What's the Story on Mozscape Updates?
-
Hey gang,
As you may be aware, we were considerably late with our last index release. You have my sincere apologies for that and the apologies of the entire team. In the interest of transparency, I want to try to explain what's been going on.
Since stepping down as CEO, I've been asked to take on a few roles in the company. One of those is product architect (basically the product owner) of our Big Data team, who produces the Mozscape link index. For several years, that team has been almost exclusively focused on getting us closer to a near real-time indexing system that does not have scalability issues. Mozscape is currently smaller than our major competitors, and we're also often slower. Our metrics (PA, DA, MozRank, MozTrust, Spam Score, Social Data, etc) have been the unique value we provide, but it's not enough. We need to be competitive on size and freshness.
Building a raw link index (without processed metrics like PA/DA et al) is hard, but it's possible. Building a link index with those metrics is really tricky, and requires computer science knowledge and skills far beyond the scope of my understanding. That's what our team's been working on, and they've made some progress, but it's been slow, hampered by unknown unknowns, and materially hurt by a lack of experienced talent we can hire to help (we've had open job posts for years now).
In the meantime, our historic Mozscape index structure keeps encountering challenges - this latest round is still somewhat unexplained (we believe there's hardware issues compounded by how the system is architected to handle large domains, but there may be other issues). The team's struggled to split time between keeping the old Mozscape running and hunkering down to finish the new system. I'm trying to help them balance things as best I can, and we're going to be putting effort toward making sure we get index releases out on time. However, to do that, we'll need to scale down size, and then rebuild back up. We think we can do this while also improving the prioritization of which links we crawl (e.g. deeper on important domains that link out, less so on deep pages that don't link anywhere) so the index overall improves.
However, I don't want to minimize the risks - we may have some slow updates, some smaller indices, and some less-than-ideal data in the next one or two indices while we work to remedy this issue. I HOPE we don't, and that things actually get better immediately, but we can't promise that until the work gets finished.
TL;DR - Mozscape V2 is in development and will let us as big and faster as any link index. In the meantime, current Mozscape's having issues & we're making smaller indices in an attempt to diagnose and repair.
As always, thanks for your understanding, continued support, and if you have any questions, feel free to leave them below. I realize that this level of service/product quality is NOT OK, and I'm doing everything in my power to fix it.
-
Thanks for the update, Rand, and good luck on getting Mozscape V2 up and running ASAP. I'm sure I'm not alone in wanting to see Moz emerge as the leader in this industry, bringing the tools up to par with the amazing community assets that you guys provide.
Looking forward to seeing the mustache disappear!
-Yair
-
Hi Ken,
It's normal to see fluctuations in link counts from update to update, especially if a large number of your links are coming from relatively few domains. Take a look at this Q&A - http://moz.com/community/q/why-did-my-da-and-links-go-down. See if it helps shed light on why this happens.
-
Yeah basically on the split index. I think it would give people a better view of how they are actually doing without exposing their data across the internet. It also seems like it could be a way of more accurately determining the DA, PA, and trust as well. And could also add more value to the product. Right now the link index only picks up a portion of the total links and then tried to determine a ranking method off of that. But in GWT there is a totally different set of links usually.
I think if you merged the GWT data, GA data, and the Moz data together things could be very powerful.
I realize a lot of people want to see just what they can do to improve their ranking and nothing more. But I tend to look at SEO as a whole picture and just want more traffic. I could really careless if it comes from Google, Bing, or some guys blog. So I think a link section would also help too. This is what I imagine in my head. Another section in our account that scrapes the referral pages out of our GA accounts and shows us how our backlinks are performing over time. That would be nice, because part of what a lot of us do is buy links in some way or another. It would let us know at a glance if a blog we want to target again is still pulling the traffic it was before. Things of that nature. But I think a real value is putting everything under one roof. GWT and GA are totally separate, having the information from both of those platforms merged into one would be awesome for me.
-
"our social channels and Q+A reaches the Moz audience, which is mostly marketers and very, very few software engineers (even fewer with the right big data skills)"
True. But we might know some. I know some. We're all well connected.
-
Unfortunately, our social channels and Q+A reaches the Moz audience, which is mostly marketers and very, very few software engineers (even fewer with the right big data skills). We've got a recruiting team that's going hard at this problem, though, and yes, we've just changed to accept remote candidates for technical roles, so hopefully that will help.
-
Well, there's probably only a few thousand people who've worked on big data issues of this scale and complexity, and hiring ex-search-engine employees who've already made their millions in stock is pretty hard
Thanks for the positive wishes - we'll keep working hard to try and get this to where it should be.
-
I'll ask Martin from the Big Data team to answer the first question - I believe we use a number of different languages across the various services that power Mozscape.
On the split-index, I don't think I quite understand? Do you mean there'd be a unique version of our index that crawls the links we see from GA referrers (via the connected profiles in Moz Analytics)? That would be possible, but a ton of infrastructure work, and we'd likely need to build a unique version of the index for each customer to keep that data private.
As for GWMT - we don't have access to those, as folks don't connect/oAuth their GWMT accounts to Moz.
-
So what are the accurate numbers, last time or this time? My total links went from 15,000 down to 3,000. I really depend on the consistency and whatever changes were made, problems encountered, have really screwed up my reporting to the executive team.
-
A giant game of Whack-a-Moz ... yeah, that's fun until it's not. I can feel the ... what is it? Distress? Worry? I know you want these things to come out on time & exactly how you want but that's rare even in the land of Google & Facebook.
You guys have great company benefits. It's amazing you find it so hard to hire the right people and as you said, have had openings for 2+ years.
Glad to hear the issues are at least unrelated. That gives us hope for the site crawls & other bugs to get fixed whatever happens to the link index.
Thanks again for the update & good luck getting through it all!
-
A suggestion.
Put out a call in Q&A and social channels. Be specific about the skill set needed. Link to job descriptions. Ask for referrals and shares. Use social channels to the do the same thing. Surely we can get a few viable candidates to step forward...
Edited for one final thought. Are you open to remote candidates?
-
I deal with a few enterprise grade clients on the server configuration end, just out of curiosity what language platform do you run on?
Also, while you are here I would like to make a feature request or inquire if it is in the pipeline.
I would like to see the index split into two subsets that are used to generate the rank / trust. I would like to see it use the GWT links and also the GA referrers. It could show a better scope and at the same time keep that data private.
-
Moz has a hybrid cloud we built ourselves on a datacenter with hardware we customized. We were previously using AWS, but moved to give ourselves greater control and huge cost savings.
-
My guess and hope right now is that we don't have another delayed index. However, based on the inconsistencies and not-totally-clear diagnosis of issues, I'd say there's some risk associated with the next index.
Re: crawl updates - those have been behind, but should be catching up. I think the Moz Analytics team said 2-3 more days for completion of all the lagging reports.
-
The good news is we do know what we need to do and we have the people at the architecture level to make smart decisions (IMO). However, finding folks to help us execute on this plan has been insanely hard. We've had open positions on this team for literally 2 years, so if you know anyone, send 'em our way! I'm certainly working my networks to try and help, too.
-
So Rand, does the engineering collective know what needs to be done or do you need a technical architect to offer an assessment of the situation and recommendations? I don't have that skill set, but perhaps there's someone in your vast audience that does and would be willing to help out.
-
Just out of curiosity are you running on your own network or off of a cloud like AWs or Google?
-
Hi Rand,
Appreciate the update. Are we probably seeing another delay this round? Ive usually had my crawl updates by now.
Cheers for the good service all round.
-
Unfortunately (or maybe fortunately), those issues are unrelated. The campaigns getting behind on updating was due to some server configuration challenges as I understand it - somehow our monitoring falsely told us things were fine, and thus, even after we fixed the issue, we've been trying to play catch up on thousands of weekly/monthly reports. I'd seen an email from the team lead last night that we should be nearly clear - maybe a day or two away.
Re: memberlist - that's a separate team, and they're aware of it, so should get a fix out soon. I think one of Moz's challenges is that we've bitten off a bit more than we can chew (that's my opinion, not necessarily representative of the whole company) and with 6+ engineering teams handling 100s of operations across a giant software suite, it feels like we're always playing whack-a-mole. We fix one thing, and the next week, 3 more things we never imagined could go wrong do. It's a frustrating problem, to be sure, and I honestly think the only way we'll break out of the cycle is to cut back to fewer projects and staff up teams, which will take time, discipline, dollars, and some good luck.
-
Great to read the update Rand! You know I'm passionate about Moz keeping up in index size so I'm happy to wait to get a better v2 as long as that wait is reasonable.
Is this causing other issues on the site? The memberlist isn't updating and it feels like bits of the site here & there are either very slow at updating at the moment or just not updating at all. There have been quite a few Q&A questions about campaigns not running/updating/performing alongside this. Are these related or should we be reporting them as they happen?
Thanks again for the update & good luck! It's a huge project but you have a great team to help accomplish it!
-
Yes - that should be possible and I will endeavor to make sure we're keeping the updates honest and correct for the future. Thanks Donna.
-
Very much appreciate this update. Thank you!
As you might expect, some of us rely heavily on the Moz API update. Consistency and quality is more important than frequency and volume. So while I now can better appreciate some of the difficulties and obstacles the Moz team is facing, I would love it if you could give us more than a few hours notice when an update is going to be delayed. Is that possible?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Moz isn't crawling all my backlinks.
Moz isn't crawling all my backlinks. It's showing only 29 referring domain when I have more than 200 referring domains linking to my website. My website URL is 360gisthub.com.ng 360gisthub.com.ng
Link Explorer | | Mustybay0 -
Why don't links from Reddit show up in Site Explorer?
Some are follow and some are no follow. They show up in webmaster tools and not in site explorer. In addition why do some other links show up in webmaster tools but not site explorer?
Link Explorer | | RafeTLouis0 -
What's with Moz continuously pushing back the Index Update date?
Moz seems to keep pushing back the Index update date, it was the 24th until the 24th, then it got changed to the 30th, now it is may 5th.... What is the reason for this?
Link Explorer | | mgladman1 -
Why does OSE redirect to another url when the url you're testing doesn't redirect in your browser?
Run an OSE report on www.schoolmatters.com/ca/san-diego/personal-injury-lawyer/. OSE redirects to brandingwithseo.com. Why? And if you go to brandingwithseo.com in your browser, it redirects to seocompany.org. Why is OSE redirecting? It appears the links that come up are a combination of links for the seo company and for schoolmatters.com.
Link Explorer | | katandmouse0 -
Changed URL from HTTP to HTTPS - 99% of my backlinks don't know though
Hi Moz community, I've got a question about all old backlinks pointing to the http version of my site: Firstly, how it impacts my site's backlinks for SEO and secondly, why does Moz and if you know why Majestic have different metric report values for the different URLs. The Back Story Two months ago I bought an SSL for my personal domain and changed my URL from http to the https version. I 301'd it and can verify that on Majestic SEO using the old http URL. I did this sitewide for an eCommerce site that I'm working and did see a lift in traffic; that was the main reason based on Google talking about sites moving to the SSL Web. I'm No Stranger to 301s Of course all the URLs on my site have been 301'd. I used a HTTPS Redirect plugin for my WordPress site and there's been no issue. I also installed a 404 Checker plugin to log broken external links to my site where I can create a redirect right away in case the HTTPS plugin missed something along the way. I'm comfortable knowing that doing when you change the domain name for a site or just a page going from one URL to another will transfer all the link equity over time. What's Causing the Confusion What's a little confusing is that when I use tools like OSE or Majestic's Explorer, the data doesn't match. For instance in OSE, the https version of my domain has a DA of 1 and PA of 1. But, the http version of my site has a DA of 25 and PA of 36. With Majestic (BTW, please feel free to stop me from asking questions about another tool on Moz, but since we're all part of the same SEO community, I thought I'd ask it here anyway) the Trust and Citation flow values are definitely closely matched but still different values nonetheless. My Question Will I ever see the DA and PA the same for the https & http versions in the future? Does OSE catch the fact that there is a 301 redirect to the https version or does it only recognize that it redirects from http://kingrosales.com to http://www.kingrosales.com when in fact it redirects to https://www.kingrosales.com? My second question is, what about the backlinks? Is it because they are different URLs that OSE doesn't have a way to recognize this and display links from the old http version to the new https version? How will I know the true PA and DA of the https version of my site even with a perfectly executed 301 redirect? lol Let me know if you need more clarification. Thanks
Link Explorer | | KingRosales3 -
When requesting a CSV for an internal 302 redirect report, the data isn't aligning with the UI. Does anyone have any suggestions?
When requesting a CSV for an internal 302 redirect report, the data isn't aligning with the UI. Does anyone have any suggestions?
Link Explorer | | Merkle-Impaqt0 -
Is there some way to tell the Moz crawler not to crawl URL's with particular dynamic tags such as "?redirect-to:http//" ?
We are encountering an issue where the crawler is finding a ton of pages from our wordpress login url that has this dynamic tag in it to kinds of different blog entries. It's madness. I can't figure out what is causing these URLs to generate to be crawled in the first place! Does this sound familiar to anyone out there, any constructive suggestions? Robots text or maybe meta robots tags that would resolve this crawl issue?
Link Explorer | | RegistrarCorp0