experiences? (My provisional ToDo would look like: Disconnect the group practice from the client's website; erase/merge it if possible; do proper LocalSEO otherwise.) Regards Nico
Local Listings | | netzkern_AG0 -
I am looking for some Local authoritative websites and aggregators of local business data
Does anyone know where I can obtain a list of aggregators of local business data for the UK? I am also looking to understand the best way to find local authoritative websites that I could build backlinks with. Hope you can help. Many thanks Nick
Local Listings | | SEM_at_Lees0 -
Google Local: When moving locations, is a new website/content needed?
I've effectively moved companies before, but I've heard that ranking locally in a competitive market after an address move it is necessary to redesign the entire website/content/domain as Google associates the old website/content/domain with the old location. Is this true? Does anyone have any direct experience with this? NOTE- I have updated citations across the internet and have regular social signals going to the new location, and this has been the case for almost 6 months now.
Local Listings | | mgordon0 -
New Local Search Results Appearance/Rankings?
Hi everybody! My team and I are all noticing a new layout for local search results. We just noticed it today. Mobile and desktop results appear to be affected. Specifically, we are looking at searches like "event spaces in Richmond" and "restaurants in Raleigh" as 2 examples. The listings appear differently in the SERPs, and the top results really are not relevant to the search queries. Is anybody noticing anything similar, or does anyone have any insight into whether this is something Google is testing or if it's here to stay? Also, any advice for overcoming rankings drops as a result of these changes? Thanks in advance!
Local Listings | | TriMarkDigital0 -
What to do with duplicate Listings for Business in Moz Local Tool?
Hi Everyone! Just another newbie Local SEO looking for a solution. I was searching my business listing in Moz Local and it returned two addresses.
Local Listings | | psuh528
Listing #1: 925 B Street #402 San Diego, CA 92101, 67623
Listing #2: 925 B St, #402, San Diego, CA, 92101 Do I need to remove the listing with two zip codes showing up? (I don't see any of my profiles showing up with two zip codes though.) Listing #2 is accurate yet the local moz tool tells me that my Google+ page is 69% complete. How is it possible that Listing #1 scored a 97% complete on Google+? Would you recommend putting the suite number in Address Line 1 or separated in Line 2? Does it even matter? Any advice would be much appreciated. Thanks!0