Why does my website not rank better for the keyword i am going for?
-
My website is www.canadafloraldelivery.com. I just can't seem to get my webpage ranked well for the keyword " Flowers Edmonton " . Also I can't seem to get my Google local listing on the map for many keywords. Is there something obvious that I am missing? Any help would be very appreciated.
-
You are very welcome, Christopher! I will PM you.
-
Hi there and thank you so much for the detailed response. I have tried to implement the changes that you posted above. I can not get the www.51blocks.com to work as we are in Canada and it does not seem to work for us northerners.
I have reworded the content of the home page to read more fluently. and am in the works of rewording all my title tags as well.
As for the suite #205 I do put it in the dashboard of Google places but it just doesn't seem to show on my +page.
I am encounter a problem with Google not fully recognizing that I have a Facebook page. I am pretty sure it is public and I have a few likes but I just can't seem to get Facebook to give me more credit for the page that we have done.
I have had an Audit of my website done by the BDC (Business Development bank of Canada) And is showed that I should be doing better than I am for Local search terms. Does your company offer in depth Audit? Getting organic traffic in Edmonton Alberta really means a lot for me and my shop.
-
Hi Christopher,
Keri has made sure I stop by, and I see you've already received some good advice on this thread. I'll add what I know and see. I break this down into numbered points.
1. The floral industry has historically been one of the tougher ones, due to heavy spamming. Things are better than they were a couple of years ago, but like locksmith and auto dealer results, floral results can often be odder or tougher to break into than the results of less competitive, less spammy verticals. California florist, Cathy Hillen-Rulloda (http://www.avantegardens.com/) actually ended up becoming a participant on David Mihm's Local Search Ranking Factors (http://www.davidmihm.com/local-search-ranking-factors-2012.shtml) in previous years due to her coverage of issues specifically affecting the floral industry. She might be a good person for you to be aware of, if you aren't already.
2. Yes, your website is over-optimized. Your title tags really need help. The Homepage title contains the word Edmonton twice, and though Google will tolerate this, it is my opinion that it is not an ideal thing to do. Word has it that you can use a keyword up to 2 times without being penalized, but I would not advise using any keyword more than once in the title tag of any page on your website. See this discussion on Linda Buquet's Local Search Forum regarding this statement from a former Google spam team member (http://localsearchforum.catalystemarketing.com/local-search-general-discussions/984-local-search-engine-optimization-warning-city-title.html). Title tags should read naturally. Rand's Whiteboard Friday that includes his advice on this topic is a must-view: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/6-changes-every-seo-should-make-before-the-over-optimization-penalty-hits-whiteboard-friday In addition to your title tags being over-optimized, there is broken code in the title tag of your About Page. So, bottom line, a compete rewrite of your title tags should be step one for you.
3. Keri mentions seeing a different address on your About Page. Perhaps you've removed that since she wrote this? I don't see it. I do see, correctly, that you have placed your complete NAP (name, address, phone number) in your website footer and that you have partial NAP on your contact page. You should put your business name at the beginning of the chunk of text displaying your address and phone number. Further, I would highly recommend that you encode this data in Schema. If you've never used Schema before, you can use this Schema creator tool: http://schema-creator.org/ Choose the 'organizations' tab from the left-hand menu. I would encode both the footer and contact page NAP in Schema, and be 100% sure that you are only publishing one address and one local phone number on your website, if you only have one shop.
4. Now let's do a phone number lookup in maps.google.com. Good. This is pulling up only one listing at the moment. Good to see. However, it looks like '205', which I believe is your suite number' is missing from your Google local listing. Is it in your dashboard? Google has had some odd bugs in recent times regarding suite addresses. The rule is that your suite address must be consistently published everywhere. It's on your site, but not on your + page. Is it entered in the dashboard?
5. The same search for your business name is showing just one listing for Canada Floral Delivery, but I do note some other florists on the same street as yours. Just want to double check with you that Grower Direct and other florists apparently located on 41 Avenue are their own companies and have nothing to do with your business.
6. Now let's look at your + page here: https://plus.google.com/110941434141977888287/about?gl=US&hl=en-US. Your description is problematic. It reads:
“Send Flowers Edmonton. Best Florist in Edmonton. Send flowers for any occasion. Sympathy Flowers. Local Florist in Edmonton Alberta. Flower Delivery to Edmonton, Sherwood Park & St Albert”
You should never put geographic terms in your business description and you've got Edmonton in there multiple times as well as other geo terms. Should definitely be edited.
7. Competitive analysis is different for every business. I recommend that you run your site through this tool: http://www.51blocks.com/online-marketing-tools/free-local-analysis/ This will show you how you stack up against your competitors on a local level. This will assess the quantity and consistency of your citations which is a giant ranking factor.
8. Hmm...here's a good clue. I just checked your address against the proximity/centroid cluster of your competitors and it appears you are pretty far away from the cluster. The bulk of your competitors are located north of the river in the area Google Maps is designating as 'Downtown'. You are apparently some miles away from this, so this can definitely affect your ranking abilities.
So, these are some thoughts. What I've written here cannot take the place of an in-depth formal audit. You have many opportunities for improvements, Christopher, only some of which can be covered by a first-glance impression like mine.
-
After quickly glancing at your site my only suggestion would be to be careful how much you stuff your keywords into your content. Don't get me wrong, it's important to integrate your keywords in the content of your website but here is an example of a bit too much and can easily cause Google to flag your site as spammy.
"Flowers Edmonton, For Flower delivery Edmonton AB. Our Edmonton flower shop will ensure that your delivery are fresh and beautiful every time. Our Edmonton flower shop is a part of the FTD flower network and we have made great relationships with florists all across the country. Send flowers in Edmonton or Canada wide with our same day delivery guarantee. 100% guarantee on all our products and gifts. Edmonton flowers done right.
Click here to see a page all about our Flower Shop in Edmonton!"I would work with a copywriter that has experience with SEO best practices to improve the content on your site, I think this would really help with your on-page optimization.
With regards to your local SEO, again make sure that you are careful with using too many keywords. Here is the current description on your local listing:
"“Send Flowers Edmonton. Best Florist in Edmonton. Send flowers for any occasion. Sympathy Flowers. Local Florist in Edmonton Alberta. Flower Delivery to Edmonton, Sherwood Park & St Albert"
This is suppose to be a description of your business or a message from the owner and it's just filled with keywords. Google is very good at identifying and penalizing these practices.
Improve your content, build quality links = improve your SEO.
Good luck
Mike
-
I've asked our local expert to step in, but my first couple of comments are this:
Home page is way overstuffed for Edmonton. The text isn't very natural, and there are a bunch of keywords at the bottom.
Second comment is I can't tell what is your address. The footer has one address, but the about page has a different address (even the internet address), and then when I search your phone number on Google, I see yet a different suite number and address. Consistent, accurate citations are real important in local search.
-
Hi Chris,
Brad makes an excellent point re regular organic rankings. RE local listings, assuming you've verified and done all the standard on page work to your Local page, it's time to start building citations. These are Name Address & Telephone references. The more places Google sees you're address the more likely you are to rank in local listings.
Here is an awesome resource for finding places to get citations...
http://searchengineland.com/top-50-citation-sources-for-uk-us-local-businesses-104938
Hope that helps.
Iain - Reload
-
Hi Chris,
Your on site optimisation seems pretty good. However, when I ran your site through OSE and looked at the number of domains linking to your site, well you'll see the issue:
http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/anchors?site=www.canadafloraldelivery.com%2F
You need to work on building more links. 47 overall linking domains isn't that many, I'd try and build that number up.
Thanks
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Thoughts on User Behavior Data as a Ranking Signal
Hi Community! We have been having an ongoing internal discussion on user behavior data as a ranking signal. We found this Moz article discussing the topic and it leaves us asking questions such as: What onsite user behavior metrics are being used (if any)? How exactly is Google collecting this information - Chrome? Google Analytics (which they have already claimed GA is not used for ranking purposes)? With privacy policies in place, how exactly is Google able to utilize this information? The article discusses Google patents for collecting this information (The Monitoring Engine), Chrome's MetricsService which is "a system in charge of the acquisition and transmission of user log data", as well as the Reasonable Surfer model. Some highlights from the article include: "Google has designed and patented a system in charge of collecting and processing of user behaviour data. They call it "the monitoring engine" "Google's client behavior data processor can retrieve client-side behavior data associated with a web page. This client-side behavior data can then be used to help formulate a ranking score for the article." The monitoring engine can: Distinguish whether the user is actually viewing an article, such as a web page, or whether the web page has merely been left active on the client device while the user is away from the client. Monitor a plurality of articles associated with one or more applications and create client-side behavior data associated with each article individually. Determine client-side behavior data for multiple user articles and ensure that the client-side behavior data associated with an article can be identified with that particular article. Transmit the client-side behavior data, together with identifying information that associates the data with a particular article to which it relates, to the data store for storage in a manner that preserves associations between the article and the client behaviors. MetricsService: "Chrome's MetricsService is a system in charge of the acquisition and transmission of user log data. Transmitted histograms contain very detailed records of user activities, including opened/closed tabs, fetched URLs, maximized windows, et cetera." “Reasonable surfer” is the random surfer's successor. The PageRank dampening factor reflects the original assumption that after each followed link, our imaginary surfer is less likely to click on another random link, resulting in an eventual abandonment of the surfing path. Most search engines today work with a more refined model encompassing a wider variety of influencing factors. In addition to perceived importance from on-page signals, a search engine may judge link popularity by observing common user choices. A link on which users click more within a page can carry more weight than the one with less clicks. Google in particular mentions user click behaviour monitoring in the context of balancing out traditional, more manipulative signals (e.g. links). I do not expect a concrete answer here, I know there is a lot of uncertainty on the topic but I am very interested to hear your thoughts. Thank you!
Search Behavior | | Joe_Stoffel2 -
Free Tool that allows you to compare traffic for multiple websites
I'm banging my head on this one. In the past I was able to use Compete.com, Quancast, Google Trends, and Alexa, but now all these sites either required you to have Pro membership (pay) or they discontinue it like Google Trends for website. I need to do this comparison for one of my client... their traffic versus 4 of their competitors. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Have a blessed Day, Benny
Search Behavior | | ACann1 -
What should go in a "Link Juice" cocktail?
The office just got some of those fancy Google Partner bottles, and I want to fill them up with a tasty cocktail that is link juice themed. Any ideas on how to tie Google and/or SEO into a fancy cocktail?
Search Behavior | | WilliamKammer1 -
Spammy website dominating SERPs! Why!?
Hey guys, I've recently noticed that a series of EMDs have been setup to completely spam an extensive set of keywords - and it seems to be working. All of the URLs are keyword targeted with tons of keyword variations. And they're getting massive ranking preference over a number of more established websites. These are just an example of some of the domains; diykitchens1.co.uk fittedkitchens1.co.uk cheapkitchens1.co.uk kitchenunits1.co.uk And then there's loads of local targeted domains such as; kitchensglasgow1.co.uk kitchensedinburgh1.co.uk Again, all of these are getting high ranking with what seems to be duplicated websites. It's pretty bizarre. Will Google penalise these sites? Surely they will?
Search Behavior | | Webrevolve0 -
Will creating sub folders for foreign versions of the website, remove rank juice from the main site?
Hi, We plan to create sub-folders for our german, spanish and italian language versions. If we do will this pass rank juice to the new sites, but at the same time badly effect our main site, regards link juice/serp? Or is this not such a huge factor in people's experience? Many thanks. James.
Search Behavior | | Quime1 -
Better rank VS Better Title Tag
I changed my title tag to encourage a better CTR by looking less keyword stuffed and my rank dropped from #2 to #5. So what do you think is better a title that business name first unlike everyone else who is just keywords first or a more google friendly title that looks like everyone else?
Search Behavior | | greenjoe0 -
Can Googlebot go through Paywalls?
So my website has a paywall that allows users that are IP Authenticated to look at content where unauthorized users don't have access to but this is hurting my SEO (since googlebot doesn't go past the paywall either). Is there any way that I could ask google to go through and crawl the entire site?
Search Behavior | | mdorvill0 -
Website coming up in omitted results for search term?
Hi, My website is coming up in omitted results for search term. Now I have heard before if this is the case then its mainly due to a duplicate content penalty. But the content I used is unique and produced by a copywriter so its good. Its a new site and was in the results for about 2 weeks, I changed the non www to www in webmaster tools 1 day ago and now its sitting in omitted results. In webmaster tools I had to add the domain twice one non www and one www. Both accounts I hooked up a sitemap. Is it just because the site is new and its just working out where to rank me? Just so you know the non www was indexed for the 2 weeks changed it in webmaster tools so I wanted the www one indexed and now gone into omitted results. Cheers
Search Behavior | | activitysuper0