Google has deindexed 40% of my site because it's having problems crawling it
-
Hi
Last week i got my fifth email saying 'Google can't access your site'. The first one i got in early November. Since then my site has gone from almost 80k pages indexed to less than 45k pages and the number is lowering even though we post daily about 100 new articles (it's a online newspaper).
The site i'm talking about is http://www.gazetaexpress.com/
We have to deal with DDoS attacks most of the time, so our server guy has implemented a firewall to protect the site from these attacks. We suspect that it's the firewall that is blocking google bots to crawl and index our site. But then things get more interesting, some parts of the site are being crawled regularly and some others not at all. If the firewall was to stop google bots from crawling the site, why some parts of the site are being crawled with no problems and others aren't?
In the screenshot attached to this post you will see how Google Webmasters is reporting these errors.
In this link, it says that if 'Error' status happens again you should contact Google Webmaster support because something is preventing Google to fetch the site. I used the Feedback form in Google Webmasters to report this error about two months ago but haven't heard from them. Did i use the wrong form to contact them, if yes how can i reach them and tell about my problem?
If you need more details feel free to ask. I will appreciate any help.
Thank you in advance
-
Great news - strange that these 608 errors didn't appear while crawling the site with Screaming Frog.
-
We found the problem. It was about website compression (GZIP). I found this after crawling my site with Moz, and saw lot's of pages with 608 Error code. Then i searched in Google and saw a response by Dr. Pete in another question here in Moz Q/A (http://moz.com/community/q/how-do-i-fix-608-s-please)
After we removed the GZIP, Google could crawl the site with no problems.
-
Dirk
Thanks a lot for your help. Unfortunately the problem remains the same. More than 65% of site has been de-indexed and it's making our work very difficult.
I'm hoping that somebody here might have any idea of what is causing this so we can find a solution to fix it.
Thank you all for your time.
-
Hi
Not sure if the indexing problem is solved now, but I did a few other checks. Most of the tools I used where able to capture the problem url without much issues even from California ip's & simulating Google bot.
I noticed that some of the pages (example http://www.gazetaexpress.com/fun/) are quite empty if you browse them without Javascript active. Navigating through the site with Javascript is extremely slow, and a lot of links don't seem to respond. When trying to go from /fun/ to /sport/ without Javascript - I got a 504 Gateway Time-out
Normally Google is now capable of indexing content by executing the javascript, but it's always better to have a non-javascript fallback that can always be indexed (http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.be/2014/05/understanding-web-pages-better.html) - the article states explicitly
- If your web server is unable to handle the volume of crawl requests for resources, it may have a negative impact on our capability to render your pages. If you’d like to ensure that your pages can be rendered by Google, make sure your servers are able to handle crawl requests for resources.
This could be the reason for the strange errors when trying to fetch like Google.
Hope this helps,
Dirk
-
Hi Dirk
Thanks a lot for your reply.
Today we turned off the firewall for a couple hours and tried to fetch the site as Google. It didn't work. The results we're the same as before.
This problem is starting to be pretty ugly since Google has started now not showing our mobile results as 'mobile-friendly' even though we have a mobile version of site, we are using rel=canonical and rel=alternate and 302 redirects for mobile users from desktop pages to mobile ones when they are browsing via smartphone.
Any other idea what might be causing this?
Thanks in advance
-
Hi,
It seems that you're pages are extremely heavy to load - I did 2 tests - on your homepage & on the /moti-sot page
Your homepage needed a whopping 73sec to load (http://www.webpagetest.org/result/150312_YV_H5K/1/details/) - the moti-sot page is quicker - but 8sec is still rather high (http://www.webpagetest.org/result/150312_SK_H9M/)
I sometimes noticed a crash of the Shockwave flash plugin, but not sure if this is related to your problem;I crawled your site with Screaming Frog, but it didn't really find any indexing problems - while you have a lot of pages very deep in your sitestructure, the bot didn't seem to have any specific troubles to access your page. Websniffer returns a normal 200 code when checking your sites - even with useragent "Google"
So I guess you're right about the firewall - may be it's blocking the ip addresses used by Google bot - do you have reporting from the firewall which traffic is blocked? Try to search for the useragent Googlebot in your logfiles and see if this traffic is rejected. The fact that some sections are indexed and others not could be related to the configuration of the firewall, and/or the ip addresses used by Google bot to check your site (the bot is not always using the same ip address)
Hope this helps,
Dirk
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How google bot see's two the same rel canonicals?
Hi, I have a website where all the original URL's have a rel canonical back to themselves. This is kinda like a fail safe mode. It is because if a parameter occurs, then the URL with the parameter will have a canonical back to the original URL. For example this url: https://www.example.com/something/page/1/ has this canonical: https://www.example.com/something/page/1/ which is the same since it's an original URL This url https://www.example.com/something/page/1/?parameter has this canonical https://www.example.com/something/page/1/ like i said before, parameters have a rel canonical back to their original url's. SO: https://www.example.com/something/page/1/?parameter and this https://www.example.com/something/page/1/ both have the same canonical which is this https://www.example.com/something/page/1/ Im telling you all that because when roger bot tried to crawl my website, it gave back duplicates. This happened because it was reading the canonical (https://www.example.com/something/page/1/) of the original url (https://www.example.com/something/page/1/) and the canonical (https://www.example.com/something/page/1/) of the url with the parameter (https://www.example.com/something/page/1/?parameter) and saw that both were point to the same canonical (https://www.example.com/something/page/1/)... So, i would like to know if google bot treats canonicals the same way. Because if it does then im full of duplicates 😄 thanks.
Technical SEO | | dos06590 -
Paypal instead of Merchant's account and will the site still move up?
Hello, Will an Ecommerce site still move up in a niche if it only accepts PayPal and doesn't have a merchant's account on it? Thanks.
Technical SEO | | BobGW0 -
Blocked URL's by robots.txt
In Google Webmaster Tools shows me 10,936 Blocked URL's by robots.txt and it is very strange when you go to the "Index Status" section where shows that since April 2012 robots.txt blocked many URL's. You can see more precise on the image attached (chart WMT) I can not explain why I have blocked URL's ? because I have nothing in robots.txt.
Technical SEO | | meralucian37
My robots.txt is like this: User-agent: * I thought I was penalized by Penguin in April 2012 because constantly i'am losing visitors now reaching over 40%. It may be a different penalty? Any help is welcome because i'm already so saturated. Mera robotstxt.jpg0 -
Google indexing less url's then containded in my sitemap.xml
My sitemap.xml contains 3821 urls but Google (webmaster tools) indexes only 1544 urls. What may be the cause? There is no technical problem. Why does Google index less URLs then contained in my sitemap.xml?
Technical SEO | | Juist0 -
Google has not been visiting my site
Hi I am working on a site at the moment http://www.cheapflightsgatwick.com and i had the site using a different template and in the search engines for the search term cheap flights gatwick we were fourth and for the term holiday magazine we were 12th in google but now we are not even in google on the first page for the search terms. But now after changing the template in joomla our rankings have gone out of the window. It took me about a day to sort out the site with the new template so i was not expecting any problems with the search engines but for some reason there is. If you put into the search engine www.cheapflightsgatwick.com then you will see that google has not visited the site for four days and also it is not showing the description and instead it is showing details about joomla. Can anyone let me know if there is anything i need to do to sort this out and why google is taking so long to visit my site
Technical SEO | | ClaireH-1848860 -
Partial Site Move -- Tell Google Entire Site Moved?
OK this one's a little confusing, please try to follow along. We recently went through a rebranding where we brought a new domain online for one of our brands (we'll call this domain 'B' -- it's also not the site linked to in my profile, not to confuse things). This brand accounted for 90% of the pages and 90% of the e-comm on the existing domain (we'll call the existing domain 'A') . 'A' was also redesigned and it's URL structure has changed. We have 301s in place on A that redirect to B for those 90% of pages and we also have internal 301s on A for the remaining 10% of pages whose URL has changed as a result of the A redesign What I'm wondering is if I should tell Google through webmaster tools that 'A' is now 'B' through the 'Change of Address' form. If I do this, will the existing products that remain on A suffer? I suppose I could just 301 the 10% of URLs on B back to A but I'm wondering if Google would see that as a loop since I just got done telling it that A is now B. I realize there probably isn't a perfect answer here but I'm looking for the "least worst" solution. I also realize that it's not optimal that we moved 90% of the pages from A to B, but it's the situation we're in.
Technical SEO | | badgerdigital0 -
Why did our site drop in Google rankings?
My site's URL (web address) is: http://tinyurl.com/3svn2l9 Hi there, We operate a travel site that lists numerous tours, accommodation and activities. Since 6th August 2011 we have dropped from top 10 SERP rankings of our pages to around result number 100 (page 10) and losing massive amount of visitors via Google Search. Our Yahoo and Bing rankings are still in the top10. We need your advice and quick! The last changes we have made are the following: -redirected the non-www version to the www version on the 1st August -bought advertising with a follow link in a sidebar that is being populated across the site (+4000 pages) about 2 months ago -added a blog to the website 2 weeks ago and posted 2 posts to date. Additionally, our website structure allows visitors (and bots) to see the same listings via different URLs which caused duplicate content. This has been the case since the launch of our website about 1 year ago. To prevent this duplicate content we have placed canonical tags on the individual listings pages. Why did our site all of a sudden plummet in the rankings?
Technical SEO | | Robbern0 -
Site problem
I moved a site earlier on in the year to a better server www.keyrs.co.uk, my main keywords being equity release - equity release calculator and equity release schemes. Since this happened the ranking have gone down and the schemes and calculator terms and have hit positions 7-8 when they were 2-3. basically my question is open to all, i am looking to see what the problem is with these pages as it is driving me nuts. All tools on SEO moz show the pages are doing well, however i must be missing something. Mike
Technical SEO | | TomBarker820